Hosted and Edited by
Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.
Do You Know?
What Are the Results of
In 1986, a commission of 12 bishops and cardinals was put in charge of this task which was assisted by a committee of seven diocesan bishops, who were supposed to be “periti” (experts) in theology and catechesis:
“In 1986 I entrusted a commission of 12 Cardinals and Bishops, chaired by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, with the task of preparing a draft of the catechism requested by the Synod Fathers. An editorial committee of seven diocesan Bishops, experts in theology and catechesis, assisted the commission in its work.” (JP-2, “Fidei Depositum”, Thursday, October 11, 1962, II. The Process and Spirit of Drafting the Text, ¶ 2.)The text of the CCC was approved by JP-2 on Thursday, June 25, 1992, and promulgated by him on Sunday, October 11, 1992, the 30th anniversary of the opening of Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962], with his constitution, “Fidei Depositum” which states in part:
“The Catechism of the Catholic Church, which I approved 25 June last and the publication of which I today order by virtue of my Apostolic Authority, is a statement of the Church's faith and of Catholic doctrine, attested to or illumined by Sacred Scripture, Apostolic Tradition and the Church's Magisterium. I declare it to be a valid and legitimate instrument for ecclesial communion and a sure norm for teaching the faith.” (JP-2, “Fidei Depositum”, Thursday, October 11, 1962, IV. The Doctrinal Value of the Text, ¶ 1; emphasis added.).Yet, by default, the norm, the “100% correct and authentic text”, which is termed the “typical edition” (editio typica), was NOT printed in Latin, which is the official language of the Church, but rather this “sure norm for teaching the faith” (JP-2, “Fidei Depositum”, Thursday, October 11, 1962, IV. The Doctrinal Value of the Text, ¶ 1), which was also touted as “a sure and authentic reference text for teaching Catholic doctrine” (JP-2, “Fidei Depositum”, Thursday, October 11, 1962, IV. The Doctrinal Value of the Text, ¶ 3), was actually printed in the French language in 1992 (Catéchisme de l'Église Catholique. Tours/Paris: Mame/Plon. 1992)! WHY this blatant subterfuge by JP-2 and his lackeys? It has been suggested that most Prelates do not know Latin, but how many really know French?
Later, the CCC was translated into other languages from, what had become by default, the French de facto “typical edition” (editio typica), since nothing exists in a vacuum except nothingness!
The English translation of the default French “typical edition” (editio typica) was first published by the U.S. bishops in 1994 with a note that it was “subject to revision according to the Latin typical edition (editio typica) when it is published” later in Latin. Thus an admission by the U.S. bishops that the default French “typical edition” (editio typica) was not really the official Vatican “typical edition” (editio typica) which, at that time, did not really exist anywhere, which obfuscation at least the U.S. bishops recognized.
On the contrary, this is the historical reverse of standard Vatican protocol and procedures that: First, everything is issued in an official Latin “typical edition” (editio typica). This official document then becomes the basis upon which to make all the vernacular translations - not the other way around! So what was the “deceitful tongue .... slippery mouth worketh ruin” (Proverbs 26:28) JP-2 trying to hide?
On the contrary, IF the default French “typical edition” (editio typica) is not really the official “typical edition” (editio typica), which would have the guarantee that it is the “sure norm for teaching the faith” (JP-2, “Fidei Depositum”, Thursday, October 11, 1962, IV. The Doctrinal Value of the Text, ¶ 1), which was also touted as “a sure and authentic reference text for teaching Catholic doctrine and particularly for preparing local catechisms” (JP-2, “Fidei Depositum”, Thursday, October 11, 1962, IV. The Doctrinal Value of the Text, ¶ 3), then where and what is this official “typical edition” (editio typica) to use “for preparing local catechisms”?
This type of nonsense is typical heretical Modernist and NEW Theology Theologian double-talk which means nothing, but which is de facto part of the legacy of JP-2’s standard “typical edition” (editio typica) of his camouflaged statements of heresy which are totally worthless!
Despite this heretical craziness of JP-2, not to mention, among the various furtive “salubrious” others, the so-called “American bishops”, it seems that some people have assumed that the original default French “typical edition” (editio typica), as well as the American 1994 and 1995 editions in English, and the belated Latin “Typical Edition” (Edito Typica) of Monday, September 8, 1997, which was an obvious bonanza for book publishers, who could now print the allegedly “corrected” editions in the vernacular languages, are all somehow “infallible”, despite the fact that JP-2 claimed the original default French “typical edition” (editio typica) of 1992, was the “sure norm for teaching the faith” (JP-2, “Fidei Depositum”, Thursday, October 11, 1962, IV. The Doctrinal Value of the Text, ¶ 1), which was also touted as “a sure and authentic reference text for teaching Catholic doctrine and particularly for preparing local catechisms” (JP-2, “Fidei Depositum”, Thursday, October 11, 1962, IV. The Doctrinal Value of the Text, ¶ 3)!
Words mean something! This is why dictionaries exist to give us the correct meaning of each word!
We are reminded how the Angelic Doctor teaches that:
“Truth cannot be Truth's contrary.” (Saint Thomas Aquinas [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], “Summa Contra Gentiles”, IV, Chapter 8).Here is what a Doctrinal Council of the Roman Catholic Church teaches:
Moreover, “since [one] Truth does not contradict [another] Truth, We declare that every assertion contrary to Truth illumined by Faith is absolutely false, and to teach otherwise We strictly forbid; and We Decree that all who adhere to errors of this kind be avoided and punished as heretics and infidels seeking to destroy the Catholic Faith.” (Rev. H. J. Schroeder, O.P., “Disciplinary Decrees of the General Councils, Text, Translation, and Commentary”, published by B. Herder Book Co., 15 & 17 South Broadway, St. Louis, Mo., and 33 Queen Square, London, W. C., 1917, The Eighteenth General Council [1512-1517], Fifth Lateran Council, Bulla “Aposolici Regiminis”, Session VIII, Friday, December 19, 1513, page 487.)Therefore, it should be self-evident to everyone that for JP-2 to proclaim that the original default French “typical edition” (editio typica) of 1992, was the “sure norm for teaching the faith” (JP-2, “Fidei Depositum”, Thursday, October 11, 1962, IV. The Doctrinal Value of the Text, ¶ 1), which was also touted as “a sure and authentic reference text for teaching Catholic doctrine and particularly for preparing local catechisms” (JP-2, “Fidei Depositum”, Thursday, October 11, 1962, IV. The Doctrinal Value of the Text, ¶ 3), and then to contradict this, with the various “corrections” made in the 1977 official Latin “Typical Edition” (Edito Typica), makes a mockery of the Truth so that one must believe whatever JP-2 says is the “truth” in the 1992 CCC, despite the fact that he would then have one believe whatever he claims is the “truth” in his “1997 version of the truth”, most especially in those places which are clearly contradictory.
Thus, JP-2's “truth of 1997" contradicts JP-2's “truth of 1992", making it obvious that JP-2’s “truth” is sometimes error, which means the Decree of the Fifth Lateran Council takes effect on JP-2:
“We Decree that all who adhere to errors of this kind be avoided and punished as heretics and infidels seeking to destroy the Catholic Faith.” (Op. Cit.)No doubt some people will take the position that neither the 1992 nor the 1997 editions of the CCC contain any errors.
Consider for a moment how a document, which is claimed to be “infallible” does not need to be “corrected”. We do not mean any possible translation errors from one language to another, but rather content errors - what the CCC actually says in all languages. For example, the second edition of the CCC in English contains 83 corrections to correct the various errors of the first edition of the 1994 edition of the American CCC.
Here are four random examples:
The Monday, September 8, 1997 “Typical Edition” (Edito Typica), in Latin, contains these corrections to the first edition which corrections were thereupon made in the vernacular languages of the CCC, including the first CCC English edition of 1994:
1. CCC paragraph # 57 - eliminated the phrase in the first sentence which reads “entrusted by divine providence to the guardianship of angels” as well as the reference in Footnote 10 to Dt 4:19 and 32:8.
2. CCC paragraph # 1863 - changed the sentence which had read:
"However venial sin does not set us in direct opposition to the will and friendship of God; it does not break the covenant with God."3. CCC paragraph # 2372 - The final sentence of this paragraph, which had read:
However venial sin does not break the covenant with God.
"It is not authorized to promote demographic regulation by means contrary to the natural law."4. CCC paragraph # 2483 - The second sentence of this paragraph which had read:
was changed to read:
In this area, it is not authorized to employ means contrary to the moral law.
"To lie is to speak or act against the truth in order to lead into error someone who has the right to know the truth."Likewise, the 1992 CCC, just as the 1997 edition, does NOT carry the Imprimatur. Therefore, the CCC contains only opinions, NOT Roman Catholic Doctrine, despite all the claims to the contrary.
was changed to:
To lie is to speak or act against the truth in order to lead someone into error.
Text of the TRC, The Roman Catechism, is from
“The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”
Issued by Order of Pope Saint Pius V, 1566 A.D.
Translated by John A. McHugh, O.P., S.T.M., Litt.D.
and Charles J. Callan, O.P., S.T.M., Litt.D.
Imprimatur: + Patrick Cardinal Joseph Hayes, D.D.,
Archbishop of New York, Wednesday, January 3, 1923
Text of the CCC, “Catechism
of the Catholic Church”
is from the 1994 Second Edition
Revised in Accordance with the Official Latin Text
Issued by Pope John-Paul 2
Translated by Unknown(s)
Most Catholics Do NOT Know This!
“For God formed the world not from materials of any sort, but created it from nothing, and that not by constraint or necessity, but spontaneously, and of His own free will. Nor was He impelled to create by any other cause than a desire to communicate His goodness to creatures. Being essentially happy in Himself He stands not in need of anything, as David expresses it: I have said to the Lord, thou art my God, for thou hast no need of my goods [Footnote 55: Psalm 15:2. Footnote 55b: On the production of the world from nothing, and on the motive of creation, see Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 44, Article 2.].” (TRC, Part I, The Creed, Article I: “I Believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth”, Creator, pp. 26-27; emphasis added.)
“The question about the origin of the world and of man has been the object of many scientific studies which have splendidly enriched our knowledge of the age and dimensions of the cosmos, the development of life-forms and the appearance of man.”
Error # 1
Response to Error # 1
On the Contrary: The question concerning the origin of the world was already answered in the Roman Catholic Catechism known as The Roman Catechism, a.k.a., “The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, Issued by Order of Pope Saint Pius V, 1566 A.D.:
TRC: “For God formed the world not from materials of any sort, but created it from nothing...” (TRC, Part I, The Creed, Article I: “I Believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth”, Creator, p. 26; emphasis added.)
CCC # 283: “The question about the origin ...... of man ... and the appearance of man.”
Response to Error # 2
On the Contrary: The question concerning the origin .... of man ... and the appearance of man was already answered in the Roman Catholic Catechism known as The Roman Catechism, a.k.a., “The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, Issued by Order of Pope Saint Pius V, 1566 A.D.:
TRC: “Lastly, He [God] formed man from the slime of the earth, so created and constituted in body as to be immortal and impassible, not, however, by the strength of nature, but by the bounty of God. Man's soul He created to His own image and likeness; gifted him with free will, and tempered all his motions and appetites so as to subject them, at all times, to the dictates of reason. He then added the admirable gift of original justice, and next gave him dominion over all other animals.” (TRC, Part I, The Creed, Article I: “I Believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth”, Of Heaven and Earth, Production Of Man, p. 29; emphasis added.)
CCC # 283: “...the development of life-forms....”
Response to Error # 3
On the Contrary: The development of life-forms is blatantly heretical. Why? Because it denies the Truth of Creation because the word development means, among other things, evolution, and evolution is the primary dogma of the Modernist Heretics and the NEW Theology Heretics. The Truth is that, in the very beginning, God Himself created all things (everything) - God did not develop anything! This heretical error was already answered in the Roman Catholic Catechism known as The Roman Catechism, a.k.a., “The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, Issued by Order of Pope Saint Pius V, 1566 A.D.:
TRC: “As it was His [God's] own goodness that influenced Him when He did all things whatsoever He would, so in the work of creation He [God] followed no external form or model; but contemplating, and as it were imitating, the universal model contained in the Divine intelligence, the supreme Architect, with infinite wisdom and power-attributes peculiar to the Divinity -- created all things in the beginning. He spoke and they were made: He commanded and they were created [Footnote 56: Psalm 32:9. Footnote 56b: On God as the exemplary cause of creation see Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 44, Article 3.].” (TRC, Part I, The Creed, Article I: “I Believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth”, Creator, p. 27; emphasis added.)
It is self-evident that the CCC has conviently ignored the above basic Truths of the Catholic Faith which have been officially taught by The Roman Catechism since 1566 A.D.
Therefore, Catholics should NEVER read the CCC which, at least in some places, as proven above, is an anti-Catholic, heretical catechism.
Instead, Catholics who read English should read the TRC, The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests, Issued by Order of Pope Saint Pius V, 1566 A.D., which was translated into English by Father John A. McHugh, O.P., S.T.M., Litt.D., and Father Charles J. Callan, O.P., S.T.M., Litt.D., with the Imprimatur of Patrick Cardinal Joseph Hayes, D.D., Archbishop of New York, which Imprimatur was issued on Wednesday, January 3, 1923.
It is currently available in PDF format for free at: http://www.freecatholicebooks.com/books/catechism_of_trent.pdf
IF this one is not available, choose the translation by Father Donovan, D.D. Several copies, in various formats, including PDF, are available for free, including this one, which is at: https://ia800503.us.archive.org/10/items/catechismofcoun00cathuoft/catechismofcoun00cathuoft.pdf
In only one sentence, CCC # 283 has vomited out several heresies! Yet this cesspool of errors is claimed to be a catechism of the Catholic Church?! Do not insult the intelligence of Catholics!
On the contrary, the CCC is an official catechism of a non-Catholic cult.
To blatantly lie on the front cover of this catechism by falsely claiming it is the Catechism of the Catholic Church is to lead to eternal perdition those who read it! This front cover is but a visual symbol of what the enemies of the Catholic Church have already done to try to destroy the unchangeable Catholic Faith, Mass, and Sacraments, all of which, in reality, are no longer Catholic in the anti-Catholic NEW World Order of anti-Christ'sSatanicSynod Vatican 2 pseudo-church of automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics, NEW Theology Heretics, as well as gangs of anti-Catholic Infiltrators such as Communists, Freemasons, Illuminati, Fifth-Column, etc.
NOTE: For Roman Catholics, The Roman Catholic Church does NOT teach errors and heresies, including the Heresies of Modernism and the NEW Theology Heresies.
Yet, it is somewhat ironic that, not even one “bishop” of the anti-Catholic NEW World Order of anti-Christ'sSatanicSynod Vatican 2 pseudo-church of automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics, NEW Theology Heretics, as well as gangs of anti-Catholic Infiltrators such as Communists, Freemasons, Illuminati, Fifth-Column, etc., has put his non-Catholic, worthless imprimatur on the CCC - even they seem to know better?!
This fact reminds one that the self-identified bishops of the United States require standing to get a piece of non-transubstantiated bread and to drink some non-transubstantiated wine at their fake and phony communion! WHY? To prevent their victimized recipients from committing the Mortal Sin of Idolatry by kneeling before the fake and phony mockery which is made available during their anti-Communion service during their anti-Mass which is, per se, not only illegal, but most especially, INVALID!
CCC # 283 is an example of how the NEW Theology Heretics try to surpass the unimaginative and insipid Modernist Heretics in their attempts to outdo each other in their fiendish competition which runs amuck in the never-never land of apostate science-fiction trilogies which blather with more and more useless sophisticated anti-Scholastic sophistries which are soaked with the vulcanized wormwood of noxious, as well as Spiritually poisonous, ambiguity in the illusory kettle of the black hole of nothingness which is kindled by the flames of the passionate vibrations of certain wanna-be pseudo-hierophantic masters of deceit with their pseudo-degrees in the black arts of chicanery, equivocity, confusion, and total demonic destruction.
CCC # 283 has been refuted by the TRC,
Roman Catechism, a.k.a. “The Catechism of the Council of Trent for
Issued by Order of Pope Saint Pius V, 1566 A.D. as proven in the Response to Error # 1, # 2, and # 3, as found above.
Although it is true that the CCC later supplies various passages from Genesis, why raise issues in CCC # 283 which later contradict CCC # 283? For example, CCC # 287 which says in part: “God reveals himself as the one to whom belong all the peoples of the earth, and the whole earth itself; he is the One who alone ‘made heaven and earth’ [Footnote # 125. Cf. Isa. 43:1; Ps. 115:15; 124:8; 134:3].”
In order to remove the deliberate confusion of such a very clear contradictions, it is necessary to remember the so-called mentality of the heretics, as in this example:
“18. This will appear more clearly to anybody who studies the conduct of Modernists, which is in perfect harmony with their teachings. In their writings and addresses they seem not infrequently to advocate doctrines which are contrary one to the other, so that one would be disposed to regard their attitude as double and doubtful. But this is done deliberately and advisedly, and the reason of it is to be found in their opinion as to the mutual separation of science and faith. Thus in their books one finds some things which might well be approved by a Catholic, but on turning over the page one is confronted by other things which might well have been dictated by a rationalist. When they write history they make no mention of the Divinity of Christ, but when they are in the pulpit they profess it clearly; again, when they are dealing with history they take no account of the Fathers and the Councils, but when they catechize the people, they cite them respectfully.” (Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto [b. at Riese, Lombardy-Venetia, Austrian Empire on Tuesday, June 2, 1835; Pope: Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - d. [b. at Riese, Lombardy-Venetia, Austrian Empire on Tuesday, June 2, 1835; Pope: Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - d. at the Apostolic Palace, Rome, Kingdom of Italy, on Thursday, August 20, 1914], Encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, Sunday, September 8, 1907, ¶ 18; emphasis added.)Therefore, despite any possible objections to these facts by thought-terrorists, and by Truth-terrorists, i.e., by Modernist Heretics and NEW Theology Heretics, the fact remains for all to see that the statements in CCC # 283, when they are seriously compared with the statements in CCC # 287, are contradictory to each other.
Rational Readers must now logically wonder how many more places in the CCC have this same problem? One statement might have been written by a heretic and yet, on turning over the page, one might find some things written which can be accepted by a Catholic, even though it was also written by a heretic!??? This is nonsense being nothing more than thought-terrorism which, if accepted as "truth", might eventually cause a person's Soul to go to Hell?!
So, here is internal proof, provided by the CCC itself, that the CCC contains heresies and was written by NEW Theology Heretics who are really no different than the Modernist Heretics, except that the NEW Theology Heretics tend to be even more subtly duplicitous and more frequently engage in sophisticated expressions of sophistry and deliberate contradictions in order to deliberately camouflage their heresies while they beguile their innocent Readers with a blitz of insidious deceptions while pretending to be so “traditional” so that innocent Readers succumb to their “bait-and-switch” tactics which have Readers wondering if what they read was really what they read, or in a more modern idiom: you did not see what you saw; therefore, you did not read what you read. Or, in Anglo-Saxon English: what you read in CCC # 283 is subtly replaced, and thereupon hopefully totally forgotten, by what you latter read in CCC # 287 which process takes advantage of the fact that the mind tends to better remember which was just read than what was read previously.
However, if for no other reason than the above, Catholics who read English should read the TRC, The Roman Catechism, “The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, Issued by Order of Pope Saint Pius V, 1566 A.D., translated into English by John A. McHugh, O.P., S.T.M., Litt.D. and Charles J. Callan, O.P., S.T.M., Litt.D., with the Imprimatur: of Patrick Cardinal Joseph Hayes, D.D., the Archbishop of New York, which Imprimatur was issued on Wednesday, January 3, 1923, and never read the heretical CCC, “Catechism of the Catholic Church” in any language.
Because of the obvious mutual conflict within the CCC itself, of one part with a different part, as proven above, which carries the clear fingerprints of the contradictory nonsense of heretics, We will limit Our comparison to but only one more subject.
Subject: False Ecumenism
“The first mark of the true Church is described in the Nicene Creed, and consists in unity: My dove is one, my beautiful one is one. (Canticle of Canticles 6:8). So vast a multitude, scattered far and wide, is called one for the reasons mentioned by St. Paul in his Epistle to the Ephesians: One Lord, one faith, one baptism (Ephesians 4:5; emphasis added).
(TRC, Part I, The Creed, Article IX: “I Believe in the Holy Catholic Church,” The Marks of the Church, One, p. 102; emphasis added.)----------------
“Certain things are required in order to respond adequately to this call [toward unity]: ..... prayer in common, because ‘change of heart and holiness of life, along with public and private prayer for the unity of Christians, should be regarded as the soul of the whole ecumenical movement, and merits the name ‘spiritual ecumenism;’” Reference Note: 282 UR 8 § 1... (Unitatis Redintegratio 8 § 1)
Error # 1
Response to Error # 1
On the Contrary: Those certain things
which it claims are required concerning the subject of this
call [toward unity] deliberately ignores the efficient cause
of unity, without which (sine qua non) there can not
ever be any real unity. Although CCC # 821 presents a short list
of how to accomplish unity, this list is only wishful thinking. In
reality, it is merely, the cite Shakespeare, a false creation,
proceeding from the heat-oppressed brains (William Shakespeare, [b. at Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, England in April 1564 A.D. - d. at Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, England on Saturday, April 23, 1616], Theatrical Play: “The Tragedy of Macbeth”, 1606 A.D., Act II, Scene I, The Dagger Scene Soliloquy.) of ex-Roman Catholics: automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theology Heretics.
The efficient cause of real, true, and everlasting unity is to be found in:
ONE teaching authority,It is wise and prudent for Catholics to refresh their memories on how to identify the ONE and only True, Real Church which is discovered in the four marks of the True Church which are: ONE, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic.
ONE law of belief,
This teaching of the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed is referenced in the Roman Catholic Catechism known as The Roman Catechism, a.k.a., “The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, Issued by Order of Pope Saint Pius V, 1566 A.D.:
TRC: “The first mark of the true Church is described in the Nicene Creed, and consists in unity.... So vast a multitude, scattered far and wide, is called one for the reasons mentioned by St. Paul in his Epistle to the Ephesians: One Lord, one faith, one baptism (Ephesians 4:5; emphasis added).” (TRC, Part I, The Creed, Article IX: “I Believe in the Holy Catholic Church,” The Marks of the Church, One, p. 102; emphasis added.)The CCC # 821 call [toward unity] was condemned on Friday, January 6, 1928 by Pope Pius XI in his Encyclical, “Mortalium Animos”, On Religious Unity.
TRC: “The second mark of the Church is holiness, as we learn from these words of the Prince of the Apostles: You are a chosen generation, a holy nation [1 Peter 2:9].... The Church is also to be called holy because she is united to her holy Head, as His [Mystical] Body; that is, to Christ the Lord [Footnote 43: Ephesians 4:15-16], the fountain of all holiness, from whom flow the graces of the Holy Spirit and the riches of the divine bounty.... Moreover, the Church alone has the legitimate worship of sacrifice, and the salutary use of the Sacraments, which are the efficacious instruments of Divine Grace, used by God to produce true holiness. Hence, to possess true holiness, we must belong to this Church. The Church therefore it is clear, is holy, and holy because she is the [Mystical] Body of Christ, by Whom she is sanctified, and in Whose Blood she is washed.” (TRC, Part I, The Creed, Article IX: “I Believe in the Holy Catholic Church,” The Marks of the Church, Holy, pp. 104-106; emphasis added.)
TRC: “The third mark of the Church is that she is Catholic; that is, universal. And justly is she called Catholic, because, as St. Augustine says, ‘she is diffused by the splendour of one faith from the rising to the setting sun.’ [Saint Augustine, Sermon 240, 2, 4].... She is also called universal, because all who desire eternal salvation must cling to and embrace her, like those who entered the ark to escape perishing in the flood.. This (note of catholicity), therefore, is to be taught as a most reliable criterion, by which to distinguish the true from a false Church.”(TRC, Part I, The Creed, Article IX: “I Believe in the Holy Catholic Church,” The Marks of the Church, Catholic, p. 106; emphasis added.)
TRC: “The true Church is also to be recognised from her origin, which can be traced back under the law of grace to the Apostles; for her doctrine is the truth not recently given, nor now first heard of, but delivered of old by the Apostles, and disseminated throughout the entire world. Hence no one can doubt that the impious opinions which heresy invents, opposed as they are to the doctrines taught by the Church from the days of the Apostles to the present time, are very different from the faith of the true Church.”
“That all, therefore, might know which was the Catholic Church, the Fathers, guided by the Spirit of God, added to the Creed the word Apostolic. For the Holy Ghost, who presides over the Church, governs her by no other ministers than those of Apostolic succession. This Spirit, first imparted to the Apostles, has by the infinite goodness of God always continued in the Church. And just as this one Church cannot err in faith or morals, since it is guided by the Holy Ghost; so, on the contrary, all other societies arrogating to themselves the name of church, must necessarily, because guided by the spirit of the devil, be sunk in the most pernicious errors, both doctrinal and moral.” (TRC, Part I, The Creed, Article IX: “I Believe in the Holy Catholic Church,” The Marks of the Church, Apostolic, p. 107; emphasis added.)
“HOW CAN so great A VARIETY OF OPINIONS make the way clear to effect the UNITY of the Church We know not; that UNITY can ONLY arise FROM ONE TEACHING authority, ONE law of BELIEF, and ONE FAITH of Christians. But We do know that from this it is an easy step to the neglect of Religion or INDIFFERENTISM and to MODERNISM, as they call it. Those, who are unhappily INFECTED WITH THESE ERRORS, HOLD THAT Dogmatic TRUTH IS NOT ABSOLUTE but relative, that is, it agrees with the varying necessities of time and place and with the varying tendencies of the mind, since it is not contained in immutable revelation, but is capable of being accommodated to human life” (Pope Pius XI, Achille Ratti [Monday, February 6, 1922 - Friday, February 10, 1939], Encyclical, “Mortalium Animos”, On Religious Unity, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 9; emphasis added).Therefore, WHY have the authors of the CCC, especially CCC # 821, conviently ignored this Encyclical of Pope Pius XI, “Mortalium Animos”, On Religious Unity?
Obviously, the authors of CCC # 821 are NOT Catholics! On the contrary, they are some of the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and the NEW Theology Heretics, especially these latter, whose sophisticated subterfuge exceeds the drivel of their progenitors, the Modernists. All of these ex-Roman Catholics have, by using their talents of camouflaging the errors of the secret societies, e.g. freemasons, with phrases and sentences which sound good, but which are broken bunches of balderdash - said in a more urbane way - not good and sound, thanks to their talent for misleading double-talk, done much to help the cause of secret societies such as the freemasons who continue to teach that ALL religions are alike:
“The Freemasons.... teach the great error of this age- that a regard for religion should be held as an INDIFFERENT matter, and THAT ALL RELIGIONS ARE ALIKE. This manner of reasoning is calculated to bring about the ruin of all forms of religion, and especially of the Catholic Religion, which, as it is the only one that is True, cannot, without great injustice, be regarded as merely equal to other religions.” (Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Humanum Genus”, On Freemasonry, Sunday, April 20, 1884, ¶ 16; emphasis added).But the freemasons have done much more than merely "inspire" parts of the CCC!
The year is 1935. Freemasonry reaches out to the archbishop of Masembria, Apostolic Delegate in Turkey, in the most difficult moment of his diplomatic activity. Roncalli joins the secret sect as a “Rose Cross,” states the author, and takes on the name of Johannes. He, a priest, knows well the value of that name.....
From that point on, in fact, the life of Roncalli is mapped out. Until the day of his death. Not by chance, twenty-three years later, coming out of the Sistine Chapel as a Pope, he will choose the name of Johannes, taken there, on the Bosphorus, upon his Masonic initiation. And he will love to shock the informed, calling himself like that other John XXIII, the schismatic. And he will raise his own coat of arms, with a tower and two lilies standing out, to which not few experts of Freemasonry will attribute a significance at all emblematic: The tower of the Masonic temple, flanked by two knights, “Reason” and “Instinct.” Naturally, the Vatican denied it. But they were brief denials, of no import....
At least in Rome, in well-informed circles, the names of the Freemason cardinals are no secret.
A priest friend of mine, Don Enrico Pompilio, military chaplain with the rank of major of the “carabinieri,” confided to me to have received from a French monsignor, a renowned lecturer met at a congress, a most grave revelation about the sudden and tragic and scandalous death of cardinal Jean Danielou......
To Freemasonry, Roncalli was to be a means, a pawn. It is no case that two years after his election to the pontificate, in 1960, he would promote a series of studies on the esoteric and initiatory societies and their relationship with the Church, initiating that process that would bring about the overriding of the excommunication of Freemasonry......
Some events, known and not so known, lend credibility to the premise of a Roncalli-mason. For example, the fact that the election of the patriarch of Venice at the Conclave of 1958 was known in advance. Today, ten years after that Conclave, before the progressive loosening of the millenary structures of the Church impressed by the Vatican II Ecumenical Council, someone has decided to reveal important and corroborating documents. One of these is the letter by Cardinal Eugenio Tisserant to an abbot professor of Canon Law, in which the French Cardinal declares illegal the election of John XXIII, because “wanted” and “arranged” by forces “extraneous” of the Holy Spirit. (Cfr. “Vita” of September 18, 1977 pg. 4 “Le profezie sui papi nell'elenco di San Malachia”, by “Il Minutante”).
Hither and thither, in the long itinerary of Roncalli’s, should we say, pre-papal activity, transpire at times enlightening reflexes, which make Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli appear to us as the “Rose Cross” pawn of the Freemason brothers.......
This priest, today the “apostolic legate” in Great Britain, ended up startling the envoy from Rome, first with his clergy-man and the smoking pipe in his teeth, then with his amazing statements on Freemasonry, defined as “One of the last forces of social conservation in today’s world, and, therefore, a force of religious conservation,” and with an enthusiastic judgment on baron Marsaudon who had the merit of making the nunciature grasp the transcendent value of Freemasonry. Precisely for this his merit, the Nuncio of Paris, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, had sustained and approved his appointment to minister of the Order of Malta in Paris. Monsignor Stockalper at that turn had remained dumbfounded, and received the ultimate blow when, protesting that Canon 2335 of the Canon Law calls for the excommunication for the affiliated to Freemasonry, he was told by his interlocutor, between a puff and another at the scented smoke of his big pipe, that “the nunciature of Paris was working in great secret to reconcile the Catholic Church with Freemasonry.” It was 1950! This episode seems to expose the connivance of Roncalli with Freemasonry. The post-conciliar Church will indeed reconcile with the secret sect....
Then the Count [Count Sella], raising his face and staring at me, began to speak:
“… In September 1958, about seven or eight days before the Conclave, I was at the Sanctuary of Orope, attending one of the usual dinners at Attilio Botto’s, a Biellese industrialist who fancied gathering around him competent from various branches, to discuss the different issues. That day had been invited a character I knew as a high Masonic authority in contact with the Vatican. He told me, driving me home, that:“Chosen by whom?” I rejoined surprised.“…The next Pope would not be Siri, as it was murmured in some Roman circles, because he was too authoritarian a Cardinal. They would elect a Pope of conciliation. The choice has already fallen on the patriarch of Venice - Roncalli.”
“By our Masonic representatives in the Conclave,” responded placidly my kind escort.And then it escaped me: “There are Freemasons in the Conclave?”
“Certainly,” was the reply, “the Church is in our hands.”I rejoined perplexed: “Who, then, is in charge in the Church?”
After a brief pause, the voice of my escort uttered precisely:
“No one can say where the upper echelons are. The echelons are occult.”The following day, Count Sella transcribed in an official document, now kept in the safe of a notary, the full name of that character and his stunning statement complete with the year, month, day, and hour. Which, days later, would turn out absolutely exact. (Franco Bellegrandi, “Nikita Roncalli, The Counterlife of a Pope”, Chapter IV; emphasis added.)
What does this mean? It means that ALL of
the popes, beginning with 2nd John 23rd, and up to and including Francis
1, have been chosen by Cardinals who are actually Freemasons! The
ultimate goal of the Freemasons has been to DESTROY the Roman Catholic
Church from within:
“Some will reject that suggestion as unthinkable. Others, while agreeing that the Church has sanctioned a change of emphasis here and there, will see it as part of the divine plan; and only a few, since it has become a characteristic of our people to reject the mere mention of a conspiracy, will see in it the working out of an age-long and deliberate scheme to destroy the Church from within. Yet there is more proof of every kind for the existence of such a conspiracy than there is for some of the commonly accepted facts of history.” (Piers Compton, The Broken Cross, The Hidden Hand in the Vatican, Part One, # 3; emphasis added.)
“Mention has already been made of the Carbonari, the Supreme Directory of which, known as the Alta Vendita, [Endnote 1-4. Literally the ‘old shop’ or the ‘old sale.’ Secret society meetings were often disguised as auction sales to avert suspicion.] became a kind of nucleus for all the secret societies spread through Italy. In organization and intention it was much the same as the Illuminati. Its leaders adopted a similar brand of whimsical appellations (such as Little Tiger, Nubius, Vindex, Minos), and it exhibited the same unremitting hostility towards Church and State.”
“This was clearly outlined in a set of Permanent Instructions, or Code of Rules, which appeared in Italy in 1818. It was written by Nubius and was addressed to a fellow conspirator called Volpi, with suggested guide lines and news of what had so far been accomplished.”
“Nubius, who appears to have been a man of rank in Rome, starts with a modest appraisal of the not insignificant task that had been entrusted to him. ‘As I told you before, I have been appointed to demoralize the education of the youth of the Church.’ But he was not unaware of the most difficult obstacle he would have to encounter. One great problem remained. ‘The Papacy has always exercised a decisive influence over Italy. With the arm, the voice, the pen, of its innumerable bishops, monks, nuns, and faithful of all latitudes, the Pope finds everywhere people who are prepared for sacrifice, and even for martyrdom, friends who would die for him, or sacrifice all for his sake.”
“‘It is a mighty lever, the full power of which few Popes have understood, and which has yet been used but partially... Our final aim is that of Voltaire, and that of the French Revolution – the complete annihilation of Catholicism, and ultimately of Christianity. Were Christianity to survive, even upon the ruins of Rome, it would, a little later on, revive and live.” (Op. Cit., Part One, # 6; emphasis added.)
“Between the ending of the first session of the Council on the 1st of December 1962, and the opening of the second session on September the 29th of the following year, Pope John, after a protracted illness, breathed his last on the evening of Monday, June the 3rd, 1963; and every form of publicity, which over the past weeks had delivered a breath-by-breath account of the death-bed in Rome, again swung into action to extol a man who had faithfully served the purpose for which he had been given the occupancy of Peter’s Chair, and set in motion a series of events that were directed to fulfil, at the expense of the Church, a large part of the aims determined by secret societies over the centuries.” (Op. Cit., Part Three, # 4; emphasis added.)
“A prominent member of the conspiracy that had fostered John XXIII, the ex-doctor of Canon Law, Roca, commented drily: ‘The old Pope, having broken the silence and started the tradition of the great religious controversy, goes to his grave’; while a revealing tribute, which should open the eyes of anyone who still finds offence in the mention of a plot, was written by Charles Riandey, a sovereign Grand Master of secret societies, in his preface to a book by Yves Marsaudon, 3-1 State Minister of the Supreme Council of French secret societies: ‘To the memory of Angelo Roncalli, priest, Archbishop of Messamaris, Apostolic Nuncio in Paris, Cardinal of the Roman Church, Patriarch of Venice, Pope under the name of John XXIII, who has deigned to give us his benediction, his understanding, and his protection’ (my emphasis). (Op. Cit., Part Three, # 4; emphasis added.)
So, based upon the above goal of the secret societies, including the members of which have infiltrated the Roman Catholic Church, by whatever the names of the various organizations for whom they work might be - the complete annihilation of Catholicism - it is self-evident that the real purpose of the CCC is nothing less than the complete annihilation of Catholicism!
Therefore, the Roman Catholic Church has, and must continue to use ONLY, The Roman Catechism - “The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests”, Issued by Order of Pope Saint Pius V, 1566 A.D.
CCC # 821: “Certain things are required in order to respond adequately to this call [toward unity]: ..... prayer in common, because ‘change of heart and holiness of life, along with public and private prayer for the unity of Christians, should be regarded as the soul of the whole ecumenical movement, and merits the name ‘spiritual ecumenism;’”.
Error # 2
On the Contrary: The certain things... required on this wish list include prayer in common. True UNITY requires that a person FIRST BE CONVERTED to the Catholic Church outside of which there is no salvation. Where is the word "CONVERT" to be found anywhere in CCC # 821? No, it is not there.
Response to Error # 2
In other words, it is one thing to pray WITH someone who is a member of the Catholic Church. But, for those who are NOT members of the Catholic Church, Catholics can only pray FOR their CONVERSION to the Catholic Church. It is a basic matter of cause and effect. Catholics pray FOR the conversion of those outside of the Catholic Church - this is the cause. Those people for whom Catholics pray who, as a result, receive the Grace of Conversion to the Catholic Church, and who correspond with the Grace of Conversion they receive, and who then become Catholics as a result, this is the effect.
CCC # 821 does not even use the term Grace of Conversion. WHY NOT?!
IF a group of people of different faiths are all praying together for unity, exactly for what kind of unity do they pray - that Catholics be converted to their false religion? It is ridiculous for any Catholic to ever think that God will grant the Grace of Conversion to anyone who is praying that the Catholic be converted to their non-Catholic religion!
Furthermore, how can a diverse group of non-Catholics ever decide on the exact prayer to use for unity? A unity which is meaningless! Even if all participants decide to use their own different prayers, the reality is God is NOT going to give them the Grace of Conversion to the Catholic Church if they have no intentions of converting to the Catholic Church. CCC # 821 has a goal which is unworkable because it does not say anything about the Grace of Conversion, and instead subtly implies a one-world religion which does not recognize any religion as the one, true religion with its gross indifferentism which actually regards all religions as being equal in every respect! Nothing at all is said about conversion to the one true faith of the Catholic Church anywhere in the entire text of CCC # 821.
For those Readers who do not have access to CCC # 821, here is the full text:
CCC # 821: Certain things are required in order to respond adequately to this call: (827, 2791)On the contrary, the Roman Catholic Church, in her official Catechism, teaches something quite different than the heresy of gross indifferentism found in CCC # 821 which really implies that all religions are essentially the same so that praying with those of other religions is not a problem.
—a permanent renewal of the Church in greater fidelity to her vocation; such renewal is the driving-force of the movement toward unity;280
—conversion of heart as the faithful “try to live holier lives according to the Gospel”;281
—prayer in common, because “change of heart and holiness of life, along with public and private prayer for the unity of Christians, should be regarded as the soul of the whole ecumenical movement, and merits the name ‘spiritual ecumenism;’”282-Reference Note : 282 UR 8 § 1. (Unitatis Redintegratio 8 § 1)
—fraternal knowledge of each other;283
—ecumenical formation of the faithful and especially of priests;284
—dialogue among theologians and meetings among Christians of the different churches and communities;285
—collaboration among Christians in various areas of service to mankind
This explains WHY the TRC teaches:
TRC: “The practice of praying FOR those who are not within the pale of the Church, is, as we know on the authority of St. Augustine, of Apostolic origin.
We pray that the faith may be made known to infidels;
that idolaters may be rescued from the error of their impiety;
that the Jews, emerging from the darkness with which they are encompassed, may arrive at the light of truth;
that heretics, returning to soundness of mind, may be instructed in the Catholic faith;
and that schismatics may be united in the bond of true charity and may return to the communion of their holy mother, the [Catholic] Church, from which they have separated.”
(TRC, Part IV: The Lord's Prayer, For Whom We Ought to Pray, Enemies And Those Outside The Church, pp. 489-490; emphasis added.)CCC # 821, without admitting it, along with some of the other entries in the CCC, is really trying to implement the NEW World Order of anti-Christ's one world religion! This is based upon Religious Indifferentism, which it is very obvious that the CCC # 821 is trying to implement! This is NOT Catholic! Religious Indifferentism is a heresy!
Popes Who Have Condemned the Heresy of Religious Indifferentism
Pope Gregory XVI
1. “Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: INDIFFERENTISM. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the Soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained” (Pope Gregory XVI, Bartolomeo Alberto-Mauro-Cappellari [Wednesday, February 2, 1831 - Monday, June 1, 1846], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”, On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 13; emphasis added).
Pope Gregory XVI
2. “This poisoned source of INDIFFERENTISM gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience must be maintained for everyone. It spreads ruin.... Thence comes transformation of minds, corruption of youths, contempt of Sacred Things and Holy Laws -- in other words, this is a most contagious error” (Pope Gregory XVI, Encyclical, “Mirari Vos Arbitramur”, On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism, Wednesday, August 15, 1832, ¶ 14; emphasis added).
Pope Gregory XVI
3. “A false idea has for a long time grown stronger and spread widely... by an impious and absurd system of INDIFFERENCE towards Religious matters..... These theologians..... state categorically that there are many things..... in the form of its external worship which are not suited to the character of our time...... they force reforms, conceive of changes, and pretend to renew the Church” (Pope Gregory XVI, Encyclical, “Quo Graviora”, On the Pragmatic Constitution, October 4, 1833, ¶ 4; emphasis added).
Pope Pius IX
4. “The HIDEOUS ERROR OF INDIFFERENTISM..... causes us to forget out duties to God in whom we live and act and have our being..... This belief embraces people who have strayed from the Truth, who are enemies of the True Faith and forget their own salvation, and who teach contradictory beliefs without firm doctrine. They make no distinction between the different creeds, agree with everybody, and maintain that the haven of eternal salvation is open to sectarians of any religion. The diversity of their teachings does not concern them” (Pope Pius IX, Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti [Tuesday, June 16, 1846 - Thursday, February 7, 1878], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Singulari Quidem”, On the Church in Austria, Monday, March 17, 1856, ¶ 3; emphasis added).
Pope Leo XIII
5. “The Freemasons.... teach the great error of this age- that a regard for religion should be held as an INDIFFERENT matter, and THAT ALL RELIGIONS ARE ALIKE. This manner of reasoning is calculated to bring about the ruin of all forms of religion, and especially of the Catholic Religion, which, as it is the only one that is True, cannot, without great injustice, be regarded as merely equal to other religions” (Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Humanum Genus”, On Freemasonry, Sunday, April 20, 1884, ¶ 16; emphasis added).
Pope Saint Pius X
6. “The enemy has, indeed, long been prowling about the fold and attacking it with such subtle cunning..... We are forced to agree with those who hold that the chief cause of the present INDIFFERENCE and, as it were, infirmity of soul, and the serious evils that result from it, is to be found above all in ignorance of things Divine. This is fully in accord with what God Himself declared through the Prophet Osee: And there is no knowledge of God in the land. Cursing and lying and killing and theft and adultery have overflowed: and blood hath touched blood. Thereafter shall the land mourn, and everyone that dwelleth in it shall languish [Osee 4:1-3]” (Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Acerbo Nimis”, On Teaching Christian Doctrine, Saturday, April 15, 1905, ¶ 1; emphasis added).
7. “HOW CAN so great A VARIETY OF OPINIONS make the way clear to effect the UNITY of the Church We know not; that UNITY can ONLY arise FROM ONE TEACHING authority, ONE law of BELIEF, and ONE FAITH of Christians. But We do know that from this it is an easy step to the neglect of Religion or INDIFFERENTISM and to MODERNISM, as they call it. Those, who are unhappily INFECTED WITH THESE ERRORS, HOLD THAT Dogmatic TRUTH IS NOT ABSOLUTE but relative, that is, it agrees with the varying necessities of time and place and with the varying tendencies of the mind, since it is not contained in immutable revelation, but is capable of being accommodated to human life” (Pope Pius XI, Achille Ratti [Monday, February 6, 1922 - Friday, February 10, 1939], using his Infallible Ordinary Magisterium, Promulgated his Infallible Encyclical, “Mortalium Animos”, On Religious Unity, Friday, January 6, 1928, ¶ 9; emphasis added).
Today Catholics who are faithful to the authentic Apostolic Tradition perceive the plague of gross indifferentism, which is an indifferentism which can also be described as: abhorrent, abominable, accursed, detestable, egregious, execrable. flagrant, repugnant, repulsive, severe, and vile indifferentism.
To Whom/What Does the CCC Say to Pray?
Another issue is TO WHOM does CCC # 821 require Readers of the CCC to pray? To God? Really? Is this not a gratuitous assumption insofar as some religions have many "gods" and some even have "goddesses", and here one is reminded of the deities of ancient Greece and ancient Rome!
How can a Catholic, in good faith, pray WITH pagans who believe there are many "gods and goddesses"? What about dualist heretics who believe in one "good god" and one "bad god"? What about those who worship their dead ancestors, or who worship the sun, or the moon, or a tree, or the universe? It is self-evident that CCC # 821 does NOT require Readers to pray to the one, true God, specifically the Most Holy Trinity - the three Divine Persons in ONE God: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost, as the Roman Catholic Church teaches.
What about praying to a Holy Catholic Saint? No mention of this in CCC # 821, which is inexcusable. But did not Synod Vatican 2, as it were, throw out the Saints of God?
The Roman Catholic Church teaches Catholics to pray to Saints so that they make function as mediators and intercessors with God on their behalf:
TRC: “Should it be said, as some say, that the patronage of the Saints is unnecessary, because God hears our prayers without the intervention of a mediator, this impious assertion is easily met by the observation of St. Augustine: There are many things which God does not grant without a mediator and intercessor [Footnote 27: Saint Augustine, Upon Exodus, Question 71. Sermons 2 and 4 on Saint Stephen.] This is confirmed by the well-known examples of Abimelech and the friends of Job who were pardoned only through the prayers of Abraham and of Job [Footnote 28: Genesis, chapter 20].”
“Should it be alleged that to recur to the patronage and intercession of the Saints argues want or weakness of faith, what will (the objectors) answer regarding the centurion whose faith was highly eulogised by the Lord God Himself, despite the fact that he had sent to the Redeemer the ancients of the Jews, to intercede for his sick servant? [Footnote 29: Matthew 7:10; Luke 7:3].” (TRC, Part III, The Decalogue, The First Commandment, It is Lawful to Honor and Invoke the Saints, Objections Answered, pp. 371-372; emphasis added.)
Summary of 12 Heresies in the CCC
Abbé Georges De Nantes
Abbé Georges De Nantes (Center)
Holding His Book Entitled:
“Book of Accusation
for Heresy Against the Author of the Supposed
‘Catechism of the Catholic Church’, A Catechism of Pride, a Catechesis of Deceit”
On Thursday, May 13, 1993, the Abbé Georges De Nantes gave two copies of his book “Book of Accusation for Heresy Against the Author of the Supposed ‘Catechism of the Catholic Church’, A Catechism of Pride, a Catechesis of Deceit” to the Vatican - one for JP-2, and one for Cardinal Ratzinger.
“This book is a canonical appeal for the opening of a heresy trial, as soon as possible, under pain of dereliction of duty.”
In the Contents of the “Book of Accusation for Heresy Against the Author of the Supposed ‘Catechism of the Catholic Church’”, written by the Abbé Georges De Nantes, the Abbé lists the following 12 heresies which he has found and analyzed in this so-called “Catechism of the Catholic Church”, a.k.a. CCC:
1. An abusive extension of the Church’s indefectibility and infallibility in her Head, in her Pastors and in her People.“We are very shaken in our faith and in our confidence in the Church by the double shock of this Catechism’s modernity which goes beyond our understanding of dogmatic Truth and which breaks with the living treasure of our Catholic Tradition. The first shock is experienced as a rent or schism, the other shock as a gnostic speculation or heresy.”
2. Error concerning the universal and absolute predestination of all men to grace, to the remission of sins, and to life eternal.
3. The error of a Son of God united to all men, forever, by His mysteries infallibly saving them all.
4. Error on the innocence of the Jews and the culpability of Christians in the passion and death of Jesus Crucified.
5. Error of a remote “Hereafter” outside space and time, of a disincarnate Christ, and of an evanescent [vaporific] Kingdom.[Editor’s Note: The Abbé Georges De Nantes merely uses a different type of description to designate JP-2’s “...heaven, which is NOT a physical place; rather, it is a state - a...relationship, and, in reality, it is the Teilhardian black hole of the nefarious omega point! Shades of the pantheism of Spinoza and a sentimentalized atheism, ala Cartesian Teilhardism! Thus, JP-2, your state of nowhere!” (Our “Letter to JP-2”; emphasis in original Letter.)6. Error concerning the Holy Spirit, the Animator of the New World.
7. The error of a People of God, convened and led by the Spirit, God alone knows where! God knows how!
8. Error of the common priesthood, the antithesis of the hierarchic priesthood. Theodemocarcy opposes Christ, sovereign Priest and King.
9. The apostasy of an anti-Christ cult of Man based on the repudiation of the Heart and Cross of Jesus.
10. Error of so-called “Christian Democracy”: secular, personalist, and socialized.
11. State secularism, man’s freedom in contempt of God’s Law, sign of the final apostasy and of God’s chastisement.
12. Your gnosis, Most Holy Father [JP-2].
“Whether it be a question of God’s supernatural relations with us, involving predestination and grace, or of our relations with the Word Incarnate, Jesus Christ, who calls us to follow Him by taking up our cross so that we might be saved, or of the drama of His sorrowful Passion suffered at the hands of wicked men for the redemption of the world, we cannot accept that the CCC should abuse Sacred Scripture with such dishonest and lying audacity nor that it should disdain and contradict the entire living, eloquent and edifying Tradition of the centuries in order to wrench us insolently from our own popular and universal religion. For such is the schism in which this Catechism is perversely and delightedly steeped. To us it seems like sacrilege.”
“If only it were done to make Divine Revelation speak to us and move us still more, to make it more accessible and to raise us up to the splendors of God! But no, it is completely the other way round. At every article of the Creed, our immemorial convictions, our common Catholic mentality are broken, annihilated and replaced by abstract theories that are totally inconsistent with our faith, or rather contrary and alien to its divine Truth and clarity. It is a multiform heresy that pursues its course and becomes more complex from one chapter to the next, leaving us shattered and miserable. It is an intellectual gnosis, an optimistic vision, but one that is demobilizing and without love, where God speaks less and less and man withdraws into his all pervading me. It is a series of heresies leading to apostasy.”
“So now that Jesus has completed His course and saved all men, for now and for ever, we wonder what paradox we shall be told about His future and ours. It will be a decisive test. If our traditions and sentiments are again upset, it will lead to despair or else a universal slide into this fanciful religion where man makes himself the center of the world and gives glory to himself with no further regard for God, His Heaven, nor Hell itself...”
“And that is precisely what does happen!....”
“Here I wince at the expression ‘It is no longer situated in space and time’. It may sound very learned and very original, but to be exact:
1). It contemptuously dismisses the traditional language, understanding and representations of the Mystery, which have kept alive the Church’s hope for two thousand years. That in itself is schismatic.
2). It plays on two levels at once: that of the ancient language and that of its esoteric interpretations, without any concern about their incoherence and permanent contradiction. This game of equivocation [Modernist Heresy & NEW Theology Heresy] hides the obvious inability of the new gnosis to explain what the state of the Risen One is today, ‘outside time and space’. Anything so inconceivable and defiant of Catholic dogma is necessarily heretical, and that is sufficient reason for rejecting it...” (Op. Cit., FIFTH HERESY; emphasis added.)
This Catechism of the Catholic Church, a.k.a. the CCC, when examined from the astute and learned perspective of the Abbé Georges De Nantes, supports Our theological, ecclesiastical, and historical positions concerning some of the founders of the Satanic Synod Vatican 2 pseudo-church as well as Pope Pius XII's statement about the NEW Theology in L'Osservatore Romano, Thursday, December 19, 1946, and Father Garrigou - Lagrange, O.P.'s theological analysis entitled: La nouvelle théologie où va-t-elle? - Where is the New Theology Leading Us?, which is must reading to better understand some of the subtle heresies involved which are couched, promoted, and even taught to hundreds of millions of Catholic victims vis-à-vis this book of heresy and apostasy, a.k.a the CCC, as some call it, by the unfaithful automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics, and the automatically excommunicated NEW Theology Theologian Heretics, who are also automatically excommunicated Apostates from the Roman Catholic Church, who can only engage in a psychobabble of inane double-talk and Newspeak which, in the final analysis, this egregious "thoughtcrime" - the CCC - means NOTHING! ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
Sounds Good, But NOT Good & Sound!
Some Heresies Are Mixed With Dogmas!
Result? Deceptive Gibberish.
Vatican 2 Newspeak
Translated into This:
A Catechism of Pride
A Catechisis of Deceit.
"We have used ambiguous
terms during the Council
and we know how we shall
interpret them afterwards."
(Fr. Edward Schillebeeckx)
(A Synod Vatican 2 pseudo-church Peritus - Expert!)
It is self-evident that the CCC has conviently ignored some basic Truths of the Catholic Faith which have been officially taught by The Roman Catechism since 1566 A.D.
Therefore, Catholics should NEVER read the CCC which is, at least in some places, as proven above, an heretical, an apostate, and, therefore, an anti-Catholic, catechism. Instead, Catholics who read English should read the TRC, The Catechism of the Council of Trent for Parish Priests, Issued by Order of Pope Saint Pius V, 1566 A.D., which was translated into English by Father John A. McHugh, O.P., S.T.M., Litt.D., and Father Charles J. Callan, O.P., S.T.M., Litt.D., with the Imprimatur of Patrick Cardinal Joseph Hayes, D.D., Archbishop of New York, which Imprimatur was issued on Wednesday, January 3, 1923.
It is currently available in PDF format for free at: http://www.freecatholicebooks.com/books/catechism_of_trent.pdf
IF this one is not available, choose the translation by Father Donovan, D.D. Several copies, in various formats, including PDF, are available for free, including this one, which is at: https://ia800503.us.archive.org/10/items/catechismofcoun00cathuoft/catechismofcoun00cathuoft.pdf
Some of Our web pages are the only places on the Internet where you will find some very important facts, because some of these facts are from Our own many personal experiences, as well as the result of Our meetings with many Catholic Traditional Clergy including various Patriarchs, Cardinals, Primates, Metropolitans, Archbishops, Bishops, and Religious and Secular Priests, over many, many, many decades, plus Our own eye-witness testimony, concerning some of the many, many, many changes, which began many, many, many decades, before the many, many, many younger generations of Catholics were even born, and of which changes all of these so many, many younger generations of Catholics, have no personal knowledge and/or personal experiences.
Most of these many changes are not only illegal, but they are also invalid, and most of them include the censure of automatic excommunication of the perpetrators, because, in reality, such changes by the cabal of automatically excommunicated Innovators, as well as the secret gangs of anti-Catholic Infiltrators, are changes which are anti-Catholic!
Please Donate to Our Patriarchal Website at:
Thank You! God Bless You!
Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.
IF You are Wise by helping a Soul with Catholic Traditional
Requiem Masses to get out of Purgatory much faster NOW,
Another Wise and Charitable Person will help YOU,
when YOUR time comes, to get out of Purgatory much faster!
God Rewards Charity for the Suffering Souls in Purgatory!
Please Help a Suffering Soul in Purgatory NOW!
||Our Blessed Mother asks Catholics to Pray her Traditional
The Rosary will really make a Powerful difference in Your Life!
||Please click here to go to the Editorial Contents Homepage.|
||Please click here to go to the Contents Homepage.|