http://www.traditionalcatholicmass.com/home-m6662.html

Hosted and Edited by
Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.
J.M.J.
A.M.D.G.
F.V.T.
An Ecclesiastical, Religious, Spiritual, Devotional, Educational, Informational, News, Data, and E-Journal Web Site, Dedicated to Preserving the Authentic Apostolic Tradition of the Catholic Church on Important Subjects and Issues Concerning the Catholic Church and Her Members.
Editorial Note by Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.

This Question was originally raised and answered back in 2005.
We now understand this may actually happen before the end of April, 2014?
Nevertheless, the Answers have NOT changed.
However, a few new items have been added.


Page # 2, Continued from Previous Page:

Did You Know......???!!!








Copyright © 1984 by Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.
Is Pope JP-2 with His Wife Edwidge, or,
Is Pope JP-2 with His Daughter, Edwidge, Jr.?
http://www.traditionalcatholicmass.com/home-m6662.html



An Official Act of Apostasy!!!
Did You Know?
Pretend Pope, and Professional Actor, JP-2,
The 4th President of the Very Evil
anti-Catholic NEW World Order    of    anti-Christ’s
  Satanic   Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church One World Religion.
Publicly Taught Heresy at least 7 Times
AND
Publicly Committed at least 7 Acts of Apostasy
By DeFacto Condemning the Truths of the Catholic Faith!
 
Because he was an automatically excommunicated
Modernist Heretic,  and a NEW Theology Heretic
as well as a Public Apostate,
Any Canonization of him is an empty anti-Christ Ceremony!



Contents
Introduction

The Lifestyle of Pope JP-2

Was the Lifestyle of Pope JP-2 The Lifestyle of a Holy, Catholic Saint?

First Example of What he Did

Some Historical Objective Facts of Pope John Paul II’s Papacy

Part One: Some of the Things Pope JP-2 Said

JP-2’s Sermons
JP-2’s Sermons - All Men Are Saved
JP-2’s Sermons - Christian Unity
JP-2’s Sermons - Man is Christ
JP-2’s Sermons - Respect Every Religion
JP-2’s General Audiences
JP-2, General Audience, Wednesday, July 21, 1999, Heaven
JP-2, General Audience, Wednesday, July 28, 1999, Hell
JP-2 General Audience Wednesday, August 4, 1999, Purgatory
Part Two: The Nine Great Failures of Pope JP-2
First Great Failure - Failed to Make a Complete Investigation of All Pedophile Clergy

Second Great Failure - Failed to  EXPEL  All Homosexual Clergy

Third Great Failure - Failed to  EXPEL  All Satanist Clergy

Fourth Great Failure - Failed to  EXPEL  ALL  IMMORAL  Seminarians

Fifth Great Failure - Failed to  EXPEL  All anti-Catholic Infiltrators

Sixth Great Failure - Failed to  EXPEL  All  NEW Theology Theologians

Seventh Great Failure - Failed to  Restore pre-1944 Liturgical Rites

Eighth Great Failure - Failed to Restore pre-Vatican 2 Catholic Church Faith, Liturgy, & Dogmas

Ninth Great Failure - Failed to Resign the Papacy

Appendix:
Appendix One:  Anathema
Further Reading:
Where is the NEW Theology Leading Us?

An Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, with an Infallible Œcumenical Council, Infalibly Decreed - FOREVER - the Exact Form of Words that MUST ALWAYS BE USED for the Valid and Lawful Double Consecration During the Holy Sacrifice of the Catholic Mass - NO EXCEPTIONS - EVER - BY ANYONE!.

What is the Satanic SynodVatican 2 church?

A Few Very Important Catholic Traditional Quotes to help Catholics Today!

Is there such a thing as an INFALLIBLE HERETIC POPE?


Introduction


Was the Lifestyle of Pope JP-2
The Lifestyle of a Holy, Catholic Saint?

Breaking News!!!

News Item # 1:  A miracle ascribed to Pope JP-2, which is a prerequisite for his canonization as a Roman Catholic Saint, has been questioned!

News Item # 2:  Plus, one of the church’s highest-ranking officials has said that Pope JP-2 ignored Cardinal Ratzinger’s (the future Pope B-16’s) pleas to open a full investigation into sex abuse accusations against the archbishop of Vienna.

News Item # 1

Questions about a miracle attributed to Pope JP-2, which is a prerequisite for his canonization as a Roman Catholic Saint, could very easily prevent the former pope’s canonization.

A Polish newspaper, Rzeczpospolita, reported that the former head of the Vatican’s saint-making office, Cardinal Jose Saraiva Martins, has said that doctors may have doubts about a nun who said she had been cured of Parkinson’s disease after praying to Pope JP-2. They are investigating whether or not she had a similar condition, apparently a number of years before the death of Pope JP-2?, which condition had gone into remission.


Cardinal Jose Saraiva Martins

Cardinal Martins, who remains one of Pope B-16’s top aides, also told reporters there was “a conspiracy” against the church, but was very vague and gave no details.

News Item # 2


JP-2 "blessing?"
Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado
[b. at Cotija de la Paz, Michoacán, Mexico on March 10, 1920 -
d. at Houston, Texas on January 30, 2008]

Here is but one of many fatal blows to Pope JP-2’s “unblemished legacy”!

The controversial Religious organization called “The Legion of Christ” formally apologized for the behavior of its founder, the late Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, whom JP-2 staunchly defended despite allegations of sexual abuse by Fr. Degollado which dates back to the 1950’s.

Fr. Degollado founded “The Legion of Christ” and the “Regnum Christi” movement. Fr. Degollado was found guilty of raping underage males and he also fathered a least one child.

An extensive investigation by “The Hartford Courant”, a major daily newspaper in Connecticut, revealed that former students of Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado accused him of molesting them when they were attending his school.  Fr. Degollado, who had lived in Rome, Italy for a time, had been praised by Pope JP-2 in 1994 as “an efficacious leader of youth”.

Nine men, all alleged victims, gave “The Hartford Courant” graphic details of their encounters with Fr. Degollado. According to them, the abuse involved about 30 boys and young men which dates back to the 1950’s.  In some cases, the men said, Fr. Degollado told them he had “permission” from Pope Pius XII for his illicit, immoral, and sinful acts!

Before his death on Wednesday, January 30, 2008, Fr. Degollado strongly denied any illicit sexual activity.

“The Legion of Christ” is an international Religious organization, a “spiritual army”, started in Mexico by Degollado in 1941 when he was a 20-year-old seminary student. This organization is frequently described as secretive and wealthy.  It is one of the fastest growing religious organizations in the world and enjoys support from the highest officials in the church. JP-2 presided at the ordination of 60 of the organization’s “priests” in 1991. Fr. Degollado had accompanied JP-2 on two of JP-2’s trips to North America.

“The Hartford Courant” article was based on interviews in both Mexico and the United States with 10 men who are now in their 50’s and 60’s, who alleged they were victims of sexual abuse by Fr. Degollado.  “The Hartford Courant” reported that most of the nine accusers had provided affidavits to support their allegations, with one of these same 10 men later retracting his testimony.

In an article in “The National Catholic Reporter”, U.S. investigative reporter Jason Berry wrote that “the charismatic” founder of “The Legion of Christ” “.....sent streams of money to Roman curia officials with a calculated end…Maciel was buying support for his group and defence for himself, should his astounding secret life become known.”

Jason Berry, along with his late colleague Gerald Renner, wrote the “Vows of Silence: The Abuse of Power in the Papacy of John Paul II” in 2004.  This book gave rise to the award-winning documentary “Vows of Silence” on Fr. Degollado and “The Legion of Christ”.  According to the above, Fr. Degollado’s key supporters, who provided him with a protective shield, included, among others:

1) Cardinal Angelo Raffaele Sodano, who was the Vatican Secretary of State from 1991 to 2006 and Dean of the College of Cardinals since 2005.
2)  Cardinal Eduardo Martínez, Prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life.
3)  Cardinal Stanislaw Dziwisz, the Polish secretary of JP-2.


Eugene Cullen Kennedy

According to Eugene Cullen Kennedy, emeritus professor of psychology at Loyola University in Chicago, Illinois:

“Catholics see that there is something seriously wrong in the official way of dealing with a scandal too deep for the tears that have been shed by the innocent....  Catholics should not accept a newly invoked form of transparent hypocrisy” with which the Church leadership is attempting to deal with the “plague” of sex abuse scandals which have come to light involving certain priests.

Although between 1956 to 1959, the Vatican had suspended Fr. Degollado as head of “The Legion of Christ” because of early allegations of pedophilia, he was found “innocent” and reinstated!   But in 1997 his notorious reputation finally began to unravel in publications in the U.S. and Mexico which reported that eight former seminarians had accused him of sexually abusing them years earlier.

Thirteen months after Cardinal Ratzinger became pope B-16 on Tuesday, April 19, 2005, B-16 ordered Fr. Degollado to retire and to conduct “a reserved life of prayer and penance, renouncing every public ministry”.

However, Fr. Degollado’s victims and their supporters have demanded much harsher measures, given the magnitude of the crimes of which he was accused.  “It shouldn’t be a question of letting bygones be bygones.  There have to be reparations for the victims and a mechanism to ensure that this does not happen again” (José Suárez, a spokesman for the “Observatorio Eclesial” - Ecclesiastic Observatory.

But many questions remain unanswered, e.g. whether there will be an investigation by B-16 of various Cardinals, such as Cardinal Sodano, Cardinal Eduardo Martínez, and Cardinal Stanislaw Dziwisz, all of whom apparently received large sums of money from Fr. Degollado and therefore the reason? of why they protected him.

While We applaud B-16 for ordering Fr. Degollado to retire and to conduct “a reserved life of prayer and penance, renouncing every public ministry”, yet this “slap on the wrist” by B-16 of Fr. Degollado before he died on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 was criminally insufficient, not to mention the fact that B-16 has not ordered ALL pedophile priests, bishops, archbishops, and cardinals to stand trial in ecclesiastical courts for their crimes and then, if found guilty, to turn them over to the secular criminal courts of their respective countries.

But the sexual abuse of Fr. Degollado was not limited to young boys and seminarians, since other reports claim that Fr. Degollado had maintained relationships with at least two women and fathered up to six children, two of whom he allegedly sexually abused as well.

On Thursday, March 25, 2010, a communiqué on “The Legion of Christ” website acknowledged as factual - “reprehensible actions” by Fr. Degollado, including the sexual abuse of minor seminarians (i.e. students in a High School level seminary system).

On Saturday, May 1, 2010, the Vatican issued a statement condemning Fr. Degollado as “immoral” and acknowledging that Fr. Degollado had committed “true crimes” and that he had led a “life deprived of scruples and authentic religious feeling”. B-16 also said he would appoint a special commission to examine the constitution of “The Legion of Christ” and also open an investigation into its Lay affiliate “Regnum Christi” (“Pope Reins In Catholic Order Tied to Abuse”, New York Times, Sunday, May 2, 2010).

Although in the above example, the Vatican condemned Fr. Degollado as “immoral” and acknowledged that Fr. Degollado had committed “true crimes” and had led a “life deprived of scruples and authentic religious feeling”, because this seems to be a rare exception since most cases are either ignored or adjudicated by secular criminal courts, the entire subject of sexual abuse by the clergy in the     anti-Catholic NEW World Order of     anti-Christ’s  Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church, especially considering that JP-2 did almost nothing to prevent all future sexual abuse by his clergy, very serious doubts are now being raised about just how “spotless” was JP-2’s 26-year reign?

In addition to this undeniable historical fact, the Vatican spokesman, identified below, responded forcefully to those calling for B-16 to resign, claiming that those who demand B-16's resignation do not understand how the church operates.


Father Federico Lombardi, S.J.

“This is not some multinational company where the chief executive is expected to take responsibility,” Fr. Federico Lombardi, S.J., [b. at Saluzzo, Piedmont, Italy on Thursday, August 20, 1942 - current] the director of the Vatican Press Office since Tuesday, July 11, 2006, told “The Washington Post”.

This is the same Jesuit who got into trouble claiming that Pope B-16 had never been a member of the Hitler Youth.  What happened?  This Jesuit was quickly corrected by reporters who told him that Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger [b. at Marktl, Bavaria, Germany on Saturday, April 16, 1927 - present], later Pope B-16 [Tuesday, April 19, 2005 - resigned on Thursday, February 28, 2013], had, himself, actually admitted that "yes", he had in fact been a member of the Hitler Youth in the 1997 book “Salt of the Earth - The Pope and Hitler Youth"!

Since this faux pas, the credibility of Fr. Federico Lombardi, S.J. has been looked upon askance with some degree of healthy skepticism.  One is left to wonder why B-16 has not yet fired him as the director of the Vatican Press Office?, especially for making the atrocious statement:

"The pope is not personally directing the actions of priests around the world. He is their spiritual leader, and he is one who has acted very clearly to confront this problem."
So, here goes the said Jesuit again with yet another faux pas!!!

On the contrary, the Pope IS the chief executive officer of the Vatican City State and of the   anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s  Satanic    Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church.    Therefore, it is as  the chief executive officer of the Vatican City State, and of the       anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s  Satanic    Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church, that the Pope IS REQUIRED to take responsibility for the actions of all of his Priests, Bishops, Archbishops, Cardinals, etc.!!!

The Pope needs to put a sign on his desk: “The buck stops here!”  None of this passing the buck, i.e. being irresponsible, and trying to pin the blame on others when he himself is the one who is ultimately responsible for the conduct of his clergy.

But, IF it is actually true that "The pope is not personally directing the actions of priests around the world”, then WHO IS in charge of the Pope’s priests???!!!

Dear Readers, How many of you that that the Pope is in charge of the Pope’s priests???!!!!  Surprise, surprise!!!  The Pope is not in charge of the Pope’s priests according to the official voice of the Vatican Press Office - Fr. Federico Lombardi, S.J.!!!


Dear Readers,

How many of you know that the Pope is supposed to be in charge of the Pope’s priests???!!!!

But, Surprise, surprise!!! The Pope is not in charge of the Pope’s priests!!!   This according to the official voice of the Vatican Press Office - Fr. Federico Lombardi, S.J.!!!

With this statement of irresponsibility, one is left to speculate WHO or WHAT is in charge, instead of the Pope?   It is most likely that WHAT is in charge is the nefarious cabal of anti-Catholic Infiltrators inside the Vatican itself, possibly including Communist, Illuminati, Freemasonic, Satanist, Pedophile, and Zionist Infiltrators?!

It is ironic that when B-16 was still Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger, he obviously thought Pope JP-2 was in charge, did he not???  By his very actions, Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger considered that the Pope IS the chief executive officer of the Vatican and of the        anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s  Satanic    Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church!!!


Cardinal Hans Hermann Groër, O.S.B. in Vienna in 1995.
The Cardinal died in 2003.
His Eminence Hans Hermann Cardinal Groër, O.S.B.

October 13, 1919, Vienna, Austria-March 24, 2003, Sankt Polten, Austria). Roman Catholic Archbishop of Vienna, 1986-1995. Born Hans Wilhelm Groer. Ordained Priest, Roman Catholic Church, April 12, 1942. Professed Priest, Order of Saint Benedict and took middle name of Hermann, September 8, 1977. 15th Archbishop of Vienna, July 15, 1986-September 14, 1995. Vicar Apostolic of Austria, Faithful of the Eastern (Byzantine) Rite, February 21, 1987-September 14, 1995. Elevated to the Sacred College of Cardinals, June 28, 1988.  He was finally fired - but supposedly never investigated - by Pope JP-2 for alleged sexual abuses going back 20 to 30 years!  IF JP-2 had sufficient reason(s) to fire him, why did JP-2 fail to order an investigation of the alleged sexual abuses he committed??!!  After all, where there is smoke, there is fire!

He was one of the highest-ranking Catholic clergymen to be involved in sexual abuse scandals in recent times. At the request of JP-2, he spent several months in Dresden and later retired to St. Joseph's Priory.
Case in point, according to published reports, it was Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger - now B-16 - whom it is claimed pressed - in vain - the stubborn JP-2 to fully investigate the then Archbishop of Vienna, Hans Hermann Groër for Groër’s alleged numerous acts of sexual abuse.

But fast forward to nowadays and one finds the undauntable Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger, now as Pope B-16, contradicting his own actions when he was yet Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger, trying endlessly to convince JP-2 to begin a complete investigation of Archbishop Hans Hermann Groër for Groër’s alleged numerous acts of sexual abuse - the “politically correct” Vatican terminology these days is the neutered term: “misconduct”, because years ago Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger obviously considered Pope JP-2 to be the chief executive officer of the Vatican City State, and of the   anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s  Satanic    Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church.

Yet, IF Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger did not consider  Pope JP-2 to be the chief executive officer of the Vatican City State, and of the     anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s  Satanic    Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church, then why was Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger so relentless in his efforts to get Pope JP-2 to open a full scale investigation of Archbishop Hans Hermann Groër for Groër’s alleged numerous acts of sexual abuse???!!!

Given the foregoing, it is somewhat of a surprise to discover that Father Federico Lombardi’s account of what happened is certainly similar to the account of Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn of Vienna.  As We understand it, Fr. Federico Lombardi’s account is that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger tried to persuade Pope JP-2 to open a full investigation into charges of sexual abuse by Cardinal Hans Hermann Groër of Vienna whom it is claimed had abused boys and young monks. But Cardinal Ratzinger’s opponents inside the Vatican citadel managed to block the investigation.


Cardinal Ratzinger

Supposedly Cardinal Ratzinger, the future Pope B-16 put it: “The other side won.”


Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn

The similar account by Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn of Vienna, Austria was broadcast on Austrian TV during which Cardinal Schoenborn claimed that the then Cardinal Ratzinger - the future Pope B-16 - who was the head of the Vatican office in charge of clerical sex abuse, in vain pressed JP-2 to fully investigate the then Archbishop of Vienna, Cardinal Groër who had stepped down in 1995 after being accused of sexually molesting a schoolboy.  Apparently Reuters news service also reported this same account of Vienna’s Cardinal Schoenborn on the ORF, Austrian television.  And that “[Ratzinger] told me [Schoenborn], ‘the other side [i.e. the cabal of anti-Catholic Infiltrators in the Vatican citadel] won’,” Schoenborn said on the ORF, Austrian television.  So now one is left to wonder what happened to that dauntless and relentless Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger described by the account of Fr. Federico Lombardi and also by the account of Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn of Vienna, Austria???


Was Joseph Aloisius
Cardinal Ratzinger killed??!!
If so, by whom??


Pope B-16

Is Pope B-16 an imposter who only looks like Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger???!!!
Notice the Subtle Difference in the Smile when comparing both above photos with each other?!
Amazing what they can do with plastic surgery these days, don’t you think??!!

Or, was Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger not killed??!!  If so, where did he go??  The bottom line is IF B-16 really is the same Joseph Aloisius Cardinal Ratzinger who had been the head of the Vatican office in charge of clerical sex abuse, and who then had been so dauntless and relentless in trying to get JP-2 to fully investigate the then Archbishop of Vienna, Cardinal Groër who had stepped down, a.k.a. fired, in 1995 after being accused of sexually molesting a schoolboy, then WHY has not this same person, by whatever name - which is currently B-16 - ordered the removal of ALL pedophile clergy from parish work all over the world?

Oh, that’s right, We forgot! Fr. Federico Lombardi claims that Pope B-16 is NOT in charge and is not responsible for B-16’s “priests” where he claims that the “church” “is not some multinational company where the chief executive is expected to take responsibility”!!!

After all:

“The pope is not personally directing the actions of priests around the world. He is their spiritual leader, and he is one who has acted very clearly to confront this problem.
B-16 “has acted very clearly to confront this problem" - HOW???  Certainly not by firing all of B-16’s “priests” of the    anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s   Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church!!!!

In any case, whoever B-16 really is, this type of semantics by the said Jesuit, who has been the official director of the Vatican Press Office since Tuesday, July 11, 2006, seems to be nothing more than a desperate legalistic way to try to help B-16 absolve himself from the pedophile mess he inherited from JP-2?  What should be abundantly self-evident to those who can think for themselves, and who reject the vain attempts at brainwashing by the   anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s   Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church, that Pope B-16 is obviously following the same slimy path of his predecessor, JP-2, by using JP’s mentality of the “pass the buck” modus operandi that exacerbated the pedophile clergy debacle which resulted in the horrible victimization of young boys and girls by preying padres around the world, especially in the U.S.A.!!!

It also apparently drained multi-millions of dollars from the bank accounts of the     anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s   Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church    dioceses in the U.S.A.?  Otherwise, why was it necessary for them to try to sell some of their church property, including church buildings, schools, etc., etc., to the highest bidder?  This sell-off of various church properties was done in order to try to pay hush money to the pedophile victims in order to keep everything quiet about the pedophile priests, bishops, and cardinals, lest everyone find out about the preying padres who were destroying the lives of so many innocent children!!!  JP-2 obviously knew about the wholesale selling of so much church property so that millions and millions of dollars could be paid to the pedophile victims as hush money?!   It is ironic that the person ultimately responsible for his gross failure to properly discipline his clergy, Pope JP-2, which resulted in the lives of many pedophile victims being destroyed, is now seriously being considered as a candidate for canonization as a “saint” in the     anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s   Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church!!!

Diocese of Phoenix, Arizona

Back on the 1990’s, an “inside source”, with “inside information” about the Diocese of Phoenix, Arizona, told Us about a major problem with pedophile clergy in that Diocese.  Although anything is possible, We find it hard to believe that JP-2 did not know anything about this major problem with his pedophile priests in the Diocese of Phoenix, Arizona?  The “insider information”, which We were given by the said “inside source”, whether it was true or false?, although in the wake of subsequent events since then would seem to indicate that it was true?, was that at least half - 50% - of the priests in JP-2’s churches in the Diocese of Phoenix, Arizona, back in the middle of the 1990’s, were alleged to be pedophiles - again according to the said “inside source”??!!!

This same “inside source” claimed that when the local bishop of the       anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s   Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church  of the Diocese of Phoenix, Arizona, was asked WHY he did not remove these pedophile “priests”, he said in response that IF he did that, he would have to close down about half of JP-2’s churches in the Phoenix, Arizona diocese!!!  again according to the said “inside source”??!!!

This was BEFORE the pedophile scandal became front page news which - to Us - verified what the said “inside source” had told Us! So, HOW was it possible for JP-2 NOT to know about it even though We knew about it despite the fact that, by the Holy Will and Grace of God, We have never had any direct dealings with that outfit?!  By the same token, how was it that IF JP-2 did not know what was going in his Phoenix, Arizona diocese, that in less than 24 hours after the deadly accident in which his bishop was involved, JP-2 immediately fired his bishop of his Phoenix, Arizona diocese???!!!  JP-2’s bishop of his Phoenix, Arizona diocese had been involved in a deadly hit-and-run, leaving the scene of a fatal traffic accident, in which JP’2 bishop killed a man!  JP-2 obviously found out about that terrible tragedy almost immediately!!!

So DO NOT tell Us that JP-2 did not also know that about half of the Phoenix, Arizona diocese “priests” of the          anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s   Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church    were (perhaps still are??) pedophiles at that time!!!  Why did JP-2 fail to fire his bishop in his Phoenix, Arizona diocese who had left pedophile “priests” - from what We were told by the said “inside source” - in about half of the churches in the      anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s   Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church's  Phoenix, Arizona diocese to continue to victimize innocent boys and girls, and perhaps even teenagers and some young adults???  NO!!!  JP-2 never fired his bishop in his Phoenix, Arizona diocese for his bishop leaving his pedophile “priests” in all of the      anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s   Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church    to which they were assigned in his Phoenix, Arizona diocese!!!






"Judge the Catholic Church, not by those who barely live by its spirit, but by the example of those who live closest to it."  (Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen)   Pervert Pope JP-2 Judged by The Standard of Archbishop Sheen!  http://www.traditionalcatholicmass.com/home-m6662.html


NOTE:

This is what the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass Looks Like
When Offered by a Roman Catholic Pope,
Not by one who barely lives by the spirit of the Catholic Church!

Was the Lifestyle of Pope JP-2 The Lifestyle of a Holy, Catholic Saint
As Was that of his Canonized Predecessors?



The Lifestyle of Pope JP-2 Proven by What He Said and/or Did


First Example of What he Did



This is NOT Catholic!!! - This IS Apostasy!!!

JP-2’s WORSHIP/ADORATION of a Pagan Book - The Mohammadan Koran

In order for anyone, and this includes Pope John Paul II, a.k.a. John-Paul 2, a.k.a. JP-2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005], to be Canonized a Saint of the Roman Catholic Church,  it must be proven, not only by alleged “miracles” after his death, but whether or not during his lifetime, he lived the type of life that most Roman Catholic Saints, most especially Canonized Roman Catholic Popes - e.g. Pope Saint Pius V and Pope Saint Pius X, have traditionally lived - a real Spiritual Life, a Life of the practice of Virtue, of the exercise of the Seven Gifts, and being responsible in fulfilling the duties of his Ecclesiastical Offices, especially that of the Papacy - in imitation of his Canonized Predecessors - for example, Pope Saint Pius V and Pope Saint Pius X.

In other words, did JP-2’s LIFESTYLE include not only the real living a genuine Spiritual Life, with the practice of the Virtues, and the exercise of the Seven Gifts of God the Holy Ghost, concerning which his Confessor should know in terms of his more private life, and the general public should know from his public life, but also did he live the life of a Roman Catholic Priest, Bishop, Cardinal, and Pope who was faithful to his duties and responsibilities within the context of the unchangeable authentic Apostolic Tradition, as did his Canonized Predecessors, especially Pope Saint Pius V, and most especially Pope Saint Pius X?

His more private life is known more to his Confessor and his closest aides.  Therefore, this is not an area which can be easily discovered by others.  However, this is not really necessary.  Why? Because of his public life as a Pope for over 26 years.  His public life, including what he said - what he said verbally or in writing - and what he did, when he was a Priest, Bishop, Cardinal, and Pope, can be analyzed and compared with the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, including previous Popes who are Canonized Saints of the Roman Catholic Church, especially Pope Saint Pius V, and most especially Pope Saint Pius X.  His slightly over a quarter of a century as a Pope can, and should be, of the greatest interest and concern - the primary focus - and also the easiest to analyze because of the length of time of his Papacy.  Whereas the talk about his possible canonization as a Saint of the Roman Catholic Church seems to be a foregone conclusion, one should seriously compare “apples with apples”, as the expression goes to ascertain any possible major variances.  In other words, it is both logical, fair, and just to compare the public life of Pope JP-2 with Canonized Saints of the Roman Catholic Church, including previous Popes who are Canonized Saints of the Roman Catholic Church, especially Pope Saint Pius V, and most especially Pope Saint Pius X, as well as the various principles of certain subject matter which are set forth on the previous web page.

Since the last Roman Catholic Pope to have been Canonized a Saint was the Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], it is only logical, fair, and just to compare what Pope JP-2 did when he was Pope with what Pope Saint Pius X did when he was Pope.  But it is also necessary to call forth additional historical objective facts which include the Infallible Teachings of a number of other Infallible Roman Catholic Popes, besides Pope Saint Pius X, as well as the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of a few Infallible Œcumenical Councils, plus the Teachings of a few of the Fathers and Doctors of the Church, as well as a few pre-Vatican 2 books with an Imprimatur.  Herewith are some of the historical objective facts of Pope JP-2’s 26-plus years of tenure as Pope.  He is frequently identified as JP-2 because this is how JP-2 liked to call himself.



Some Historical Objective Facts of Pope John Paul II’s Papacy

Part One: Some of the Things Pope JP-2 Said
JP-2’s Sermons

JP-2’s Sermons - All Men Are Saved
JP-2’s Sermons - Christian Unity
JP-2’s Sermons - Man is Christ
JP-2’s Sermons - Respect Every Religion

JP-2’s Sermons - All Men Are Saved


Pope JP-2

Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Paul III
Pope JP-2 Taught this Heresy:

“The Eucharist is the sacrament of the covenant of the Body and Blood of Christ , of the covenant which is eternal. This is the covenant which embraces all.  This Blood embraces all and saves all.”  (Pope JP-2, Sermon, June 6, 1985, L’Osservatore Romano, The Official Vatican Newspaper, July 1, 1985, p. 3; emphasis added).
 

Pope JP-2's Heresy was Condemned a priori
by an Infallible Roman Catholic Pope:

“But although Christ died for all, yet not all receive the benefit of His death, but those only to whom the merit of His Passion is communicated.”

With reason, therefore, were the words ‘FOR ALL’ NOT USED.”

(The Infallible Roman Catholic Council of Trent, and the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Paul III, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, together Promulgated the Infallible Decree on Justification, Chapter III, Who Are Justified Through Christ; emphasis added).

The Roman Catholic Church Infallibly Teaches:


Infallible Roman Catholic Œcumenical Council of Trent, Session 6, Chapter 3

But, though He died for all, yet do not all receive the benefit of His death, but those only unto whom the merit of His passion is communicated. For as in truth men, if they were not born propagated of the seed of Adam, would not be born unjust, seeing that, by that propagation, they contract through him, when they are conceived, injustice as their own, so, if they were not born again in Christ, they never would be justified; seeing that, in that new birth, there is bestowed upon them, through the merit of His passion, the grace whereby they are made just. For this benefit the Apostle exhorts us, evermore to give thanks to the Father, who hath made us worthy to be partakers of the lot of the saints in light, and hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the Kingdom of the Son of His love, in whom we have redemption, and remission of sins.   (“The Canons and Decrees of the Sacred and Œcumenical Council of Trent”, Translated by Father James Waterworth, Session Six, Monday, January 13, 1547, “Decree on Justification”, Chapter III, Who Are Justified Through Christ, pp. 31-32.  Infallibly Promulgated by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Paul III, Alessandro Farnese [Saturday, October 13, 1534 - Thursday, November 10, 1549], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Infallibly Promulgated this Infallible Decree along with the Infallible Roman Catholic Dogmatic Council of Trent; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V

“The additional words ‘for you and for many’, are taken, some from Matthew, some from Luke [Matt. xxvi.28, Luke xxii.20], but were joined together by the Catholic Church under the guidance of the Spirit of God. They serve to declare the fruit and advantage of His Passion. For if we look to its value, we must confess that the Redeemer shed His blood for the salvation of all; but if we look to the fruit which mankind have received from it, we shall easily find that it pertains NOT UNTO ALL, but to MANY of the human race. When therefore (our Lord) said: ‘For you’, He meant either those who were present, or those chosen from among the Jewish people, such as were, with the exception of Judas, the disciples with whom He was speaking. When He added, ‘And for many’, He wished to be understood to mean the remainder of the elect from among the Jews or Gentiles.”

With reason, therefore, were the words ‘FOR ALL’  NOT USED, as in this place the fruits of the Passion are alone spoken of, and to the elect ONLY did His Passion bring the fruit of salvation. And this is the purport of the Apostle when he says: ‘Christ was offered once to exhaust the sins of  MANY’ [Heb. ix.28]; and also of the words of our Lord in John: ‘I pray for them; I pray not for the world, but for them whom thou hast given Me, because they are thine’[John xvii.9].”  (The Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible “Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, a.k.a. “The Roman Catechism”.  Translated by Father John A. McHugh, O. P. and Father Charles J. Callan, O. P.,  Part II: The Sacraments, The Sacraments in General, The Sacrament of the Eucharist, An Explanation of The Form Used In The Consecration of The Wine; emphasis added).  This Catechism was “recommended” to “all Seminarists” by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII.  So also, the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, also Promulgated this Infallible Catechism: The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests as the Official Catechism to be used for study, for teaching, and for preaching, but also has been ordered to be used by all Roman Catholic Priests and Prelates by the “Decree and Command” of the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius X, both “in virtue of Our Apostolic Authority”, and also in virtue of Saint Pius X’s official use of his Papal Infallibility by the exercise of his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium; emphasis added.)

Editorial Commentary by Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.

Habent insidias hominis blanditiæ mali.

(Phaedrus.  “The fair speeches of a bad man are designed for treachery, have a treacherous object in view, are replete with treachery.”)


(Phaedrus was written by Plato, is a dialogue between Plato's main protagonist, Socrates, and Phaedrus, an interlocutor in a number of different dialogues. Phaedrus was most probably composed in about 370 B.C., which places it at about the same time as Plato's Republic and Symposium.)
It is self-evident that the June 6, 1985 Sermon of JP-2 sounds good to many people, but it is not good and sound because it is replete with treachery, i.e. it is heretical, especially where he preaches that all men are saved where he says that:  “This is the covenant which embraces all.  This Blood embraces all and saves all.”

The Infallible Dogmatic “Decree on Justification” by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Paul III and the Infallible Roman Catholic Dogmatic Council of Trent clearly teaches that:  “But, though He [Christ] died for all, yet do not all receive the benefit of His death, but those only unto whom the merit of His passion is communicated” (Op. Cit.).  In addition, the above two paragraphs from the Infallible “Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests” explains WHY the words “for you and for many” are part of the form of the Consecration of the Most Precious Blood during the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, especially “for many”:   “When He [Christ] added, ‘And for many’, He wished to be understood to mean the remainder of the elect from among the Jews or Gentiles” (Op. Cit.).

This is WHY the words “for all” are not used:   “With reason, therefore, were the words ‘for all’ NOT USED, as in this place the fruits of the Passion are alone spoken of, and to the elect ONLY did His Passion bring the fruit of salvation” (Op. Cit.).
The Catechism them brings forth Saint Paul to testify to this fact:  “And this is the purport of the Apostle when he says: ‘Christ was offered once to exhaust the sins of many’ [Heb. ix.28]” (Op. Cit.).  Notice that Saint Paul does NOT write something like this: “Christ was offered once to exhaust the sins of everyone”.NO!  The Scripture teaches all of us that “Christ was offered once to exhaust the sins of MANY” (Hebrews 9:28; emphasis added).  There should be no question as to the acceptance of the Infallible “Canons and Decrees of the Sacred and Œcumenical Council of Trent”.



Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII
Infallible Encyclical, Depuis Le Jour, ¶ 23

The Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his  Ordinary Magisterium, recommended the study of the ‘Roman Catechism’ to all Seminarians when he used his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, to Promulgate his Infallible Encyclical, “Depuis Le Jour”, On the Education of the Clergy, Friday, September 8, 1899, ¶ 23:  “23. We recommend equally that all Seminarists have in their hands, and frequently peruse, that golden book known as ‘The Catechism of the Council of Trent’, or ‘Roman Catechism’, dedicated to all Priests invested with the Pastoral Office (Catechismus ad Parochos). Noted both for the richness and exactness of its Doctrine, and for the elegance of its style, this Catechism is a precious summary of all theology, both dogmatic and moral. The Priest who knows it thoroughly has always at his disposal resources which will enable him to preach with fruit, to acquit himself fitly in the important ministry of the Confessional and the Direction of Souls, and be in a position to refute triumphantly the objections of unbelievers” (Op. Cit.).

But the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X did much more than just “recommend” that “all Seminarists have in their hands, and frequently peruse, that golden book known as ‘The Catechism of the Council of Trent’”, because, exercising his  Ordinary Magisterium, the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope  Saint Pius X  INFALLIBLY  DECREED and COMMANDED that “all Pastors, and those having the Care of Souls, shall explain the Catechism to the people..... The Catechetical  instruction shall be based on ‘The Catechism of the Council of Trent’”:



Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X
Infallible Encyclical, Acerbo Nimis, ¶ 24

“24. VI. Since it is a fact that in these days Adults need instruction no less than the young, all Pastors, and those having the Care of Souls, shall explain the Catechism to the people in a plain and simple style adapted to the intelligence of their hearers. This shall be carried out on all holy days of obligation, at such time as is most convenient for the people, but not during the same hour when the children are instructed, and this instruction must be in addition to the usual homily on the Gospel which is delivered at the parochial Mass on Sundays and holy days. The Catechetical  instruction shall be based on ‘The Catechism of the Council of Trent’; and the matter is to be divided in such a way that in the space of four or five years, treatment will be given to the Apostles' Creed, the Sacraments, the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer and the Precepts of the Church.” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Acerbo Nimis”, On Teaching Christian Doctrine, ¶ 24, Saturday, April 15, 1905; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X
Infallible Encyclical. Acerbo Nimis, ¶ 25
“25. Venerable Brethren, We Decree and Command this by virtue of Our  Apostolic Authority” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Acerbo Nimis”, On Teaching Christian Doctrine, ¶ 25, Saturday,  April 15, 1905).  Therefore, from the above it should be very clear that in the Roman Catholic Church the Official Catechism to be used for study, for teaching, and for preaching is only “The Catechism of the Council of Trent” by the express “Decree and Command” of the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, “in virtue of Our Apostolic Authority”.

You will remember that on page one the Infallible Roman Catholic Council Vatican 1 taught that the Pope is Infallible even in his Ordinary Magisterium, which is what this Encyclical is of the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X.

“The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests” was written by four distinguished theologians:

1) Archbishop Leonardo Marino of Lanciano.
2) Archbishop Muzio Calini of Zara.
3) Archbishop Egidio Foscarini of Modena.
4) Archbishop Francisco Fureiro, O.P., a Portuguese Dominican.
Three Cardinals were appointed to supervise the work. Saint Charles Borromeo,  [b. in the Castle of Arona, Italy on the Southern shore of the Lago Maggiore in Northern Italy, on Sunday, October 2, 1538 A.D. - d. at Milan, Italy on Saturday, November 3, 1584 A.D.], Archbishop of Milan, Cardinal-Priest of the Title of Saint Prassede, Papal Secretary of State under the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Pius IV, Giovanni Angelo De Medici [Friday, December 25, 1559 - Thursday, December 9, 1565], superintended the redaction of the original Italian text, which was finished in 1564. Cardinal William Sirletus then gave it the final touches.

This Catechism became one of the chief factors in the Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation.  Hence, based upon the upon Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church as Infallibly taught by:

1) The Infallible Roman Catholic Dogmatic Council of Trent in Session the Six, Monday, January 13, 1547, “Decree on Justification”, Chapter III, Who Are Justified Through Christ, and which was Promulgated by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Paul III, Alessandro Farnese [Saturday, October 13, 1534 - Thursday, November 10, 1549].

2)  “The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, a.k.a. “The Roman Catechism”, a.k.a. “The Catechism of Pius V”, Promulgated by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius V, Part II: The Sacraments, The Sacraments in General, The Sacrament of the Eucharist, An Explanation of The Form Used In The Consecration of The Wine, and which Catechism was “recommended” to “all Seminarists” by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, and which same Catechism not only has been Infallibly approved by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X as the Official Catechism to be used for study, for teaching, and for preaching, but also has been ordered to be used by all Roman Catholic Priests and Prelates by the “Decree and Command” of the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius X, both “in virtue of Our Apostolic Authority”, and also in virtue of Saint Pius X’s official use of his Papal Infallibility by the exercise of his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium.

Question # 1

“Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his Sermon on June 6, 1985?”

Answer to Question # 1

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 1

1.  Based upon the above quoted text from JP-2's Predecessor, the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Paul III and the Infallible Roman Catholic Dogmatic Council of Trent, Session Six, Monday, January 13, 1547, “Decree on Justification”, Chapter III, Who Are Justified Through Christ, pp. 31-32, JP-2 preached/taught the heresy that the Most Precious Blood embraces all and saves all  in his heretical sermon on June 6, 1985.

2.  Based upon the above quoted text from JP-2's Predecessor, the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V and “The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, a.k.a. “The Roman Catechism”, which the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V, using his Ordinary Magisterium, Infallibly Promulgated, which text is found in Part II: The Sacraments, The Sacraments in General, The Sacrament of the Eucharist, An Explanation of The Form Used In The Consecration of The Wine, JP-2 preached/taught the heresy that the Most Precious Blood embraces all and saves all  in his heretical sermon on June 6, 1985.

3.  Based upon “The Missale Romanum”, of JP-2's Predecessor, the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V, who using his Ordinary Magisterium, Infallibly Issued this Missale on Tuesday, July 14, 1570, which included the Infallible Papal Bulla Quo Primum Tempore, which forbade changes to this Missale, and which Missale contained the Form for the Consecration of the Most Precious Blood which said Consecration Form contains the term pro multis - for many (NOT “for all”), JP-2 preached/taught the heresy that the Most Precious Blood embraces all and saves all  in his heretical sermon on June 6, 1985.


Judgement  - Based Upon these True Facts

1.  “I am the Lord and I change not” (Malachias 2:6).

2.  “With the Father of light there is no change nor shadow of alteration”  (James 1:17).

3.  “God is Truth” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, “Summa Theologica”, Part I, Question 16, Article 5; “Summa Theologica”, Part II-II, Question 93, Article 2, Reply to Objection 2. “Summa Contra Gentiles” Book I, Chapter 60).

4.  “Truth cannot be Truth's contrary”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., “Summa Contra Gentiles” Book IV, Chapter 8).

5. “Thou must in no manner deny that there is an immutable Truth, embracing all such things as are immutably true; a Truth which thou canst not call thine, or mine, or any man’s but which is present to all and gives itself to all alike who discern the things that are Immutably true, as a light which in some miraculous way is both secret and yet open to all” (Saint Augustine, a.k.a. Aurelius Augustinus [b. Tagaste, Africa, Saturday, November 13, 354 A.D. - d. Hippo Regia, Africa, Wednesday, August 28, 430 A.D.], Bishop of Hippo Regia, Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, the Doctor of Grace, a protégé of Patriarch Saint Ambrose [b. in Gaul, possibly at Trier, Arles, or Lyons in 340 A.D. - d. at Milan, Italy on Friday, April 4, 397 A.D.] Patriarch of Milan [374 A.D. - Friday, April 4, 397 A.D.], “De Libero Arbitrio”, 2, 12, 33).

6.  “Moreover, since one Truth cannot contradict another Truth, every assertion contrary to the Truth of Faith, We define to be altogether false”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Eighteenth Œcumenical Council, the Fifth Lateran Council [Friday, April 19, 1512 A.D. - Friday, March 16, 1517 A.D.], Session 1, Friday, December 19, 1513).

7.  “Every assertion contrary to the Truth of revealed Faith is altogether false, for the reason that it contradicts, however slightly, the Truth”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Eighteenth Œcumenical Council, the Fifth Lateran Council [Friday, April 19, 1512 A.D. - Friday, March 16, 1517 A.D.], with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo X, Giovanni De Medici [Sunday, March 9, 1513 - Thursday, December 1, 1521], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Papal Bulla “Apostolici Regiminis”).

8.  Canon 2314.

§ 1. Omnes a christiana fide apostatæ et omnes et singuli hæretici aut schismatici:
(All apostates from the Christian faith and all heretics and schismatics:)

1.  Incurrunt ipso facto excommunicationum.
(1.  Incur excommunication ipso facto.)  (Codex Iuris Canonici, 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2314 § 1.)

9.  JP-2 frequently, perhaps even daily, committed the Mortal Sin of Perjury for breaking his Solemn, Public Oath, and also frequently, perhaps even daily, automatically excommunicated himself:

Here are the relevant passages from the text of his Solemn, Public Oath in which he swore:

To change nothing of the received Tradition, and nothing thereof, I have found before me guarded by my God pleasing Predecessors, to encroach to alter (CHANGE), or to permit any INNOVATION therein...

To guard the Holy Canons and Decrees of Our Popes likewise as Divine Ordinances of Heaven, because I am conscious of Thee, Whose place I take through the Grace of God, Whose Vicarship I possess with Thy support, being subject to severest accounting before Thy Divine Tribunal over all that I confess.

If I should undertake to act in anything of contrary sense, or should permit that it will be executed, Thou willst not be merciful to me on the dreadful day of Divine Justice.

“Accordingly, without exclusion, We subject to severest Excommunication anyone - be it Ourself or be it another - who would dare to undertake ANYTHING  NEW in contradiction to this constituted evangelic Tradition and the purity of the Orthodox Faith and the Christian Religion, or would seek to CHANGE ANYTHING by his opposing efforts, or would concur with those who undertake such blasphemous venture” (Coronation Oath of the Pope-Elect, “Liber Diurnus Romanorum Pontificum”, (Jacques Paul Migne [b. Saint-Flour, France on Saturday, October 25, 1800 - d. Paris, France on  Sunday, October 24, 1875], “Patrologiæ Latinæ Cursus Completus”, published in 221 volumes [1862 - 1864], Volume 105, S. 54).

10.  JP-2 frequently, perhaps even daily, committed the Mortal Sin of Perjury for breaking his Solemn, Public Oath, and also frequently, perhaps even daily, automatically excommunicated himself:

Here are the relevant passages from the text of his Solemn, Public Oath - The Profession of Faith - in which he swore:

“I, (state your name), believe and vow with a firm faith each and every single article of Faith, which is found in the Collection of the Articles of Faith, which the Holy Catholic Church uses, which are:

“I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, the Creator of Heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, born of the Father before all ages; God from God, light from light, true God from true God; begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father, through Whom all things were made; Who for the sake of us men and for our salvation descended from Heaven and was made Incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary, and became Man.

“He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died and was buried.  He rose from the dead the third day according to the Scriptures and ascended into Heaven. He sits at the right hand of the Father...

I resolutely accept and firmly embrace the Apostolic and Ecclesiastical Traditions and the other observances and constitutions of the same Church....

I will never accept or interpret it [Sacred Scripture] in a manner different from the unanimous agreement of the Fathers of the Church...

I also accept and acknowledge the customary and approved Rites of the Catholic Church in the Solemn Administration of the aforesaid Sacraments.

I embrace and accept each and every article defined by the most Holy Synod of Trent in regard to Original Sin and Justification.

I likewise declare publicly that in the Mass is offered to God a True, Proper and Propitiatory Sacrifice, for the Living and the Dead...

I consistently hold that there is a Purgatory and that the souls detained therein are helped by the prayers of the faithful....

“I firmly assert that images of Christ and the ever Virgin Mother of God, and of the other saints we must have and keep and that they must be duly honored and venerated....

I condemn, reject and anathematize everything which is contrary to these propositions and all heresies without exception which have been condemned, rejected and anathematized by the Church....

“I, (state your name), by this present’ promise, vow and sear that, with the help of God, I shall most constantly hold and profess this true Catholic Faith, without which no one can be saved and which I now freely profess and truly hold.  With the help of God, I shall profess it whole and inviolate to my dying breath; and, with all the power and ability in me, I will see to it that those under me and any others who come under my care by virtue of my Office, to Hold, to Teach, and to Preach all of the above mentioned Truths.  To this end, so help me God and these Holy Gospels of God.”

(N.B.  The Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IV, Giovanni Angelo De Medici [Friday, December 25, 1559 - Thursday, December 9, 1565], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Papal Bulla “Injunctum Nobis”on Friday, November 13, 1564.  This Infallible Papal Bulla, “Injunctum Nobis”, contains the text for the “Profession of Faith”; emphasis added).
This Creed summarized the doctrines which all Roman Catholics are bound to believe in order to ensure their eternal salvation. It is required to be taken by all Sub-Deacons and Priests at their Ordination, all Bishops at their Episcopal Consecration, all Archbishops and Cardinals at their Elevation, and all Pope-Elects prior to their Installation as a Roman Catholic Pope. Since this is, in fact, an Oath, anyone who takes it and later violates it, commits the Mortal Sin of Perjury for each violation.)

11.  JP-2 frequently, perhaps even daily, committed the Mortal Sin of Perjury for breaking his Solemn, Public Oath, and also frequently, perhaps even daily, automatically excommunicated himself:

Here are the relevant passages from the text of his Solemn, Public Oath - The Oath Against Modernism - in which he swore:

“I [state your name], firmly accept and embrace each and every doctrine defined by the Church’s unerring teaching authority and all that she has maintained and declared, especially those points of Doctrine which are directly opposed to the errors of our time....

“I accept and acknowledge the external proofs of revelation, namely, Divine facts, especially miracles and prophecies, as most certain signs of the Divine origin of the Christian religion and I hold that these same proofs are well suited to the intelligence of every age and of all men, including our own times....

“I also firmly believe that the Church... was personally, directly and absolutely instituted by Christ Himself, the true Christ of history...

“I sincerely hold that the Doctrine of Faith was handed down to us from the Apostles through the officially approved Fathers, in exactly the same sense and with always the same meaning....

“Therefore, I completely reject the heretical notion that dogmas evolve and change from one meaning to another different from the one meaning which the Church held from the beginning.

“I likewise condemn every erroneous notion according to which, instead of the Divine Deposit of Faith entrusted by Christ to His spouse, the Church, and to be faithfully guarded by Her, one may substitute a philosophical system or a creation of the human mind gradually refined by human effort and capable of continual and indefinite development.

“Faith is not a blind religious sentiment evolving from the hidden recesses of subliminal consciousness, and morally formed by the influence of heart and the motion of the will, but that it is a real assent of the intellect to objective Truth learned by hearing, an assent wherein we believe to be true whatever has been spoken, testified and revealed by the personal God, our Creator and Lord, on the authority of God, Who is the perfection of Truth.

“Furthermore, in all due reverence, I submit to and fully uphold all of the condemnations, declarations and the prescripts contained in the Encyclical Letter PASCENDI and in the Decree LAMENTABILI, especially those concerning what is called the history of dogmas....

“I also condemn and reject the opinion of those who say that a well-educated Christian assumes a dual personality, one as a believer and another as an historian, thus making it permissible for the historian to maintain what his faith as a believer contradicts, or to lay down premises from which there follows the falsity or the uncertainty of dogmas, provided only that these are not directly denied.

“I likewise reject that method of determining and interpreting Sacred Scripture which, departing from the Tradition of the Church and the analogy of Faith and the norms of the Holy See, adopts the principles of the Rationalists, and with equal arbitrariness and rashness regards textual criticism as the sole supreme norm....

“That the writings of individual Fathers must be interpreted solely by the data of science without any reference to Sacred Authority...

“Finally, I profess that I am completely opposed to the error of the Modernists who hold that there is nothing inherently Divine in Sacred Tradition; or who-which is far worse-admit it in a pantheistic sense.  For them, there would remain only a bare simple fact, like the ordinary facts of history, to the effect that the system begun by Christ and His Apostles still find men to support it by their energy, skill and ability.

“Therefore, I most firmly retain and will retain to my last breath the Faith of the Fathers of the Church, which has the supernatural guarantee of Truth...

“This is not to be understood that we may hold what seems better suited to the culture of a particular age, but rather that we may never believe nor understand anything other than the absolute and unchangeable Truth preached from the beginning by the Apostles.

“All this I promise to keep faithfully, entirely and sincerely and to guard them inviolately and never to depart from them in any way in teaching, word or in writing.  Thus I promise, thus I swear, so help me God and His Holy Gospels.”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914] “Oath Against Modernism”, in the Infallible Motu Proprio “Sacrorum Antistitum”, Thursday, September 1, 1910 (AAS, 2-655; Fontes, n. 689, Volume III, p. 774; emphasis added.  Those who are required to take the Profession of Faith are required to take the Oath Against Modernism immediately afterwards.).

N.B.  In the Science of Scholastic Philosophy, the act of judging is the operation of the intellect which results in the judgmentJudgment is the pronouncement of the power of the Soul, called the "intellect", on the agreement, or disagreement, of two concepts (ideas).  The reason(s) for the answer to the question are the agreement of two ideas with each other, i.e. because the reason(s) given are consistent with - in agreement with - what is found in the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church.  So also, the reason(s) for the answer to the question are in disagreement with the heresy, or heresies, of JP-2, which heresy or heresies of JP-2 are contrary to the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church, of which said heresies are the antithesis (exact opposite)  thereunto.  Such reasoned, rational judgement is very definite, very precise, and very indisputable - definitely NOT a matter of peradventure (uncertainty), i.e. of the deliberately deceitful vague, equivocal ambiguities of the NEW Theology Theologians’ “if’s, and’s, and but’s” phraseologies  of concocted confusion by insolent “blind guides who strain out a gnat, and swallow a camel” (Matthew 23:24).

Final Conclusion to Question # 1

It is a contradiction of terms to claim that any Heretic, including the automatically Excommunicated Heretic, Pope JP-2, can be canonized a “saint”.

A picture is worth is thousand words.


Pope F-1 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier

This Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix is:   “... a sinister symbol, used by Satanists in the sixth century, that had been revived at the time of Vatican II. This was a bent or broken cross, on which was displayed a repulsive and distorted figure of Christ, which the black magicians and sorcerers of the Middle Ages had made use of to represent the Biblical term Mark of the Beast [i.e. anti-Christ].”  (Piers Compton, “The Broken Cross: Hidden Hand In the Vatican,” 1981.)

In other words, the person who uses the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ crucifix tells the entire world two things:  1) that person is a Satanist; 2) that person personifies anti-Christ! Furthermore, IF JP-2 should be “canonized a saint” by the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope F-1, this will simply be a public statement - by F-1’s public acts of  Heresy  and Apostasy - that proves Pope F-1 is himself an Heretic and an Apostate, and who follows in the Heretical  and Apostate footsteps of the Heretic and Apostate JP-2 and merits the same “reward” as the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope JP-2!!!
 

Pope JP-2 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier


The Eternal “reward” of JP-2


Because of Pope JP-2’s Sermon of June 6, 1985 in which he preached:

“The Eucharist is the sacrament of the covenant of the Body and Blood of Christ, of the covenant which is eternal.  This is the covenant which embraces all.  This Blood embraces all and saves all.”

Pope JP-2 was condemned, a priori, as the above texts prove:

1.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Eighteenth Œcumenical Council, the Fifth Lateran Council.

2.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo X.

3.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Paul III.

4.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Council of Trent.

5.  By 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2314, § I  -  ipso facto  Excommunication!

6.  By the Coronation Oath of the Pope-Elect.

7.  By the Profession of Faith.

8.  By the Oath Against Modernism.

As an Heretic JP-2 publicly preached the Heresy that ALL people, which automatically includes ALL non-Catholics, are saved.  This Heresy of Religious Indifferentism  is  contrary to the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church quoted above.



JP-2’s Sermons - Christian Unity



Pope JP-2, Professional Actor

Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII

JP-2 the Professional Actor/Clown
Buffon with no respect for Papacy

Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI
Pope JP-2 Taught this  Heresy:

“‘The way to achieve Christian unity, in fact,’ says the document of the Pontifical Commission for Russia, is not proselytism, but fraternal dialogue...’” 

(Pope JP-2, Sermon, June 6, 1985, L’Osservatore Romano, The Official Vatican Newspaper, January 27, 1993, p. 2; emphasis added).
 

Pope JP-2’s Heresy was Condemned a priori
by these Infallible Roman Catholic Popes:

“But how can hearts be united in Perfect Charity where minds do not agree in Faith?”  (Infallible  Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, The Reunion of Christendom, Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20.)

“Unity is not so much promoted by discussions [e.g. by fraternal dialogue] or by other artificial means, as by the example of a holy life and by good works”  (Infallible  Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Ecclesiam Dei, ¶ 18, Monday, November 12, 1923).

The Roman Catholic Church Infallibly Teaches:



Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII
Infallible Encyclical, Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, ¶ 20


But how can hearts be united in Perfect Charity where minds do not agree in Faith?”  (Infallible  Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, The Reunion of Christendom, Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20.)



Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI
Infallible Encyclical, Ecclesiam Dei, ¶  18

“18. We invite most sincerely the Schismatics to join with Us in this unity of the Church, and We desire also that all the faithful, following the teachings and in the footsteps of St. Josaphat, may strive, each according to his ability, to cooperate with Us towards the achievement of this purpose.


May all realize, too, that unity is not so much promoted BY DISCUSSIONS  [e.g. by fraternal dialogue] or by other artificial means, as by the example of a holy life and by good works, especially those dictated by charity towards our Slav brethren and all other Easterners.”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Ecclesiam Dei”, On Saint Josaphat, Monday, November 12, 1923, ¶ 18; emphasis added).



Editorial Commentary by Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.

Contrary to JP-2’s anti-proselytism, a.k.a. anti-conversion, a.k.a. anti-evangelism, of the Schismatic Eastern Rite Orthodox, JP-2 prefers to engage in the fallacy of  fraternal dialogue as The way to achieve Christian unity.   JP-2’s terminology fraternal dialogue is nothing more than thinly disguised classical Communist Dialectics!  The word “dialectics” comes from the Greek “dialektike tekhne” - “art of debate”, which comes from “dialegesthai” -  “converse with”.

But what makes classical Communist "dialectics" different from "dialectics", per se, is that classical Communist “dialectics” does not believe in the existence of Truth, and therefore does not search for it - since it does not exist!  On the contrary, classical Communist “dialectics” is nothing more than a con game to talk something to death - not to search for the Truth by any method of logical discussion.  The proof for this is found in the historical used of classical Communist “dialectics” which discussions are nothing more than an exercise in futility!  Therefore, when JP-2 speaks of fraternal dialogue, he talks about discussions which are, a priori, unproductive, irrelevant, and a waste of time as witnessed by the Vatican's official policy of Ostpolitik - a total disaster, with no real results - except for the Communist butchers of innocent Roman Catholics and others in the lands they have occupied by force.


JP-2 with Agostino Cardinal Casaroli

Ostpolitik (German for Eastern Politics) describes the politics of the "Change Through Rapprochement" principle, was implemented by Agostino Cardinal Casaroli [b. at Castel San Giovanni, in the Province of Piacenza, Italy on November 24, 1914 - d. of cardiorespiratory disease at Rome, Italy on June 9, 1998], who held the second most powerful position in the Vatican, after the Pope himself, as the Vatican Secretary of State.


Communist Khrushchev Banging Shoe at U.N.
We Will Bury You” Speech:  Reference to U.S.A.

Ostpolitik,Xwhich is only thinly disguised classical Communist Dialectics, a Religious toxic “born-again apple of Paradise”, was offered to 2nd John 23rd by the Communist Russian leader Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev [b. in Kalinovka, Russian Empire, on Tuesday, April 17, 1894 - d. in Moscow, Russia, Soviet Union on Saturday, September 11, 1971] offered the Vatican on the occasion of the 80th birthday of 2nd Pope John 23, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli [b. at Sotto il Monte, Italy on November 25, 1881 - d. at the Vatican on Monday, June 3, 1963]; Papacy: [Tuesday, October 28, 1958 - Monday, June 3, 1963], on Saturday, November 25, 1961, and who, in imitation of Adam and Eve, also ate the “forbidden fruit”,which resulted in the Vatican ignoring the persecution of millions of Catholics by the Communists, especially in the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) and primarily in the Ukraine where over 8 million Catholics had died because of the Satanic policy of the butcher Stalin.

Therefore, Ostpolitik, which was the original terminology which JP-2 merely “updated” and replaced with his propagandized, misleading term fraternal dialogue  which is only a cunning synonym for Ostpolitik, - does nothing but discuss; does nothing but talk in order to make everyone think something positive is being “done”, as the actors in Roman Collars prance about the world stage, the lines of which ignored and dismiss the reality of the mountains of dead martyrs for the Catholic Faith.

In reality, fraternal dialogue, which is nothing more than a modernized Ostpolitik, is designed to accomplish little or nothing because, in reality, it is only deliberate talk and double talk used to accomplish nothing but talk ad infinitum!!!

It is all an act put on by the actor-turned-pope: none other than the ex-professional actor, JP-2, who still mouths the lines of his red script, although the invisible puppet lines on his legs and arms and head sometimes get tangled with each other because the master falls asleep from boredom and the control boards from his expert hands fall on the stage!!!!



Editorial Commentary by Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.

Dear Readers,

What can you expect from JP-2’s avid proselytism of the errors of Hegelian materialistic dialectics which fits, hand in glove, as the expression goes, with his very cunning and very subtle equally avid proselytism of the atheistic and false philosophy of Marxist Communism??!!

Bottom Line:  It is totally IRONIC how JP-2, by his words and actions, is an adept of avid proselytism of the errors, not only of Hegelian materialistic dialectics, but of its cousin-in-crimes against the Truth, to wit - the anti-God philosophy of Marxist Communism, including, when he was still a Cardinal, his sacrilegious reading of Marx during the Papal Conclave which selected John-Paul 1, Albano Luciani [Saturday, August 26, 1978 - Thursday, September 28, 1978]  (Wilton Wynn, KEEPERS OF THE KEYS, p. 39)!   Yet this same JP-2, the adept of avid proselytism of the errors, not only of Hegelian materialistic dialectics, but of its cousin-in-crimes against the Truth, to wit - the anti-God philosophy of Marxist Communism, is totally against any kind of proselytism when it comes to the Eastern Rite Orthodox!!!   Because of Pope JP-2’s Sermon of June 6, 1985 in which he preached:  “‘The way to achieve Christian unity, in fact,’ says the document of the Pontifical Commission for Russia, ‘is not proselytism, but fraternal dialogue...’”


Question # 2

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his Sermon on June 6, 1985?”

Answer to Question # 2

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 2

1.  Based upon the above quoted text from JP-2's Predecessor, the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII:  But how can hearts be united in Perfect Charity where minds do not agree in Faith?  (Infallible  Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, The Reunion of Christendom, Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20.)

JP-2 preached/taught the Heresy that:  The way to achieve Christian unityis not proselytism,   but fraternal dialogue, in his heretical sermon on June 6, 1985.

2.  1.  Based upon the above quoted text from JP-2's Predecessor, the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI:  “May all realize, too, that unity is not so much promoted  BY DISCUSSIONS  [e.g. by fraternal dialogue] or by other artificial means, as by the example of a holy life and by good works, especially those dictated by charity towards our Slav brethren and all other Easterners.”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Ecclesiam Dei”, On Saint Josaphat, Monday, November 12, 1923, ¶ 18; emphasis added).

JP-2 preached/taught the Heresy that:  The way to achieve Christian unityis not proselytism,   but fraternal dialogue, in his heretical sermon on June 6, 1985.

Judgement - Based Upon these True Facts

Please click on this link regarding Judgement.

Final Conclusion to Question # 2

It is a contradiction of terms to claim that any Heretic, including the automatically Excommunicated Heretic, Pope JP-2, can be canonized a “saint”.

A picture is worth is thousand words.


Pope F-1 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier

This Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix is:  “... a sinister symbol, used by Satanists in the sixth century, that had been revived at the time of Vatican II. This was a bent or broken cross, on which was displayed a repulsive and distorted figure of Christ, which the black magicians and sorcerers of the Middle Ages had made use of to represent the Biblical term Mark of the Beast [i.e. anti-Christ].”  (Piers Compton, “The Broken Cross: Hidden Hand In the Vatican,” 1981.)

In other words, the person who uses the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ crucifix tells the entire world two things:  1) that person is a Satanist; 2) that person personifies anti-Christ! Furthermore, IF JP-2 should be “canonized a saint” by the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope F-1, this will simply be a public statement - by F-1’s public acts of  Heresy and Apostasy - that proves Pope F-1 is himself an Heretic and an Apostate, and who follows in the Heretical  and Apostate footsteps of the Heretic and Apostate JP-2 and merits the same “reward” as the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope JP-2!!!
 

Pope JP-2 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier


The Eternal “reward” of JP-2

“‘The way to achieve Christian unity, in fact,’ says the document of the Pontifical Commission for Russia, ‘is not proselytism,   but fraternal dialogue...’”.

Pope JP-2 was condemned, a priori,  as the above texts prove:

1.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII

2.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI

3.  By 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2314, § I  -  ipso facto  Excommunication!

4.  By the Coronation Oath of the Pope-Elect.

5.  By the Profession of Faith

6.  By the Oath Against Modernism

JP-2 was an Heretic who publicly preached the Heresy that: “‘The way to achieve Christian unity, in fact,’ says the document of the Pontifical Commission for Russia, ‘is not proselytismbut fraternal dialogue...’”. This Heresy of Religious Indifferentism  is  contrary to the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church quoted above.



JP-2

The  LYING  TEACHER

Pope JP-2 was condemned, a priori, by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, and by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, quoted above, as an  Heretic who publicly preached the Heresy of False Ecumenism and also the Communist Heresy of fraternal dialogue.  These heresies, based upon the Heresy of Religious Indifferentism, are contrary to the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church quoted above.


JP-2’s Sermons - Man is Christ

Pope JP-2, Professional Actor

The First Commandment of Almighty God
Moses with the Ten Commandments

JP-2 the Professional Actor/Clown
Buffon with no respect for Papacy

Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius V
Pope JP-2 Taught these Heresies:

“‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God’ (Mt. 16:16). These words were spoken by Simon, son of Jonah, in the district of Caesarea Philippi… These words mark the beginning of Peter’s mission in the history of salvation…

“On this day and in this place these same words must again be uttered and listened to: ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.’ Yes, Brothers and sons and daughters, these words first of all… please listen once again, today, in this sacred place, to the words uttered by Simon Peter. In those words is the faith of the Church. In those same words is the new truth, indeed, the ultimate and definitive truth about man: the Son of the living God – ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” (Pope JP-2, First Sermon, Sunday, October 22, 1978, “L’Osservatore Romano”, The Official Vatican Newspaper, November 2, 1978, p. 1; emphasis added.)

 “… let us pause in adoration in the cave, and gaze upon the Newborn Redeemer. In him we can recognize the face of every little child who is born…” (Pope JP-2, Sermon, December 25, 2001, “L’Osservatore Romano”, The Official Vatican Newspaper, January 2, 2002, p. 1; emphasis added).

Pope JP-2’s Heresies were Condemned a priori  by God in this Sacred Scripture by this Infallible Roman Catholic Pope:

I am the Lord thy God.  Thou shalt not have strange gods before Me” (The First Commandment of Almighty God:   Exodus 20:2-3; Deuteronomy 5:6-7).

The human race, having fallen from its elevated dignity, no power of men or Angels could raise it from its fallen condition and replace it in its primitive state.”

(Infallible “Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, a.k.a. “The Roman Catechism”, which the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V, using his Ordinary Magisterium, Infallibly Promulgated, which text is found in Part I: The Creed, Article II : “And in Jesus Christ, His Only Son, Our Lord”.

Translated by Father John A. McHugh, O. P. and Father Charles J. Callan, O. P.; emphasis added.)

This Infallible Dogmatic Doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church was contradicted by JP-2 who preached/taught the Heresy that Man is Christ in his heretical sermons, which include his First Sermon on Sunday, October 22, 1978, and also his Sermon on December 25, 2001.

The Roman Catholic Church Infallibly Teaches:


Scripture

The Scripture reminds us how the Devil tempted Eve, saying:  “You shall be as gods, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:5).

I am the Lord thy God.  Thou shalt not have strange gods before Me” (The First Commandment of Almighty God:   Exodus 20:2-3; Deuteronomy 5:6-7).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V

“When Adam had departed from the obedience due to God and had violated the prohibition, of every tree of paradise thou shalt eat: But of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat, for in what day soever thou shalt eat of it, thou shalt die the death, he fell into the extreme misery of losing the sanctity and righteousness in which he had been placed, and of becoming subject to all those other evils which have been explained more fully by the holy Council of Trent.”

“Wherefore, the Pastor should not omit to remind the Faithful that the guilt and punishment of Original Sin were not confined to Adam, but justly descended from him, as from their source and cause, to all posterity.The human race, having fallen from its elevated dignity, no power of men or Angels could raise it from its fallen condition and replace it in its primitive state. To remedy the evil and repair the loss it became necessary that the Son of God, whose power is infinite, clothed in the weakness of our flesh, should remove the infinite weight of sin and reconcile us to God in His blood”  (The Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible “Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, a.k.a. “The Roman Catechism”.  Translated by Father John A. McHugh, O. P. and Father Charles J. Callan, O. P.. Part I: The Creed, Article II : “And in Jesus Christ, His Only Son, Our Lord”.  This Catechism was “recommended” to “all Seminarists” by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII.  So also, the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, also Promulgated this Infallible Catechism: The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests as the Official Catechism to be used for study, for teaching, and for preaching, but also has been ordered to be used by all Roman Catholic Priests and Prelates by the “Decree and Command” of the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius X, both “in virtue of Our Apostolic Authority”, and also in virtue of Saint Pius X’s official use of his Papal Infallibility by the exercise of his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium; emphasis added.)


“The Roman Catechism”

Thou shalt not have Strange Gods before Me

“The Pastor should teach that the first part of the Decalogue contains our duties towards God; the second part, our duties towards our neighbour. The reason (for this order) is that the services we render our neighbour are rendered for the sake of God; for then only do we love our neighbour as God commands when we love him for God's sake. The Commandments which regard God are those which were inscribed on the first table of the Law.”

The Above Words Contain A Command And A Prohibition

“(The Pastor) should next show that the words just quoted contain a twofold precept, the one mandatory, the other prohibitory. When it is said: Thou shalt not have strange gods before Me, it is equivalent to saying: Thou shalt worship Me the true God; thou shalt not worship strange gods.”

What They Command

“The (mandatory part) contains a precept of Faith, Hope and Charity. For, acknowledging God to be immovable, immutable, always the same, we rightly confess that He is faithful and entirely just. Hence in assenting to His oracles, we necessarily yield to Him all belief and obedience. Again, who can contemplate His omnipotence, His clemency, His willing beneficence, and not repose in Him all his hopes? Finally, who can behold the riches of His goodness and love, which He lavishes on us, and not love Him? Hence the exordium and the conclusion used by God in Scripture when giving His commands: I, the Lord.”

What They Forbid

“The (negative) part of this Commandment is comprised in these words: Thou shalt not have strange gods before me. This the Lawgiver subjoins, not because it is not sufficiently expressed in the affirmative part of the precept, which means: Thou shalt worship me, the only God, for if He is God, He is the only God; but on account of the blindness of many who of old professed to worship the true God and yet adored a multitude of gods. Of these there were many even among the Hebrews, whom Elias reproached with having halted between two sides, and also among the Samaritans, who worshipped the God of Israel and the gods of the nations” (The Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible “Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, a.k.a. “The Roman Catechism”.  Translated by Father John A. McHugh, O. P. and Father Charles J. Callan, O. P., Part III: The Decalogue, The First Commandment; emphasis added.)


Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.

In commenting on this deceptive lie by Satan, the Angelic Doctor teaches how Adam and Eve were both pre-disposed to accept the lies of Satan as though it was the Truth:   “Reply to Objection 3: The desire for knowledge resulted in our first parents from their inordinate desire for excellence. Hence the serpent began by saying: ‘You shall be as Gods,’ and added: ‘Knowing good and evil’”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part II-II, Question 163, Article 1, Reply to Objection 3; emphasis added).

Reply to Objection 4: According to Augustine (Gen. ad lit. xi, 30), ‘the woman had not believed the serpent’s statement that they were debarred by God from a good and useful thing, were her mind not already filled with the love of her own power, and a certain proud self-presumption.’ This does not mean that pride preceded the promptings of the serpent, but that as soon as the serpent had spoken his words of persuasion, her mind was puffed up, the result being that she believed the demon to have spoken truly” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part II-II, Question 163, Article 1, Reply to Objections 5; emphasis added.)

“Thus, too, did the devil set about the temptation of the first man. For at first he enticed his mind to consent to the eating of the forbidden fruit, saying (Gn. 3:1): ‘Why hath God commanded you that you should not eat of every tree of paradise?’ Secondly [he tempted him] to vainglory by saying: ‘Your eyes shall be opened.’ Thirdly, he led the temptation to the extreme height of pride, saying: ‘You shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.’” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part III, Question 41, Article 4, Conclusion; emphasis added.)

Editorial Commentary by Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.

The Scripture reminds us how the Devil tempted Eve, saying:  “You shall be as gods, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:5).
The One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church teaches that in the Mystery of the Most Holy Trinity, the Second Person is God the Son, Jesus Christ.

Therefore, for JP-2 to claim:  “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God”, is to really claim not only that “YOU are God”, but also that HE, JP-2, is God”!!! THIS IS IDOLATRY!!!

Why?  Because since Jesus Christ is God, and because since HE (JP-2) is also Christ - per himself,  JP-2, therefore, because HE (JP-2) is Christ, HE (JP-2) is really God!

In these sermons you witness, not Satan himself, tempting Eve with his big lie:   “You shall be as gods, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:5), but rather a human agent of Satan, JP-2, tempting all Catholics with an even bigger lie:  Because ““YOU are the Christ”, and because Christ is God, YOU are actually God!  This is idolatry!

I am the Lord thy God.  Thou shalt not have strange gods before Me” (The First Commandment of Almighty God:   Exodus 20:2-3; Deuteronomy 5:6-7).

Now by JP-2 saying that “YOU are the Christ”, JP-2 thereby says, without saying it because IF he was very clear in what he said and in how he said it - which ambiguity is the trademark of the NEW Theology Theologians, his vague Heresy would be clearly obvious to everyone, that Christ is divided into billions of “YOU” - this is ludicrous!

Furthermore, in the final analysis, this logically also means that this heresy of pagan humanism in the "church of man" the - “YOU are the Christ”- according to JP-2, logically means:

1)  It was YOU, being Christ, who were born of the Virgin Mary!

2)  It was YOU, being Christ, who were taken to Egypt to escape the slaughter of the Holy Innocents!

3)  It was YOU, being Christ, who lived in Nazareth and were a carpenter!

4)  It was YOU, being Christ, who was Baptized by Saint John the Baptist in the River!

5)  It was YOU, being Christ, who were tempted by the Devil!

6)  It was YOU, being Christ, who called twelve men to be YOUR Apostles!

7)  It was YOU, being Christ, who changed water into wine!

8)  It was YOU, being Christ, who raised the dead to life!

9)  It was YOU, being Christ, who fed the thousands in the wilderness!

10)  It was YOU, being Christ, who told the devout disciples of Saint John the Baptist that unless they eat YOUR flesh and drink YOUR blood, they shall not have eternal life and who all left you because this is a hard saying and who can believe it?!

11)  It was YOU, being Christ, who perfectly instituted the unchangeable ontological essence and the metaphysical essence for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments!
12)  It was YOU, being Christ, who were in great agony in the Garden!

13)  It was YOU, being Christ, who was scourged!

14)  It was YOU, being Christ, who was crowned with thorns!

15)  It was YOU, being Christ, who fell three times carrying YOUR cross to Calvary!

16)  It was YOU, being Christ, who were nailed to YOUR cross!

17)  It was YOU who were crucified on the cross because YOU, being Christ, are the Messias and the Redeemer!

18)  It was YOU, being Christ, who died on the Cross after a horrible three hours of agony.

19)  It is in YOUR name that everyone is Baptized!

20)  It is YOU who are received in Communion!

On the contrary, the Holy Apostle already dealt with this nonsense!!!!

“Is Christ divided? Was Paul then crucified for you? or were you Baptized in the name of Paul?” (1 Corinthians 1:13).

The Powers of the Soul

Likewise, since JP-2 is so busy claiming that “YOU are the Christ”, JP-2 either ignored or forgot about the reality of the powers of the Soul - the Intellect and the Will and how these Powers of the Soul disprove JP-2's horrible Heresy!  For example:
 


Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P.

“Whence comes this superiority of the love of God over the knowledge of Him that we have on earth? St. Thomas answers as follows: ‘The action of the intellect consists in this, that the idea of the thing understood is in the one who understands; whereas the act of the will consists in this, that the will is inclined to the thing as existing in itself. And therefore the Philosopher says (Metaph., VI) that good and evil, which are objects of the will, are in things, but truth and error, which are objects of the intellect, are in the mind.’ [Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 82, Article 3, I answer that], it is better to know inferior things than to love them.”

It follows that on earth our knowledge of God is inferior to the love of God, since, as St. Thomas further says,  [Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 82, Article 3, I answer that];  On the contrary, the knowledge of corporeal things is better than the love thereof when we know God, we draw Him in a way to ourselves, and in order to represent Him to ourselves, we impose on Him the bounds of our limited ideas; whereas when we love Him, it is we who are drawn to Him, lifted up to Him, such as He is in Himself.”

“An act of love of God made by the Cure of Ars as he taught catechism, was worth more than a learned theological meditation inspired by a lesser love. Our knowledge of God draws Him to us, whereas our love of God draws us to Him. Therefore, as long as we have not the beatific vision, that is, while we are on earth or in purgatory, the love of God is more perfect than the knowledge of God. It presupposes this knowledge, but it surpasses it” (Reverend Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P.  [b. Auch, France 1877 A.D. - d. Rome, Italy, 1964 A.D.], who taught dogmatic and Spiritual theology for 53 years at the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, the Angelicum, in Rome, THE THREE AGES OF THE INTERIOR LIFE, Prelude of Eternal Life, Translated by Sister M. Timothea Doyle, O.P., Volume 1, Part 1 - The Sources of the Interior Life and Its End, Chapter 8:  The True Nature of Christian Perfection (continued), Some Exact Theological Statements on the Nature of Perfection, The Superiority of Charity to the Knowledge of God in this Life, p. 157; emphasis added.)

N.B.  For those who would be wont to claim that JP-2 did not know the above basic Truths should be told that when JP-2 was yet a seminarian, We understand that the future JP-2 physically attended classes at the Angelicum, in Rome, with at least some - perhaps even all??? - of the classes he attended being taught by this author - Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P.!!!


Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.

However, because, as the Angelic Doctor teaches, "when we know God, we draw Him in a way to ourselves, and in order to represent Him to ourselves, we impose on Him the bounds of our limited ideas; whereas when we love Him, it is we who are drawn to Him, lifted up to Him, such as He is in Himself” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 82, Article 3, I answer that) this means that it is contrary to the Truth to say:   “YOU are the Christ, the Son of the living God” in the sense that Man is Christ, because “the ultimate and definitive truth about man: [IS THAT MAN IS] the Son of the living God”, which logically means that Man, per se, IS God because Christ IS God.   From this heresy of JP-2 it also follows not only that “YOU are God”, but also that HE, JP-2, is “God”!!!   ALL OF THIS IS IDOLATRY!!!


The Most Holy Trinity

There is only ONE God in THREE Divine Persons, not in 100 billion "Divine Persons"!!!  Mankind is finite which is why, in order to represent God to ourselves, we impose on Him the bounds of our limited ideas.   Now the bounds of our limited ideas, are finite ideas, because limited ideas, by their nature, are  finite, and by Original Sin, can hold both truth and error, which are objects of the intellect, and which are in the mind, just as good and evil,are objects of the will.  Therefore, good and evil, which are objects of the will, and truth and error, which are objects of the intellect, of which the intellect and will are the powers of the Soul, prove that both Men and Women, irregardless their ages, are FINITE human beings, because FINITE human intellects can fall into error by not choosing Truth, and FINITE human wills can choose evil instead of that which is good.  However, because  “God is Truth” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 16, Article 5; Summa Theologica, Part II-II, Question 93, Article 2, Reply to Objection 2. Summa Contra Gentiles, Book I, Chapter 60), and because “God is Good” (Bishop Saint Augustine, a.k.a. Aurelius Augustinus [b. Tagaste, Africa, Saturday, November 13, 354 A.D. - d. Hippo Regia, Africa, Wednesday, August 28, 430 A.D.], Bishop of Hippo Regia, Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, the Doctor of Grace, On the Doctrine of Christ, I, 31),it is a contradiction of terms for JP-2 to claim that human beings are Christ, and that being Christ, all human beings are therefore God and thus both “Truth” and “Good” - which implies “Sinless”!

This heresy of JP-2 denies the existence of Original Sin!  This heresy of JP-2 also denies Divine Revelation that mankind is totally sinless:  “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the Truth is not in us” (1 John 1:8).



The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests
Part I, The Creed, Article II
Contrary to the heresy of JP-2, the Roman Catholic Church Infallibly teaches:  “The human race, having fallen from its elevated dignity, no power of men or Angels could raise it from its fallen condition and replace it in its primitive state”  (“The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, which the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius V, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Infallibly Promulgated.  Translated by Father John A. McHugh, O. P. and Father Charles J. Callan, O. P.. Part I: The Creed, Article II: “And in Jesus Christ, His Only Son, Our Lord”.)

Finally, because only God is the Infinite Uncaused First Cause this means that human beings are NOT Infinite, but finite, and are not Uncaused (uncreated), but caused (i.e. created).  Human beings certainly are not the First Cause either!


God the Father

The Existence of God is proven from
The Argument from Cause (a.k.a. A First Cause):

Summary

If interconnected efficient causes are here and now actually operating, air and warmth, say, to preserve my life, then there must be a supreme cause from which here and now these causes derive their preservative causality.

Premise/Conclusion

(Premise 1) A thing cannot be the cause of itself.

(Premise 2) The chain of causes cannot go on to infinity

(Premise 3) If there is no First Cause, there would be no effects.

(Conclusion) There is a First Cause = God

But only GOD is the First Cause.  This means that Men and Women are not the First Cause because Men and Women cannot be the cause of themselves since Men and Women are only the effects of the First Cause.  But IF Men and Women are all Christ, and because Christ is God - the First Cause - it is impossible for Men and Women to be Christ, i.e. to be God because Men and Women are only the effects of the First Cause Who is God.


Transfiguration of God the Son
Jesus Christ Revealed His Divine Nature as God

The Existence of God is proven from
The Argument from Necessity (a.k.a. Contingency):

Summary

If there exist contingent beings, which can cease to exist, then there must be a necessary being which cannot cease to exist, which of itself has existence, and which, here and now, gives existence to these contingent beings. If once nothing at all existed, there would not be now, or ever, anything at all in existence. To suppose all things contingent, that is, of themselves non-existent, is to suppose an absurdity.

Premise/Conclusion

(Premise 1) It is possible for anything in nature to be or not be (to exist or not to exist).

(Premise 2) If it is possible for something to be or not be, then it must  have at some time not been (i.e. not existed).
_________________________

(Premise 3) (Conclusion) If everything could be or not be, then it is possible that at one time nothing existed.

(Premise 4) Things are brought into existence by something that already exists.
__________________________

(Premise 5) (Conclusion) (Premise 3) (Premise 4) If at one time nothing existed, then there would be  nothing in existence now. But there are things in existence now.

(Premise 6) (Conclusion) So, there must be something which exists necessarily.

(Premise 7) An infinite chain of necessary beings in impossible.
__________________________

(Conclusion) Something must have its own necessity = God.

But only GOD is Contingent.  This means that Men and Women are not necessary beings because only the First Cause, God, is Contingent.

But IF Men and Women are all Christ, per the heresy of JP-2, because Christ is Contingent God,  it is impossible for Men and Women ever to be Christ, i.e. to be God, because Men and Women are not required to exist because it is not necessary for them to exist because, by their nature as created creatures by Contingent God, at some point in time at some time the billions of Men and Women who have lived on earth have never been, i.e. they never existed until the moment they were created by Contingent God!


God the Holy Ghost in the Form of a Dove

The Existence of God is proven from
The Argument from Hierarchy:

Summary

If there are beings in the world which differ in their degree of nobility, goodness, and Truth, it is because they have but a share, a part, because they participate diversely, in existence, in nobility, goodness, and Truth.

Hence there is, in each of them, a composition, a union, between the subject which participates and the perfection, existence, goodness, Truth, which are participated to them.  Now composition, union, presupposes the unity in which it participates.

[Quae secundum se diversa sunt non conveniunt in aliquod unum nisi per aliquam causam, adunantem ipsa.  Things which are different in themselves cannot unite into something unless something causes them to unite.]. Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 3, Article 7, I answer that, ..... Thirdly, ....].

Hence, at the summit, there must be one cause, one source of all perfection, who alone can say, not merely “I have existence, Truth, and life,” but rather “I AM existence, Truth, and life.”

Premise/Conclusion

(Premise 1) Things are more or less good, true, noble, etc.

(Premise 2) Things can only be more or less good, etc. in relation to a standard  of the maximum.

(Premise 3) The maximum in any genus is the cause of everything else in the  genus.

(Conclusion) There must be some maximum being which is the cause of all the  good qualities in every other being = God.

Only GOD can say, and has said, of Himself “I AM”:  “God said to Moses: I AM WHO AM. He said: Thus shalt thou say to the children of Israel: HE WHO IS, hath sent me to you” (Exodus 3:14).  When “God said to Moses: I AM WHO AM”, God was telling Moses that He IS “being itself, eternal, self-existent, independent, infinite; without beginning, end, or change; and the source of all other beings.”

Therefore, it should be self-evident that Men and Women can not say of themselves:

I AM WHO AM.”
So also, they can not say of themselves:
HE WHO IS”.
This is yet further proof of the pernicious heresy of JP-2 because only God can say of Himself:
“I AM existence, Truth, and life.”

The Most Holy Trinity

The Existence of God is proven from
The Argument from Design:

Summary

IF YOU find in the world, inanimate and animated, natural activities manifestly proportioned to a purpose, this proportioned fitness presupposes an intelligence which produces and preserves this purposeful tendency.

If the corporeal world tends to a cosmic center of cohesion, if plant and animal tend naturally to assimilation and reproduction, if the eye is here for vision and the ear for hearing, feet for walking and wings for flying; if human intelligence tends to Truth and human will to good, and if each man by nature longs for happiness, then necessarily these natural tendencies, so manifestly ordained to a proportioned good, a proportioned purpose, presuppose a supreme ordinator, a supreme intelligence, which knows and controls the raison d'etre of all things and this supreme ordinator must be Wisdom itself and Truth itself.

For again, union presupposes unity, presupposes absolute identity.  A thing uncaused, says Saint Thomas, [Quod causam non habet primum et immediatum est. Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles, Book  2, Chapter 15, § 2] is of itself, and immediately (i.e. without intermediary) being itself, one by nature, not by participation. [Ens per essentiam et non per participationem. Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles, Book  2, Chapter 15, § 2].

Premise/Conclusion

(Premise 1) Things without intelligence act (for the most part) for the best  result.
________________

(Premise 2) (Conclusion) Things are acting for an end.

(Premise 3) An unintelligent thing cannot move towards an end unless directed by an intelligent being.
________________

(Conclusion) There is an intelligent being that directs all things toward their  end = God
 

FP Q[3] A[7]  [Conclusion]  God is uncaused, as shown above (Q[2], A[3]), since He is the first efficient cause

The above proofs for the existence of God rest on the principle of causality.

This means that anything that exists, if it does not exist in and of itself, depends in the final analysis on something which in fact does exist in and of itself.

To deny this principle leads to absurdity.

To say:  “A thing contingent, that is, a thing which of itself does not have existence, is nevertheless uncaused”  is the same thing as saying:  “A thing may exist of itself and simultaneously not exist of itself.”

This is a self-evident contradiction of terms because existence, in and of itself, would belong to it, both necessarily and impossibly.

This means that existence would be an inseparable predicate of a being which can be separated from existence.

It is self-evident that all of these absurdities are worthless and unintelligible - in other words totally absurd.

Now that is absurd which cannot exist because it is beyond the bounds of objective reality, without any possible relation to reality. It is the agreement between two terms which objectively can never agree.

Therefore, an uncaused union of things which are, in and of themselves, diverse is absurd.

On the contrary, the only cause of union is unity. Union means a share in unity, because it presupposes things which are diverse, brought together by a higher unity.

So, when you say:  “Anything [whether it be an angel, a cloud, a blade of grass, or even a grain of sand] can arise without any cause from absolute nothingness,”  then you are making a statement which is not merely unsupported and gratuitous, but which is objectively absurd.

To recapitulate:  A being which is not self-existent, which only participates in existence, presupposes necessarily a Being which, by nature, is self-existent. Unity by participation presupposes unity by essence.  Therefore, once again the claim of JP-2 - that mankind is Christ - is a gross absurdity and a contradiction of Sacred Scripture and the Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.

JP-2's statement - that mankind is Christ - is not only unsupported and gratuitous, it is the breaking of his Oath of the Pope-Elect, The Profession of Faith, The Oath Against Modernism, and total heretical foolishness!



Our Lady of LaSalette

No wonder Our Blessed Mother
Prophecized at LaSalette on September 19, 1846:

Rome will lose the Faith and
become the seat of anti-Christ
the Church will be in eclipse
(Our Lady of LaSalette, Saturday, September 19, 1846).

Rome LOST the Faith at the Convention of the
anti-Catholic Innovators & Infiltrators at Synod Vatican 2 in 1962!


Prophecy Fulfilled:
Rome will lose the Faith and
become the seat of anti-Christ
the Church will be in eclipse
(Our Lady of LaSalette, Saturday, September 19, 1846).



Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX

On August 24, 1852, the Roman Catholic Church, in the person of the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni M. Mastai Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], recognized and approved both this apparition, and also the Secret Prophecies, as genuine.  The Pope also permitted Bishop de Bruillard to make a like pronouncement.  Bishop de Bruillard obtained the help of his friend, Bishop Villecourt of La Rochelle.   In the Diocese of Grenoble it was read to every congregation at every Mass on Sunday, November 16, 1851.



Repetition of “Man is Christ”

Perhaps some Readers might be wondering if they should give JP-2 the “benefit of the doubt”?  Perhaps he really did not mean to say what he said or was somehow “misinterpreted”?  IF this is the case, please consider this statement:

“… so that consciences can be freed in the full truth of man, who is Christ, ‘peace and mercy’ for everyone” (Pope JP-2, General Audience, February 22, 1984, “L’Osservatore Romano”, The Official Vatican Newspaper, February 27, 1984, p. 1).


“The FOOL hath said in his heart: There is no God”
(Psalm 13:1).



Part of the “Job Description” of each Catholic Prelate and Priest is this:


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII

To block the “attacks of error and the deceits of heresy; to watch the tactics of the wicked who war against the Faith....; to unmask the plots and to reveal the ambushes and traps; they must warn naive people, strengthen those who are timid, and open the eyes of the blinded”(Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Infallible Encyclical, “Depuis Le Jour”, On the Education of the Clergy, Friday, September 8, 1899, ¶ 48, In Doctrina; emphasis added).

Therefore:

LOOK  to  SEE  and  to  LEARN:
JP-2's BLATANT  BLASPHEMIES:


This is NOT Catholic!!!  -  This IS Apostasy!
This IS a Blasphemous Abomination!

Question # 3

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his First Sermon on Sunday, October 22, 1978?

Question # 4

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his Sermon on December 25, 2001?

Answer to Question # 3

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 3

Please refer to the above quoted texts of the Infallible Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church under: JP-2’s Sermons - Man is Christ

Answer to Question # 4

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 4

Please refer to the above quoted texts of the Infallible Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church under: JP-2’s Sermons - Man is Christ

Judgement - Based Upon these True Facts

Please click on this link regarding Judgement.

Final Conclusion to Questions # 3 & # 4

It is a contradiction of terms to claim that anyHeretic, including the automatically Excommunicated Heretic, Pope JP-2, can be canonized a “saint”.  Because of Pope JP-2’s First Sermon on Sunday, October 22, 1978, in which he preached: the NEW truth, indeed, the ultimate and definitive truth about man: the Son of the living God – You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.  Because of Pope JP-2’s Sermon on December 25, 2001, in which he preached: In him we can recognize the face of every little child who is born.

Pope JP-2 was condemned, a priori,  as the above texts prove:

1.  By the Infallible Sacred Scriptures:  Exodus 20:2-3; Deuteronomy 5:6-7.

2.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V, Infallible “Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”.

3.  By 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2314, § I  -  ipso facto  Excommunication!

4.  By the Coronation Oath of the Pope-Elect.

5.  By the Profession of Faith.

6.  By the Oath Against Modernism.

JP-2 was an Heretic who publicly preached the Heresy thatMan is Christ. This Heresy of Idolatry, this Apostasy of Idolatry, is  contrary to the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church quoted above.


JP-2’s Sermons - Respect Every Religion

Pope JP-2, Professional Actor

Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III

JP-2 the Professional Actor/Clown
Buffon with no respect for Papacy

Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI

JP-2 the Professional Actor/Clown
Buffon with no respect for Papacy

Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII

JP-2 Kissing his Wife, Edwige?
JP-2 Kissing a Daughter?
JP-2 Kissing a Stranger?

Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI

Pope JP-2 Taught these Heresies:

April 12, 1997

“… the Church, which seeks only to be able freely to preach … with respect for… every religion”   (Pope JP-2, Sermon, April 12, 1997, “L’Osservatore Romano”, The Official Vatican Newspaper, April 16, 1997, p. 3; emphasis added).

October 16, 1979

“It is extremely important to give a correct and fair presentation of the other Churches and ecclesial communities that the Spirit of Christ does not refrain from using as means of salvation; ‘moreover, some, even very many, of the outstanding elements and endowments which together go to build up and give life to the Church herself, can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church’(V-2, Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio, 3, November 21, 1964: AAS 57 (1965), p. 93.)  (JP-2, Apostolic Exhortation, “Catechesi Tradendae” - On Catechesis in Our Time, October16, 1979; emphasis added).

February 24, 1980

“The duty of respecting the faith of every person is at one and the same time correlative to the natural and civil right of liberty of conscience and religion” (Pope JP-2, Sermon, Sunday, February 24, 1980; emphasis added).

July 12, 1995

“Even with regard to the work of evangelization and sanctification, the Council's attitude is sincere and respectful. It affirms that the [non-Catholic] Churches and ecclesial communities are not in fact deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation (UR 3). 

All this contains the impelling appeal for full unity. It is not merely a matter of gathering all the spiritual riches scattered throughout the Christian communities, as if in so doing we might arrive at a more perfect Church, the Church which God would desire for the future.” (JP-2, General Audience, July 12, 1995; emphasis added).


JP-2The LYING TEACHER



Synod Vatican 2, November 21, 1964

“The brethren divided from us also use many liturgical actions of the Christian religion. These most certainly can truly engender a life of grace in ways that vary according to the condition of each Church or Community. These liturgical actions must be regarded as capable of giving access to the community of salvation. 

It follows that the separated Churches and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. 

The Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church.”  (CONVENTION of anti-Catholic Infiltrators - Communists, Freemasons, Illuminati, Zionists, etc. - Synod Vatican 2, Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio, November 21, 1964, ¶ 3; emphasis added).


Synod Vatican 2
The LYING TEACHER



The above collage shows six of the NEW Theology Theologians who were invited by Pope 2nd John 23rd to be Periti [Experts] at Synod V-2 according to Bishop Aloysius Wycislo:


Bishop Aloysius Wycislo

“Pope Pius XII's encyclical Humani Generis had.... a devastating effect on the work of a number of pre-conciliar theologians.... theologians and biblical scholars, who had been under a cloud for years, surfaced as periti [theological experts who advised the Bishops] at Vatican II.”  (Bishop Aloysius Wycislo [b. at Chicago, Illinois in 1908 - d. in 2005] Vatican Two Revisited; Reflections by One who was there, paperback edition published by Alba House in October, 1987.)

Bishop Wycislo specifically mentions Hans Kung [1], Karl Rahner [2], John Courtney Murray [3], Yves Congar [4], Edward Schillebeeckx [5], and Henri De Lubac [6] as theologians who had been under a cloud of suspicion of heresy, and yet they were invited to be periti, i.e. theological experts, by Pope 2nd John 23rd, at Synod Vatican 2!

Pope JP-2’s Heresies were Condemned a priori
by God in this Sacred Scripture
by these Infallible Roman Catholic Popes
and by this Infallible Roman Catholic Council:

If any man come to you and bring not this Doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him: God speed you” (2 John 1:10).

There is one Universal Church of the Faithful, outside of which there is absolutely no salvation”  (Twelfth Œcumenical Council, the Fourth Lateran Council - [Sunday, November 1, 1215 A.D. - Monday, November 30, 1215 A.D.],  with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated Canon 1; emphasis added).

We excommunicate and anathematize every heresy that raises against the holy, orthodox and Catholic faith... condemning all heretics under whatever names they may be known” (Ibid., Canon 3; emphasis added).

We decree that those who give credence to the teachings of the heretics, as well as those who receive, defend, and patronize them, are excommunicated” (Ibid., Canon 3; emphasis added).


Pope Gregory XVI

“13. INDIFFERENTISM. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the Soul by the profession of any kind of religion...” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, Bartolomeo Alberto-Mauro-Cappellari, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”, On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 13; emphasis added).

“14. This poisoned source of  INDIFFERENTISM  gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience  must be maintained for everyone...Thence comes transformation of minds, corruption of youths, contempt of Sacred Things and Holy Laws -- in other words, this is a most contagious error” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, Bartolomeo Alberto-Mauro-Cappellari, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”, On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 14; emphasis added).

“4. This idea is spread by an impious and absurd system of INDIFFERENCE  towards Religious matters which claims that the Christian Religion can become perfect in time.... they force reforms, conceive of changes, and pretend to renew the Church”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Quo Graviora”, On the “Pragmatic Constitution”, October 4, 1833, ¶ 4; emphasis added).

“9.  Their purpose is to spread   Religious liberty, or rather an INSANE  DESIRE for INDIFFERENCE concerning Religion... liberty of conscience, or rather of ERROR” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Inter Præcipuas”, On Biblical Societies, Wednesday, May 8, 1844, ¶ 9; emphasis added).

“14. INDIFFERENCE to Religion propagated by the sect members under the [false] name of Religious liberty” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI,  using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Inter Præcipuas”, On Biblical Societies, May 8, 1844, ¶ 14; emphasis added).

“15.   It makes no difference to which religion one belongs, a theory which is greatly at variance even with reason.... They pretend that men can gain eternal salvation by the practice of  ANY  religion”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Qui Pluribus”, On Faith and Religion, Monday, November 9, 1846”, ¶ 15;emphasis added).

They [the sons of darkness] want to spread everywhere the deadly virus of INDIFFERENTISM and  UNBELIEF” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”, Urging Prayers for Peace, Tuesday, August 1, 1854, ¶ 1; emphasis added).

“2. Mockery and contempt for Sacred Things, for Holy Laws; the deadly virus of  INDIFFERENTISM  and incredulity. Men, miserably deserting the norms of Truth, justice, and Religion, enslave themselves to their own evil and unbridled desires in resolute labor for all that is sinful” (Ibid.,  ¶ 2; emphasis added).

“3.  The  Hideous Error of Indifferentism.This belief embraces people who have strayed from the Truth, who are enemies of the True Faith and forget their own salvation, and who teach contradictory beliefs without firm doctrine. They maintain that the haven of eternal salvation is open to sectarians of any religion”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Singulari Quidem”, On the Church in Austria”, Monday, March 17, 1856,  ¶ 3; emphasis added).

“3.  The DEADLY VIRUS OF UNBELIEF AND INDIFFERENTISM spread far and wide...” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX,  using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Quanto Conficiamur Moerore”, On Promotion of False Doctrines, Monday, August 10, 1863, ¶ 3; emphasis added)

“16.  That a regard for religion should be held as an INDIFFERENT matter, and THAT ALL RELIGIONS ARE ALIKE” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Humanum Genus”, On Freemasonry, Sunday, April 20, 1884, ¶ 16; emphasis added).

But how can hearts be united in Perfect Charity where minds do not agree in Faith?” (Infallible  Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, The Reunion of Christendom, Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20; emphasis added).

“The enemy has, indeed, long been prowling about the fold and attacking it with such subtle cunning...The chief cause of the present  INDIFFERENCE... is to be found above all in ignorance of things Divine”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Acerbo Nimis”, On Teaching Christian Doctrine, Saturday, April 15, 1905, ¶ 1; emphasis added).

“The disciples of Christ must be united principally by the bond of one Faith” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Mortalium Animos, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 9; emphasis added).

This Apostolic See has never allowed its subjects to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics: for the union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have unhappily left it” (Ibid.,  ¶ 10; emphasis added).

It were foolish and out of place to say that the Mystical Body is made up of members which are disunited and scattered abroad” (Ibid.,  ¶ 10; emphasis added).

Whosoever therefore is not united with the body is no member of it, neither is he in communion with Christ its head” (Ibid.,  ¶ 10; emphasis added).

The Roman Catholic Church Infallibly Teaches:


Sacred Scripture

If any man come to you and bring not this Doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him: God speed you” (2 John 1:10).

Infallible Roman Catholic Popes


November, 1215 A.D.


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III
and The Infallible Fourth Lateran Council

Canon 1

CANON 1:   “There is one Universal Church of the Faithful, outside of which there is absolutely no salvation. In which there is the same priest and sacrifice, Jesus Christ, whose Body and Blood are truly contained in the Sacrament of the Altar under the forms of bread and wine; the bread being changed (Transubstantiation) by Divine Power into the Body, and the wine into the Blood, so that to realize the mystery of unity we may receive of Him what He has received of us. And this Sacrament no one can effect except the priest who has been duly [validly] Ordained in accordance with the keys of the Church, which Jesus Christ Himself gave to the Apostles and their successors.”  (H. J. Schroeder, “Disciplinary Decrees of the General Councils: Text, Translation and Commentary”, published by B. Herder, 1937, St. Louis, Twelfth Œcumenical Council, The Fourth Lateran Council - [Sunday, November 1, 1215 A.D. - Monday, November 30, 1215 A.D.], Canon 1, with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III, Lotario Dei Conti Di Segni [Thursday, January 8, 1198 - Saturday, July 16, 1216], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated the Infallible Canon 1; emphasis added).


November, 1215 A.D.


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III
and The Infallible Fourth Lateran Council

Canon 3

CANON 3:   “Text. We excommunicate and anathematize every heresy that raises against the holy, orthodox and Catholic faith which we have above explained; condemning all heretics under whatever names they may be known, for while they have different faces they are nevertheless bound to each other by their tails, since in all of them vanity is a common element...”
 

We decree that those who give credence to the teachings of the heretics, as well as those who receive, defend, and patronize them, are excommunicated; and we firmly declare that after any one of them has been branded with excommunication, if he has deliberately failed to make satisfaction within a year, let him incur ipso jure the stigma of infamy and let him not be admitted to public offices or deliberations, and let him not take part in the election of others to such offices or use his right to give testimony in a court of law. Let him also be intestable, that he may not have the free exercise of making a will, and let him be deprived of the right of inheritance. Let no one be urged to give an account to him in any matter, but let him be urged to give an account to others. If perchance he be a judge, let his decisions have no force, nor let any cause be brought to his attention. If he be an advocate, let his assistance by no means be sought. If a notary, let the instruments drawn up by him be considered worthless, for, the author being condemned, let them enjoy a similar fate. In all similar cases we command that the same be observed. If, however, he be a cleric, let him be deposed from every office and benefice, that the greater the fault the graver may be the punishment inflicted.”  (H. J. Schroeder, “Disciplinary Decrees of the General Councils: Text, Translation and Commentary”, published by B. Herder, 1937, St. Louis, Twelfth Œcumenical Council, the Fourth Lateran Council - [Sunday, November 1, 1215 A.D. - Monday, November 30, 1215 A.D.], Canon 3, with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III, Lotario Dei Conti Di Segni [Thursday, January 8, 1198 - Saturday, July 16, 1216], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated the Infallible Canon 3; emphasis added).

The Infallible Fourth Lateran Council was attended by 71 patriarchs and Metropolitan Archbishops, 412 Bishops, and 900 Abbots and Priors of Monasteries.


August 15, 1832


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI's
Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”
Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 13

“13. Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: INDIFFERENTISM. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the Soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, Bartolomeo Alberto-Mauro-Cappellari [Wednesday, February 2, 1831 - Monday, June 1, 1846], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”, On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 13; emphasis added).


August 15, 1832


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI's
Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”
Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 14

“14. This poisoned source of  INDIFFERENTISM  gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience  must be maintained for everyone.  It spreads ruin in sacred and civil affairs, though some repeat over and over again with the greatest impudence that some advantage accrues to religion from it. ‘But the death of the Soul is worse than freedom of error,’ as Augustine was wont to say [Saint Augustine, Epistle 166].  When all restraints are removed by which men are kept on the narrow path of truth, their nature, which is already inclined to evil, propels them to ruin. Then truly ‘the bottomless pit’[Apocalypse 9:3] is open from which John saw smoke ascending which obscured the sun, and out of which locusts flew forth to devastate the earth. Thence comes transformation of minds, corruption of youths, contempt of Sacred Things and Holy Laws -- in other words, this is a most contagious error”” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, Bartolomeo Alberto-Mauro-Cappellari [Wednesday, February 2, 1831 - Monday, June 1, 1846], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”, On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 14; emphasis added).


October 4, 1833


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI's
Infallible Encyclical, “Quo Graviora”
Friday, October 4, 1833, ¶ 4

“4. You know, Venerable Brothers, on what erroneous principles the abovementioned men and their followers depend and where that desire which moves them to begin effecting a revolution in the Church has its origin. We do not think it superfluous to clarify many of those things and to explain them here. A false idea has for a long time grown stronger and spread widely through these regions. This idea is spread by an impious and absurd system of INDIFFERENCE  towards Religious matters which claims that the Christian Religion can become perfect in time. While the patrons of such a false idea are afraid to adapt the shaky possibility of perfection to the truths of faith, they establish it in the external administration and discipline of the Church. Moreover, in order to bring about faith in their error, they wrongfully and deceitfully usurp the authority of Catholic theologians. These theologians propound here and there a distinction between the teaching and the discipline of the Church which underlies this change, that it will always stand firm and never be harmed by any alteration. Once this is established, they state categorically that there are many things in the discipline of the Church in the present day, in its government, and in the form of its external worship which are not suited to the character of our time. These things, they say, should be changed, as they are harmful for the growth and prosperity of the Catholic religion, before the teaching of faith ant morals suffers any harm from it. Therefore, showing a zeal for religion and showing themselves as an example of piety, they force reforms, conceive of changes, and pretend to renew the Church”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, Bartolomeo Alberto-Mauro-Cappellari [Wednesday, February 2, 1831 - Monday, June 1, 1846], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Quo Graviora”, On the “Pragmatic Constitution”, October 4, 1833, ¶ 4; emphasis added).


May 8, 1844


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI's
Infallible Encyclical, “Inter Præcipuas”
Wednesday, May 8, 1844, ¶ 9

“9. Now, however, these sect members are deprived of their expectations and regret the immense outlay of money spent in publishing their Bibles and spreading them without success. Some have now been found who have directed their efforts toward Italians, especially the citizens of Rome herself, after the manner of a new first assault. Actually We learned from reports and documents just received that a number of men of various sects met in the city of New York last year on June 12 and founded a new society called Christian League. Their common purpose is to spreadReligious liberty, or rather an INSANE  DESIRE for INDIFFERENCE concerning Religion, among Romans and Italians. They assert that the institutions of the Roman and Italian peoples have been so influential that anything of any consequence that has happened in the world had its origin in Rome. They arrive at this conclusion not because the Supreme See of Peter is here according to the plan of the Lord, but because there has been a certain residue of ancient Roman domination, usurped by Our predecessors, as they often repeat, but still active. Therefore they are determined to give everyone the gift of  liberty of conscience,   or rather of ERROR; they liken it to a fountain from which political liberty and increased public prosperity may spring forth” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, Bartolomeo Alberto-Mauro-Cappellari [Wednesday, February 2, 1831 - Monday, June 1, 1846], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Inter Præcipuas”, On Biblical Societies, Wednesday, May 8, 1844, ¶ 9; emphasis added).


May 8, 1844


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI's
Infallible Encyclical, “Inter Præcipuas”
Wednesday, May 8, 1844, ¶ 14

“14. We have no doubt that these cares of Ours and yours will be seconded with the aid of the civil powers, especially by the more influential princes of Italy. This is because of their exceptional zeal for preserving the Catholic religion and because they realize that the state would benefit if the efforts of the above-mentioned sect members should fail. Experience shows that there is no more direct way of alienating the populace from fidelity and obedience to their leaders than through that INDIFFERENCE to Religion propagated by the sect members under the [false] name of  Religious liberty” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, Bartolomeo Alberto-Mauro-Cappellari [Wednesday, February 2, 1831 - Monday, June 1, 1846], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Inter Præcipuas”, On Biblical Societies, May 8, 1844, ¶ 14; emphasis added).


November 9, 1846


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX's
Infallible Encyclical, “Qui Pluribus”
Monday, November 9, 1846,  ¶ 15

“15.  Also perverse is the shocking theory that it makes no difference to which religion one belongs, a theory which is greatly at variance even with reason. By means of this theory, those crafty men remove all distinction between virtue and vice, Truth and error, honorable and vile action. They pretend that men can gain eternal salvation by the practice of  ANY  religion, as if there could ever be any sharing between justice and iniquity, any collaboration between light and darkness, or any agreement between Christ and Belial”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Qui Pluribus”, On Faith and Religion, Monday, November 9, 1846”, ¶ 15;emphasis added).


August 1, 1854


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX's
Infallible Encyclical, “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”
Tuesday, August 1, 1854, ¶ 1

They [the sons of darkness] want to spread everywhere the deadly virus of  INDIFFERENTISM   and   UNBELIEF; to mix together all human and Divine rights; to promote dissension, discord, and movements of impious rebellion; and to commit vicious deeds and cruel crimes. They leave nothing untried so that if it were possible, Our religion would be uprooted and human society itself might be destroyed” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”, Urging Prayers for Peace, Tuesday, August 1, 1854, ¶ 1; emphasis added).


August 1, 1854


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX's
Infallible Encyclical, “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”
Tuesday, August 1, 1854, ¶ 2

“2.... Therefore We must deplore all the following: the blindness covering the minds of many; the fierce war against everything Catholic...  the hideous hatred of virtue and rectitude... the unbridled liberty of thinking, living, and daring everything at will; the unrestrained intolerance of all rule, power, and authority; the mockery and contempt for Sacred Things, for Holy Laws, for even the finest institutions; the lamentable corruption of improvident youth; the annoying aggregate of bad books, pamphlets, and posters flying about everywhere and teaching sin; the deadly virus ofINDIFFERENTISM    and incredulity....  Serious evils indeed are to be feared in private and public affairs when men, miserably deserting the norms of Truth, justice, and Religion, enslave themselves to their own evil and unbridled desires in resolute labor for all that is sinful” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”, Urging Prayers for Peace, August 1, 1854, ¶ 2; emphasis added).


March 17, 1856


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX's
Infallible Encyclical, “Singulari Quidem”
Monday, March 17, 1856, ¶ 3

“3. Among the many deplorable evils which disturb and afflict both ecclesiastical and civil society, two stand out in our day and are justly considered to be the cause of the others. In effect, you are aware of the innumerable and fatal damages which the  HIDEOUS  ERROR   OF   INDIFFERENTISM causes to Christian and civil society. It causes us to forget out duties to God in whom we live and act and have our being. It causes us to slacken our concern for Holy Religion and shakes almost to destruction the very basis of all law, justice, and virtue. There is little difference between this hideous form of   INDIFFERENCE   and the  DEVILISH   SYSTEM  of INDIFFERENCE between the different religions. This belief embraces people who have strayed from the Truth, who are enemies of the True Faith and forget their own salvation, and who teach contradictory beliefs without firm doctrine. They make no distinction between the different creeds, agree with everybody, and maintain that the haven of eternal salvation is open to sectarians of any religion. The diversity of their teachings does not concern them as long as they agree to combat that which alone is the Truth”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Singulari Quidem”, On the Church in Austria”, Monday, March 17, 1856,  ¶ 3; emphasis added).


August 10, 1863


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX's
Infallible Encyclical, “Quanto Conficiamur Moerore”
Monday, August 10, 1863, ¶ 3

“3. Would that we could announce the end of such terrible calamities besetting the Church! Never will there be grief enough over the corruption of morals so extensively increasing and promoted by irreligious and obscene writings, theatrical spectacles and meretricious houses established almost everywhere; by other depraved arts and monstrous portents of every error disseminated in all directions; by the abominable impurities of all vices and crimes growing constantly and theDEADLY  VIRUS OF   UNBELIEF   AND   INDIFFERENTISM   spread far and wide...” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Quanto Conficiamur Moerore”, On Promotion of False Doctrines, Monday, August 10, 1863, ¶ 3; emphasis added)


December 8, 1864


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX's
Infallible “Syllabus” - Collection of Modern Errors, Condemned Propositions
Sec. 111. Indifferentism, Latitudinarianism
Thursday, December 8, 1864

“1715 15 Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which he, led by the light of reason, thinks to be the true religion (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Allocution, “Maxima Quidem,” Monday, June 9, 1862; Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Multiplices Inter,” Tuesday, June 10, 1851).

1716 16. In the worship of any religion whatever, men can find the way to eternal salvation, and can attain eternal salvation (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Qui pluribus,” Monday, November 9, 1846).

1717 17. We must have at least good hope concerning the eternal salvation of all those who, in no wise [way], are in the true Church of Christ (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Quanto Conficiamur,” Monday, August 10, 1863, etc.).

1718 18. Protestantism is nothing more than a different form of the same true Christian religion, in which it is possible to serve God as equally well as in the Catholic Church (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Noscitis,” Saturday, December 8, 1849).”   (Father Heinrich Joseph Dominicus Denzinger [b. at Liège, Belgium on Sunday, October 10, 1819 A.D. - d. at Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany on Tuesday, June 19, 1883 A.D.], Enchiridion Symbolorum et Definitionum; emphasis added).


April 20, 1884


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII's
Infallible Encyclical, “Humanum Genus”
Sunday, April 20, 1884, ¶ 16

“16. If those who are admitted as members are not commanded to abjure by any form of words the Catholic doctrines, this omission, so far from being adverse to the designs of the Freemasons is more useful for their purposes. First, in this way they easily deceive the simple-minded and the heedless, and can induce a far greater number to become members. Again, as all who offer themselves are received whatever may be their form of religion, they thereby teach the great error of this age -- that a regard for religion should be held as an INDIFFERENT matter, and THAT ALL RELIGIONS ARE ALIKE. This manner of reasoning is calculated to bring about the ruin of all forms of religion, and especially of the Catholic Religion, which, as it is the only one that is True, cannot, without great injustice, be regarded as merely equal to other religions” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Humanum Genus”, On Freemasonry, Sunday, April 20, 1884, ¶ 16; emphasis added).


June 20, 1894


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII's
Infallible Encyclical, “Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ”
Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20

But how can hearts be united in Perfect Charity where minds do not agree in Faith?” (Infallible  Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ”, The Reunion of Christendom, Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20; emphasis added.)


April 15, 1905


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X's
Infallible Encyclical, “Acerbo Nimis”
Saturday, April 15, 1905, ¶ 1

“The enemy has, indeed, long been prowling about the fold and attacking it with such subtle cunning that now, more than ever  before, the prediction of the Apostle to the elders of the Church of  Ephesus seems to be verified: I know that . . . fierce wolves will get in  among you, and will not spare the flock [Acts 20:29].  Those who still are zealous for  the glory of God are seeking the causes and reasons for this decline in Religion. Coming to a different explanation, each points out, according to  his own view, a different plan for the protection and restoration of the  kingdom of God on earth. But it seems to Us, Venerable Brethren, that while we should not overlook other considerations, We are forced to agree with  those who hold that the chief cause of the present  INDIFFERENCE   and, as it  were, infirmity of soul, and the serious evils that result from it, is to  be found above all in ignorance of things Divine. This is fully in accord  with what God Himself declared through the Prophet Osee: And there is no  knowledge of God in the land. Cursing and lying and killing and theft and  adultery have overflowed: and blood hath touched blood. Thereafter shall  the land mourn, and everyone that dwelleth in it shall languish [Osee 4:1-3]”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Acerbo Nimis”, On Teaching Christian Doctrine, Saturday, April 15, 1905, ¶ 1; emphasis added).


January 6, 1928


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI's
Infallible Encyclical, “Mortalium Animos”
Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 9

“9. These pan-Christians who turn their minds to uniting the churches seem, indeed, to pursue the noblest of ideas in promoting charity among all Christians: nevertheless how does it happen that this charity tends to injure faith? Everyone knows that John himself, the Apostle of love, who seems to reveal in his Gospel the secrets of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, and who never ceased to impress on the memories of his followers the new commandment ‘Love one another,’ altogether forbade any intercourse with those who professed a mutilated and corrupt version of Christ's teaching: If any man come to you and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him: God speed you[2 John 1:10].

“For which reason, since charity is based on a complete and sincere faith, the disciples of Christ must be united principally by the bond of ONE Faith. Who then can conceive a Christian Federation, the members of which retain each his own opinions and private judgment, even in matters which concern the object of faith, even though they be repugnant to the opinions of the rest?

“And in what manner, We ask, can men who follow contrary opinions, belong to one and the same Federation of the Faithful? For example, those who affirm, and those who deny, that Sacred Tradition is a True fount of Divine Revelation; those who hold that an ecclesiastical hierarchy, made up of bishops, priests and ministers, has been divinely constituted, and those who assert that it has been brought in little by little in accordance with the conditions of the time; those who adore Christ really present in the Most Holy Eucharist through that marvelous conversion of the bread and wine, which is called Transubstantiation, and those who affirm that Christ is present only by faith or by the signification and virtue of the Sacrament; those who in the Eucharist recognize the nature both of a Sacrament and of a Sacrifice, and those who say that it is nothing more than the memorial or commemoration of the Lord's Supper; those who believe it to be good and useful to invoke by prayer the Saints reigning with Christ, especially Mary the Mother of God, and to venerate their images, and those who urge that such a veneration is not to be made use of, for it is contrary to the honor due to Jesus Christ, the one mediator of God and men.[Cf. 1 Timothy 2:15. ]

How so great a variety of opinions can make the way clear to effect the unity of the Church We know not; that unity can only arise from ONE teaching authority, ONE law of belief and ONE Faith of Christians. But We do know that from this it is an easy step to the neglect of religion or  INDIFFERENTISMand to MODERNISM,  as they call it. Those, who are unhappily infected with these errors, hold that dogmatic truth is not absolute but relative, that is, it agrees with the varying necessities of time and place and with the varying tendencies of the mind, since it is not contained in immutable revelation, but is capable of being accommodated to human life.

“Besides this, in connection with things which must be believed, it is nowise licit to use that distinction which some have seen fit to introduce between those articles of faith which are fundamental and those which are not fundamental, as they say, as if the former are to be accepted by all, while the latter may be left to the free assent of the faithful: for the supernatural virtue of faith has a formal cause, namely the authority of God revealing, and this is patient of no such distinction.

“For this reason it is that all who are truly Christ's believe, for example, the Conception of the Mother of God without stain of Original Sin with the same Faith as they believe the mystery of the August Trinity, and the Incarnation of our Lord just as they do the infallible teaching authority of the Roman Pontiff, according to the sense in which it was defined by the Ecumenical Council of the Vatican [Vatican I]....”(Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, Achille Ratti [Monday, February 6, 1922 - Friday, February 10, 1939], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mortalium Animos”, On Religious Unity, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 9; emphasis added).


January 6, 1928


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI's
Infallible Encyclical, “Mortalium Animos”
Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 10

“10. So, Venerable Brethren, it is clear why this Apostolic See has NEVER ALLOWED its subjects to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics: for the union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the ONE, TRUE Church of Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have unhappily left itTo the ONE, TRUE Church of Christ, We say, which is visible to all, and which is to remain, according to the will of its Author, exactly the same as He instituted it. ....

“For since the Mystical Body of Christ, in the same manner as His physical body, is ONE, [1 Corinthians 12:12] compacted and fitly joined together, [Ephesians 4:16] it is foolish and out of place to say that the Mystical Body is made up of members which are disunited and scattered abroad: WHOSOEVER therefore IS NOT UNITED WITH THE  [MYSTICAL]  BODY IS NOT A MEMBER OF IT, NEITHER IS HE IN COMMUNION WITH CHRIST ITS HEAD. [Cf. Ephesians 5:30; 1, 22]” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, Achille Ratti [Monday, February 6, 1922 - Friday, February 10, 1939], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Mortalium Animos”, On Religious Unity, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 10; emphasis added).



Editorial Commentary by Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.

For JP-2 to publicly proclaim the Heresy of False Ecumenism and the Heresy of Religious Indifferentism by teaching that:

“… the Church, which seeks only to be able freely to preach … with respect for… every religion(Pope JP-2, Sermon, April 12, 1997, “L’Osservatore Romano”, The Official Vatican Newspaper, April 16, 1997, p. 3; emphasis added).

“It is extremely important to give a correct and fair presentation of the other Churches and ecclesial communities that the Spirit of Christ does not refrain from using as means of salvation; ‘moreover, some, even very many, of the outstanding elements and endowments which together go to build up and give life to the Church herself, can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church’(V-2, Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio, 3, November 21, 1964: AAS 57 (1965), p. 93.)  (JP-2, Apostolic Exhortation, “Catechesi Tradendae” - On Catechesis in Our Time, October16, 1979; emphasis added).

“The duty of respecting the faith of every person is at one and the same time correlative to the natural and civil right of liberty of conscience and religion” (Pope JP-2, Sermon, Sunday, February 24, 1980; emphasis added).

“The Council's attitude is sincere and respectful. It affirms that the [non-Catholic] Churches and ecclesial communities are not in fact deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation (UR 3)....  All this contains the impelling appeal for full unity”  (JP-2, General Audience, July 12, 1995; emphasis added).

is substantial proof that JP-2 is not only an Heretic, but an Apostate!

For the Convention of anti-Catholic Infiltrators, and of the NEW Theology Theologians - who were automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics, a.k.a. Synod Vatican 2, to publicly proclaim the Heresy of False Ecumenism and the Heresy of Religious Indifferentism by teaching that:  “The brethren divided from us also use many liturgical actions of the Christian religion. These most certainly can truly engender a life of grace in ways that vary according to the condition of each Church or Community. These liturgical actions must be regarded as capable of giving access to the community of salvation.  It follows that the separated Churches and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. The Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church” (CONVENTION of anti-Catholic Infiltrators - Communists, Freemasons, Illuminati, Zionists, etc. - Synod Vatican 2, Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio, November 21, 1964, ¶ 3; emphasis added), is substantial proof that the Convention of anti-Catholic Infiltrators, and of the NEW Theology Theologians - who were automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics, a.k.a. Synod Vatican 2, is not only Heretical, but also Apostate!

The Convention of anti-Catholic Innovators and anti-Catholic Infiltrators, and of the NEW Theology Theologians - who were automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics, a.k.a. Synod Vatican 2’s, Heresies and Apostasy, and also JP-2’s Heresies and Apostasy, were Condemneda priori  by:

1.  Almighty God in Sacred Scripture;
2.  Infallible Roman Catholic Popes;
3.  Infallible Roman Catholic Council.
These include:

1)  2 John 1:10.

2)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated the Infallible Canons 1 and 3.

3)  Infallible Roman Catholic Twelfth Œcumenical Council, The Fourth Lateran Council, Canons 1 and 3.

4)   Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”, On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 13.

5)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”, On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 14.

6)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Quo Graviora”, On the “Pragmatic Constitution”, October 4, 1833, ¶ 4.

7)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Inter Præcipuas”, On Biblical Societies, Wednesday, May 8, 1844, ¶ 9.

8)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Inter Præcipuas”, On Biblical Societies, Wednesday, May 8, 1844, ¶ 14.

9)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Qui Pluribus”, On Faith and Religion, Monday, November 9, 1846”, ¶ 15.

10)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”, Urging Prayers for Peace, Tuesday, August 1, 1854, ¶ 1.

11)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”, Urging Prayers for Peace, Tuesday, August 1, 1854, ¶ 2.

12)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”, Urging Prayers for Peace, Tuesday, August 1, 1854, ¶ 3.

13)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Singulari Quidem”, On the Church in Austria”, Monday, March 17, 1856,  ¶ 3.

14)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Quanto Conficiamur Moerore”, On Promotion of False Doctrines, Monday, August 10, 1863, ¶ 3.

15)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible “Syllabus”, A Collection of Modern Errors, All Condemned Propositions, Section 111: Indifferentism, Latitudinarianism, Thursday, December 8, 1864, ¶¶ 15-18.

16)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Humanum Genus”, On Freemasonry, Sunday, April 20, 1884, ¶ 16.

17)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, The Reunion of Christendom, Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20.

18)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Acerbo Nimis”, On Teaching Christian Doctrine, Saturday, April 15, 1905, ¶ 1.

19)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Mortalium Animos, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 9.

20)  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Mortalium Animos, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 10.

The above Roman Catholic Sources Infallibly teach these Truths:

If any man come to you and bring not this Doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him: God speed you” (2 John 1:10).
There is one Universal Church of the Faithful, outside of which there is absolutely no salvation”  (Twelfth Œcumenical Council, the Fourth Lateran Council - [Sunday, November 1, 1215 A.D. - Monday, November 30, 1215 A.D.],  with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III, who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated the Infallible Canon 1; emphasis added).

We excommunicate and anathematize every heresy that raises against the holy, orthodox and Catholic faith... condemning all heretics under whatever names they may be known”  (Twelfth Œcumenical Council, the Fourth Lateran Council - [Sunday, November 1, 1215 A.D. - Monday, November 30, 1215 A.D.],  with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III, who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated the Infallible Canon 3; emphasis added).

We decree that those who give credence to the teachings of the heretics, as well as those who receive, defend, and patronize them, are excommunicated”  (Twelfth Œcumenical Council, the Fourth Lateran Council - [Sunday, November 1, 1215 A.D. - Monday, November 30, 1215 A.D.],  with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III, who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated the Infallible Canon 3; emphasis added).

“13. INDIFFERENTISM. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked  who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the Soul by the profession of any kind of religion...” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, Bartolomeo Alberto-Mauro-Cappellari, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”, On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 13; emphasis added).

“14. This poisoned source of  INDIFFERENTISM  gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience  must be maintained for everyone...Thence comes transformation of minds, corruption of youths, contempt of Sacred Things and Holy Laws -- in other words, this is a most contagious error” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, Bartolomeo Alberto-Mauro-Cappellari, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”, On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 14; emphasis added).

“4. This idea is spread by an impious and absurd system of INDIFFERENCE  towards Religious matters which claims that the Christian Religion can become perfect in time.... they force reforms, conceive of changes, and pretend to renew the Church”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Quo Graviora”, On the “Pragmatic Constitution”, October 4, 1833, ¶ 4; emphasis added).

“9.  Their purpose is to spread   Religious liberty, or rather an INSANE  DESIRE for INDIFFERENCE concerning Religion... liberty of conscience,  or rather of ERROR” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Inter Præcipuas”, On Biblical Societies, Wednesday, May 8, 1844, ¶ 9; emphasis added).

“14. INDIFFERENCE to Religion propagated by the sect members under the [false] name of  Religious liberty” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI,  using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Inter Præcipuas”, On Biblical Societies, May 8, 1844, ¶ 14; emphasis added).

“15.   It makes no difference to which religion one belongs, a theory which is greatly at variance even with reason.... They pretend that men can gain eternal salvation by the practice of  ANY  religion”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Qui Pluribus”, On Faith and Religion, Monday, November 9, 1846”, ¶ 15; emphasis added).

They [the sons of darkness] want to spread everywhere the deadly virus of INDIFFERENTISM and  UNBELIEF” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”, Urging Prayers for Peace, Tuesday, August 1, 1854, ¶ 1; emphasis added).

“2. Mockery and contempt for Sacred Things, for Holy Laws; the deadly virus of  INDIFFERENTISM   and incredulity. Men, miserably deserting the norms of Truth, justice, and Religion, enslave themselves to their own evil and unbridled desires in resolute labor for all that is sinful” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”, Urging Prayers for Peace, Tuesday, August 1, 1854, ¶ 2; emphasis added).

“3.  The  HIDEOUS   ERROR   OF   INDIFFERENTISM. This belief embraces people who have strayed from the Truth, who are enemies of the True Faith and forget their own salvation, and who teach contradictory beliefs without firm doctrine.   They maintain that the haven of eternal salvation is open to sectarians of any religion”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Singulari Quidem”, On the Church in Austria”, Monday, March 17, 1856,  ¶ 3; emphasis added).

“3.  The DEADLY  VIRUS   OF   UNBELIEF   AND   INDIFFERENTISM   spread far and wide...” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX,  using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Quanto Conficiamur Moerore”, On Promotion of False Doctrines, Monday, August 10, 1863, ¶ 3; emphasis added)

“16.  That a regard for religion should be held as an INDIFFERENT matter, and THAT ALL RELIGIONS ARE ALIKE” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Humanum Genus”, On Freemasonry, Sunday, April 20, 1884, ¶ 16; emphasis added).

But how can hearts be united in Perfect Charity where minds do not agree in Faith?” (Infallible  Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Præclara Gratulationis Publicæ, The Reunion of Christendom, Wednesday, June 20, 1894, ¶ 20; emphasis added).

“The enemy has, indeed, long been prowling about the fold and attacking it with such subtle cunning...The chief cause of the present  INDIFFERENCE... is to be found above all in ignorance of things Divine”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Acerbo Nimis”, On Teaching Christian Doctrine, Saturday, April 15, 1905, ¶ 1; emphasis added).

“The disciples of Christ must be united principally by the bond of one Faith” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Mortalium Animos, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 9; emphasis added).

This Apostolic See has never allowed its subjects to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics: for the union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have unhappily left it” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Mortalium Animos, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 10; emphasis added).

It were foolish and out of place to say that the Mystical Body is made up of members which are disunited and scattered abroad” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Mortalium Animos, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 10; emphasis added).

Whosoever therefore is not united with the body is no member of it, neither is he in communion with Christ its head” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, Mortalium Animos, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 10; emphasis added).
Because Pope JP-2 publicly proclaimed the Heresy of False Ecumenism and the Heresy of Religious Indifferentism, as well as Apostasy, as exampled in his above false and erroneous teachings,



Therefore, Pretend Pope JP-2 was condemned, a priori, by:

1.  Almighty God (2 John 1:10);
2.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III;
3.  Infallible Roman Catholic Twelfth Œcumenical Council, The Fourth Lateran Council;
4.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, in 3 Infallible Encyclicals;
5.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, in 4 Infallible Encyclicals;
6.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, in his Infallible “Syllabus of Errors”;
7.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, in 2 Infallible Encyclicals;
8.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, in his Infallible Encyclical;
9.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, in his Infallible Encyclical.

All quoted above, as an Heretic   and as an Apostate from the Roman Catholic Church, who publicly proclaimed the Heresy that ALL people, which automatically includes ALL non-Catholics, are saved!  This Apostasy, this Heresy of False Ecumenism, and this Heresy of Religious Indifferentism  are all contrary to the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church which have been quoted above.

Here is What Happens to Heretics and Apostates
From the One, True Faith of the Catholic Church
And to Those Superiors Who Protect Pedophile & Satanist Clergy!:

A Word to the Wise is Sufficient!
An Encyclopedia to the Foolish is Never Enough!

Because the Convention of anti-Catholic Infiltrators, a.k.a. Synod Vatican 2, along with  the NEW Theology Theologians - who were automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics, publicly proclaimed their Heresy of False Ecumenism and their Heresy of Religious Indifferentism, as well as their Apostasy, as exampled in their above false and erroneous teachings, all of the anti-Catholic Infiltrators at the Convention of anti-Catholic Infiltrators, a.k.a. Synod Vatican 2, and the NEW Theology Theologians, who were all automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics, were all condemned a priori by:

1.  Almighty God (2 John 1:10);
2.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III;
3.  Infallible Roman Catholic Twelfth Œcumenical Council, The Fourth Lateran Council;
4.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI, in 3 Infallible Encyclicals;
5.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, in 4 Infallible Encyclicals;
6.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, in his Infallible “Syllabus of Errors”;
7.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, in 2 Infallible Encyclicals;
8.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, in his Infallible Encyclical;
9.  Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, in his Infallible Encyclical.

all quoted above, as Heretics and as Apostates from the Roman Catholic Church, who publicly proclaimed the Heresy that ALL people, which automatically includes ALL non-Catholics, are saved!

This Apostasy, this Heresy of False Ecumenism, and this Heresy of Religious Indifferentism, are all contrary to the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church which have been quoted above.


Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani

I pray to God that I may die before the end of the council -- in that way I can die a Catholic” (Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani [b. at Rome, Italy on Wednesday, October 29, 1890 - d. at Rome, Italy on Friday, August 3, 1979], June 1962, Cardinal Prefect of the Supreme Holy Office, following a speech by Cardinal Montini  - the future Paul VI - on the need for changes in the Church).


Giuseppe Cardinal Siri

[Synod Vatican 2, which JP-2 frequently quoted, was] the greatest disaster in recent ecclesiastical history”(Giuseppe Cardinal Siri [b. Sunday, May 20, 1906 in Genoa, Italy - d. Tuesday, May 2, 1989], Archbishop of Genoa, Italy, from “Pontiff”, p. 369 - Gordon Thomas/Max Morgan Witts).

Synod Vatican 2, which JP-2 frequently quoted, was characterized as:

A sinister farce acted out by three thousand good-for-nothings, some of whom, despite the gold [pectoral] crosses on their chests, don’t even believe in the Trinity or the Virgin” (Bishop Antonio Romeo of the Sacred Congregation of Rites in Bob Considine’s column ON THE LINE in the NEW YORK JOURNAL AMERICAN of Friday, November 27, 1964).


Why Are All NEW Theology Theologians
Automatically Excommunicated Modernist Heretics?

All NEW Theology Theologians are Modernist Heretics, in one way or another.  This means that these the NEW Theology Theologians have  all  been  automatically excommunicated by this Infallible Papal Document:


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X's
Infallible Motu Proprio
PRÆSTANTIA SCRIPTURÆ SACRÆ
Monday, November 18, 1907

Motu Proprio of Our Most Holy Lord Pius X, by Divine Providence Pope, on the decisions of the Pontifical Commission on the Bible and on the censures and penalties against those who neglect to observe the prescriptions against the errors of the Modernists:

In his encyclical letter “Providentissimus Deus,” given on November 18, 1893, Our predecessor, Leo XIII, of immortal memory, after describing the dignity of Sacred Scripture and commending the study of it, set forth the laws which govern the proper study of the Holy Bible; and having proclaimed the divinity of these books against the errors and calumnies of the rationalists, he at the same time defended them against the false teachings of what is known as the higher criticism, which, as the Pontiff most wisely wrote, are clearly nothing but the commentaries of rationalism derived from a misuse of philology and kindred studies. Our predecessor, too, seeing that the danger was constantly on the increase and wishing to prevent the propagation of rash and erroneous views, by his Apostolic letters “Vigilantes Studiique Memores,” given on October 30, 1902, established a Pontifical Council or Commission on Biblical matters, composed of several Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church distinguished for their learning and wisdom, to which Commission were added as consultors a number of men in sacred orders chosen from among the learned in theology and in the Holy Bible, of various nationalities and differing in their methods and views concerning exegetical studies. In so doing the Pontiff had in mind as an advantage most adapted for the promotion of study and for the time in which we live that in this Commission there should be the fullest freedom for proposing, examining and judging all opinions whatsoever, and that the Cardinals of the Commission were not to reach any definite decision, as described in the said apostolic letters, before they had examined the arguments in favor and against the question to be decided, omitting nothing which might serve to show in the clearest light the true and genuine state of the Biblical questions under discussion. Only after all this had been done were the decisions reached to be submitted for the approval of the Supreme Pontiff and then promulgated.

After mature examination and the most diligent deliberations the Pontifical Biblical Commission has happily given certain decisions of a very useful kind for the proper promotion and direction on safe lines of Biblical studies. But We observe that some persons, unduly prone to opinions and methods tainted by pernicious novelties and excessively devoted to the principle of false liberty, which is really immoderate license and in sacred studies proves itself to be a most insidious and a fruitful source of the worst evils against the purity of the faith, have not received and do not receive these decisions with the proper obedience.

Wherefore We find it necessary to declare and to expressly prescribe, and by this Our act We do declare and decree that all are bound in conscience to submit to the decisions of the Biblical Commission relating to doctrine, which have been given in the past and which shall be given in the future, in the same way as to the decrees of the Roman congregations approved by the Pontiff; nor can all those escape the note of disobedience or temerity, and consequently of grave sin, who in speech or writing contradict such decisions, and this besides the scandal they give and the other reasons for which they may be responsible before God for other temerities and errors which generally go with such contradictions.

Moreover, in order to check the daily increasing audacity of many Modernists who are endeavoring by all kinds of sophistry and devices to detract from the force and efficacy not only of the decree “Lamentabili sane exitu” (the so-called Syllabus), issued by Our order by the Holy Roman and Universal Inquisition on July 3 of the present year [1907],but also of Our Encyclical letter “Pascendi Dominici Gregis” given on September 8 of this same year [1907],We do by Our Apostolic Authority repeat and confirm both that decree of the Supreme Sacred Congregation and those Encyclical letters of Ours, adding the penalty of excommunication against their contradictors, and this We declare and decree that should anybody, which may God forbid, be so rash as to defend any one of the propositions, opinions or teachings condemned in these documents he falls, ipso facto, under the censure contained under the chapter “Docentes” of the constitution “Apostolicae Sedis,” which is the first among the excommunications latae sententiae [automatic excommunication], simply reserved to the Roman Pontiff. This excommunication is to be understood as salvis poenis,which may be incurred by those who have violated in any way the said documents, as propagators and defenders of heresies, when their propositions, opinions and teachings are heretical, as has happened more than once in the case of the adversaries of both these documents, especially when they advocate the errors of the Modernists that is, the synthesis of all heresies.

Wherefore We again and most earnestly exhort the ordinaries of the dioceses and the heads of religious congregations to use the utmost vigilance over teachers, and first of all in the seminaries; and should they find any of them imbued with the errors of the Modernists and eager for what is new and noxious, or lacking in docility to the prescriptions of the Apostolic See, in whatsoever way published, let them absolutely forbid the teaching office to such; so, too, let them exclude from sacred orders those young men who give the very faintest reason for doubt that they favor condemned doctrines and pernicious novelties. We exhort them also to take diligent care to put an end to those books and other writings, now growing exceedingly numerous, which contain opinions or tendencies of the kind condemned in the encyclical letters and decree above mentioned; let them see to it that these publications are removed from Catholic publishing houses, and especially from the hands of students and the clergy. By doing this they will at the same time be promoting real and solid education, which should always be a subject of the greatest solicitude for those who exercise sacred authority.  All these things We will and order to be sanctioned and established by Our Apostolic Authority, aught to the contrary notwithstanding.  Given at Rome in Saint Peter's, the 18th November, 1907, the fifth year of Our Pontificate.

Pius PP. X.  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Motu Proprio, Præstantia Scripturæ Sacræ, Monday, November 18, 1907.)

Question # 5

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his Sermon on April 12, 1997?

Answer to Question # 5

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 5

Please refer to the above quoted texts of the Infallible Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church under: JP-2’s Sermons - Respect Every Religion

Question # 6

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his Apostolic Exhortation, “Catechesi Tradendae” on October16, 1979?

Answer to Question # 6

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 6

Please refer to the above quoted texts of the Infallible Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church under: JP-2’s Sermons - Respect Every Religion

Question # 7

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his Sermon on Sunday, February 24, 1980?

Answer to Question # 7

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 7

Please refer to the above quoted texts of the Infallible Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church under: JP-2’s Sermons - Respect Every Religion

Question # 8

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his General Audience, July 12, 1995?

Answer to Question # 8

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 8

Please refer to the above quoted texts of the Infallible Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church under: JP-2’s Sermons - Respect Every Religion

Question # 9

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church by quoting from Synod Vatican 2's Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio, November 21, 1964, ¶ 3?

Answer to Question # 9

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 9

Please refer to the above quoted texts of the Infallible Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church under: JP-2’s Sermons - Respect Every Religion

Judgement - Based Upon these True Facts

Please click on this link regarding Judgement.

Final Conclusion to Questions # 5 thru # 9

It is a contradiction of terms to claim that any Heretic, including the automatically Excommunicated Heretic, Pope JP-2, can be canonized a “saint”.

Because of Pope JP-2's Sermon on April 12, 1997, in which he preached:  “...respect for… every religion”.

Because of Pope JP-2's Apostolic Exhortation, “Catechesi Tradendae” on October16, 1979  in which he taught:  “...other Churches and ecclesial communities thatthe Spirit of Christ does not refrain from using as means of salvation....  can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church”.

Because of Pope JP-2's Sermon on Sunday, February 24, 1980, in which he preached:  “The duty of respecting the faith of every person is at one and the same time correlative to the natural and civil right of liberty of conscience and religion”.

Because of Pope JP-2's General Audience on July 12, 1995  in which he repeated the Heresy of Synod Vatican 2, Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio, November 21, 1964, ¶ 3:  “Churches and ecclesial communities are not in fact deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation”.

Because of Pope JP-2's quoting from Synod Vatican 2's Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio, November 21, 1964, ¶ 3 which taught:  “For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvationwhich derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church”.

Pope JP-2 was condemned, a priori,  as the above texts prove:

1.  By the Infallible Sacred Scripture:  2 John 1:10.

2.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Twelfth Œcumenical Council, the Fourth Lateran Council.

3.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III.

4.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory XVI.

5.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX.

6.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX.

7.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII.

8.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X.

9.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI.

10.  By 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2314, § I  -  ipso facto  Excommunication!

11.  By the Coronation Oath of the Pope-Elect.

12.  By the Profession of Faith.

13.  By the Oath Against Modernism.

JP-2 was an Heretic who publicly preached the Heresy to Respect Every Religion, which is but an example of the  Heresy of False Ecumenism and also of the Heresy of Religious Indifferentismwhich really means that ALL people are saved!  This is simply another way of Heretic garbage/heresy mouth - the GREAT JP-2 - to teach the LIE that ALL non-Catholics are also saved!  So, therefore, logically speaking, it is a total waste of time for STUPID people to be “Catholics” who go to mass and receive the sacraments and believe the Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church!!!

It also logically means: If it feels good, do it”  because  “God is not in the punishment business”!!!!

Apparently “God is not in the punishment business”!!!!  was JP-2’s favorite motto???

Or, was it:  “If it feels good, do it”!!!  This would help to explain JP-2’s bizzare, blasphemous, Satanic, anti-Catholic, pornographic behavior:


“The FOOL hath said in his heart: There is no God”
(Psalm 13:1).

Part of the “Job Description” of each Catholic Prelate and Priest is this:


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII

To block the “attacks of error and the deceits of heresy; to watch the tactics of the wicked who war against the Faith....; to unmask the plots and to reveal the ambushes and traps; they must warn naive people, strengthen those who are timid, and open the eyes of the blinded” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Depuis Le Jour”, On the Education of the Clergy, Friday, September 8, 1899, ¶ 48, In Doctrina; emphasis added).

And in the half of the week the Victim and the Sacrifice shall fail:  and there shall be in the Temple the Abomination of Desolation:  and the Desolation shall continue even to the consummation, and to the end.”(Daniel 9:27; emphasis added).

And they shall defile the Sanctuary of Strength, and shall take away the Continual Sacrifice, and they shall place there the Abomination unto desolation.” (Daniel  11:31; emphasis added).

N.B.: This Continual Sacrifice  is the Holy Sacrifice of the Catholic Traditional Mass which, before Synod Vatican 2, was Offered around the world, 24/7.  The Jews never had a  Continual Sacrifice around the world.

This Blasphemous Abomination was also Prophecized at the beginning of the last Century!  Jesus Christ and Our Blessed Mother warned all Catholics about this Blasphemous Abomination of Desolation!

In 1902 A.D. Jesus Christ Prophecized
A NEW “mass that contains words which are odious in My Sight”!

On Saturday, November 27, 1902, the 72nd anniversary of the Miraculous Medal Apparition [Saturday, November 27, 1830], Our Lord warned of the conspiracy of evil people which was already inventing a NEW liturgy - this was in 1902!!! - to replace the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass which He had PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted:
 
 

“I give you a warning. The disciples who are not of My Gospel are now working hard to remake, according to their ideas, and under the influence of the enemy of souls [Satan], a mass that contains words which are odious in My Sight. When the fatal hour arrives where the faith of My Priests are put to the test, it will be these texts that will be celebrated, in this second period.  The first period is the one of My Priesthood, existing since Me.

The second is the one of the persecution, when the enemies of the Faith and of Holy Religion will impose their formulas in the book of the second celebration. These infamous spirits are those who crucified me and are awaiting the kingdom of the New Messias.  Many of My holy Priests will refuse this book, sealed with the words of the abyss.  Unfortunately, amongst them are those who will accept it.”

This means that the UNCHANGEABLE Essence of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass Perfectly and Divinely Instituted by Jesus Christ, which are found in the Valid and Lawful Catholic Traditional Approved Ancient Mass Rites, most especially the Ancient Roman Rite, a.k.a. the Old Mass in Latin, was to be remade:  “according to their ideas, and under the influence of the enemy of souls [Satan], a mass [The NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae] that contains words which are odious in My Sight”.

This also means that there will in fact be Priests and Bishops who will use these texts, i.e. the texts found in the various missals of the various versions (e.g. Latin, Spanish, French, German, English, Polish, Italian, etc.) of the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae.

Historically, there is only ONE situation to which this prophecy can be applied and considered to have been fulfilled - the texts found in the various “missals” of the various versions (e.g. Latin, Spanish, French, German, English, Polish, Italian, etc.) of the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae.

Jesus Christ prophecized that not all Priests would accept the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae.  Catholic Priests and Bishops who are faithful to their Holy Vocation to the Holy Priesthood continue to offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as it is found in Missals printed in 1943 and earlier in what is called "Catacombs III which is to be found around the world!  They reject all other missals printed for use in the Roman Rite which were printed in 1944 and thereafter!

Jesus Christ tells everyone that the various “missals” of the various versions (e.g. Latin, Spanish, French, German, English, Polish, Italian, etc.) of the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae are sealed with the words of Hell, i.e. “of the abyss”.

Jesus Christ also prophecized that there would be Priests who would accept “this book, sealed with the words of the abyss”, which automatically also includes all of those missals printed in 1944, 1950, 1955, 1956, 1960, 1962, 1969, etc., etc.!

In summary, these prophecies of Jesus Christ totally fit the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae like a glove!!!  There is no other historical set of facts which perfectly and totally - 100% - fit these prophecies of Jesus Christ in 1902!

On Tuesday, May 10, 1904,
Our Lady described the NEW Clergy and their NEW liturgy:

“They will not stop on this hateful and sacrilegious road. They will go further to compromise all at once, and in one blow, the Holy Church, the Clergy, and the Faith of my children.”

She announced the dispersion of the pastors by the church herself:

true Pastors, who

will be replaced by others formed by Hell:”


“...NEW preachers of NEW sacraments,”


NEW temples


(From Catholic Traditional Baptisms
with ALL of the Exorcisms)

(to this Catholic farce:)


NEW baptisms,”


A NEW Theology Theologian Teaching HERESIES
To Catholics Who Are VERY Ignorant of Their Faith!!!
“NEW confraternities.”

These prophecies refer to the wholesale
“Spiritual slaughter”
of “the Holy Church, the Clergy, and the Faith of my children”.

This also refers to the fact that those Priests and Bishops who refused to accept and/or to use all of the anti-Catholic Satanic changes to the Mass and the Sacraments were kicked out - with no place to go and, apparently in some cases, without getting their pensions?!

Some of these Priests and Prelates quickly became the nucleus of the Clergy in Catacombs III and their courage and fortitude to continue to Offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, and to administer the Seven Sacraments, according to the Ancient Roman Rite, just as they had done before this CONVENTION of God-Haters and Catholic-Haters in Synod Vatican 2, all of which haters were/are guilty of Spiritual, Ecclesiastical, and Religious HATE CRIMES against Catholics!

JP-2’s Apostasy from the Catholic Faith
His Many Meetings with non-Catholics
In the Photographs Below


This is NOT Catholic!!!  -  This IS Apostasy!


Heresy of False Ecumenism
 

Heresy of Religious Indifferentism

These Heresies Mean
ALL Religions are the SAME!!
 



JP-2 Kissing the Pagan KORAN

JP-2’s vicious mockery and blasphemy of God, and of the Catholic Faith, and his vicious attacks against Catholics, because, BY HIS ACTIONS and by his Heresy of False Ecumenism, and by his blatant  Heresy of Religious Indifferentism.

JP-2 is de facto really telling Catholics that they
are DUMB and STUPID for being “Catholics”!!

WHY?  Because ALL people are “saved” anyway!!!!

WHY?  Because ALL Religions are the SAME!!!

Hence, JP-2’s heretical pernicious nonsense   about how Catholics are supposed to Respect Every Religion, which is the  Heresy of False Ecumenism, as well as the blatant  Heresy of Religious Indifferentismis totally contrary to the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church which are quoted above in the section:

JP-2’s Sermons - Respect Every Religion

It is a contradiction of terms to claim that any Heretic, including the automatically Excommunicated Heretic, Pope JP-2, can be canonized a “saint”.

This is especially true because JP-2 incurred the Censure of automatic Excommunication most probably “millions” of times during his 26 year reign of Satanic Hatred of everything “Catholic”.

This included JP-2:

1)  Breaking his Solemn Oaths.

2)  Preaching and teaching the OPPOSITE  of the UNCHANGEABLE  Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church - per the quotes on this web page.

3)  Protecting his Pedophile and Satanist clergy!!!

Remember, JP-2 permitted HIS Clergy to teach these Heresies:

God is NOT in the punishment business”!!!!
If it feels good, do it”!!!
Part of the “Job Description” of each Catholic Prelate and Priest is this:


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII

To block the “attacks of error and the deceits of heresy; to watch the tactics of the wicked who war against the Faith....; to unmask the plots and to reveal the ambushes and traps; they must warn naive people, strengthen those who are timid, and open the eyes of the blinded.”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Depuis Le Jour”, On the Education of the Clergy, Friday, September 8, 1899, ¶ 48, In Doctrina; emphasis added).

Below are 2 Versions of Satanic “masses”:


Satanic  “Black mass”

Satanic  NOR  - NEW - “White mass”

Similarities


Satanic  “Black mass”

1) 1 or more NUDE women.
2) Fake and phony anti-Catholic “mass”.
3) Blasphemy of the valid and lawful pre-1944 Catholic Traditional Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
4) Assistants who go along with this blasphemy.
5) Leader who performs anti-Catholic acts/ritual.
6) Worship Satan by means of this Satanic rite.


Satanic  NOR  - NEW - “White mass”

1) 1 or more NUDE women.
2) Fake and phony anti-Catholic “mass”.
3) Blasphemy of the valid and lawful pre-1944 Catholic Traditional Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
4) Assistants who go along with this blasphemy.
5) Leader who performs anti-Catholic acts/ritual.
6) Worship Satan by means of this Satanic rite.

Differences


Satanic  “Black mass”

1) Use of an altar instead of a table.
2) Fake and phony anti-Catholic “mass” usually done in private or in secret.
3) Do not pretend to use the valid and lawful Catholic Traditional Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
4) Assistants seem to be very happy to take part in, and to go along with, and even contribute to, this blasphemy.
5) Leader does not pretend to be anything he is not.
6) Leader has a validly consecrated Host to desecrate which was stolen by breaking into a Catholic Traditional Tabernacle.


Satanic  NOR  - NEW - “White mass”

1) Use of a table instead of an altar.
2) Fake and phony anti-Catholic “mass” done in public.
3) Pretend to use the valid and lawful Catholic Traditional Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
4) Assistants are required to go along with this blasphemy, despite the disgusted look on some of their faces.
5) Leader acts and pretends very hard to be very holy and pius.
6) Leader has no validly consecrated Host to desecrate because NOR NEW “mass” in invalid and illegal - it is NOT a valid Catholic Mass.

The Satanic “Black mass” is a Satanic rite that’s a mockery of the valid and lawful pre-1944 Catholic Traditional Mass, which Satanic rite is used to mock God - which is blasphemy - and to worship the devil.  This Satanic rite sometimes includes human sacrifice, obscenity, and blasphemy of horrific proportions.


Some Historical Objective Facts of Pope John Paul II’s Papacy


Part One: Some of the Things Pope JP-2 Said
JP-2’s General Audiences



JP-2, General Audience  Wednesday, July 21, 1999

Heaven

In the context of Revelation, we know that the “heaven” or “happiness” in which we will find ourselves is neither an abstraction nor a physical place in the clouds, but a living, personal relationship with the Holy Trinity. It is our meeting with the Father which takes place in the risen Christ through the communion of the Holy Spirit.”

It is always necessary to maintain a certain restraint in describing these “ultimate realities” since their depiction is always unsatisfactory. Today, personalist language is better suited to describing the state of happiness and peace we will enjoy in our definitive communion with God.”  (JP-2, General Audience, Wednesday, July 21, 1999, ¶ 4.)  http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1999/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_21071999_en.html

The Roman Catholic Church Infallibly Teaches:

What Is Heaven?

Heaven - From: The Bible

“Behold Heaven is the Lord's, thy God.” (Deuteronomy 10:14; emphasis added).

“For I know that my Redeemer liveth, and in the last day I shall rise out of the earth.  And I shall be clothed again with my skin, and in my flesh I shall see my God. Whom I myself shall see, and my eyes shall behold, and not another: this my hope is laid up in my bosom.” (Job 19:25-27; emphasis added).

(Commentary: This resurrection of the body is the prelude to one's eternal reward, either Heaven or Hell. The point is that Heaven is the reward of those who live a holy life of virtue and die in the state of Sanctifying Grace. The above verses 25-27 are Job's explicit belief in the Resurrection of the Body on the last day. The resurrected body will be totally complete, with all of its same original flesh which belongs to its own very same Soul. This Resurrection of the Body is by the power of God. The physical body of the flesh will be changed in quality, but not changed in substance. After this, every one receives one's judgement according to one's works in this life and goes to one's eternal reward - whether it is Heaven or it is Hell.)

“Thus saith the Lord: Heaven is My Throne” (Isaias 66:1; emphasis added).

“But I say to you not to swear at all, neither by Heaven, for it is the Throne of God: Nor by the earth, for it is His footstool” (Matthew 5:34-35; emphasis added).



Heaven - From:
An Infallible Roman Catholic Council
Infallible Œcumenical Council of Florence


Along with an Infallible Roman Catholic Pope
Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Eugene IV

15.  It [the Sacrosanct Roman Church, founded by the voice of our Lord and Savior] firmly believes, professes, and preaches that the Son of God, in His assumed humanity, was truly born of the Virgin, truly suffered, truly died and was buried, truly rose again from the dead, ascended  INTO  Heaven, and  SITS  AT  the right hand of the Father, and will come at the end of time to judge the living and the dead.

16. It[the Sacrosanct Roman Church, founded by the voice of our Lord and Savior], moreover, anathematizes, execrates, and condemns every Heresy that suggests contrary things” (The Infallible Œcumenical Council of Florence - The Seventeenth Œcumenical Council, The First Council of Basel, Ferrara, Florence [Monday, April 9, 1438 A.D. - Thursday, August 7, 1445 A.D.], along with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Eugene IV, Gabriele Condulmer [Thursday, March 3, 1431 - Tuesday, February 23, 1447], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Papal Bulla "Cantate Domino", The Papal Bulla of Union with the Copts, Session 11, Friday, February 4, 1442, ¶ 15, ¶ 16; emphasis added).


Heaven - From: Infallible Roman Catholic Popes


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Honorius III

“Let them strive, so that above all things they should desire to have the Spirit of the Lord and His holy operation, to pray always to Him with a pure heart and to be humble, patient in persecution and infirmity and to love those who persecute and correct and accuse us, because the Lord says, ‘Love your enemies, pray for those who persecute and calumniate you’ (Matthew 5:44). ‘Blessed are those who suffer persecution for justice’s sake, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven’ (Matthew 5:10). ‘He who has persevered until the end, however, will be saved’ (Matthew 10:22)”  (Infallible Roman Catholic  Pope Honorius III, Cencio Savelli [Monday, July 18, 1216 - Thursday, March 18, 1227], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Papal Bulla “Solet Annuere”, On the Rule of the Friars Minor, Sunday, November 29, 1226 A. D., Chapter X, On the Admonition and Correction of the Friars; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory IX

“8. Therefore, since the wondrous events of his glorious life are quite well known to Us because of the great familiarity he had with Us while We still occupied a lower rank, and since We are fully convinced by reliable witnesses of the many brilliant miracles, We and the flock entrusted to Us, by the mercy of God, are confident of being assisted at his intercession and of having IN  HEAVEN a patron whose friendship we enjoyed on earth” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory IX, Ugolino, Count of Segni [Friday, March 19, 1227 - Thursday, August 22, 1241], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Papal Bulla “Mira Circa Nos”, On the Canonization of Saint Francis of Assisi, ¶ 8, Sunday, July 16, 1228; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XII

“By this Constitution which is to remain in force FOREVER, We, with Apostolic Authority, define the following: ..... all these Souls, immediately (mox) after death and, in the case of those in need of purification, after the purification mentioned above, since the ascension of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ  INTO  HEAVEN, already before they take up their bodies again and before the general judgment, have been, are and will be with Christ IN  HEAVEN,  IN  THE  HEAVENLY  KINGDOM  AND PARADISE, joined to the company of the Holy Angels” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XII, Jacques Fournier [Monday, December 20, 1334 - Wednesday, April 25, 1342], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Apostolic Constitution “Benedictus Deus”, On the Beatific Vision of God, 1336 A.D.; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Eugene IV

15.  It [the Sacrosanct Roman Church, founded by the voice of our Lord and Savior] firmly believes, professes, and preaches that the Son of God, in His assumed humanity, was truly born of the Virgin, truly suffered, truly died and was buried, truly rose again from the dead, ascended  INTO  Heaven, and  SITS  AT  the right hand of the Father, and will come at the end of time to judge the living and the dead.

16. It[the Sacrosanct Roman Church, founded by the voice of our Lord and Savior], moreover, anathematizes, execrates, and condemns every Heresy that suggests contrary things” (The Infallible Œcumenical Council of Florence - The Seventeenth Œcumenical Council, The First Council of Basel, Ferrara, Florence [Monday, April 9, 1438 A.D. - Thursday, August 7, 1445 A.D.], along with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Eugene IV, Gabriele Condulmer [Thursday, March 3, 1431 - Tuesday, February 23, 1447], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Papal Bulla "Cantate Domino", The Papal Bulla of Union with the Copts, Session 11, Friday, February 4, 1442, ¶ 15, ¶ 16; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX

“To use the words of Chrysostom, Prayer is ‘the source, the root, and the Mother of innumerable good things. The power of prayer extinguishes the strength of fire, restrains the raging of lions, settles wars and fights, endures storms, escapes devils, OPENS  THE  DOORS  OF  HEAVEN, breaks the bonds of death, casts out diseases, repels injuries, and strengthens shattered cities’. (1. St. John Chrysostom, homily 15 on the incomprehensible nature of God against the Anomaei.)  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”, Urging Prayers for Peace, ¶ 3, Tuesday, August 1, 1854; emphasis added).

“Above all, We constantly call upon the Virgin Mary, the Immaculate Mother of God, who is the most suitable and most powerful intercessor with God and who is the mother of graces and mercies. Then We invoke the patronage of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul and of all the saints WHO  REIGN  WITH  CHRIST  IN  HEAVEN. Nothing should be more important, nothing more preferable to you than to exhort the faithful entrusted to your care so that they, daily more firm and immovable, may persist in the profession of the Catholic Faith; avoid the snares, lies, and deceptions of their enemies; advance more quickly in the ways of God's commandments; and carefully abstain from sin”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Apostolicæ Nostræ Caritatis”, Urging Prayers for Peace, ¶ 6, Tuesday, August 1, 1854; emphasis added).

“With a still more ardent zeal for piety, religion and love, let them continue to venerate, invoke and pray to the most Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God, conceived without Original Sin. Let them fly with utter confidence to this most sweet Mother of Mercy and Grace in all dangers, difficulties, needs, doubts and fears. Under her guidance, under her patronage, under her kindness and protection, nothing is to be feared; nothing is hopeless. Because, while bearing toward us a truly Motherly affection and having in her care the work of our salvation, she is solicitous about the whole human race. And since she has been appointed by God to be the QUEEN  OF  HEAVEN and earth, and is exalted above all the choirs of angels and saints, and even STANDS  AT  THE  RIGHT  HAND of her only-begotten Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, she presents our petitions in a most efficacious manner. What she asks, she obtains. Her pleas can never be unheard”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Apostolic Constitution “Ineffabilis Deus”, The Immaculate Conception, Friday, December 8, 1854; emphasis added).

“Let us seek likewise the intercession of the most holy Apostles, Peter and Paul, and of all THE  BLESSED  IN  HEAVEN, that with their efficacious prayers before God, they may implore mercy and graces for all and powerfully avert all adversities and dangers afflicting the Church everywhere and especially in Italy” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Quanto Conficiamur Moerore”, On Promotion of False Doctrines, ¶ 6, Monday, August 10, 1863; emphasis added).

“Let us also seek the suffrages of the Most Blessed Peter, Prince of the Apostles, and of Paul, his Fellow-Apostle, and of all THE  SAINTS  IN  HEAVEN, who having now become God's friends, HAVE  ARRIVED  AT  THE  HEAVENLY  KINGDOM, and being crowned bear their palms, and being secure of their own immortality are anxious for our salvation” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Quanta Cura”, Condemning Current Errors, ¶ 6, Thursday, December 8, 1864; emphasis added).

“Under their leadership, you will eagerly take up the task of diligently working for the cause of God, for the Church, and for the salvation of souls. You will strengthen the powers of the faithful who stand firm, assist the weakness of those who falter, and increase daily before God the merits which you have already attained by patience, constancy, and Priestly fortitude. The labors which those who act as ambassadors of Christ must sustain are very heavy at this time. But our trust should be placed in Him who has conquered the world. He helps those who labor in His name and rewards them with  A  CROWN  OF  UNFADING  GLORY  IN  HEAVEN” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Graves Ac Diuturnæ”, On the Church in Switzerland, ¶ 6, Tuesday, March 23, 1875; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII

“This being so, no further and fuller ‘manifestation and revelation of the Divine Spirit’ may be imagined or expected; for that which now takes place in the Church is the most perfect possible, and will last until that day when the Church herself, having passed through her militant career, shall be taken up  INTO  the joy of the Saints triumphing IN  HEAVEN” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Divinum Illud Munus”, On the Holy Ghost, ¶ 6, Sunday, May 9, 1897; emphasis added).

“What more divine, what more delightful, than to meditate and pray with the Angels? With what confidence may we not hope that those who on earth have united with the Angels in this ministry will one day enjoy their blessed company  IN  HEAVEN?” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Augustissimæ Virginis Mariæ”, On the Confraternity of the Holy Rosary, ¶ 10, Sunday, September 12, 1897; emphasis added).

“May they by these Virtues strive to honor God as they ought, and to win everlasting happiness  IN  HEAVEN” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Annum Sacrum”, On Consecration to the Sacred Heart, ¶ 9, Thursday, May 25, 1899; emphasis added).

“5. Therefore we earnestly exhort your faithful, although of various regions and tongues, to preserve that far more excellent kinship which is born from the communion of Faith and common Sacraments. For whoever are Baptized in Christ, have one Lord and one Faith; they are one body and one spirit, insofar as they are called to one Hope. It would be truly disgraceful that those who are bound together by so many holy ties and are seeking THE  SAME  CITY  IN  HEAVEN should be torn apart by earthly reasons, rivaling with one another, as the Apostle says, and hating one another” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Reputantiubus”, On the Language Question in Bohemia, ¶ 5, Tuesday, August 20, 1901; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X

Were some Modernist Heretics Inside the Vatican
Trying to Poison Pope Saint Pius X
As Rumor Has It?

“6. We begin, then, with the philosopher.Modernists place the foundation of religious philosophy in that doctrine which is commonly called Agnosticism. According to this teaching human reason is confined entirely within the field of phenomena, that is to say, to things that appear, and in the manner in which they appear: it has neither the right nor the power to overstep these limits. Hence it is incapable of lifting itself up to God, and of recognizing His existence, even by means of visible things. From this it is inferred that God can never be the direct object of science, and that, as regards history, He must not be considered as an historical subject. Given these premises, everyone will at once perceive what becomes of Natural Theology, of the motives of credibility, of external revelation. The Modernists simply sweep them entirely aside...”

“Yet it is a fixed and established principle among them that both science and history must be atheistic: and within their boundaries there is room for nothing but phenomena; God and all that is Divine are utterly excluded. We shall soon see clearly what, as a consequence of this most absurd teaching, must be held touching the most sacred Person of Christ, and the mysteries of His life and death, and of His Resurrection and Ascension  INTO  HEAVEN”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Pascendi Dominici Gregis”, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, ¶ 6, Sunday, September 8, 1907; emphasis added).

From: The Catechism of Pope St. Pius X

"39 Q. If Adam and Eve had not sinned, would they have bee exempt from death?"

"A. If Adam and Eve had not sinned and if they had remained faithful to God, they would, after a happy and tranquil sojourn here on earth, and without dying, have been transferred by God into Heaven, to enjoy a life of unending glory" (The First Article of the Creed, God the Father Almighty).

"3 Q. Why were not the Souls of the Holy Fathers admitted INTO  HEAVEN before the death of Jesus Christ?"

"A. The Souls of the Holy Fathers were not admitted INTO  HEAVEN before the death of Jesus Christ, because Heaven was closed by the sin of Adam, and it was but fitting that Jesus Christ, Who reopened it by His death, should be the first to enter it" (The Fifth Article of the Creed).

"1 Q. What are we taught in the Sixth Article: He ascended INTO HEAVEN, sitteth at the right hand of God, the Father Almighty?"

"A. The Sixth Article of the Creed teaches us that Jesus Christ, forty days after His Resurrection, ascended of Himself INTO HEAVEN in the sight of His Apostles; and that while as God He was equal to His Father in glory, as man He has been raised above all the Angels and Saints, and constituted Lord of all things" (The Sixth Article of the Creed).

"3 Q. Why did Jesus Christ ascend into Heaven?"

"A. Jesus Christ ascended INTO  HEAVEN: (1) To take possession of the Kingdom He had merited by His death; (2) To prepare the PLACE of our glory, and to be our Mediator and Advocate with the Father, (3) To send the Holy Ghost upon His Apostles."

"4 Q. Why is it said of Jesus Christ that He ascended, and of His Most Holy Mother that she was assumed, INTO HEAVEN?"

"A. It is said of Jesus Christ that He ascended INTO  HEAVEN, and of His Most Holy Mother that she was assumed, because, Jesus Christ, being Man-God, ascended INTO HEAVEN by His own power; but His Mother, being a creature, even though the greatest of all creatures, was taken up into Heaven by the power of God."

"5 Q. Explain the words: Sitteth at the right hand of God, the Father Almighty."

"A. The word SITTETH signifies the peaceful possession which Jesus Christ has of His glory; and the words: At the right hand of God, the Father Almighty, denote that He has a PLACE  OF  HONOR above all creatures" (The Sixth Article of the Creed; emphasis added).

"5 Q. WHERE are the members of the Church to be found?"

"A. The members of the Church are found partly IN  HEAVEN, forming the Church Triumphant; partly IN  PURGATORY, forming the Church Suffering; partly on earth, forming the Church Militant" " (The Ninth Article of the Creed, The Church in General; emphasis added).

"15 Q. What do we mean by the Kingdom of God?"

"A. By the Kingdom of God we mean a threefold spiritual Kingdom; that is, the reign of God in us, or the reign of grace; the reign of God on earth, or the Holy Catholic Church; and the reign of God IN  HEAVEN, or Paradise" (The Lord's Prayer, The Second Petition; emphasis added).

"18 Q. In the words: Thy Kingdom come, what do we ask regarding Heaven?"

"A. Regarding Heaven we beg to be one day admitted into that Paradise for which we were created and where we shall be perfectly happy" (The Lord's Prayer, The Second Petition; emphasis added).

"19 Q. What do we ask in the Third Petition: 'Thy will be done on earth as it is IN HEAVEN?'"

"A. In the Third Petition: 'Thy will be done on earth as it is IN  HEAVEN', we beg the Grace to do the will of God in all things by obeying His Commandments as promptly as the Angels and Saints obey Him IN  HEAVEN; and we also beg the Grace to correspond to Divine Inspirations and to live resigned to the Will of God should He send us tribulations" (The Lord's Prayer, The Third Petition; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI

“Should any man dare, in sacrilegious disregard of the essential differences between God and His creature, between the God-man and the children of man, to place a mortal, were he the greatest of all times, by the side of, or over, or against, Christ, he would deserve to be called PROPHET OF NOTHINGNESS, to whom the terrifying words of Scripture would be applicable: ‘HE  THAT  DWELLETH  IN  HEAVEN  shall laugh at them’ (Psalm ii. 3)”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI, Achille Ratti [Monday, February 6, 1922 - Friday, February 10, 1939], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Mit Brennender Sorge”, On the Church and the German Reich, ¶ 17, Sunday, March 14, 1937; emphasis added).


The Roman Catholic Church Teaches

Heaven - From: Roman Catholic Traditional Books

From: The Roman Catechism

"God, then, in order to lift up the minds of men to contemplate His infinite power and majesty, which are so preeminently visible in the work of the heavens, declares in Sacred Scripture that Heaven is His dwelling-place" ("The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests", a.k.a. "The Roman Catechism", translated circa 1923 by Father John A. McHugh, O. P. and Father Charles J. Callan, O. P., PART IV: THE LORD'S PRAYER, Opening Words of the Lord's Prayer, "Our Father Who art in Heaven", "Who art in Heaven", Meaning Of These Words, p. 305; emphasis added).

From: Baltimore Catechism No. 3

Q. 1149. Why must we serve God in the form of religion He has instituted and in no other?

A. We must serve God in the form of religion He has instituted and in no other, because Heaven is not a right, but a promised reward, a free gift of God, which we must merit in the manner He directs and pleases.

Q. 1396. In what does the happiness IN HEAVEN consist?

A. The happiness IN HEAVEN consists in seeing the beauty of God, in knowing Him as He is, and in having every desire fully satisfied.

Q. 1397. What does St. Paul say of Heaven?

A. St. Paul says of Heaven, "That eye hath not seen. nor ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart of man WHAT THINGS God hath prepared for them that love Him." (1 Corinthians 2:9.)

Q. 1398. Are the rewards IN HEAVEN and the punishments IN HELL the same for all who enter into either of these states?

A. The rewards of Heaven and the punishments IN HELL are not the same for all who enter into either of these states, because each one's reward or punishment is in proportion to the amount of good or evil he has done in this world. But as Heaven and Hell are everlasting, each one will enjoy his reward or suffer his punishment forever.

From: An Explanation Of the Baltimore Catechism

"'Who art IN HEAVEN.' The Catechism says 'God is everywhere'. Why then do we say, 'Who art IN HEAVEN,' as if He were no PLACE else? We say so to remind us, 1st, that Heaven is our true home, and that this world is only a strange land in which we are staying for a while to do the work that God wishes us to do here, and then return to our own home; 2nd, that IN HEAVEN we shall see God face to face and as He is; 3rd, that Heaven is the PLACE where God will be for all eternity with the Blessed" (Father Thomas L. Kinkead, "An Explanation Of the Baltimore Catechism", Benziger Brothers, Imprimatur Michael Augustine, Archbishop of New York, New York, September 5, 1891, Prayers, The Lord's Prayer, p.11; emphasis added).

"51 Q. Is original sin the only kind of sin?"

"A. Original Sin is not the only kind of sin; there is another kind of sin which we commit ourselves, called actual sin."

"Sin is first or chiefly divided into original and actual ; that is, into the sin we inherit from our first parents and the sin we commit ourselves. We may commit 'actual' sin in two ways; either by doing what we should not do stealing, for example and thus we have a sin of commission, that is, a bad act committed; or by not doing what we should do not hearing Mass on Sunday, for example and thus we have a sin of omission, that is, a good act omitted. So it is not enough to simply do no harm, we must also do some good. Heaven is a reward, and we must do something to merit it" (Father Thomas L. Kinkead, "An Explanation Of the Baltimore Catechism", Lesson Sixth, On Sin and its Kinds, 51 Q. Is Original Sin the only kind of sin?, p.67; emphasis added).

"The Blessed Virgin lived on earth about eleven years after the Ascension of Our Lord. They buried her in a tomb, and Tradition tells us that after her burial the Angels carried her body to Heaven, WHERE she now sits beside her Divine Son. This taking of her body to Heaven is called the Assumption. This feast was celebrated in the Church from a very early age. A very strong proof of the Assumption is that no persons ever claimed to have any part of the body of the Blessed Virgin as a relic" (Father Thomas L. Kinkead, "An Explanation Of the Baltimore Catechism", Lesson Twenty-Seventh, On the Sacramentals, 302 Q. Are there any other Sacramentals besides the Sign of the Cross and Holy Water?, p.273; emphasis added).

"420 Q. What is Heaven?"

"A. Heaven is the... most delightful PLACE we could possibly imagine as Heaven would not be near what it really is. Everything that is good is there and forever, and we shall never tire of its joys. All the pleasures and beauties of earth are as nothing compared with Heaven; and though we think we can imagine its beauty and happiness now, we shall see how far we have been from the real truth if ever we reach this Heavenly HOME. 'God face to face' that is, as He is.... Now, to see God in heaven we need a special light, which is called the 'light of glory.' God Himself gives us this light and thus enables us to see Him as He is. This Beautiful Vision of God IN HEAVEN is called the 'Beatific Vision,' and thus our whole life IN HEAVEN our joy and happiness consists in the enjoyment of the BEATIFIC VISION" (Father Thomas L. Kinkead, "An Explanation Of the Baltimore Catechism", Lesson Thirty-Seventh, On the Last Judgment and the Resurrection, Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven, 420 Q. What is Heaven?, pp.355-356; emphasis added).

From: The Catechetical Instructions of St. Thomas Aquinas

"The Ascension of Christ INTO  HEAVEN is in accord with reason:"

"(1) because Heaven was due to Christ by His very nature. It is natural for one to return to that PLACE from whence he takes his origin. The beginning of Christ is from God, who is above all things: 'I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again I leave the world, and I go to the Father' (John 16:28). 'And no man hath  ASCENDED  INTO  HEAVEN, but He that DESCENDED  FROM  Heaven, the Son of man Who is IN Heaven.' (John 3:13). The Just ascend  INTO  HEAVEN, but not in the manner that Christ ascended, i.e., by His own power; for they are taken up by Christ: 'Draw me, we will run after Thee' (Canticle, 1:3). Or, indeed, we can say that no man but Christ has ascended INTO  HEAVEN, because the Just do not ascend except in so far as they are the members of Christ who is the head of the Church. 'Wheresoever the body shall be, there shall the eagles also be gathered together' (Matthew, 24:28)." ("The Catechetical Instructions of St. Thomas Aquinas", Translated with a Commentary by Rev. Joseph B. Collins, S.S., D.D., Ph.D., Introduction by Rev. Rudolph G. Bandas, Ph.D., S.T.D. et M., Nihil Obstat: E. A. Connolly, S.S., J.C.D, Censor Deputatus, Imprimatur: Most Reverend Michael J. Curley, D.D., Archbishop of Baltimore, Baltimore, February 9, 1939, The Apostles' Creed, The Sixth Article, The Reasonableness of the Ascension; emphasis added).

From: Ecclesiastical Dictionary

"Heaven is the Kingdom far 'above all heavens' (Ephes. iv. 10), where our happiness is complete and eternal, in the contemplation of God by the BEATIFIC VISION, the ever enduring union with our Saviour, and the joy which results therefrom: thus completing our heavenly happiness in this triple recompense of the three theological virtues, of which the one that is everlasting IN HEAVEN is charity. Faith, which we possess on earth, is the steadfast belief of beholding God, cannot have place in paradise, when there we see what we have here believed without seeing. Likewise the hope we experience in this world, that causes us to await with patience and confidence the realization of our Redeemer's promises, disappears, when we possess that for which we have hoped. Charity alone remains, to become more and more perfect, and more like the charity of Him who is ever merciful, and ever great in His love for all mankind" (Father John Thein, "Ecclesiastical Dictionary", Benziger Brothers, New York, Cincinnati, Chicago, 1900, "Heaven", pp. 328d-329-a; emphasis added).

The Beatific Vision

From: Ecclesiastical Dictionary

"Beatific Vision [is what ] we call the vision by which the Blessed see God IN  HEAVEN. Some heretics have pretended that man, through the sole power of nature, can arrive at the intuitive vision of God; this error has been condemned by the Council of Vienne [1311 A.D.]."

"It is evident, indeed, that for the meritorious works, which are the means of salvation, man is in need of grace, with much more reason is he in need of supernatural help for salvation itself, which is in itself nothing but the Beatific Vision."

"The Church teaches that the Just, who are free from all sin and all punishment due to sin, enjoy the Beatific Vision immediately after death. Pope John XXII had, speaking in his personal name and as individual doctor, taught that, until the day of resurrection, the Souls would not see the Face of God, and that the Blessed enjoy only the vision of the humanity of Christ. If he did not teach this, as received doctrine, in the Latin Church, it was at least his desire, that this opinion should be considered as problematical. But he never decided anything about the subject, and, at the approach of death, he retracted all he might have said and believed about the question."

"This doctrine, borrowed from the Greeks, and which apparently could not be reconciled with that of the Invocation of Saints, excited the minds a good deal. The Paris University declared it erroneous; twenty four theologians of the theological faculty of Paris, assembled by King Philip the Fair, decided that the Souls of the Blessed are admitted to a Clear, Intuitive, Beatific, and Immediate Vision of the Divine Essence, a Vision which the Apostle calls 'face to face'.

"The Council of Trent confirmed these decisions."

"In what does the Intuitive Vision consist?"

"It is not an ideal representation of the Deity, such as we have in this life, but an immediate manifestation which God makes of Himself to the Blessed. St. Paul speaks of this vision when he says:

"'We see now through a glass in a dark manner; but then face to face' (1 Cor. xiii. 12)."

"And we read in the Gospel: 'The Angels in Heaven always see the face of My Father Who is IN HEAVEN' (Matt, xviii. 10)."

"Moreover, the theologians say that the Blessed see all things in the Word, as in a (concentric) looking-glass wherein all things reflect themselves, for it is in His Word that God has the ideas of all things. The Beatific Vision is not for all alike:

"'There are several mansions IN  the House of My Father', says our Lord (John xiv. 2)."

"And the Apostle says:

"'One star differs in brightness from another star' (1 Cor. xiv. 41)."

"This vision, although intuitive, will not, on this account, be completive, that is, the created Spirit, although assisted by the light of glory, will nevertheless not be capable of embracing the whole extent of the Divine Essence, and the creature is essentially limited."

"Although it is not absolutely repugnant that God may grant, in the present life, to a man, the Beatific Vision, nevertheless, theologians generally agree that God never did grant this to any creature" (Father John Thein, "Ecclesiastical Dictionary", "Beatific Vision", pp. 705d - 706a-b, Benziger Brothers, New York, Cincinnati, Chicago, 1900).

From: Christ the Savior

"As stated in this last citation, this doctrine of the permanence of the Gifts [of God the Holy Ghost] IN  HEAVEN is affirmed by St. Ambrose, [Footnote: 904. De Spiritu Sancto, Bk. I, chap. I.] and the reason is that the Gifts of the Holy Ghost perfect the human mind to follow the prompting of the Holy Ghost, which is especially the case IN  HEAVEN. But IN  HEAVEN, evil and temptation being no more, by the Gifts of the Holy Ghost we are perfected in good, not entirely as regards the same material object but the Gifts will preserve in us intact the same formal objects both quo and quod of the Virtues by which latter they are specified; for as theologians in Heaven will see the object of theology, either in the Word if in this life they studied it out of love for God, or outside the Word; so also all the Blessed in Heaven will receive special inspirations from the Holy Ghost to know something special by means of experimental knowledge, according as it is connaturally related to Divine things, for instance, to know for what wayfarers they must especially pray. The BEATIFIC  VISION precedes BEATIFIC LOVE, whereas the knowledge obtained by the Gifts follows this Love. Finally, there is neither succession in knowledge nor acquisition of anything new, whereas by the Gifts it is possible for the Blessed to acquire additional knowledge" (Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., "Christ the Savior", A Commentary on the Third Part of St. Thomas' Theological Summa, The Third Part of St Thomas' Theological Summa, Chapter IX: Question 7: The Things Co-assumed the Grace of Christ, Fifth Article: Whether In Christ There Were The Gifts, Reply to third objection).

The Beatific Vision of God and the State of Grace on Earth

From: God the Author of Nature and the Supernatural, A Dogmatic Treatise

"By the State of Grace here on earth (in statu viæ) we understand the aggregate of those Divine Gifts which aid man in immediately preparing for, and attaining to, his supernatural end, i.e., the BEATIFIC VISION. Besides Sanctifying Grace with all its prerogatives, the State of Grace, therefore, also includes Actual Grace. The supernatural character of the BEATIFIC VISION as vouchsafed to existing rational creatures IN  HEAVENIS  A  DOGMA; with regard to purely possible and creatable beings it may be set down as a theological conclusion."

"a) From this teaching the supernatural character of the State of Grace in statu viæ is a necessary inference. The State of Grace on earth is related to the BEATIFIC VISION IN HEAVEN as a means to an end. Since a means must always be duly proportioned to its end, a supernatural end can not be attained by purely natural, or even preternatural, means."

"It is not quite correct, theologically, to distinguish between BEATIFIC VISION IN  HEAVEN and the State of Grace on earth as though they were separated by an abyss, and to contemplate them merely in their relation of end and means. Glory and Grace are far more intimately related. The character of Divine Sonship conferred by both constitutes a common note which puts them on the same essential level and separates the State of Grace on earth from the BEATIFIC VISION IN  HEAVEN merely after the manner of what is imperfect from what is perfect."

"St. Paul describes the endowment of Grace which God grants to man on earth as an heirship of adopted children, while the State of Grace which He bestows on man IN  HEAVEN resembles an heir s taking possession of his inheritance (Romans 8:17, sqq.). Elsewhere (Ephesians 1:14) the same Apostle refers to the State of Grace on earth as 'the pledge of our inheritance, unto the redemption of acquisition, unto the praise of his glory'."

"But if the Divine Sonship which we are vouchsafed here below is of the same specific nature as that which God grants to the Elect IN  HEAVEN, both states must be as strictly supernatural in their essence as the visio  beatifica  itself. And what is true of Divine Sonship, must be equally true of Sanctifying Grace and of the Theological Virtue of Charity, which, like Divine Sonship, endures unchanged IN  HEAVEN, whereas Hope becomes possession and Faith gives way to intuition through the lumen gloriæ. The necessity of the lumen gloriæ as a means of attaining to the BEATIFIC VISION of God furnishes another proof for the strictly supernatural character of that vision" (Rt. Rev. Msgr. Joseph Pohle, Ph.D., D.D., "God the Author of Nature and the Supernatural, A Dogmatic Treatise", Adapted and Edited by Arthur Preuss, Dogmatic Theology, Volume III, B. Herder Book Co. St. Louis, Mo., 1919, Imprimatur, Sti. Ludovici, die 5. Aug. 1919, Joannes J. Glennon. Archiepiscopus Sti. Ludovici, Third edition, 1919, Part II, Creation Passively Considered, or the Created Universe, Chapter II, Dogmatic Anthropology, Section 2, The Supernatural in Man, Article I, Nature and the Supernatural, B. The Prerogatives. That Constitute the Super natural Order, Thesis I: There are two gifts of God which are Supernatural in the strict sense, and therefore belong to the Divine Order, namely, Beatific Vision and the State of Grace, pp. 191-192; emphasis added).

Empyrean Heaven

From: The Summa Theologica

"Four things are stated to be created together---viz. the Empyrean Heaven, corporeal matter, by which is meant the earth, time, and the Angelic nature" (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, "Summa Theologica," Part I, Question 46, Article 3, Body).

"I answer that, As was observed (A[3]), the universe is made up of corporeal and Spiritual creatures. Consequently Spiritual creatures were so created as to bear some relationship to the corporeal creature, and to rule over every corporeal creature. Hence it was fitting for the Angels to be created in the highest corporeal place, as presiding over all corporeal nature; whether it be styled the Empyrean Heaven, or whatever else it be called. So Isidore says that the Highest Heaven is the Heaven of the Angels, explaining the passage of Dt. 10:14: 'Behold Heaven is the Lord's thy God, and the Heaven of Heaven'" (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.,"Summa Theologica," Part I, Question 61, Article 4, Body).

"PLACE is implied as existing in the Empyrean Heaven, this being the boundary of the universe. And since PLACE has reference to things permanent, it was created at once in its totality. But time, as not being permanent, was created in its beginning: even as actually we cannot lay hold of any part of time save the 'now'." (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., "Summa Theologica," Part I, Question 66, Article 4, Reply to Objection 5).

From: Catechism of the Summa Theologica of
Saint Thomas Aquinas For the Use of the Faithful

"What is the locality where the Angels were created called? We call it Heaven simply, and sometimes the Empyrean Heaven (LXI. 4)."

"What does the Empyrean Heaven mean? It means a place full of glory and splendour which is the most beautiful part of the corporal world (ibid.)."

"Is the Empyrean Heaven the same as the Heaven of the Blessed? Yes (ibid. Obj. 3)" P. Thomas Pegues, O.P., "Catechism of the 'Summa Theologica' of Saint Thomas Aquinas For the Use of the Faithful," IX. Of the Creation of the Angels, p. 19, Benziger Brothers, New York, Cincinnati, Chicago, 1922).

In Summary

From: The New Catholic Dictionary

"Heaven (A.-S., heofon). In Holy Writ the term Heaven is used to designate the DWELLING-PLACE of God, His angels, and saints, as well as their happiness, and is called the kingdom of heaven (Matt., 5), the kingdom of God (Mark, 9), the kingdom of Christ (Luke, 22), the house of the Father (John, 14), the city of God, the heavenly Jerusalem (Heb., 12), the holy place (Heb., 9), paradise (2 Cor., 12), life everlasting (Matt., 19), the joy of the Lord (Matt., 25), crown of life (James, 1), crown of justice (2 Tim., 4), crown of glory (1 Peter, 5), eternal inheritance (Heb., 9)."

"The existence of heaven is denied by atheists, materialists, pantheists, and those rationalists who deny the existence of God and the immortality of the soul. Reason proves that God in His infinite wisdom and justice must give virtue its due reward."

"Experience teaches that the Just do not receive an adequate reward here, since evil often triumphs over good. Hence there must be an eternal recompense hereafter for the soul which is immortal. The supernatural beatitude of heaven fundamentally consists in the intuitive vision of God, i.e., the seeing of God face to face and in experiencing perfect happiness through this BEATIFIC VISION."

"Texts of Holy Writ, such as, 'I will be thy reward exceeding great', 'I shall be satisfied when Thy glory appeareth', prove that God, the Supreme Author of creation, will be the object of the creature's eternal delight."

"Finally, such texts as: 'IN  My  Father's  HOUSE  there are many  MANSIONS' (John, 14), 'Each shall receive his own reward according to his own toil' (1 Cor., 3), indicate that there are various degrees of happiness among the blessed. --C.E.; Pohle-Preuss, Eschatology, St. L., 1924; Delloue, tr. Leahy, Solution of the Great Problem, N. Y., 1917" (Conde B. Pallen, Ph.D., LL.D., John J. Wynne, S.J., S.T.D., et alii, "The New Catholic Dictionary", 1929, Imprimatur, Patrick Cardinal Hayes, Tuesday, October 1, 1929,Heaven, pp. 433d - 434a; emphasis added).

Is Heaven a Place?

1. Heaven is a PLACE

"For thus saith the High and the Eminent [God] that inhabiteth eternity: and His name is Holy, Who dwelleth in the High and HOLY PLACE [Heaven]...." (Isaias 57:15; emphasis added).

"In My Father's HOUSE there are MANY MANSIONS. If not, I would have told you: because I go to prepare A  PLACE for you. And if I shall go, and prepare A PLACE for you, I will come again, and will take you to myself; that where I am, you also may be. And where I go you know, and the way you know" (John 14:2-4; emphasis added).

"For Jesus is not entered into the holies [Greek: "hagion" - holy place] made with hands, the patterns of the true [Greek: "ale¯thinos Hagion" - True Holy PLACE, i.e. Heaven]: but INTO Heaven itself [Heaven itself is the pattern of the true - Greek: "ale¯thinos Hagion" - (Heaven) - the True Holy PLACE], that He may appear now in the presence of God for us" (Hebrews 9:24).

2. FROM HEAVEN

"And behold a Voice FROM HEAVEN, saying: 'This is My beloved Son, in Whom I am well pleased'" (Matthew 3:17; emphasis added).

"And behold there was a great earthquake. For an Angel of the Lord descended FROM HEAVEN, and coming, rolled back the stone, and sat upon it" (Matthew 28:2; emphasis added).

"If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father FROM HEAVEN give the good Spirit to them that ask Him?" (Luke 11:13; emphasis added).

"For the bread of God is that which cometh down FROM HEAVEN, and giveth life to the world" (John 6:33; emphasis added).

"Because I came down FROM HEAVEN, not to do My own will, but the will of Him that sent Me" (John 6:38; emphasis added).

"I am the living bread which came down FROM HEAVEN" (John 6:51; emphasis added).

"The Holy Ghost being sent down FROM HEAVEN, on Whom the Angels desire to look" (1 Peter 1:12; emphasis added).

"And after three days and a half, the spirit of life from God entered into them. And they stood upon their feet, and great fear fell upon them that saw them. And they heard a Great Voice FROM HEAVEN, saying to them: Come up hither. And they went up to Heaven in a cloud: and their enemies saw them" (Apocalypse 11:11-12; emphasis added).

3. IN HEAVEN

"The Lord hath prepared His Throne IN HEAVEN: and His Kingdom shall rule over all" (Psalm 102:19).

"Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great IN HEAVEN" (Matthew 5:12; emphasis added).

"So let your light shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father Who is IN HEAVEN" (Matthew 5:16; emphasis added).

"That you may be the children of your Father Who is IN HEAVEN" (Matthew 5:45 emphasis added).

"Take heed that you do not your justice before men, to be seen by them: otherwise you shall not have a reward of your Father Who is IN HEAVEN" (Matthew 6:1 emphasis added).

"Thus therefore shall you pray: Our Father Who art IN HEAVEN, Hallowed be Thy Name. Thy Kingdom come. Thy will be done on earth as it is IN HEAVEN" (Matthew 6:9-10; emphasis added).

"But lay up to yourselves treasures IN HEAVEN: where neither the rust nor moth doth consume, and where thieves do not break through, nor steal" (Matthew 6:20; emphasis added).

"If you then being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children: how much more will your Father Who is IN HEAVEN, give good things to them that ask Him?" (Matthew 7:11; emphasis added).

"Not every one that saith to Me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven: but he that doth the will of My Father Who is IN HEAVEN, he shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven" (Matthew 7:21; emphasis added).

"Every one therefore that shall confess Me before men, I will also confess him before My Father Who is IN HEAVEN. But he that shall deny Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father Who is IN HEAVEN" (Matthew 10:32-33; emphasis added).

"And Jesus answering, said to him: Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but My Father Who is IN HEAVEN" (Matthew 16:17; emphasis added).

"And I will give to thee the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also IN HEAVEN: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also IN HEAVEN"(Matthew 16:19; emphasis added).

"See that you despise not one of these little ones: for I say to you, that their Angels IN HEAVEN always see the Face of My Father Who is IN HEAVEN" (Matthew 18:10; emphasis added).

"Even so it is not the will of your Father, Who is IN HEAVEN, that one of these little ones should perish" (Matthew 18:14; emphasis added).

"Amen I say to you, whatsoever you shall bind upon earth, shall be bound also IN HEAVEN; and whatsoever you shall loose upon earth, shall be loosed also IN HEAVEN. Again I say to you, that if two of you shall consent upon earth, concerning any thing whatsoever they shall ask, it shall be done to them by My Father Who is IN HEAVEN" (Matthew 18:18-19; emphasis added).

"Jesus saith to him: If thou wilt be perfect, go sell what thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure IN HEAVEN: and come follow Me" (Matthew 19:21; emphasis added).

"For in the Resurrection [of the Body] they shall neither marry nor be married; but shall be as the Angels of God IN HEAVEN. And concerning the Resurrection of the Dead...." (Matthew 22:30-31; emphasis added).

"But yet rejoice not in this, that spirits are subject unto you; but rejoice in this, that your names are written IN HEAVEN" (Luke 10:20; emphasis added).

"Fear not, little flock, for it hath pleased your Father to give you a kingdom. Sell what you possess and give alms. Make to yourselves bags which grow not old, a treasure IN HEAVEN which faileth not: where no thief approacheth, nor moth corrupteth" (Luke 12:32-33; emphasis added).

"And no man hath ascended into Heaven, but He that descended from Heaven, the Son of man who is IN HEAVEN" (John 3:13; emphasis added).

"For we know, if our earthly house of this habitation be dissolved, that we have a building of God, a house not made with hands, eternal IN HEAVEN" (2 Corinthians 5:1; emphasis added).

"Unto an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that can not fade, reserved IN HEAVEN for you" (1 Peter 1:4; emphasis added).

"And there are Three who give testimony IN HEAVEN, the Father, the Word [Christ], and the Holy Ghost. And these Three [Persons] are One [God]" (1 John 5:7; emphasis added).

"And immediately I was in the spirit: and behold there was a Throne set IN HEAVEN, and upon the Throne One sitting" .... The Four and Twenty Ancients fell down before Him that sitteth on the Throne, and adored Him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the Throne, saying: Thou art worthy, O Lord our God, to receive glory, and honour, and power: because Thou hast created all things; and for Thy will they were, and have been created" (Apocalypse 4:2; 4:10-11; emphasis added).

"After these things I heard as it were the voice of much people IN HEAVEN, saying: Alleluia. Salvation, and glory, and power is to our God" (Apocalypse 19:1; emphasis added).

"On the contrary, It is written (2 Cor. 5:1): 'If our earthly house of this habitation be dissolved, that we have . . . a house not made with hands, but reserved in heaven [*Vulg.: 'eternal in heaven'; cf. 1 Pt. 1:4].' Therefore, after the body's dissolution, the Soul has an abode, which had been reserved for it IN HEAVEN" (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., "Summa Theologica", Supplement, Question 69, Article 2, On the Contrary).

"All this is but one side of the story of what death begins. Uncomfortable as the Truth may be, the fact is that there is a hell as well as a heaven, that death not only begins an eternal life, it also begins an eternal death; there is not only adequate reward, there is also adequate punishment. We have it on the authority of the infallible word of God that there is a hell and that in that hell devils and men who die in mortal sin are punished eternally. This, you understand, is not something submitted for the judgment of our individual taste; it will not do to decide that we shall accept some of the Truths of revelation -- pleasant Truths like grace, the Incarnation, the sacraments, and heaven -- and reject one that is particularly displeasing. To reject any one is to reject them all, for it is to reject the reason for accepting any one of them, namely, the infallible veracity of the God Who has revealed them all" (Walter Farrell, O.P., "A Companion to the Summa", Volume 4, Chapter XX, Eternal Beginnings).

4. KINGDOM OF HEAVEN

"And I say to you that many shall come from the East and the West, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob in the KINGDOM OF HEAVEN: But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into the exterior darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth"(Matthew 8:11-12; emphasis added).

"Then Jesus said to His Disciples: Amen, I say to you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. And again I say to you: It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the KINGDOM OF HEAVEN" (Matthew 19:23-24; emphasis added).

5. UP TO HEAVEN

"And thou Capharnaum, shalt thou be exalted UP TO HEAVEN?  thou shalt go down even unto Hell" (Matthew 11:23; emphasis added).

"And it came to pass, whilst He Blessed them, He departed from them, and was carried UP TO HEAVEN" (Luke 24:51; emphasis added).

"And while they were beholding Him going UP TO HEAVEN, behold two men stood by them in white garments. Who also said: Ye men of Galilee, why stand you looking UP TO HEAVEN? This Jesus Who is taken up from you into Heaven, shall so come, as you have seen Him going into Heaven" (Acts 1:10-11; emphasis added).


6. THRONE OF GOD

"But I say to you not to swear at all, neither by Heaven, for it is the THRONE OF GOD: Nor by the earth, for it is His footstool" (Matthew 5:34-35; emphasis added).

"And he that sweareth by Heaven, sweareth by the THRONE OF GOD, and by Him that sitteth thereon" (Matthew 23:22; emphasis added).

"And another Angel came, and stood before the Altar, having a Golden Censer; and there was given to him much Incense, that he should offer of the Prayers of all Saints upon the Golden Altar, which is before the THRONE OF GOD" (Apocalypse 8:3; emphasis added).

"And the sixth angel sounded the trumpet: and I heard a voice from the Four Horns of the Great Altar, which is before the eyes of God" (Apocalypse 9:13; emphasis added).

"We humbly beseech Thee, Almighty God, command these offerings to be carried by the hands of Thy Holy Angel to THY ALTAR ON HIGH, IN THE SIGHT OF THY DIVINE MAJESTY, so that as many of us as shall, by partaking at this Altar, receive the Most Sacred Body and Blood of Thy Son, may be filled with every Heavenly Blessing and Grace. Through the same Christ our Lord. Amen." (1943 Edition of the Missale Romanum, Prayer Supplices Te Rogamus).

"The Deacon on festival days dismisses the people at the end of the Mass, by saying: Ite, [Go,] Missa est, that is, the Victim [of the Mass, i.e. God the Son, Jesus Christ] has been sent [Missa est] to God [the Father] through the Angel, so that it may be accepted by God [the Father]" (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P. [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part III, Question 83, Article 4, Reply to Objection 9).

In other words, the most correct translation of Ite, Missa est in English is:

"Go [Ite], the Infinite, Divine Victim of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, God the Son, Jesus Christ, has been sent [Missa est] to God the Father by the hands of His Holy Angel, Saint Michael the Archangel, and placed 'upon the Golden Altar, which is before the THRONE OF GOD' the Father in Heaven, so that the Infinite, Perfect Victim on the Golden Altar, may be accepted by God the Father."
"Thus saith the Lord: Heaven is My Throne" (Isaias 66:1; emphasis added).

"But I say to you not to swear at all, neither by Heaven, for it is the Throne of God: Nor by the earth, for it is His footstool" (Matthew 5:34-35; emphasis added).


7. INTO HEAVEN

"And the Lord Jesus, after He had spoken to them, was taken up INTO HEAVEN, and sitteth at the right hand of God" (Mark 16:19; emphasis added).

"For Jesus is not entered into the holies made with hands, the patterns of the True: but INTO HEAVEN itself, that He may appear now in the presence of God for us" (Hebrews 9:24; emphasis added).

"....being gone INTO HEAVEN" (1 Peter 3:22; emphasis added).

Commentaries

The Catholic Laity should not be fearful of what the Roman Catholic Church has taught down through almost 20 centuries. On the contrary, the Catholic Laity need to have at least a basic knowledge and understanding of their Catholic Faith so that no one can "rob" them of their precious patrimony, whether by lies, falsehoods, fallacies, and/or heresies.

Back in 1947, Francis (Frank) J. Sheed tried to encourage the Catholic Laity of his day to do this. This timely and opportune advice is still as true today as it was in 1947 - only even more so! Here is a brief excerpt of what he wrote. Please keep in mind, this was written in the "Forward" to his then newly published book:

"This book contains theology, not the great mass of it that theologians need, but the indispensable minimum that every man needs in order that he may be living mentally in the REAL WORLD - which is what the word SANITY means in my title."

"Sanity, remember, does not mean living in the same world as everyone else; it means living in the real world. But some of the most important elements in the real world can be known only by the revelation of God, which it is theology's business to study."

"LACKING THIS KNOWLEDGE, THE MIND MUST LIVE A HALF-BLIND LIFE, TRYING TO COPE WITH A REALITY MOST OF WHICH IT DOES NOT KNOW IS THERE.This is a wretched state for an immortal spirit, and pretty certain to lead to disaster. THERE IS A GOOD DEAL OF DISASTER AROUND AT THIS MOMENT. F. J. S." (Frank J. Sheed, "Theology and Sanity", Forward, page V).

The "disaster" of which he wrote is much worse today than it was in 1947. Hopefully, this web page, with prayerful reading, will help everyone who reads this web page.

Today, the Catholic Laity must not blindly pick and choose what to read in print (e.g. magazine articles, books, internet web pages) or what to hear (e.g. audio tapes, audio CD's and DVD's) and what to watch (e.g. audio/video movies, CD's, and DVD's), because the Moral, Doctrinal, Spiritual, Philosophical, and Theological deadly "black plague" of a NEW Theology has been let loose upon the unprepared Catholic Laity - which too often becomes its victims - which said Moral, Doctrinal, Spiritual, Philosophical, and Theological deadly "black plague" is called by such names as "Nouvelle Théologie", the NEW Theology, "neo-Modernism", etc., etc.

Commentary on 6. Throne of God

The THRONE OF GOD denotes a certain PLACE - which is HEAVEN - of WHERE the THRONE is to be found. The THRONE OF GOD is also a certain THING that God "sitteth thereon".

The THRONE upon which God "sitteth thereon" is WHERE Jesus Christ, God the Son, "sitteth at the right hand of God" the Father:

"And the Lord Jesus, after He had spoken to them, was taken up INTO HEAVEN, and SITTETH AT THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD" (Mark 16:19; emphasis added).

This means that Jesus Christ, God the Son, SITTETH on HIS THRONE which is set "at the right hand of God" the Father.

This Truth exposes the errors and heresies of "Nouvelle Théologie" - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians as exampled by the Modernist Heretic Pope JP-2 whose heresy teaches that heaven is not "a physical place in the clouds, but a living, personal relationship with the Holy Trinity".

In other words, according to JP-2's heresy, Heaven is NOT the THRONE OF GOD, but rather a "Personal Relationship with the Holy Trinity".

But this "personal relationship" has no place for the THRONE of God the Father, and no place for the THRONE of God the Son, so that JP-2 apparently would either have God the Father and God the Son STANDING FOREVER in a PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP with Souls, because JP-2 does not admit the existence of any THRONES upon which to sit.

Nor does JP-2 admit the existence of "the Golden Altar, which is before the THRONE OF GOD" the Father in Heaven.

Perhaps it might possibly mean, in the contorted mind of JP-2, that WHAT God the Father, in Matthew 23:22, would SIT ON is a PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP with Souls, just as WHAT God the Son, in Mark 16:19, would SIT ON is also a PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP with Souls! But just exactly HOW does anyone SIT on a PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP with anyone?

Would JP-2 have all of the Souls in Heaven squashed together by a billion-ton press which makes the THRONE OF GOD out of all of these Souls? This is absurd!

In other words, JP-2's heresy STEALS the THRONES of God the Father and God the Son in Matthew 23:22 and Mark 16:19 so that JP-2 makes God the Father and God the Son THRONELESS and does not give either One a THRONE upon which to SIT!!!

It is self-evident that JP-2 totally ignored Matthew 5:34-35, Matthew 23:22, Mark 16:19, and, of course, Apocalypse 8:3! Maybe the reason for this was that he was still too busy trying to understand, and otherwise to try to comprehend (an apparent exercise in gross futility?), the well-worn pages of the book of political theory by Karl Marx which had also occupied his mind in the Conclave that elected Pope JP-1? (Wilton Wynn, "Keepers of the Keys", p. 39)!

The repulsive absurdity, and obvious hatred towards the Bible, which JP-2 had in the above instance seems to be indicative of other "Nouvelle Théologie" - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians as well as their crass hatred of Scholasticism!


HOW DID JP-2 GET SO SCREWED UP???!!

Pope Saint Pius X gives all of us the answer where he writes in part:  “Yet it is a fixed and established principle among them [NEW Theology Theologians, a.k.a. Modernist Heretics] that both science and history must be atheistic: and within their boundaries there is room for nothing but phenomena; God and all that is Divine are utterly excluded. We shall soon see clearly what, as a consequence of this most absurd teaching, must be held touching the most sacred Person of Christ, and the mysteries of His life and death, and of His Resurrection and Ascension  INTO  HEAVEN”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Pascendi Dominici Gregis”, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, ¶ 6, Sunday, September 8, 1907; emphasis added).
One must rightly wonder, when JP-2 met the Just Judge, Jesus Christ, Who was SITTING ON HIS THRONE, what kind of punishment the Just Judge meted out to JP-2 just for teaching that the Just Judge, Jesus Christ, is THRONELESS!!!!???

Should We also wonder the same regarding the Heresy JP-2 permitted which claims that “God is not in the punishment business”? Obviously, JP-2 got the “business” end of the punishment he so copiously deserved!

And I saw in the right hand of HIM THAT SAT ON THE THRONE, a book written within and without, sealed with seven seals” (Apocalypse 5:1; emphasis added).

The references to the THRONE remind one of a huge THRONE room where three THRONES sit elevated above the floor, one THRONE for each Person of the Holy Trinity.

HERE is the PLACE WHERE “the four and twenty ancients, and the four living creatures fell down and adored God that sitteth upon the THRONE, saying: Amen; Alleluia.” (Apocalypse 19:4).

HERE is also the PLACE WHERE the Prophet Daniel writes:  “I beheld till THRONES were PLACED, and the Ancient of Days [God] sat: His garment was white as snow, and the hair of His head like clean wool: His THRONE like flames of fire: the wheels of it like a burning fire. A swift stream of fire issued forth from before Him: thousands of thousands [of Angels] ministered to Him, and ten thousand times a hundred thousand [Angels] stood before Him: the judgment sat, and the books were opened” (Daniel 7:9-10; emphasis added).

Regarding this Scripture, one finds where the Angelic Doctor says:  “A twofold reason may be given in assigning the number of the assisting and ministering angels. For Gregory says that those who minister are more numerous than those who assist; because he takes the words (Dan. 7:10) thousands of thousands ministered to Him, not in a multiple but in a partitive sense, to mean 'thousands out of thousands'; thus the number of those who minister is indefinite, and signifies excess; while the number of assistants is finite as in the words added, and ten thousand times a hundred thousand assisted Him. This explanation rests on the opinion of the Platonists, who said that the nearer things are to the one first principle, the smaller they are in number; as the nearer a number is to unity, the lesser it is than multitude. This opinion is verified as regards the number of orders [i.e. of the 9 Choirs of Angels], as six administer and three assist” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 112, Article 4, Reply to Objection 2; emphasis added).

This is somewhat simplified in the “Companion”:  “IN THE COURT OF HEAVEN, the highest hierarchy (Seraphim, Cherubim and Thrones) are members of the divine household whose whole activity is centered on the divinity itself. The first choir of the second hierarchy (Dominions) serve as the medium between the heavenly court and its messengers; while the last two choirs of the second hierarchy (Virtues and Powers) and the third hierarchy (Principalities, Archangels, Angels) have the actual administration of the material world. From the supernatural point of view, inasmuch as all enjoy the beatific vision, all the angels are said to be assisting angels, ASSISTING AT THE THRONE OF GOD” (Walter Farrell, O.P., A Companion to the Summa, Volume 1, Chapter XIX, The Role of the Angels; emphasis added).

Commentary on 7.  INTO Heaven

The GO INTO, of GO INTO HEAVEN, means to GO INSIDE OF a specific PLACE, in the case in point, GO INSIDE OF, means the same thing whether it be GO INSIDE OF a Church , GO INSIDE OF some other PLACE, and/or GO INSIDE OF HEAVEN:  “INTO, prep. To the inside of; within... expressing entrance, or a passing from the outside of a thing to its interior parts, and following verbs expressing motion; as, come into the house; go into the church...” (An American Dictionary Of The English Language, by Noah Webster, LL.D., 1865 edition, “INTO”, p. 710-ac).

“Further, it is written (Acts 1:11): ‘(This Jesus) . . . shall so come as you have seen Him going into Heaven.’ Now HE  ASCENDED  INTO  HEAVEN from Mount Olivet which overlooks the Valley of Josaphat. Therefore He will come to judge in the neighborhood of that place” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Supplement, Question 88, Article 4, On the Contrary; emphasis added).

When you read that Christ “ASCENDED INTO HEAVEN”, in English Grammar this means that Christ WENT INSIDE OF HEAVEN, i.e. Christ WENT  INSIDE  OF  A  PLACE  CALLED  HEAVEN.

JP-2’s  “heaven”

Thus, JP-2’s  HERETICAL “heaven” is NOT “a physical place”; rather, it is a state - “a...relationship”.  In reality, it is the Teilhardian black hole of the omega point! Shades of the pantheism of Spinoza and a sentimentalized atheism, ala Cartesian Teilhardism! Thus, the state of “nowhere”!

JP-2 did NOT believe the UNCHANGEABLE   DOGMATIC  DOCTRINAL teachings of the Catholic Church!!  In other words, the reason JP-2 got so screwed up was because, as a Modernist Heretic - a NEW Theology Theologian, JP-2, as a Modernist Heretic, placed "the foundation of religious philosophy in that doctrine which is commonly called Agnosticism. According to this teaching human reason is confined entirely within the field of phenomena, that is to say, to things that appear, and in the manner in which they appear: it has neither the right nor the power to overstep these limits".

Hence, JP-2 was incapable of lifting himself up to God! To totally and insidiously and diabolically choose to deliberately ignore the Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church which INFALLIBLY teach the opposite of JP-2's SCREWED UP HERESY that “heaven” is NOT “a physical place” is what one would, and should, expect from classical NEW Theology Theologians’ double talk, wrapped up in equivocal terminology which is so contrary to the precision found in Scholastic Philosophy and Thomistic Theology which has been defended by a number of Infallible Roman Catholic Popes, including these two:


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Sixtus V

“Truly in these last days, in which already there has come those dangerous times described by the Apostle, and the blasphemous, proud, seductive men who advance to what is worse still, erring and sending others into error, this (kind of theology) is necessary to sensibly confirm the dogmas of the Catholic Faith and confute heresies.”

“And the state of affairs is such, that the judges are the very enemies themselves of the Truth, by whom Scholastic Theology has become dreadful to the greatest degree, who scarcely understand, by that apt and inner connected coherence of things and causes, in that order and arrangement, as by the training of soldiers in fighting, with those lucid definitions and distinctions, by that firmness of arguments and the sharpest disputations, that light is distinguished from shadows, and the true from the false, and their mendacity, involuted with many deceptions and fallacies, like a vestment borne away, is brought to light and stripped bare.”

“Therefore, inasmuch as these men begin to fight and overturn this most fortified citadel of Scholastic Theology, so much more does it befit us to defend this unconquered defense of the Faith, and both to conserve and keep safe the inheritance of Our Fathers, and to embellish, as much as we can, the keenest defenders of the Truth with merited honors.” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Sixtus V, Felice Peretti [Wednesday, April 24, 1585 - Monday, August 27, 1590], Infallible Decretal Letter “Triumphantis Hierusalem”,  in which St. Bonaventure, the Seraphic Doctor, Cardinal Bishop of Alba, is numbered among the exceptional and extraordinary Doctors of the Holy Catholic Church, § 10; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII

“17. Among the Scholastic Doctors, the chief and master of all towers Thomas Aquinas, who, as Cajetan observes, because ‘he most venerated the ancient Doctors of the Church, in a certain way seems to have inherited the intellect of all’ (Cajetan's commentary on Summa Theologica , IIa -- IIae 148, 9. Art. 4; Leonine edition, Volume 10, p. 174, n. 6). The doctrines of those illustrious men, like the scattered members of a body, Thomas collected together and cemented, distributed in wonderful order, and so increased with important additions that he is rightly and deservedly esteemed the special bulwark and glory of the Catholic Faith. With his spirit at once humble and swift, his memory ready and tenacious, his life spotless throughout, a lover of Truth for its own sake, richly endowed with human and divine science, like the sun he heated the world with the warmth of his virtues and filled it with the splendor of his teaching. Philosophy has no part which he did not touch finely at once and thoroughly; on the laws of reasoning, on God and incorporeal substances, on man and other sensible things, on human actions and their principles, he reasoned in such a manner that in him there is wanting neither a full array of questions, nor an apt disposal of the various parts, nor the best method of proceeding, nor soundness of principles or strength of argument, nor clearness and elegance of style, nor a facility for explaining what is abstruse.”

“19. For these reasons most learned men, in former ages especially, of the highest repute in theology and philosophy, after mastering with infinite pains the immortal works of Thomas, gave themselves up not so much to be instructed in his angelic wisdom as to be nourished upon it. It is known that nearly all the founders and lawgivers of the Religious Orders commanded their members to study and religiously adhere to the teachings of St. Thomas, fearful least any of them should swerve even in the slightest degree from the footsteps of so great a man. To say nothing of the family of St. Dominic, which rightly claims this great teacher for its own glory, the statutes of the Benedictines, the Carmelites, the Augustinians, the Society of Jesus, and many others all testify that they are bound by this law.”

“21. But, furthermore, Our predecessors in the Roman pontificate have celebrated the wisdom of Thomas Aquinas by exceptional tributes of praise and the most ample testimonials. Clement VI in the Bulla ‘In Ordine’; Nicholas V in his Brief to the Friars of the Order of Preachers, 1451; Benedict XIII in the Bulla ‘Pretiosus’, and others bear witness that the universal Church borrows luster from his admirable teaching; while St. Pius V declares in the Bulla ‘Mirabilis’ that heresies, confounded and convicted by the same teaching, were dissipated, and the whole world daily freed from fatal errors; others, such as Clement XII in the Bulla ‘Verbo Dei’, affirm that most fruitful blessings have spread abroad from his writings over the whole Church, and that he is worthy of the honor which is bestowed on the greatest Doctors of the Church, on Gregory and Ambrose, Augustine and Jerome; while others have not hesitated to propose St. Thomas for the exemplar and master of the universities and great centers of learning whom they may follow with unfaltering feet. On which point the words of Blessed Urban V to the University of Toulouse are worthy of recall: ‘It is our will, which We hereby enjoin upon you, that ye follow the teaching of Blessed Thomas as the true and Catholic doctrine and that ye labor with all your force to profit by the same’ (“Constitutio 5a, data die 3 Aug. 1368,” ad Cancell. Univ. Tolos.). Innocent XII, followed the example of Urban in the case of the University of Louvain, in the Letter in the form of a Brief addressed to that university on February 6, 1694, and Benedict XIV in the Letter in the form of a Brief addressed on August 26, 1752, to the Dionysian College in Granada; while to these judgments of great Pontiffs on Thomas Aquinas comes the crowning testimony of Innocent VI: ‘His teaching above that of others, the canonical writings alone excepted, enjoys such a precision of language, an order of matters, a Truth of conclusions, that those who hold to it are never found swerving from the path of Truth,  and he who dare assail it will always be suspected of error.’ (Sermon on Saint Thomas).”

“22. The Œcumenical Councils, also, where blossoms the flower of all earthly wisdom, have always been careful to hold Thomas Aquinas in singular honor. In the Councils of Lyons, Vienna, Florence, and the Vatican one might almost say that Thomas took part and presided over the deliberations and decrees of the Fathers, contending against the errors of the Greeks, of heretics and rationalists, with invincible force and with the happiest results. But the chief and special glory of Thomas, one which he has shared with none of the Catholic Doctors, is that the Fathers of Trent made it part of the order of conclave to lay upon the Altar, together with Sacred Scripture and the Decrees of the supreme Pontiffs, the ‘Summa’ of Thomas Aquinas, whence to seek counsel, reason, and inspiration.

“23. A last triumph was reserved for this incomparable man -- namely, to compel the homage, praise, and admiration of even the very enemies of the Catholic name. For it has come to light that there were not lacking among the leaders of heretical sects some who openly declared that, if the teaching of Thomas Aquinas were only taken away, they could easily battle with all Catholic teachers, gain the victory, and abolish the Church (Bucer). A vain hope, indeed, but no vain testimony.”

“24. Therefore, Venerable Brethren, as often as We contemplate the good, the force, and the singular advantages to be derived from his philosophic discipline which Our Fathers so dearly loved. We think it hazardous that its special honor should not always and everywhere remain, especially when it is established that daily experience, and the judgment of the greatest men, and, to crown all, the voice of the Church, have favored the Scholastic philosophy. Moreover, to the old teaching a novel system of philosophy has succeeded here and there, in which We fail to perceive those desirable and wholesome fruits which the Church and civil society itself would prefer. For it pleased the struggling innovators of the sixteenth century to philosophize without any respect for Faith, the power of inventing in accordance with his own pleasure and bent being asked and given in turn by each one. Hence, it was natural that systems of philosophy multiplied beyond measure, and conclusions differing and clashing one with another arose about those matters even which are the most important in human knowledge. From a mass of conclusions men often come to wavering and doubt; and who knows not how easily the mind slips from doubt to error? But, as men are apt to follow the lead given them, this new pursuit seems to have caught the souls of certain Catholic philosophers [the NEW Theology Theologians], who, throwing aside the Patrimony of ancient wisdom, chose rather to build up a new edifice than to strengthen and complete the old by aid of the new -- illadvisedly, in sooth, and not without detriment to the sciences. For, a multiform system of this kind, which depends on the authority and choice of any professor, has a foundation open to change, and consequently gives us a philosophy not firm, and stable, and robust like that of old, but tottering and feeble. And if, perchance, it sometimes finds itself scarcely equal to sustain the shock of its foes, it should recognize that the cause and the blame lie in itself. In saying this We have no intention of discountenancing the learned and able men who bring their industry and erudition, and, what is more, the wealth of new discoveries, to the service of philosophy; for, of course, We understand that this tends to the development of learning. But one should be very careful lest all or his chief labor be exhausted in these pursuits and in mere erudition. And the same thing is true of Sacred Theology, which, indeed, may be assisted and illustrated by all kinds of erudition, though it is absolutely necessary to approach it in the grave manner of the Scholastics, in order that, the forces of revelation and reason being united in it, it may continue to be ‘the invincible bulwark of the Faith’ (Sixtus V, Papal Bulla “Triumphantis”).”

“25. With wise forethought, therefore, not a few of the advocates of philosophic studies, when turning their minds recently to the practical reform of philosophy, aimed and aim at restoring the renowned teaching of Thomas Aquinas and winning it back to its ancient beauty.”

“26. We have learned with great joy that many members of your order, Venerable Brethren, have taken this plan to heart; and while We earnestly commend their efforts, We exhort them to hold fast to their purpose, and remind each and all of you that Our first and most cherished idea is that you should all furnish to studious youth a generous and copious supply of those purest streams of Wisdom flowing inexhaustibly from the precious fountainhead of the Angelic Doctor.”

“30. And here it is well to note that our philosophy can only by the grossest injustice be accused of being opposed to the advance and development of natural science. For, when the Scholastics, following the opinion of the Holy Fathers, always held in anthropology, that the human intelligence is only led to the knowledge of things without body and matter by things sensible, they well understood that nothing was of greater use to the philosopher than diligently to search into the mysteries of nature and to be earnest and constant in the study of physical things. And this they confirmed by their own example; for St. Thomas, Blessed Albertus Magnus, and other leaders of the Scholastics were never so wholly rapt in the study of philosophy as not to give large attention to the knowledge of natural things; and, indeed, the number of their sayings and writings on these subjects, which recent professors approve of and admit to harmonize with Truth, is by no means small. Moreover, in this very age many illustrious professors of the physical sciences openly testify that between certain and accepted conclusions of modern physics and the philosophic principles of the schools there is no conflict worthy of the name.”

“31. While, therefore, We hold that every word of Wisdom, every useful thing by whomsoever discovered or planned, ought to be received with a willing and grateful mind, We exhort you, Venerable Brethren, in all earnestness to restore the golden wisdom of St. Thomas, and to spread it far and wide for the defense and beauty of the Catholic faith, for the good of society, and for the advantage of all the sciences. The wisdom of St. Thomas, We say; for if anything is taken up with too great subtlety by the Scholastic doctors, or too carelessly stated -- if there be anything that ill agrees with the discoveries of a later age, or, in a word, improbable in whatever way -- it does not enter Our mind to propose that for imitation to Our age. Let carefully selected teachers endeavor to implant the doctrine of Thomas Aquinas in the minds of students, and set forth clearly his solidity and excellence over others. Let the universities already founded or to be founded by you illustrate and defend this doctrine, and use it for the refutation of prevailing errors. But, lest the false for the true or the corrupt for the pure be drunk in, be ye watchful that the doctrine of Thomas be drawn from his own fountains, or at least from those rivulets which, derived from the very fount, have thus far flowed, according to the established agreement of learned men, pure and clear; be careful to guard the minds of youth from those which are said to flow thence, but in reality are gathered from strange and unwholesome streams.”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Æterni Patris”, On the Restoration of Christian Philosophy, Infallibly Promulgated on Monday, August 4, 1879).

JP-2’s Apotheosis?

So when did JP-2’s apotheosis take place in which JP-2 received this NEW “revelation” as he traveled throughout the black hole of heresy, the fruition of the nothingness of nowhere, which proceedeth from the heat-oppressed brain of the Roman-collared gargoyle while proffering the raiments of:  “whited sepulchres, which outwardly appear to men beautiful, but within are full of dead men's bones, and of all filthiness, so you also outwardly indeed appear to men just; but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity” (Matthew 23:27-28)?

JP-2’s anti-Scholastic, anti-Thomistic, anti-Catholic “definitions seek only to reconcile us to Modernism” (Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., “Angelicum”, 1946, “La nouvelle théologie où va-t-elle?”, “Where is the New Theology Leading Us?”, First Issue, 1. Do the Dogmatic Formulæ Themselves Retain Their Immutability?; emphasis added).

Or was there, perchance, no apotheosis at all, but merely the subtle work of an anti-Catholic Infiltrator who was much more enamored of the works of the Communist, Karl Marx, than of the Summa Theologica of Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.?  One is left to wonder if the Seminarian - the future JP-2 - actually flunked the much tauted class(es) he took under the illustrious Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P. who has written an article against the NEW Theology??!!

Therefore, let no one be so rash as to opine that the future JP-2 became a NEW Theology Theologian   because of his Seminary Professor, Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P.!  Either the future JP-2 did not understand what Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P. was teaching, or JP-2 disagreed with it because he was an anti-Catholic Infiltrator?!

As a NEW Theology Theologian   you will observe that JP-2's ideas are “...not at all those of the Church and which [instead] are blasphemous inversionsbecause they are always the pantheistic negation of the true Supernatural, and often even the negation of the distinction of moral good and of moral evil, in order to allow only that which is a useful or desired good, including cosmic or physical evil, which with the reintegration of all, without exception, will disappear”(Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., “Angelicum”, 1946, “La nouvelle théologie où va-t-elle?”, “Where is the New Theology Leading Us?”, Footnote # 44; emphasis added).

Question # 10

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his General Audience which was held on Wednesday, July 21, 1999?

Answer to Question # 10

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 10

Please refer to the above quoted texts of the Infallible Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church under: JP-2’s General Audience which was held on Wednesday, July 21, 1999.

Judgement - Based Upon these True Facts

Please click on this link regarding Judgement.

Final Conclusion to Question # 10

It is a contradiction of terms to claim that any Heretic, including the automatically Excommunicated Heretic, Pope JP-2, can be canonized a “saint”.

A picture is worth is thousand words.


Pope F-1 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier

This Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix is:  “... a sinister symbol, used by Satanists in the sixth century, that had been revived at the time of Vatican II. This was a bent or broken cross, on which was displayed a repulsive and distorted figure of Christ, which the black magicians and sorcerers of the Middle Ages had made use of to represent the Biblical term Mark of the Beast [i.e. anti-Christ].”  (Piers Compton, “The Broken Cross: Hidden Hand In the Vatican,” 1981.)

In other words, the person who uses the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ crucifix tells the entire world two things:  1) that person is a Satanist; 2) that person personifies anti-Christ! Furthermore, IF JP-2 should be “canonized a saint” by the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope F-1, this will simply be a public statement - by F-1’s public acts of  Heresy  and Apostasy - that proves Pope F-1 is himself an Heretic and an Apostate, and who follows in the Heretical  and Apostate footsteps of the Heretic and Apostate JP-2 and merits the same “reward” as the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope JP-2!!!
 

Pope JP-2 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier


The Eternal “reward” of JP-2

Pope JP-2’s General Audience, Wednesday, July 21, 1999, in which he taught:  “...“heaven” or “happiness”.... is neither an abstraction nor a physical place in the clouds, but a living, personal relationship with the Holy Trinity.”.
Pope JP-2 was condemned, a priori,  as the above texts prove:

1.  By the Infallible Sacred Scriptures:

Psalm 102:19.
Isaias 57:15.
Isaias 66:1
Daniel 7:9-10.

Matthew 3:17.
Matthew 5:12.
Matthew 5:16.
Matthew 5:34-35.
Matthew 5:45.
Matthew 6:1.
Matthew 6:9-10.
Matthew 6:20.
Matthew 7:11.
Matthew 7:21.
Matthew 8:11-12.
Matthew 10:32-33.
Matthew 11:23.
Matthew 16:17.
Matthew 16:19.
Matthew 18:10.
Matthew 18:14.
Matthew 18:18-19.
Matthew 19:21.
Matthew 19:23-24.
Matthew 22:30-31.
Matthew 23:22.
Matthew 28:2.

Mark 16:19.

Luke 10:20.
Luke 11:13.
Luke 12:32-33.
Luke 24:51.

John 3:13.
John 6:33.
John 6:38.
John 6:51.
John 14:2-4.

Acts 1:10-11.

2 Corinthians 5:1.

Hebrews 9:24.

1 Peter 1:4.
1 Peter 1:12.
1 Peter 3:22.

1 John 5:7.

Apocalypse 4:2; 4:10-11.
Apocalypse 5:1.
Apocalypse 8:3.
Apocalypse 9:13.
Apocalypse 11:11-12.
Apocalypse 19:1.

2.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Œcumenical Council of Florence

3.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Honorius III

4.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Gregory IX

5.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XII

6.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX

7.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII

8.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X

9.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius XI

10.  By Infallible Roman Catholic Books:

Infallible Catechism of Pope St. Pius X
Infallible Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests
Infallible Missale Romanum, 1943 Edition, Prayer Supplices Te Rogamus.

11.  By Roman Catholic Books with an Imprimatur:

A Companion to the Summa
An Explanation Of the Baltimore Catechism
Baltimore Catechism No. 3.
Catechetical Instructions of St. Thomas Aquinas
Catechism of the Summa Theologica
Christ the Savior
Ecclesiastical Dictionary
God the Author of Nature and the Supernatural, A Dogmatic Treatise
New Catholic Dictionary
Summa Theologica

12.  By the 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2314, § I  -  ipso facto  Excommunication!

13.  By the Coronation Oath of the Pope-Elect.

14.  By the Profession of Faith.

15.  By the Oath Against Modernism.

JP-2 was an Heretic who publicly taught the Heresy that Heaven is NOT a PLACE.  This is  contrary to the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church quoted above.


Part One: Some of the Things Pope JP-2 Said
JP-2’s General Audiences


JP-2, General Audience
Wednesday, July 28, 1999

Hell

1. It [Hell] is not a punishment imposed externally by God but a development of premises already set by people in this life. The very dimension of unhappiness which this obscure condition brings can in a certain way be sensed in the light of some of the terrible experiences we have suffered which, as is commonly said, make life “hell”.

In a theological sense however, hell is something else: it is the ultimate consequence of sin itself, which turns against the person who committed it. It is the state of those who definitively reject the Father’s mercy, even at the last moment of their life.

3. The images of hell that Sacred Scripture presents to us must be correctly interpreted. They show the complete frustration and emptiness of life without God. Rather than a place, hell indicates the state of those who freely and definitively separate themselves from God, the source of all life and joy. This is how the Catechism of the Catholic Church summarizes the truths of faith on this subject: To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God’s merciful love means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice. This state of definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed is called ‘hell’” (n. 1033).

4.  The thought of hell — and even less the improper use of biblical images — must not create anxiety or despair, but is a necessary and healthy reminder of freedom within the proclamation that the risen Jesus has conquered Satan, giving us the Spirit of God who makes us cry “Abba, Father!” (Rm 8:15; Gal 4:6).  (JP-2, General Audience, Wednesday, July 28, 1999, ¶¶ 1, 3, and 4).
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1999/
documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_28071999_en.html

The Roman Catholic Church Infallibly Teaches:

Hell


Hell - From: The Bible

“But if the Lord do a new thing, and the earth opening her mouth swallow them down, and all things that belong to them, and they go down alive  INTO  HELL, you shall know that they have blasphemed the Lord.” (Numbers 16:30; emphasis added).

And they went down alive INTO  HELL, the ground closing upon them, and they perished from among the people.” (Numbers 16:33; emphasis added).

“As a cloud is consumed, and passeth away: so he that shall  GO  DOWN  TO  HELL shall not come up.” (Job 7:9; emphasis added).

Why then do the wicked live, are they advanced, and strengthened with riches?  Their seed continueth before them, a multitude of kinsmen, and of children's children in their sight.  Their houses are secure and peaceable, and the rod of God is not upon them.  Their cattle have conceived, and failed not: their cow has calved, and is not deprived of her fruit.  Their little ones go out like a flock, and their children dance and play.  They take the timbrel, and the harp, and rejoice at the sound of the organ. They spend their days in wealth, andxxin a moment they  GO DOWN  TO  HELL. Who have said to God: Depart from us, we desire not the knowledge of Thy ways. Who is the Almighty, that we should serve Him? and what doth it profit us if we pray to Him?”  (Job  21:7-15; emphasis added).

“The Lord shall be known when He executeth judgments: the sinner hath been caught in the works of his own hands.  The wicked shall be turned  [sent] INTO  HELL, all the nations that forget God.  For the poor man shall not be forgotten to the end: the patience of the poor shall not perish for ever.”  (Psalm 9:17-19; emphasis added).

They are laid  IN  HELL like sheep:  DEATH  SHALL  FEED  UPON  THEM. And the Just shall have dominion over them in the morning; and their help shall DECAY  IN  HELL  from their glory.” (Psalm 48:15; emphasis added).

Let death come upon them, and let them go down alive  INTO  HELL. For there is wickedness in their dwellings: in the midst of them.”  (Psalm 54:16; emphasis added).

(N.B. Let death come upon them, and let them go down alive  INTO  HELL.... This, and such like imprecations which occur in the Psalms, are delivered prophetically.  In other words, by way of foretelling the punishments which shall fall upon the wicked from Divine Justice, and approving the Justice of God.  This is not done by any ill will, or by uncharitable curses, which the law of God forbids.)
“Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit? or whither shall I flee from Thy Face? If I ascend  INTO  HEAVEN, Thou art there [physically]: if I descend  INTO  HELL, Thou art present [not physically, but only in Justice].”  (Psalm 138:7-8; emphasis added).
(N.B.  ...if I descend  INTO  HELL, Thou art present. This metaphorical terminology is meant to explain that no one can flee from Thy Face - no one can flee from God, whether it be from His physical presence in Heaven, or from the presence of His Justice in Hell.  God is everywhere, either by virtue of His Justice in Hell, or by virtue of His physical presence in Heaven.)
“But yet thou [Lucifer/Satan] shalt be  BROUGHT  DOWN  TO  HELL, INTO  THE  DEPTH  OF  THE  PIT [of Hell].” (Isaias 14:15; emphasis added).

For Topheth [Gehenna; Hell] is prepared from yesterday, prepared by the king, deep, and wide. The nourishment thereof is fire and much wood: the breath of the Lord as a torrent of brimstone kindling it.” (Isaias 30:33; emphasis added).

“Thou art grown old in a strange country, thou art defiled with the dead: thou art counted with them that go down  INTO  Hell.” (Baruch 3:11; emphasis added).

“I shook the nations with the sound of his fall, when I brought him  DOWN TO HELL  with them that  DESCEND  INTO  THE  PIT.” (Ezechiel 31:16; emphasis added).

“And fear ye not them that kill the body, and are not able to kill the Soul:  but rather fear him that can destroy both Soul and body  IN  HELL.”  (Matthew  10:28; emphasis added).

“....upon this rock I will build My Church, and  the  GATES  of  HELL  shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew  16:18; emphasis added).

“You serpents, generation of vipers, how will you flee from the judgment of HELL?” (Matthew  23:33; emphasis added).

And these shall go into  EVERLASTING  PUNISHMENT: but the Just, into life everlasting.” (Matthew 25:46)

“Where the worm dieth not, and the  FIRE  is not extinguished.  For everyone shall be  SALTED  with  FIRE.” (Mark 9:47-48; emphasis added).

“There was a certain rich man, who was clothed in purple and fine linen; and feasted sumptuously every day.  And there was a certain beggar, named Lazarus, who lay at his gate, full of sores,  desiring to be filled with the crumbs that fell from the rich man's table, and no one did give him; moreover the dogs came, and licked his sores.  And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the Angels into Abraham's bosom. And the rich man also died:  and  he was BURIED  IN  HELL.”

“And lifting up his eyes when he was in torments, he saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom:  And he cried, and said:  Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, to cool my tongue: for I am tormented in this flame.

“And Abraham said to him: Son, remember that thou didst receive good things in thy lifetime, and likewise Lazarus evil things, but now he is comforted; and thou art tormented.  And besides all this, between us and you, there is fixed a great chaos:  so that they who would pass from hence to you, cannot, nor from thence come hither.

“And he said:  Then, father, I beseech thee, that thou wouldst send him to my father's house, for I have five brethren, that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this  PLACE  of  TORMENTS.

“And Abraham said to him: They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.

“But he said:  No, father Abraham:  but if one went to them from the dead, they will do penance.

“And he said to him:  If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they believe, if one rise again from the dead.” (Luke 16:19-31; emphasis added).

“But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there shall be among you


LYING  TEACHERS,”

who shall bring insects of perdition, and deny the Lord who bought them: bringing upon themselves swift destruction.  And many shall follow


their riotousnesses,

through whom the way of Truth shall be evil spoken of.”
 

“And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you. Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their perdition slumbereth not. For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, DRAWN  DOWN BY  infernal  ROPES  TO  the lower  HELL,   UNTO  TORMENTS, to be reserved unto Judgment:  And spared not the original world, but preserved Noe, the eighth person, the Preacher of Justice, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly.  And reducing the cities of the Sodomites, and of the Gomorrhites, into ashes, condemned them to be overthrown, making them an example to those that should after act wickedly.  And delivered just Lot, oppressed by the injustice and lewd conversation of the wicked.  For in sight and hearing he was Just: dwelling among them, who from day to day vexed the Just Soul with unjust works.  The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly from temptation, but to”


JP-2's Ostpolitik with Gorbachev
reserve the unjust
unto the Day of Judgment

to be TORMENTED.”

“And especially them who walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government, audacious, self willed,”


they fear not to bring in sects,

they fear not to bring in sects,


blaspheming.”

“Whereas angels who are greater in strength and power, bring not against themselves a railing judgment. But these men,”


as irrational beasts,”

naturally tending to the snare and to destruction,”


blaspheming those things which they know not,


shall perish in their corruption.”
(2 Peter 2:1-12; emphasis added).

The angels who kept not their principality, but forsook their own habitation, He hath reserved under  DARKNESS  IN  EVERLASTING  CHAINS.”  (Jude 1:6; emphasis added).

“And when I had seen Him, I fell at His feet as dead.  And He laid His right hand upon me, saying: Fear not.  I am the First and the Last, and alive, and was dead, and behold I am living for ever and ever, and have the  KEYS of death and  OF  HELL.”  (Apocalypse 1:17-18; emphasis added).

And whosoever was not found written in the Book of Life,


was cast into the pool of fire.”
(Apocalypse 20:15; emphasis added).



Hell - From: An Infallible Roman Catholic Council


Along with an Infallible Roman Catholic Pope

Moreover, the Souls of those who depart this life in actual Mortal Sin... descend immediately INTO  HELL but to undergo punishments of different kinds.” (The Infallible Œcumenical Council of Florence - The Seventeenth Œcumenical Council, The First Council of Basel, Ferrara, Florence [Monday, April 9, 1438 A.D. - Thursday, August 7, 1445 A.D.], along with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Eugene IV, Gabriele Condulmer [Thursday, March 3, 1431 - Tuesday, February 23, 1447], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Papal Bulla “Lætentur Cœli”, Infallible Decree for the Greeks, Session 6, July 6, 1439; emphasis added).


Hell - From: Infallible Roman Catholic Popes

Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XII

“By this Constitution which is to remain in force FOREVER, We, with Apostolic Authority, define the following: ..... We define that according to the general disposition of God, the Souls of those who die in actual Mortal Sin descend  into  Hell  immediately (mox) after death and theresuffer the pain of  HELL. Nevertheless, on the Day of Judgment all men will appear with their bodies ‘before the Judgment Seat of Christ’ to give an account of their personal deeds, ‘that every one may receive the proper things of the body, according as he hath done, whether it be good or evil’ (2 Corinthians 5.10).” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XII, Jacques Fournier [Monday, December 20, 1334 - Wednesday, April 25, 1342], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Apostolic Constitution “Benedictus Deus”, On the Beatific Vision of God, 1336 A.D.; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Eugene IV

Moreover, the Souls of those who depart this life in actual Mortal Sin... descend immediately INTO  HELL but to undergo punishments of different kinds.” (The Infallible Œcumenical Council of Florence - The Seventeenth Œcumenical Council, The First Council of Basel, Ferrara, Florence [Monday, April 9, 1438 A.D. - Thursday, August 7, 1445 A.D.], along with the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Eugene IV, Gabriele Condulmer [Thursday, March 3, 1431 - Tuesday, February 23, 1447], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Papal Bulla “Lætentur Cœli”, Infallible Decree for the Greeks, Session 6, July 6, 1439; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V

“In this work, to such extremes has their impiety, practiced in all the arts of Satan, been carried, that it would seem almost impossible to confine it within any bounds; and did we not rely on the splendid promises of the Saviour, who declared that He had built His Church on so solid a foundation that the Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it, we should have good reason to fear lest, beset on every side by such a host of enemies and assailed and attacked by so many machinations, it would, in these days, fall to the ground.” (The Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572], who, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible “Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, a.k.a. “The Roman Catechism”, translated circa 1923 by Father John A. McHugh, O. P. and Father Charles J. Callan, O. P., INTRODUCTORY,  The Necessity Of Religious Instruction, Need of an Authoritative Catholic Catechism; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX

We know for certain, moreover, that the  GATES  of  HELL  will never prevail against the Church which stands and will stand immovable with Christ Jesus, our Lord, as Guardian and Protector, Who has built the Church.” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical “Quanto Conficiamur Moerore”, On Promotion of False Doctrines, ¶ 18, Monday, August 10, 1863; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X

Were some Modernist Heretics Inside the Vatican
Trying to Poison Pope Saint Pius X
As Rumor Has It?

From: The Catechism of Pope St. Pius X

“18  Q.  Were all the angels faithful to God?”
“A. No, the Angels were not all faithful to God, many of them through pride claimed to be His equals and independent of Him -- for which sin they were banished for ever from Paradise and condemned to Hell.” (The First Article of the Creed, God the Father Almighty, 18  Q; emphasis added).

“19  Q.  What are the Angels called who were banished for ever from Paradise and condemned to Hell?”
“A. The Angels banished forever from Paradise and condemned to Hell are called demons, and their chief is called Lucifer or Satan” (The First Article of the Creed, God the Father Almighty, 19  Q; emphasis added).

“20  Q.  Can the demons do us any harm?”
“A. Yes, the demons can do us great harm both in Soul and body, especially by tempting us to sin, provided God permits them to do so.” (The First Article of the Creed, God the Father Almighty, 20  Q.).

“1  Q.  What are we taught by the Last Article: Life Everlasting?”
“A. The Last Article of the Creed teaches us that, after the present life there is another life, eternally happy for the elect in heaven, or eternally miserable for the damned in Hell”  (The Twelfth Article of the Creed, 1  Q; emphasis added).

“4  Q.  In what does the misery of the damned consist?”
“A. The misery of the damned consists in being for ever deprived of the vision of God and punished with eternal torments in Hell” (The Twelfth Article of the Creed, 4  Q; emphasis added).

“5  Q.  Are the happiness of Heaven and the miseries of Hell for the Soul alone?”
“A. The happiness of Heaven and the miseries of Hell at present affect the Soul alone, because at present the Soul alone is in Heaven or in Hell; but after the resurrection of the flesh, man in the fullness of his nature, that is, in body and in Soul, will be for ever happy or forever tormented” (The Twelfth Article of the Creed, 5  Q; emphasis added).

(The Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Catechism which is now called:  The Catechism of Pope St. Pius X).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XV

“It is thus that, according to the Divine Revelation, in this poem shines out the majesty of God One and Three, the Redemption of the human race operated by the Word of God made Man, the supreme loving-kindness and charity of Mary, Virgin and Mother, Queen of Heaven, and lastly the glory on high of Angels, Saints and men; then the terrible contrast to this, the pains of the impious in Hell; then the middle world, so to speak, between Heaven and Hell, Purgatory, the Ladder of Souls destined after expiation to supreme beatitude.”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XV, Giacomo Paolo Giovanni Battista della Chiesa [Thursday, September 3, 1914 - Saturday, January 21, 1922], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Præclara Summorum”, On Dante, ¶ 4, on Saturday, April 30, 1921).


The Roman Catholic Church Teaches:

Hell - From: Fathers of the Catholic Church


Saint Justin Martyr

“Our Master Jesus Christ said, that what is impossible with men is possible with God, [1809] and, Fear ye not them that kill the body, and are not able to kill the Soul:  but rather fear him that can destroy both Soul and body  IN  HELL  (Matthew  10:28; emphasis added).  And Hell is a PLACE where those are to be punished who have lived wickedly, and who do not believe that those things which God has taught us by Christ will come to pass.” (Saint Justin Martyr [b. Sichem, a.k.a. Neapolis, or Flavia Neapolis, modern day Nablus, Palestine c. 100 A.D. - d. Rome, Italy c. 165 A.D.], The First Apology of Justin, Chapter XIX; emphasis added).


Patriarch Saint Cyril of Jerusalem

“....to alienate from God the things on earth; having forgotten the Psalm which says, “If I ascend  INTO  HEAVEN, Thou art there [physically]: if I descend  INTO  HELL, Thou art present [not physically, but only in Justice]”  (Psalm 138:7-8; emphasis added).  For if there is nothing higher than Heaven, and if Hell is deeper than the earth, He [God] Who rules the lower regions reaches the earth also” (Psalm 139:8).  (Patriarch Saint Cyril of Jerusalem [b. 315 A.D. - d. 386 A.D.], Doctor of the Catholic Church, Patriarch of Jerusalem, Catechetical Orations, Lecture VIII, On Jeremias 39:18-19; emphasis added).

(N.B.  ...if I descend  INTO  HELL, Thou art present. This metaphorical terminology is meant to explain that no one can flee from Thy Face - no one can flee from God, whether it be from His physical presence in Heaven, or from the presence of His Justice in Hell.  God is everywhere, either by virtue of His Justice in Hell, or by virtue of His physical presence in Heaven.)


Patriarch Saint John Chrysostom

“That the Universe is not without a Providence we may conjecture from things amongst ourselves, for nothing will continue to exist, if not provided for; but even herds, and all other things stand in need of governance. And that the Universe was not made by chance, Hell is a proof, and so was the deluge in Noah's day, the fire, [of Sodom] the overwhelming of the Egyptians in the sea, the things which happened in the wilderness.” (Patriarch Saint John Chrysostom [b. Antioch, c. 347 A.D. - d. at Commana in Pontus on Friday, September 14, 407 A.D.], Patriarch of Constantinople [Thursday, February 26, 398 A.D. - Thursday, June 24, 404 A.D.], exiled from his See the 2nd time on Thursday, June 24, 404 A.D., Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, HOMILY V, On Colossians 1:26-28; emphasis added).


Hell - From: Roman Catholic Traditional Books

From: The Catechetical Instructions of St. Thomas Aquinas

“(2)..... anyone who descends into Hell in Mortal Sin has no hope of deliverance; and he will remain in Hell as long as the Holy Fathers remain in Paradise, that is, for all eternityAnd these shall go into everlasting punishment: but the Just, into life everlasting (Matthew 25:46).”  (“The Catechetical Instructions of St. Thomas Aquinas", Translated with a Commentary by Rev. Joseph B. Collins, S.S., D.D., Ph.D., Introduction by Rev. Rudolph G. Bandas, Ph.D., S.T.D. et M., Nihil Obstat: E. A. Connolly, S.S., J.C.D, Censor Deputatus, Imprimatur: Most Reverend Michael J. Curley, D.D., Archbishop of Baltimore, Baltimore, February 9, 1939, The Apostles’ Creed, The Fifth Article, What We May Learn from this; emphasis added).

From: Ecclesiastical Dictionary

Hell is  A  PLACE  of anguish and torment, where those who have voluntarily and finally defied God suffer the everlasting punishment of their sins, proportioned in its violence to their deserts. It consists of absolute and eternal separation from God, enchained in darkness, as  the angels who kept not their principality, but forsook their own habitation, He hath reserved under darkness in everlasting chains, (Jude 1:6; emphasis added); where the fire of remorse for having voluntarily merited damnation, and of despair for this incomparable and unending anguish, is unextinguishable; Where the worm dieth not, and the fire is not extinguished.  For everyone shall be salted with fire (Mark 9:47-48; emphasis added). If sinners die with determined will for evil, they freely place themselves beyond recall of good, and in ceaseless degradation and torture.” (Father John Thein, “Ecclesiastical Dictionary”, “Hell”, p. 330, column a; p. 330, column b, Benziger Brothers, New York, Cincinnati, Chicago, 1900).

The Beatific Vision of God and the State of Grace on Earth

From: God the Author of Nature and the Supernatural, A Dogmatic Treatise

“2.  The Punishment of the Fallen Angels. It is an Article of Faith that the fallen angels in punishment for their crime were forth with shorn of Grace and cast  INTO  HELL, where they have no hope of redemption. Sacred Scripture teaches this expressly. Cfr. 2 Peter 2:4: ‘God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower Hell, unto torments, to be reserved unto judgment.’   Epistle of St. Jude 1:6: ‘And the angels who kept not their principality, but forsook their own habitation, He hath reserved under darkness in everlasting chains, unto the judgment of the great day.’  The phrase reserved ‘unto the judgment of the great day’ does not mean that the evil spirits have any chance of redemption, but merely indicates that their punishment will not be complete till after the Last Judgment, when they shall cease to harass men.”  (Rt. Rev. Msgr. Joseph Pohle, Ph.D., D.D., “God the Author of Nature and the Supernatural, A Dogmatic Treatise”, Adapted and Edited by Arthur Preuss, Dogmatic Theology, Volume III, B. Herder Book Co. St. Louis, Mo., 1919, Imprimatur, Sti. Ludovici, die 5. Aug. 1919, Joannes J. Glennon. Archiepiscopus Sti. Ludovici, Third edition, 1919, Part II, Creation Passively Considered, or the Created Universe, Chapter III, Christian Angelology, Section 3, The Apostasy of a Number of the Angels, Article I, The Fallen Angels or Demons, p. 343; emphasis added).

In Summary

From: The New Catholic Dictionary

“Hell ....theologically, a place of privation and punishment after death.  In the strict sense of the term, hell (infernus) is the  PLACE  of eternal punishment for the damned, whether demons or men.” (Conde B. Pallen, Ph.D., LL.D., John J. Wynne, S.J., S.T.D., et alii, "The New Catholic Dictionary", 1929, Imprimatur, Patrick Cardinal Hayes, Tuesday, October 1, 1929,Hell, p. 436, column a; emphasis added).

Editorial Commentary by Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.

The Catholic Laity should not be fearful of what the Roman Catholic Church has taught down through almost 20 centuries. On the contrary, the Catholic Laity need to have at least a basic knowledge and understanding of their Catholic Faith so that no one can rob them of their precious patrimony, whether by lies, falsehoods, fallacies, and/or heresies.

Back in 1947, Francis (Frank) J. Sheed tried to encourage the Catholic Laity of his day to do this. This timely and opportune advice is still as true today as it was in 1947 - only even more so! Here is a brief excerpt of what he wrote. Please keep in mind, this was written in the Forward to his then newly published book:

“This book contains theology, not the great mass of it that theologians need, but the indispensable minimum that every man needs in order that he may be living mentally in the REAL WORLD - which is what the word SANITY means in my title.”

“Sanity, remember, does not mean living in the same world as everyone else; it means living in the real world. But some of the most important elements in the real world can be known only by the revelation of God, which it is theology's business to study.”

“LACKING THIS KNOWLEDGE, THE MIND MUST LIVE A HALF-BLIND LIFE, TRYING TO COPE WITH A REALITY MOST OF WHICH IT DOES NOT KNOW IS THERE.  This is a wretched state for an immortal spirit, and pretty certain to lead to disaster. THERE IS A GOOD DEAL OF DISASTER AROUND AT THIS MOMENT. F. J. S.” (Frank J. Sheed, Theology and Sanity, Forward, page V).

The “disaster” of which he wrote is much worse today than it was in 1947. Hopefully, this web page, with prayerful reading, will help everyone who reads this web page.

Today, the Catholic Laity must not blindly pick and choose what to read in print (e.g. magazine articles, books, internet web pages) or what to hear (e.g. audio tapes, audio CD’s and DVD’s) and what to watch (e.g. audio/video movies, CD’s, and DVD’s), because the Moral, Doctrinal, Spiritual, Philosophical, and Theological deadly black plague of a NEW Theology has been let loose upon the unprepared Catholic Laity - which too often becomes its victims - which said Moral, Doctrinal, Spiritual, Philosophical, and Theological deadly black plague is called by such names as “Nouvelle Théologie”, the NEW Theology, neo-Modernism, etc., etc.

It is self-evident that JP-2 totally ignored Numbers, Job, Psalms, Isaias, Baruch, Ezechiel, Matthew, Mark, Luke, 2 Peter, Jude, and the Apocalypse!

Maybe the reason for this was that he was still too busy trying to understand, and otherwise to try to comprehend (an apparent exercise in gross futility?), the well-worn pages of the book of political theory by Karl Marx which had also occupied his mind in the Conclave that elected Pope JP-1? (Wilton Wynn, Keepers of the Keys, p. 39)!

The repulsive absurdity, and obvious hatred towards the Bible, which JP-2 had in the above instance seems to be indicative of other Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernist theologians as well as their crass hatred of Scholasticism!

Typically, JP-2 wrapped up his NEW Theology Heresies in equivocal terminology and blatant double-talk which is so contrary to the precision found in Scholastic Philosophy and Thomistic Theology which has been defended by a number of Infallible Roman Catholic Popes, including these two:


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Sixtus V

“Truly in these last days, in which already there has come those dangerous times described by the Apostle, and the blasphemous, proud, seductive men who advance to what is worse still, erring and sending others into error, this (kind of theology) is necessary to sensibly confirm the dogmas of the Catholic Faith and confute heresies.”

“And the state of affairs is such, that the judges are the very enemies themselves of the Truth, by whom Scholastic Theology has become dreadful to the greatest degree, who scarcely understand, by that apt and inner connected coherence of things and causes, in that order and arrangement, as by the training of soldiers in fighting, with those lucid definitions and distinctions, by that firmness of arguments and the sharpest disputations, that light is distinguished from shadows, and the true from the false, and their mendacity, involuted with many deceptions and fallacies, like a vestment borne away, is brought to light and stripped bare.”

“Therefore, inasmuch as these men begin to fight and overturn this most fortified citadel of Scholastic Theology, so much more does it befit us to defend this unconquered defense of the Faith, and both to conserve and keep safe the inheritance of Our Fathers, and to embellish, as much as we can, the keenest defenders of the Truth with merited honors” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Sixtus V, Felice Peretti [Wednesday, April 24, 1585 - Monday, August 27, 1590], Infallible Decretal Letter “Triumphantis Hierusalem”,  in which St. Bonaventure, the Seraphic Doctor, Cardinal Bishop of Alba, is numbered among the exceptional and extraordinary Doctors of the Holy Catholic Church, § 10; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII

“17. Among the Scholastic Doctors, the chief and master of all towers Thomas Aquinas, who, as Cajetan observes, because ‘he most venerated the ancient Doctors of the Church, in a certain way seems to have inherited the intellect of all’ (Cajetan's commentary on Summa Theologica , IIa -- IIae 148, 9. Art. 4; Leonine edition, Volume 10, p. 174, n. 6). The doctrines of those illustrious men, like the scattered members of a body, Thomas collected together and cemented, distributed in wonderful order, and so increased with important additions that he is rightly and deservedly esteemed the special bulwark and glory of the Catholic Faith. With his spirit at once humble and swift, his memory ready and tenacious, his life spotless throughout, a lover of Truth for its own sake, richly endowed with human and divine science, like the sun he heated the world with the warmth of his virtues and filled it with the splendor of his teaching. Philosophy has no part which he did not touch finely at once and thoroughly; on the laws of reasoning, on God and incorporeal substances, on man and other sensible things, on human actions and their principles, he reasoned in such a manner that in him there is wanting neither a full array of questions, nor an apt disposal of the various parts, nor the best method of proceeding, nor soundness of principles or strength of argument, nor clearness and elegance of style, nor a facility for explaining what is abstruse.”

“19. For these reasons most learned men, in former ages especially, of the highest repute in theology and philosophy, after mastering with infinite pains the immortal works of Thomas, gave themselves up not so much to be instructed in his angelic wisdom as to be nourished upon it. It is known that nearly all the founders and lawgivers of the Religious Orders commanded their members to study and religiously adhere to the teachings of St. Thomas, fearful least any of them should swerve even in the slightest degree from the footsteps of so great a man. To say nothing of the family of St. Dominic, which rightly claims this great teacher for its own glory, the statutes of the Benedictines, the Carmelites, the Augustinians, the Society of Jesus, and many others all testify that they are bound by this law.”

“21. But, furthermore, Our predecessors in the Roman pontificate have celebrated the wisdom of Thomas Aquinas by exceptional tributes of praise and the most ample testimonials. Clement VI in the Bulla ‘In Ordine’; Nicholas V in his Brief to the Friars of the Order of Preachers, 1451; Benedict XIII in the Bulla ‘Pretiosus’, and others bear witness that the universal Church borrows luster from his admirable teaching; while St. Pius V declares in the Bulla ‘Mirabilis’ that heresies, confounded and convicted by the same teaching, were dissipated, and the whole world daily freed from fatal errors; others, such as Clement XII in the Bulla ‘Verbo Dei’, affirm that most fruitful blessings have spread abroad from his writings over the whole Church, and that he is worthy of the honor which is bestowed on the greatest Doctors of the Church, on Gregory and Ambrose, Augustine and Jerome; while others have not hesitated to propose St. Thomas for the exemplar and master of the universities and great centers of learning whom they may follow with unfaltering feet. On which point the words of Blessed Urban V to the University of Toulouse are worthy of recall: ‘It is our will, which We hereby enjoin upon you, that ye follow the teaching of Blessed Thomas as the true and Catholic doctrine and that ye labor with all your force to profit by the same’ (“Constitutio 5a, data die 3 Aug. 1368,” ad Cancell. Univ. Tolos.). Innocent XII, followed the example of Urban in the case of the University of Louvain, in the Letter in the form of a Brief addressed to that university on February 6, 1694, and Benedict XIV in the Letter in the form of a Brief addressed on August 26, 1752, to the Dionysian College in Granada; while to these judgments of great Pontiffs on Thomas Aquinas comes the crowning testimony of Innocent VI: ‘His teaching above that of others, the canonical writings alone excepted, enjoys such a precision of language, an order of matters, a Truth of conclusions, that those who hold to it are never found swerving from the path of Truth, and he who dare assail it will always be suspected of error’ (Sermon on Saint Thomas).”

“22. The Œcumenical Councils, also, where blossoms the flower of all earthly wisdom, have always been careful to hold Thomas Aquinas in singular honor. In the Councils of Lyons, Vienna, Florence, and the Vatican one might almost say that Thomas took part and presided over the deliberations and decrees of the Fathers, contending against the errors of the Greeks, of heretics and rationalists, with invincible force and with the happiest results. But the chief and special glory of Thomas, one which he has shared with none of the Catholic Doctors, is that the Fathers of Trent made it part of the order of conclave to lay upon the Altar, together with Sacred Scripture and the Decrees of the supreme Pontiffs, the ‘Summa’ of Thomas Aquinas, whence to seek counsel, reason, and inspiration.

“23. A last triumph was reserved for this incomparable man -- namely, to compel the homage, praise, and admiration of even the very enemies of the Catholic name. For it has come to light that there were not lacking among the leaders of heretical sects some who openly declared that, if the teaching of Thomas Aquinas were only taken away, they could easily battle with all Catholic teachers, gain the victory, and abolish the Church (Bucer). A vain hope, indeed, but no vain testimony.”

“24. Therefore, Venerable Brethren, as often as We contemplate the good, the force, and the singular advantages to be derived from his philosophic discipline which Our Fathers so dearly loved. We think it hazardous that its special honor should not always and everywhere remain, especially when it is established that daily experience, and the judgment of the greatest men, and, to crown all, the voice of the Church, have favored the Scholastic philosophy. Moreover, to the old teaching a novel system of philosophy has succeeded here and there, in which We fail to perceive those desirable and wholesome fruits which the Church and civil society itself would prefer. For it pleased the struggling innovators of the sixteenth century to philosophize without any respect for Faith, the power of inventing in accordance with his own pleasure and bent being asked and given in turn by each one. Hence, it was natural that systems of philosophy multiplied beyond measure, and conclusions differing and clashing one with another arose about those matters even which are the most important in human knowledge. From a mass of conclusions men often come to wavering and doubt; and who knows not how easily the mind slips from doubt to error? But, as men are apt to follow the lead given them, this new pursuit seems to have caught the souls of certain Catholic philosophers [the NEW Theology Theologians], who, throwing aside the Patrimony of ancient wisdom, chose rather to build up a new edifice than to strengthen and complete the old by aid of the new -- illadvisedly, in sooth, and not without detriment to the sciences. For, a multiform system of this kind, which depends on the authority and choice of any professor, has a foundation open to change, and consequently gives us a philosophy not firm, and stable, and robust like that of old, but tottering and feeble. And if, perchance, it sometimes finds itself scarcely equal to sustain the shock of its foes, it should recognize that the cause and the blame lie in itself. In saying this We have no intention of discountenancing the learned and able men who bring their industry and erudition, and, what is more, the wealth of new discoveries, to the service of philosophy; for, of course, We understand that this tends to the development of learning. But one should be very careful lest all or his chief labor be exhausted in these pursuits and in mere erudition. And the same thing is true of Sacred Theology, which, indeed, may be assisted and illustrated by all kinds of erudition, though it is absolutely necessary to approach it in the grave manner of the Scholastics, in order that, the forces of revelation and reason being united in it, it may continue to be ‘the invincible bulwark of the Faith’ (Sixtus V, Papal Bulla “Triumphantis”).”

“25. With wise forethought, therefore, not a few of the advocates of philosophic studies, when turning their minds recently to the practical reform of philosophy, aimed and aim at restoring the renowned teaching of Thomas Aquinas and winning it back to its ancient beauty.”

“26. We have learned with great joy that many members of your order, Venerable Brethren, have taken this plan to heart; and while We earnestly commend their efforts, We exhort them to hold fast to their purpose, and remind each and all of you that Our first and most cherished idea is that you should all furnish to studious youth a generous and copious supply of those purest streams of Wisdom flowing inexhaustibly from the precious fountainhead of the Angelic Doctor.”

“30. And here it is well to note that our philosophy can only by the grossest injustice be accused of being opposed to the advance and development of natural science. For, when the Scholastics, following the opinion of the Holy Fathers, always held in anthropology, that the human intelligence is only led to the knowledge of things without body and matter by things sensible, they well understood that nothing was of greater use to the philosopher than diligently to search into the mysteries of nature and to be earnest and constant in the study of physical things. And this they confirmed by their own example; for St. Thomas, Blessed Albertus Magnus, and other leaders of the Scholastics were never so wholly rapt in the study of philosophy as not to give large attention to the knowledge of natural things; and, indeed, the number of their sayings and writings on these subjects, which recent professors approve of and admit to harmonize with Truth, is by no means small. Moreover, in this very age many illustrious professors of the physical sciences openly testify that between certain and accepted conclusions of modern physics and the philosophic principles of the schools there is no conflict worthy of the name.”

“31. While, therefore, We hold that every word of Wisdom, every useful thing by whomsoever discovered or planned, ought to be received with a willing and grateful mind, We exhort you, Venerable Brethren, in all earnestness to restore the golden wisdom of St. Thomas, and to spread it far and wide for the defense and beauty of the Catholic faith, for the good of society, and for the advantage of all the sciences. The wisdom of St. Thomas, We say; for if anything is taken up with too great subtlety by the Scholastic doctors, or too carelessly stated -- if there be anything that ill agrees with the discoveries of a later age, or, in a word, improbable in whatever way -- it does not enter Our mind to propose that for imitation to Our age. Let carefully selected teachers endeavor to implant the doctrine of Thomas Aquinas in the minds of students, and set forth clearly his solidity and excellence over others. Let the universities already founded or to be founded by you illustrate and defend this doctrine, and use it for the refutation of prevailing errors. But, lest the false for the true or the corrupt for the pure be drunk in, be ye watchful that the doctrine of Thomas be drawn from his own fountains, or at least from those rivulets which, derived from the very fount, have thus far flowed, according to the established agreement of learned men, pure and clear; be careful to guard the minds of youth from those which are said to flow thence, but in reality are gathered from strange and unwholesome streams.”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII, using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Æterni Patris”, On the Restoration of Christian Philosophy, Infallibly Promulgated on Monday, August 4, 1879).

As a NEW Theology Theologian you will observe that JP-2's ideas are “...not at all those of the Church and which [instead] are blasphemous inversions because they are always the pantheistic negation of the true Supernatural, and often even the negation of the distinction of moral good and of moral evil, in order to allow only that which is a useful or desired good, including cosmic or physical evil, which with the reintegration of all, without exception, will disappear”(Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P., “Angelicum”, 1946, “La nouvelle théologie où va-t-elle?”, “Where is the New Theology Leading Us?”, Footnote # 44; emphasis added).

Question # 11

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his General Audience which was held on Wednesday, July 28, 1999?

Answer to Question # 11

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 11

Please refer to the above quoted texts of the Infallible Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church under: JP-2’s General Audiences, General Audience, Wednesday, July 28, 1999.

Judgement - Based Upon these True Facts

Please click on this link regarding Judgement.

Final Conclusion to Question # 11

It is a contradiction of terms to claim that any Heretic, including the automatically Excommunicated Heretic, Pope JP-2, can be canonized a “saint”.

A picture is worth is thousand words.


Pope F-1 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier

This Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix is:

“... a sinister symbol, used by Satanists in the sixth century, that had been revived at the time of Vatican II. This was a bent or broken cross, on which was displayed a repulsive and distorted figure of Christ, which the black magicians and sorcerers of the Middle Ages had made use of to represent the Biblical term Mark of the Beast [i.e. anti-Christ].”  (Piers Compton, “The Broken Cross: Hidden Hand In the Vatican,” 1981.)

In other words, the person who uses the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ crucifix tells the entire world two things:  1) that person is a Satanist; 2) that person personifies anti-Christ! Furthermore, IF JP-2 should be “canonized a saint” by the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope F-1, this will simply be a public statement - by F-1’s public acts of  Heresy  and Apostasy - that proves Pope F-1 is himself an Heretic and an Apostate, and who follows in the Heretical  and Apostate footsteps of the Heretic and Apostate JP-2 and merits the same “reward” as the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope JP-2!!!
 

Pope JP-2 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier


The Eternal “reward” of JP-2

Because of Pope JP-2’s General Audience, Wednesday, July 28, 1999, in which he taught:

[Hell]  IS  NOT A PUNISHMENT  imposed  EXTERNALLY  by God”.

HELL.... is the  STATE  of.... ”.

Rather than a PLACE,  HELL  indicates the  STATE  of....”.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church summarizes the truths of faith on this subject: To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God’s merciful love means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice. This  STATE   OF  definitive SELF-EXCLUSION  from communion with God and the blessed is called ‘hell’” (n. 1033)”.

Pope JP-2 was condemned, a priori,  as the above texts prove:

1.  By the Infallible Sacred Scriptures:

Numbers 16:30
Numbers 16:33

Job 7:9
Job  21:7-15

Psalm 9:17-19
Psalm 48:15
Psalm 54:16
Psalm 138:7-8

Isaias 14:15
Isaias 30:33

Baruch 3:11

Ezechiel 31:16

Matthew  10:28
Matthew  16:18
Matthew  23:33
Matthew 25:46

Mark 9:47-48

Luke 16:19-31

2 Peter 2:1-12

Jude 1:6

Apocalypse 1:17-18
Apocalypse 20:15

2.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Œcumenical Council of Florence

3.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XII

4.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Eugene IV

5.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V

6.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IX

7.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X

8.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XV

9.  By Roman Catholic Books with an Imprimatur:

The Catechetical Instructions of St. Thomas Aquinas
Ecclesiastical Dictionary
God the Author of Nature and the Supernatural, A Dogmatic Treatise
The New Catholic Dictionary

10.  By the 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2314, § I  -  ipso facto  Excommunication!

11.  By the Coronation Oath of the Pope-Elect.

12.  By the Profession of Faith.

13.  By the Oath Against Modernism.

JP-2 was an Heretic who publicly taught the Heresy that Hell is NOT a PLACE.  This is  contrary to the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church quoted above.

The UNCHANGEABLE DOGMATIC DOCTRINES that the Catholic Church has consistently taught is to be understood WHEREVER, and by WHOMEVER, these UNCHANGEABLE DOGMATIC DOCTRINES of the Catholic Church, not only in the Vatican, not only in the city of Rome itself, but also in various parts of the world, e.g. where the Fathers of the various  Œcumenical Councils of the Catholic Church met and eventually issued various Canons and Decrees.  Another example is found in the illustrious lives of the Apostolic Fathers and the Fathers of the Catholic Church.  Insofar as taking Roma Locuta - Rome has Spoken - literally, you must reflect on all of the various Papal Documents, whether Encyclicals, etc. issued Infallibly - in virtue of Vatican 1's Infallible teaching for Roman Catholics about the Infallible Ordinary Magisterium concerning such Infallible Documents and Decrees.

IF you take the time to compare all of the Roma Locuta - Rome has Spoken - Infallible Dogmatic Dogmas which were taught before the reign of the first Pretend Pope, and the first President, of the    anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s   Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church, Jolly John as the world press called the 2nd John 23rd, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli [Tuesday, October 28, 1958 - Monday, June 3, 1963] and his successors in the     anti-Catholic NEW World Order   of     anti-Christ’s   Satanic     Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church:

Paul 6, Paul VI, Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978]

John-Paul 1, JP-1, Albano Luciani [Saturday, August 26, 1978 - Thursday, September 28, 1978]

John-Paul 2, JP-2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]

Benedict 16,  Joseph Ratzinger [Tuesday, April 19, 2005 - resigned on Thursday, February 28, 2013]

Francis 1, Jorge Mario Bergoglio [Wednesday, March 13, 2013 - present].

most especially JP-2, you will quickly observe by your analysis that what has been taught since the days of the 2nd John 23rd, and the 2nd John 23rd's CONVENTION of anti-Catholic Infiltrators, is different - sometimes the difference is hidden/obscure; sometimes the difference is very glaring, e.g. all of the changes to the Liturgical Rites for the Mass and the Seven Sacraments, how church traditional Altars were thrown out, along with traditional statues, traditional vestments, etc., etc. - indeed it is very, very different from what was taught by all of the various sources quoted above, not to mention all of the quotes from the Bible, all of which de facto condemn this heretical NEW Theology - which is only the Heresy of Modernism in disguise!

Because during his tenure as pope for over 26 years, JP-2 FAILED to clearly, precisely, and traditionally preach and teach and act as pre-Vatican 2 Popes had preached, had taught, and had acted - most especially the holy Saint Pope Pius X - JP-2, by clear contrast, has automatically forfeited any and all rights to even be remotely considered for canonization as a saint, most especially because he self-excommunicated himself thousands of times, and likewise automatically excommunicated himself tens of thousands of times - by violating his solemn Oaths - for which acts of excommunication this Modernist Heretic and Apostate from the Catholic Church automatically cast himself into the eternal fires of Hell!

JP-2 has NO CREDIBILITY in terms of what he said, what he preached, what he taught, and what he did because all of the examples found on this web page are heretical and anti-Catholic. Nobody has any business even thinking JP-2 should be “canonized” a “saint”!

Here is the Bottom Line:
To “canonize” JP-2 a “saint”

would be no different, nay even worse,
than to “canonize” anyone of these  other
human  agents  of  Satan a “saint”:


“saint” Adolph Hitler


“saint” Joseph Stalin


“saint” Pontius Pilate


“saint” Judas Iscariot

and:


“saint” JP-2

This makes a mockery of the “canonization” process itself!

The Mocker?  A picture is worth is thousand words.


Pretend Pope F-1 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier

This Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix is:  “... a sinister symbol, used by Satanists in the sixth century, that had been revived at the time of Vatican II. This was a bent or broken cross, on which was displayed a repulsive and distorted figure of Christ, which the black magicians and sorcerers of the Middle Ages had made use of to represent the Biblical term Mark of the Beast [i.e. anti-Christ].”  (Piers Compton, “The Broken Cross: Hidden Hand In the Vatican,” 1981.)

In other words, the person who uses the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ crucifix tells the entire world two things:  1) that person is a Satanist; 2) that person personifies anti-Christ! Furthermore, IF JP-2 should be “canonized a saint” by the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope F-1, this will simply be a public statement - by F-1’s public acts of  Heresy  and Apostasy - that proves Pope F-1 is himself an Heretic and an Apostate, and who follows in the Heretical  and Apostate footsteps of the Heretic and Apostate JP-2 and merits the same “reward” as the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope JP-2!!!
 

Pretend Pope JP-2 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier


The Eternal “reward” of JP-2

Part One:
Some of the Things Pope JP-2 Said
JP-2’s General Audiences


JP-2 General Audience
Wednesday, August 4, 1999

Purgatory

5. In following the Gospel exhortation to be perfect like the heavenly Father (cf. Mt 5:48) during our earthly life, we are called to grow in love, to be sound and flawless before God the Father 'at the coming of our Lord Jesus with all his saints' (1 Thes 3:12f.). Moreover, we are invited to 'cleanse ourselves from every defilement of body and spirit' (2 Cor 7:1; cf. 1 Jn 3:3), because the encounter with God requires absolute purity.

Every trace of attachment to evil must be eliminated, every imperfection of the soul corrected. Purification must be complete, and indeed this is precisely what is meant by the Church's teaching on purgatory. The term does not indicate a place, but a condition of existence. Those who, after death, exist in a state of purification, are already in the love of Christ who removes from them the remnants of imperfection (cf. Ecumenical Council of Florence, Decretum pro Graecis: DS 1304; Ecumenical Council of Trent, Decretum de Iustificatione: DS 1580; Decretum de Purgatorio: DS 1820).

It is necessary to explain that the state of purification is not a prolungation of the earthly condition, almost as if after death one were given another possibility to change one's destiny.

6. One last important aspect which the Church's tradition has always pointed out should be reproposed today: the dimension of 'communio'. Those, in fact, who find themselves in the state of purification are united both with the blessed who already enjoy the fullness of eternal life, and with us on this earth on our way towards the Father's house (cf. CCC, n. 1032).

Just as in their earthly life believers are united in the one Mystical Body, so after death those who live in a state of purification experience the same ecclesial solidarity which works through prayer, prayers for suffrage and love for their other brothers and sisters in the faith. Purification is lived in the essential bond created between those who live in this world and those who enjoy eternal beatitude.  (JP-2, General Audience, Wednesday, July 28, 1999, ¶¶ 5 and 6).
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1999/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_04081999_en.html

The Roman Catholic Church Infallibly Teaches:


Infallible Roman Catholic Œcumenical Council of Trent, Session 25

“Whereas the Catholic Church, instructed by the Holy Ghost, has, from the Sacred Writings and the Ancient Tradition of the Fathers, taught, in Sacred Councils, and very recently in this Œcumenical Synod, that there is a Purgatory, and that the Souls  THERE  DETAINED  are helped by the suffrages of the Faithful, but principally by the acceptable Sacrifice of the Altar.”  (“The Canons and Decrees of the Sacred and Œcumenical Council of Trent”, Translated by Father James Waterworth, Session 25, Monday, December 3-4, 1563, “Decree Concerning Purgatory”.  Infallibly Promulgated by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IV, Giovanni Angelo De Medici [Friday, December 25, 1559 - Thursday, December 9, 1565], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Infallibly Promulgated this Infallible Decree along with the Infallible Roman Catholic Dogmatic Council of Trent; emphasis added).

Infallible Roman Catholic Popes


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IV

“Whereas the Catholic Church, instructed by the Holy Ghost, has, from the Sacred Writings and the Ancient Tradition of the Fathers, taught, in Sacred Councils, and very recently in this Œcumenical Synod, that there is a Purgatory, and that the Souls  THERE  detained are helped by the suffrages of the Faithful, but principally by the acceptable Sacrifice of the Altar.”  (“The Canons and Decrees of the Sacred and Œcumenical Council of Trent”, Translated by Father James Waterworth, Session 25, Monday, December 3-4, 1563, “Decree Concerning Purgatory”.  Infallibly Promulgated by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IV, Giovanni Angelo De Medici [Friday, December 25, 1559 - Thursday, December 9, 1565], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Infallibly Promulgated this Infallible Decree along with the Infallible Roman Catholic Dogmatic Council of Trent; emphasis added).


Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XV

“It is thus that, according to the Divine Revelation, in this poem shines out the majesty of God One and Three, the Redemption of the human race operated by the Word of God made Man, the supreme loving-kindness and Charity of Mary, Virgin and Mother, Queen of Heaven, and lastly the glory on high of Angels, Saints and men; then the terrible contrast to this, the pains of the impious in Hell; then the middle world, so to speak, between Heaven and Hell, Purgatory, the Ladder of Souls destined after expiation to supreme beatitude”  (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XV, Giacomo Paolo Giovanni Battista della Chiesa [Thursday, September 3, 1914 - Saturday, January 21, 1922], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Præclara Summorum”, On Dante, ¶ 4, on Saturday, April 30, 1921).

Editorial Commentary by Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.

When the Infallible Roman Catholic Council of Trent and the Infallible Pope Pius IV, together, Infallibly teach that “there is a Purgatory, and that the Souls  THERE  detained are helped by the suffrages of the Faithful, but principally by the acceptable Sacrifice of the Altar” it does not take a proverbial rocket scientist to figure out that the word THERE refers to a PLACE, contrary to the Heresy of JP-2, who else?, that spouts the heresy that the term does not indicate a place, but a condition of existence.

JP-2 is wrong, as usual, because the Souls  THERE  detained definitely refers to a PLACE, NOT to a condition of existence.

Question # 12

Did Pope John-Paul II preach and teach the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church in his General Audience which was held on Wednesday, August  4, 1999?

Answer to Question # 12

NO!

Reasons for this Answer to Question # 12

Please refer to the above quoted texts of the Infallible Teachings of the Roman Catholic Church under:  JP-2’s General Audience on Wednesday, August  4, 1999.

Judgement - Based Upon these True Facts

Please click on this link regarding Judgement.

Final Conclusion to Question # 12

It is a contradiction of terms to claim that any Heretic, including the automatically Excommunicated Heretic, Pope JP-2, can be canonized a “saint”.

In Pope JP-2’s General Audience, Wednesday, August 4, 1999, he taught:  “Every trace of attachment to evil must be eliminated, every imperfection of the soul corrected. Purification must be complete, and indeed this is precisely what is meant by the Church's teaching on purgatory. The term does not indicate a place, but a condition of existence. Those who, after death, exist in a state of purification, are already in the love of Christ who removes from them the remnants of imperfection (cf.  Ecumenical Council of Florence, Decretum pro Graecis: DS 1304; Ecumenical Council of Trent, Decretum de Iustificatione: DS 1580; Decretum de Purgatorio: DS 1820).”

Notice where JP-2 takes advantage of the ignorance of his audience!?  JP-2 claims that the Ecumenical Council of Florence, Decretum pro Graecis: DS 1304; and the Ecumenical Council of Trent, Decretum de Iustificatione: DS 1580; Decretum de Purgatorio: DS 1820, teach that Purgatory is but a condition of existence  - which is a LIE and which LIE would have been clearly evident IF JP-2 had actually  QUOTED  these sources verbatim!

JP-2 conveniently  does NOT  QUOTE  verbatim, the Infallible Roman Catholic Œcumenical Council of Trent, Session 25  -  “Decree Concerning Purgatory”:  “Whereas the Catholic Church, instructed by the Holy Ghost, has, from the Sacred Writings and the Ancient Tradition of the Fathers, taught, in Sacred Councils, and very recently in this Œcumenical Synod, that there is a Purgatory, and that the Souls  THERE  DETAINED  are helped by the suffrages of the Faithful, but principally by the acceptable Sacrifice of the Altar.”  (“The Canons and Decrees of the Sacred and Œcumenical Council of Trent”, Translated by Father James Waterworth, Session 25, Monday, December 3-4, 1563, “Decree Concerning Purgatory”.  Infallibly Promulgated by the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IV, Giovanni Angelo De Medici [Friday, December 25, 1559 - Thursday, December 9, 1565], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Infallibly Promulgated this Infallible Decree along with the Infallible Roman Catholic Dogmatic Council of Trent; emphasis added).

SO, JUST EXACTLY WHERE - IN THE ABOVE VERBATIM QUOTE - DOES the Infallible Roman Catholic Œcumenical Council of Trent, Session 25  -  “Decree Concerning Purgatory” - CLEARLY STATE thatThe term [“Purgatory”] does not indicate a place, but a condition of existence???

On the contrary, the term “Purgatory” DOES  indicate  A  PLACE, but DOES NOT indicate a condition of existence!!!  No wonder JP-2 conveniently   DID NOT QUOTE his sources VERBATIM!!!  It was bad enough that JP-2 went around the world teaching the Heresy of Modernism, but to LIE on top of it!!! Apparently JP-2 was either desperate or arrogantxxor both???

Or was he simply

non compos mentis?!

AND  YET  “Catholics” want this  anti-Catholic Infiltrator, HERETIC, BLASPHEMER,  APOSTATE, and LYING  TEACHER formed by Hell  “canonized” a “saint”???!!! Apparently the anti-Catholic Infiltrators, Heretics, Blasphemers, Apostates, and LIARS desperately need a “patron saint”???!!!

No wonder JP-2 was a pretend pope and a professional actor of the anti-Catholic NEW World Order of   anti-Christ’sSatanic   Synod Vatican 2  pseudo-church. The “church” of anti-Catholic Innovators, Infiltrators, Heretics, Blasphemers, Apostates, and LIARS!!!!

Woe to you that call evil good, and good evil: that put darkness for light, and light for darkness: that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter. Woe to you that are wise in your own eyes, and prudent in your own conceits.” (Isaias 5:20-21; emphasis added).

Pope JP-2 was condemned, a priori,  as the above texts prove:

1.  By the infallible Roman Catholic Œcumenical Council of Trent

2.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Pius IV

3.  By the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Benedict XV

4.  By the 1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2314, § I  -  ipso facto  Excommunication

5.  By the Coronation Oath of the Pope-Elect.

6.  By the Profession of Faith.

7.  By the Oath Against Modernism.

JP-2 was an Heretic who publicly taught the Heresy that Purgatory is NOT a PLACE.  This is  contrary to the Infallible Dogmatic Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church quoted above.


Part Two
The Great Failures of Pope JP-2

The First Great Failure of Pope JP-2


Hans Hermann Cardinal Groer, O.S.B.
Pope JP-2 Refused to
Investigate Alleged Pedophile Cardinal Groer
At the Request of Cardinal Ratzinger
(Now Pope B-16)

Pope JP-2’s Innumerable Public Mortal Sins of Omission
Failed to Make a Complete Investigation of All Pedophile Clergy:
Sub-Deacons, Deacons, Priests, Bishops, Archbishops and Cardinals


The Second Great Failure of Pope JP-2


A Homosexual Priest in the Gay Parade,
Rome, 2000, September, 2000

Pope JP-2’s Innumerable Public Mortal Sins of Omission for
Failed to  EXPEL  All Homosexual Clergy, including:
Sub-Deacons, Deacons, Priests, Bishops, Archbishops and Cardinals


The Third Great Failure of Pope JP-2


Pope JP-2’s Innumerable Public Mortal Sins of Omission
Failed to  EXPEL  All Satanist Clergy, including:
Sub-Deacons, Deacons, Priests, Bishops, Archbishops and Cardinals

Satanist Clergy are holding Black Masses inside Vatican City.” (Archbishop Emmanuel Milingo, Fatima 2000 International Congress On World Peace Rome, Italy in November 1996).


The Fourth Great Failure of Pope JP-2


Pope JP-2’s Innumerable Public Mortal Sins of Omission
Failed to  EXPEL  ALL  IMMORAL  Seminarians:
This Includes ALL Pedophiles, Homosexuals, and Satanists


The Fifth Great Failure of Pope JP-2


Pope JP-2’s Innumerable Public Mortal Sins of Omission
Failed to  EXPEL  All anti-Catholic Infiltrators:
Laity, Religious, all Clergy, including: Sub-Deacons, Deacons,
Priests, Bishops, Archbishops and Cardinals.
Plus:  Communists, Freemasons, Illuminati, Satanists, Etc.


The Sixth Great Failure of Pope JP-2


Father Karl Rahner with Father Joseph Ratzinger (Now Pope B-16)
At the Convention of anti-Catholic Infiltrators, a.k.a. Vatican 2
Both NEW Theology Theologians in Secular Clothes

Pope JP-2’s Innumerable Public Mortal Sins of Omission
Failed to  EXPEL  All  NEW Theology Theologians:
Laity, Religious, Clergy including: Sub-Deacons, Deacons,
Priests, Bishops, Archbishops and Cardinals


The Seventh Great Failure of Pope JP-2


Catholic Traditional Mass Before
The Convention of anti-Catholic Infiltrators, a.k.a. Vatican 2

Pope JP-2’s Innumerable Public Mortal Sins of Omission
Failed to  Restore All of the Valid/Lawful pre-1944
Liturgical Rites for the Catholic Mass and the Seven Sacraments


The Eighth Great Failure of Pope JP-2


JP-2’s Institution of Pagan Tilak NOR NEW “mass”.


JP-2 Sitting on
Inverted Cross of anti-Christ Throne

JP-2 Giving Communion in the Hand
This is a Violation of Church Law

JP-2’s Institution of NUDE NOR NEW “mass”
The Abomination of Desolation!

JP-2’s Institution of
Pagan Aztec NOR NEW “mass”

JP-2’s  Heresy of False Ecumenism
Heresy of Religious Indifferentism
Apostasy from the Catholic Church
Sitting on Chair in Jewish Synagogue

JP-2’s  WIFE, Edwige?
Or, maybe a Daughter?

JP-2’s  Heresy of False Ecumenism
Heresy of Religious Indifferentism
Apostasy from the Catholic Church
Sitting on Chair in Buddhist Temple

JP-2’s  Heresy of False Ecumenism
Heresy of Religious Indifferentism
Apostasy from the Catholic Church
Toleration of Voodoo-like Cults in Brazil

Porno PLAYBOY and Perfidious Pope
JP-2’s  Blasphemy of the Sacred

Porno PLAYBOY and Perfidious Pope
JP-2’s  Blasphemy of the Sacred

JP-2’s  Heresy of False Ecumenism
Heresy of Religious Indifferentism
Apostasy from the Catholic Church
Adoration/Respect of
Pagan Book-The Koran

JP-2’s  Heresy of False Ecumenism
Heresy of
Religious Indifferentism
and Blatant Apostasy
from the Catholic Church
Meeting with non-Catholic Leaders
of non-Catholic religions
At Assisi in 1986


JP-2’s Institution of the
NUDE NOR (Novus Ordo Rite) NEW “mass”
The Abomination of Desolation!
 

Pope JP-2’s Continual Public

anti-Catholic Acts of Defiance
 

Pope JP-2’s Innumerable Public Mortal Sins of Omission
Failed to Restore pre-Vatican 2 Catholic Church
Faith, Liturgy, & Dogmas
By Speaking, Writing, and Acting as a Roman Catholic Pope.

Instead, JP-2 Continued his Public Acts of Defiance of Catholic Dogma,
His Public Mortal Sins of Perjury for the Violation of His Papal Oath,
By His Public anti-Catholic Acts (Speaking, Writing, Actions)
of Continued Scandalous Public Heresy and Public Apostasy, and
His Public Mortal Sins of Perjury in Violation of
The Profession of Faith and The Oath Against Modernism


The Ninth Great Failure of Pope JP-2

Pope JP-2’s Innumerable Public Mortal Sins of Omission
Failed to Resign the Papacy



Bottom Line


WHY Should Pope John-Paul II
Be Canonized a Saint?


Because  of  JP-2’s
anti-Catholic
LIFESTYLE
of:
Defiant Heresies,
Disobedient Pope,
A Prophecized Pastor:
Formed by Hell,
Blatant Blasphemies,
Aggressive Apostasy,
Satanic Liturgies,
Protector of Pedophiles,
NEW Theology Theologian,
Public Perjuries,
Self-Excommunicated,
False Philosophies,
Modernist Theology,
The  LYING  TEACHER,
Automatically Excommunicated,
Deceptive Preacher,
Anything Goes Innovator,
Protagonist of Paganism,
Propagandist of Fallacies,
Defender of Errors,
Hatred of Everything Catholic,
Mountains of:
Mortal Sins of Omission,
Guru of Nothingness,
Instructor of Indifferentism,
Juxtaposer of Different Realities,
Show-Off Clown,
Condemner of Apostolic Tradition,
Disciple of Karl Marx,
Proselytizer of Humanism,
Irresponsible Moralist,
Contemner of Church Laws,
Changer of:
The Changes of the Changes
of the Changes of the Changes,
Irreverent Religionist,
A Gaudeamus Evolutionist,
Mogul of Hypocrisy,
Proficient in Doctrines of Devils,
Propounder of the Equivocal,
Despiser of Everything Sacred,
Deification of Man,
Adept of Eschatological
Juxtapositions,
Worshipper of Pagan Idols,
Phenomenologist extraordinaire,
Expert of Duplicitous Phraseology,
Despicable Trouble-Maker,
Habitual Liar,
Rogue Pope,
Penchants for Deception,
Spontaneous Prevaricator,
Supercilious Miscreant,
Usurper of the Papal Dignity,
Gourmand of Iniquity,
anti-Christ Role Model,
and
formed by Hell

As Proven Over and Over Again,
Based Upon Each Above Fact,
The Answer to this Question:

 
“Did Pope John-Paul II, who held the office of an official teacher in the church, preach and teach - always consistently - without any exceptions, whether verbally, and/or in writing, and/or by his actions, and/or by his policies, the Unchangeable Deposit of the Catholic Faith, which contains the Unchangeable Dogmatic Doctrines of the Catholic Church, when he was pope, as did his Canonized predecessors?”
IS NO!
Therefore the Final Answer IS:


NO  WAY  -  NOT  EVER!!!!

A picture is worth is thousand words.


Pope F-1 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier

This Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix is:  “... a sinister symbol, used by Satanists in the sixth century, that had been revived at the time of Vatican II. This was a bent or broken cross, on which was displayed a repulsive and distorted figure of Christ, which the black magicians and sorcerers of the Middle Ages had made use of to represent the Biblical term Mark of the Beast [i.e. anti-Christ].”  (Piers Compton, “The Broken Cross: Hidden Hand In the Vatican,” 1981.)

In other words, the person who uses the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ crucifix tells the entire world two things:  1) that person is a Satanist; 2) that person personifies anti-Christ! Furthermore, IF JP-2 should be “canonized a saint” by the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope F-1, this will simply be a public statement - by F-1’s public acts of  Heresy  and Apostasy - that proves Pope F-1 is himself an Heretic and an Apostate, and who follows in the Heretical  and Apostate footsteps of the Heretic and Apostate JP-2 and merits the same “reward” as the bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier-Bearer Pope JP-2!!!
 

Pretend Pope JP-2 with Bent, Satanist, anti-Christ Crucifix Crozier


The Eternal “reward” of JP-2



Appendix


Appendix One  - Anathema

“Share the lot of those whom you freely embrace and not the honor and communion of the Catholic Church.  Likewise, realize that you are separated from the number of the Faithful; that you receive the name of an enemy of the Christian religion; that you are condemned by the judgment of the Holy Ghost and Apostolic Authority; and that you are never released from the bonds of this Anathema” (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Felix I [Tuesday,  January 5, 269 - Wednesday, December 30, 274], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical Letter, “Epistle 6”; emphasis added).

“ANATHEMA then appears as the more Solemn Form of pronouncing or declaring Excommunication” (Rev. P. Chas. Augustine, O.S.B., D.D., “A Commentary on the New Code of Canon Law”, Volume 8, Canons 2255 & 2256, p. 170).

“ANATHEMA:  A thing or person struck by God’s malediction and intended for ruin.  Cf. I Cor. 12:13; Rom. 9:3; Gal. l:8-9.  Anathema, in actual Church discipline, is the term used for IPSO FACTO Excommunication incurred by those denying a solemnly defined Truth” (Parente, Piolanti, Garofalo, Dictionary of Dogmatic Theology, “Anathema”; emphasis added).

 
The Blessing
V. Sit + Nomen Domini benedictum.
R. Ex hoc nunc, et usque in saeculum.
V. Adjutorium nostrum in
Nomine Domini.
R. Qui fecit cœlum et terram.
V. Benedicat vos, Omnipotens Deus:
V. Pa + ter, et Fi + lius, et Spiritus + Sanctus, descendat super vos, et maneat semper.
R. Amen.
V. Blessed + be the Name of the Lord.
R. Now and for ever more.x
V. Our help is in the Name of the Lord.
mm
R. Who made Heaven and earth.
V. May Almighty God Bless thee:x
V. The Fa + ther, the + Son, and the Holy + Ghost, descend upon thee, and always remain with thee.
R. Amen.

Dear Visitors:

Please help Us to continue to provide the Truth,  which   all Catholics need to know,   in these days of deliberate confusion,   lies, brainwashing,  and   propaganda!

Some of Our web pages are the only places on the Internet where you will find some very important facts,  because some of these facts are from Our own many personal experiences,     as well as the result of Our meetings with many Catholic Traditional Clergy including various Patriarchs, Cardinals, Primates, Metropolitans, Archbishops, Bishops, and Religious and Secular Priests, over many, many, many decades,    plus    Our own eye-witness testimony,   concerning   some of the many, many, many changes, which began many, many, many decadesbefore the many, many, many younger generations of Catholics were even born,   and    of which changes all of these so many, many younger generations of Catholicshave no personal knowledge and/or personal experiences.

Most of these many changes    are not only   illegal,  but they are also   invalid,  and   most of them include the censure of  automatic excommunication of the perpetrators,  because, in reality, such changes by the cabal of   automatically excommunicated Innovators,   as well as   the secret gangs   of anti-Catholic Infiltrators,    are changes which are  anti-Catholic!

Discover what the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH teaches    about the UNCHANGEABLE: Roman Catholic Faith,   Mass, Sacraments,  etc., etc.

We have recently added what has quickly become Our very popular Editorial Pages on various subjects.

Please Donate to Our Patriarchal Website at:
http://www.traditionalcatholicmass.com/home-m08.html
Thank You!  God Bless You!
Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.


Knowledge
 
It is of the greatest importance that in order to gain assured knowledge of things, to rely on exact acquaintance with facts, rather than on the uncertain testimony of public rumor; and then what we have proved for certain we may proclaim without hesitation. (Saint Bernard of Clairvaux  [b. Castle Fontaines, near Dijon, France in 1090 A.D. - d. at Clairvaux, France on Friday, August 21, 1153 A.D.], Abbot of Clairvaux, Doctor of the Church, Letters).
All Catholics Need Purgatory Fire Insurance NOW!
IF You are Wise by helping a Soul with Catholic Traditional
Requiem Masses to get out of Purgatory much faster NOW,
Another Wise and Charitable Person will help YOU,
when YOUR time comes, to get out of Purgatory much faster!
God Rewards Charity for the Suffering Souls in Purgatory!

Please Help a Suffering Soul in Purgatory NOW!
Our Blessed Mother asks Catholics to Pray her Traditional Rosary daily.
The Rosary will really make a Powerful difference in Your Life!
Please click here to go to the Editorial Contents Homepage.
Please click here to go to the Contents Homepage.
5