http://www.traditionalcatholicmass.com/home-m57.html
Theological Analysis of the
Two Different Liturgical Rites
Used for the Administration of
The Sacrament of the Episcopacy


A Few Important Quotes Which Catholic Prelates Must Observe and Teach

With the Father of light there is no change nor shadow of alteration”  (James 1:17; emphasis added).
“Be not led away with various and strange doctrines.  Jesus Christ yesterday, and today, and the same forever” (Hebrews 13:8-9; emphasis added).
But though We, or an angel from Heaven, preach to you a Gospel besides that which We have preached to you; let him be anathema” (Galatians 1:8; emphasis added).
“For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the Truth, but will be turned unto fables” (2 Timothy 4:3-4; emphasis added).
Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold the Traditions which you have been taught, whether by word [oral Tradition] or by Our letter [written Tradition - Scripture]” (2 Thessalonians 2:15; emphasis added.).
Do not be one of those timourous physicians who like their tranquility more than the saving of the sick...  Even though Salome should dance before Herod, should ask for John's head and should obtain it from the detestable King, John's duty is to cry out: NON LICET! [It is not permitted!]” (Bishop Saint Ivo of Chartres, a.k.a. Yves, I’ve, Yvo  [b. Beauvais, France or Auteuil, France, c. 1040 A.D. - d. Chartres, France, Tuesday, May 30, 1116 A.D.], Bishop of Chartres [1090 A.D. - Tuesday, May 30, 1116 A.D.], Letter # 24, To Bishop Hugh of Lyons, October, 1094 A.D.; emphasis added).
“Receive the staff of the Pastoral Office, so that in the correction of vices you may be lovingly severe, giving judgment without wrath, softening the minds of your hearers whilst fostering virtues, not neglecting strictness of discipline through love of tranquillity.” (Pontificale Romanum, 1891 Edition, Ancient Roman Rite of the Catholic Church, Rite for the Administration of the Sacrament of the Holy Episcopacy, Episcopal Consecrator gives the Crozier - Pastoral Staff - to the Newly Consecrated Bishop; emphasis added.)
Catholic Doctrine tells us that the primary duty of Charity does not lie in the toleration of false ideas, however sincere they may be.... Catholic Doctrine further tells us that love for our neighbor flows from our love for God, Who is Father to all, and goal of the whole human family; and in Jesus Christ whose members we are, to the point that in doing good to others we are doing good to Jesus Christ Himself. Any other kind of love is sheer illusion, sterile and fleeting....
“Further, whilst Jesus was kind to sinners and to those who went astray, He did not respect their false ideas, however sincere they might have appeared. He loved them all, but He instructed them in order to convert them and save them....   they show in Our Lord Jesus Christ something quite different from an inconsistent and impotent humanitarianism.”  (Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Encyclical “Notre Charge Apostolique”, Our Apostolic Mandate, To the French Bishops, Monday, August 15, 1910, ¶ 27, ¶ 47; emphasis added.)
“These latter days have witnessed a notable increase in the number of the enemies of the Cross of Christ, who, by arts entirely new and full of deceit, are striving to destroy the vital energy of the Church, and, as far as in them lies, utterly to subvert the very Kingdom of Christ. Wherefore, We may no longer keep silence, lest We should seem to fail in Our most Sacred Duty, and lest the kindness that, in the hope of wiser counsels, We have hitherto shown them, should be set down to lack of diligence in the discharge of Our Office” (Pope Saint Pius X, Encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, Sunday, September 8, 1907, ¶ 1; emphasis added.)
We do by Our Apostolic Authority repeat and confirm both that Decree of the Supreme Sacred Congregation and those Encyclical letters of Ours, adding the Penalty of Excommunication against their contradictors, and this We declare and Decree that should anybody, which may God forbid, be so rash as to defend any one of the propositions, opinions or teachings condemned in these documents he falls, ipso facto, under the censure contained under the chapter ‘Docentes’ of the Constitution ‘Apostolicae Sedis’, which is the first among the Excommunications latae sententiae....
This Excommunication... which may be incurred by those who have violated in any way the said documents, as propagators and defenders of heresies, when their propositions, opinions and teachings are heretical, as has happened more than once in the case of the adversaries of both these documents, especially when they advocate the errors of the Modernists that is, the synthesis of all heresies” (Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Motu Proprio, “Præstantia Scripturæ Sacræ”, ¶ 5, Monday, November 18, 1907. Automatic Excommunication of all Heretics, especially the Modernist Heretics, and which today also includes the NEW Theology Theologian Heretics, some of whom were “periti” - experts - at Synod Vatican 2; - after they were actually invited to attend Synod Vatican 2 by the Modernist Heretic 2nd pope John 23rd; emphasis added).

Side-by-Side Comparison of Only The Form of
Episcopal Consecration Required for Validity
ARR:  32.
The Form of Episcopal Consecration
Required for Validity
[NOTE:  In his Apostolic Constitution “Sacramentum Ordinis”, On the Sacrament of Order, First Sunday of Advent, November 30, 1947, Pope Pius XII declared that the following words of this Preface of Episcopal Consecration (the Form of Episcopal Consecration), are essential and therefore are required for validity.  Therefore, they should be recited more solemnly, slowly, carefully, and very distinctly.]
The Episcopal Consecrator and the Assistant Bishops all together, in total unison, continue to say, but even much more solemnly, slowly and more carefully and very distinctly:
NOR:  32.
The Form of Episcopal Consecration
Required for Validity

The following part of the prayer is recited by all the consecrating bishops, with hands joined:

ARR:  33.
Traditional Latin Text:

“Comple in Sacerdote Tuo Ministerii tui summam, et ornamentis totius glorificationis instructum Cślestis unguenti rore santifica.”

NOR:  33.
Traditional Latin Text:

Et nunc effunde super hunc Electum eam virtutem, quae a te est, Spiritum principalem, quem dedisti dilecto Filio tuo Iesu Christo, quem ipse donavit sanctis Apostolis, qui constituerunt Ecclesiam per singula loca ut sanctuarium tuum, in gloriam et laudem indeficientem nominis tui.

ARR:  34.
Official English Translation:

“Perfect in Thy Priest the fullness of Thy Ministry and, clothing him in all the ornaments of spiritual glorification, Sanctify him with the Heavenly anointing.”

NOR:  34.
Official English Translation:

So now pour out upon this chosen one the power that is from you, the governing Spirit whom you gave to your beloved Son, Jesus Christ, the Spirit given by him to his holy apostles, who founded the Church in every place to be your temple for the unceasing glory and praise of your name.




Commentary

The above side-by-side comparisons between the old and the new should make it self-evident to everyone that there are, in various places, major changes made by the new when compared to the old.

Some of these changes have to do with the validity of the Sacrament of the Episcopacy and remind one of the infallible Papal Document by Pope Leo XIII which Infallibly Decreed that Anglican Orders are invalid in his Encyclical Apostolicae Curae, which was promulgated on Tuesday, September 15, 1896.

You will find the text for the Encyclical, Apostolicae Curae, at:
http://www.traditionalcatholicmass.com/home-m22.html

In his Encyclical Apostolicae Curae, Pope Leo XIII reafirms the teaching of the Catholic Church that the Proper Matter, Form, and Intention are all required for a Sacrament to be valid and are, therefore, part of the required essence.

These basic principles prove that, because of the invalid and illegal changes made by Synod Vatican 2, the Vatican invalidated all of the Seven Sacraments in one way or in another, whether the defect be in the matter, and/or in the form, and/or in the intention.

But what most people do not know is that the Vatican has actually admitted that the essence (part of what makes a Sacrament valid) of all of the Seven Sacrament were changed!

Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, perfectly instituted the Seven Sacraments.  This included the Ontological Essence for each of the Seven Sacraments, which, in general, require the Proper Matter, Proper Form and Proper Intention for validity.

The text of the above Encyclical, Apostolicae Curae, of Tuesday, September 15, 1896 of Pope Leo XII declares that Anglican Orders are invalid.  This simply means that all of the Bishops and Priests who were consecrated and ordained with the use of the Anglican Ordinal are not Bishops and not Priests!

On the contrary, they are simply members of the Laity dressed up like Bishops and Priests because they have no Sacramental Powers of offer Mass, to administer the Sacraments, to Bless, to perform Exorcisms, etc., because the Bishop(s) who ordained/consecrated them used the Anglican [Edwardine] Ordinal which contains invalid liturgical Rites for the Seven Sacraments, including the Sacrament of Holy Orders!

Besides all of the invalidating and illegal changes which were made to the Roman Missal used for offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass by Pope Paul 6, the Roman Ritual and the Pontificale Romanum were also changed so that the situation after Synod Vatican 2 was similar to the situation in 16th Century Western Europe after the Protestants began to change not only the liturgical Rites for the Mass, but also for the Sacraments, and, in the process of doing this, the Protestants recklessly invalidated everything, not just the Catholic Rite of Mass, which they replaced with a Protestant Memorial Supper Meal, now currently in use, in one form or fashion, throughout the Synod Vatican 2 church, from the Vatican to every tiny parish of the Synod Vatican 2 church around the world, but also the Protestants invalidated the liturgical Rites for the Sacraments as well, with most Protestants keeping only two of the Seven Sacraments!

Consider that this is not mere speculation.  On the contrary, the official publication of the Pope himself, and the Vatican in general, had this to say about the changes to the liturgical Rites of the Seven Sacraments:

"THE REFORM OF THE LITURGY, carried out in accordance with the Constitution of the Second Vatican Council, has also INTRODUCED CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS IN THE VERY ESSENCE OF THE SACRAMENTAL RITES." (L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO, Thursday, November 7, 1974; emphasis added).
Here is an actual ADMISSION by the Vatican that they did, in fact, change "the very ESSENCE (The Ontological Essence is that which makes a thing to be what it is-in the case of the Sacraments, it is part of what makes the Sacraments VALID!) of the Sacramental Rites"!

One must wonder if anyone would need any more proof than this public admission in 1974 because the above quote is THE PUBLIC ADMISSION BY THE VATICAN THAT THEY ACTUALLY CHANGED that which makes a Sacrament a Sacrament and without which a Sacrament is no longer a Sacrament!!!!

But of course the apologists for, and the defenders of, all of these changes, by which We mean those who believe, preach, teach, write, and otherwise propagate the heresy of evolution, a.k.a. the heresy of continual, never-ending changes, namely the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and the automatically excommunicated NEW Theology Theologians, try to twist the words in such a way that such words are robbed of their real and true meaning.

In other words, the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theologian Theologian Heretics use a "dictionary" in which the actual definition of each word is in a state of perpetual change, of perpetual evolution, which changes these heretics also apply to the unchangeable Dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church.

The result istotal chaos and total confusion because, for  the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theologian Theologian Heretics, there is no such thing as Truth, which ultimately means there is no God!

Why?

Sacred Scripture testifies to these unchangeable Truths, which We have emphasized, because the LIES of the LIARS are hereby exposed  for what  the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theologian Theologian Heretics  really are, for  all of them are possessed by the Spirits of Error and Doctrines of Devils speaking lies in hypocrisy   and having their conscience seared.

I am the Lord and I change not” (Malachias 3:6).


With the Father of light there is no change nor shadow of alteration”  (James 1:17).

Be not led away with various and strange doctrines.  Jesus Christ yesterday, and today, and the same forever” (Hebrews 13:8-9).

“Now the Spirit manifestly saith that in the last times some shall depart from the Faith, giving heed to Spirits of Error and Doctrines of Devils speaking lies in hypocrisy and having their conscience seared” (1 Timothy 4:1).

“Into Thy hands I commend my spirit: Thou hast redeemed me, O Lord, the God of Truth” (Psalm 30:6).

Sent forth Thy light and Thy Truth: they have conducted me, and brought me unto Thy holy hill, and into Thy tabernacles” (Psalm 42:3).

“For Thy mercy is magnified even to the heavens: and Thy Truth unto the clouds” (Psalm 56:11).

“For God loveth mercy and Truth: the Lord will give grace and glory” (Psalm 83:12).

“For His mercy is confirmed upon us: and the Truth of the Lord remaineth for ever” (Psalm 116:2).

A deceitful tongue loveth not Truth: and a slippery mouth worketh ruin” (Proverbs 26:28).

And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we saw His glory, the glory as it were of the only begotten of the Father,) full of Grace and Truth” (John 1:14).
I am the Way, and the Truth and the Life.  No man cometh to the Father but by Me” (John 14:6).

“But when the Paraclete [God the Holy Ghost] cometh, Whom I will send you from the Father, the Spirit of Truth, Who proceedeth from the Father, He shall give testimony of Me” (John 15:26).

“But when He [God the Holy Ghost], the Spirit of Truth, is come, He will teach you all Truth” (John 16:13).

Because they receive not the love of the Truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying” (2 Thessalonians 2:10).

If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to that doctrine which is according to godliness.   He is proud, knowing nothing, but sick about questions and strifes of words; from which arise envies, contentions, blasphemies, evil suspicions, conflicts of men corrupted in mind, and who are destitute of the Truth, supposing gain to be godliness” (1 Timothy 6:3-5).
Ever learning, and never attaining to the knowledge of the Truth” (2 Timothy 3:7).

“For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound Doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the Truth, but will be turned unto fables” (2 Timothy 4:3-4).

“No lie is of the Truth”  (1 John 2:21).

“And it is the Spirit which testifieth, that Christ is the Truth” (1 John 5:6).



Other sources likewise attest to the Truth.

“Let them [heretics] not complain of what they do not understand,, or they will bring on them a double imputation, of irreligion and of ignorance. Rather let them investigate the matter in a docile spirit, and learning what hitherto they have not known, cleanse their irreligious ears with the spring of Truth and the Doctrines of Religion.”   (Patriarch Saint Athanasius [b. Alexandria, Egypt 296 A.D. - d. Alexandria, Egypt on Wednesday, May 2, 373A.D.], Patriarch of Alexandria, Egypt, Father of Orthodoxy in the Catholic Church, Epistle - “In Defense of the Nicene Definition”, Chapter II, Conduct Of the Arians Towards the Nicene Council, ¶ 1; emphasis added.)

Therefore, “God IS Truth”.  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 16, Article 5; Summa Theologica, Part II-II, Question 93, Article 2, Reply to Objection 2. Summa Contra Gentiles, Book I, Chapter 60; emphasis added.)

Truth cannot be Truth’s contrary” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., “Summa Contra Gentiles”, Book IV, Chapter 8). In other words, Truth does not contradict itself.

“We can sum up all this doctrine on the knowledge of God in the one profound statement: God is Truth. For Truth is in an intellect when that intellect knows a thing as it really is; Truth is in a thing, when it measures up to the intellect which caused it; God's essence not only measures up to His intellect, it is His intellect; God's intellect not only knows His essence, it is His essence. This is the Immutable First Truth, the foundation of all other Truths. Every other Truth participates in this First Truth or ceases to be Truth: the world of reality as it measures up to the Divine Exemplar; created minds when, measuring up to the world of reality, they get a glimpse of the Divine Exemplar. When we touch upon Truth we are in the shadow of Divinity; when we embrace it, we are ennobled by the contact to a degree easily recognizable by all men. In the world of reason, love of Truth produces the philosopher; in the world of affairs it produces the gentleman; in the world of Grace it produces the Saint. The respect given these men is the spontaneous tribute given to Divine Messengers. Humanity doffs its cap or makes its curtsey and goes its way with renewed hope; God is Truth” (Father Walter Farrell, O.P., S.T.D., S.T.M., [b. Chicago, Illinois on Tuesday, July 21,1902 A.D. -  d. River Forest, Illinois on Friday, November 23, 1951 A.D.], a Moral Theologian, Member of the Thomistic Institute, A Companion to the Summa, Volume 1, Chapter IV, The Vision of God; emphasis added).

Truth must always be taken, literally, straight, with its full force.”  (Father Walter Farrell, O.P., S.T.D., S.T.M., A Companion to the Summa, Volume 4, The Way of Life, Chapter XX, Eternal Beginnings [Summa Theologica, Supplement, Questions 92-99], The Truth of the Beginnings; emphasis added).

God [IS] the Sovereign Truth” (Saint Albert the Great, O.P., a.k.a. Albertus Magnus, [b. at Lauingen, Swabia c. 1206 A.D. - d. at Cologne, Germany 1280 A.D.], Dominican philosopher, theologian, and scientist, “On Union with God”, With Notes by Rev. P. J. Berthier, O.P., Imprimatur - Edm. Can. Surmont, Vicarius Generalis, Westmonasterii, Die 7 Decembris, 1911, Translated by A Benedictine of Princethorpe Priory, Chapter III, The Law of Man’s Perfection in this Life, p. 26; emphasis added.)

“(30) Moreover, it is of the same impiety to disparage either the Father or the Son or the Holy Spirit. For he does not believe in the Father who does not believe in the Son; nor does he believe in the Son of God who does not believe in the Spirit, nor can Faith stand without the Rule of Truth. For he who has begun to deny the unity of power in the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit surely cannot prove a divided Faith there where there is no division. So, since the unity of piety is to believe well, the unity of impiety also is to believe badly.”  (Patriarch Saint Ambrose [b. in Gaul, possibly at Trier, Arles, or Lyons in 340 A.D. - d. at Milan, Italy on Friday, April 4, 397 A.D.] Patriarch of Milan [374 A.D. - Friday, April 4, 397 A.D.], “Saint Ambrose, Theological and Dogmatic Works”, Translated by Roy J. Deferrari, PH.D., The Catholic University of America, Imprimatur: + Patrick A. O'boyle, Archbishop of Washington, D.C., August 1, 1962, “The Holy Spirit” , Book I, Chapter 2, ¶ 30, p. 47; emphasis added.)

“Since there are therefore three states, or steps, of Truth, we ascend to the first by the toil of Humility, to the second by the emotion of compassion, to the third by the ecstasy of contemplation.”  (Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, Confessor, Cistercian Abbot [1090 A.D. - 1153 A.D.], Doctor of the Church, [b. at the Castle Fontaines, near Dijon, France in 1090 A.D. - d. at Clairvaux, France in 1153 A.D.], “The Steps of Humility”, 6.)

“Therefore, heresy is so-called from the Greek word meaning “choice”, by which each chooses according to his own will what he pleases to teach or believe.  BUT WE ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BELIEVE WHATEVER WE CHOOSE, NOR TO CHOOSE WHATEVER SOMEONE ELSE HAS BELIEVED. We have the Apostles of God as authorities, who did not themselves of their own will choose what they would believe, but faithfully transmitted to the nations the teaching received from Christ.  So, even if an Angel from Heaven should preach otherwise, he shall be calledanathema”  (Saint Isidore of Seville [b. Cartagena, Spain 560 A.D. - d. Seville, Spain, 636 A.D.], Bishop of Seville, Doctor of the Catholic Church, ETYMOLOGIES, 8, 3; emphasis added).

And this is EXACTLY what the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theologian Theologian Heretics  really are  -  anathema  in the sight of Almighty God -  for  all of them are possessed by the Spirits of Error and Doctrines of Devils speaking lies in hypocrisy    and having their conscience seared.

Therefore:

Truth IS both Absolute and Immutable.

In plain English this means that:

1)  Truth IS Absolute, NOT relative, NOT subject to any change or shadow of alteration;
2) Truth does NOT evolve; Truth is NOT in a state of constant transformation.
3) Truth NEVER changes because Truth is immutable, i.e. unchangeable.
Most likely some Readers will wonder why We have included the ENTIRE Liturgical Rite of Episcopal Consecration, including not only all of the texts, but also the rubrics which help the Reader to understand what/why certain things are done?

Part of the answer is to be found in the Significatio ex Adjunctis  of the Liturgical Rite taken as a whole, since the term  significatio ex adjunctis means:

signification from the rest of the Rite and the Prayers around it”.
It is this  Significatio ex Adjunctis  of the Liturgical Rite, taken as a whole which defines, by the CONTEXT of the Liturgical Rite whole and entire, in and of itself, per se, what is meant by the Form.

Please remember how  the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theologian Theologian Heretics use a "dictionary" in which the actual definition of each word is in a state of perpetual change, of perpetual evolution, which changes these heretics also apply to the unchangeable Dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church.

For those of you who are able to read, write, and speak English, primarily American-English, the unabridged dictionary of the American-English dictionary is a very, very thick book!

Why?

Because many words found in American-English unabridged dictionaries have more than only one meaning. But the same is even true of American-English abridged dictionaries.

For example:

Words like accent, be, carry, develop, engineer, fill, gas, honor, in, jam, kid, love, low, model, number, order, party, quarter, roll, shape, take, under, value, water, x, yellow, zone, have more than three dictionary meanings.
So how does a person who proficiently and naturally reads, writes, and speaks fluently American-English make the correct choice for the meaning of these and so many, many other words?

AnswerCONTEXT!

The actual CONTEXT of each word in almost every sentence, in almost every case, automatically helps to provide the correct definition of each word.  This is the proverbial "second nature", so to speak, for those people who are proficient in the proper and correct use of the American-English language.  It is very natural and easy for such people to read, write, and speak American-English because the full meaning of every word in every sentence "flows" without blockages of any kind concerning the correct meaning of every word to be found in every sentence.

Hence, the CONTEXT of every word in every sentence of the American-English language provides the correct meaning for each of the words in every sentence, without people, who are fluent and proficient in the American-English language, having to carry with them a dictionary of the American-English language.

But those who are fluent and proficient in the American-English language also know, not only the definition of each word, in virtue of the CONTEXT of each word, but also the FUNCTION of each word - how each word functions - according to the correct laws or rules of the American-English language.

Those who are able to correctly diagram sentences can readily understand the correct grammatical function of each word in every sentence.

In other words, in the diagram of a sentence, which word is the subject, the predicate, the object.  What is the classification of the words, i.e. which words are nouns, pronouns, adjectives, verbs, adverbs, etc.  Is the case of the noun or pronoun singular or plural, and which words are masuline, feminine, or neuter.  With verbs are they regular or irregular; transitive or intransitive; active or passive voice; etc., etc.

Here, then, is an example of how the term  Significatio ex Adjunctis  - signification from the rest of the Rite and the Prayers around it” - can be applied, in terms of its basic principle - context -  to reading, writing, and speaking American-English.

Therefore, this is also how the term   Significatio ex Adjunctis  - signification from the rest of the Rite and the Prayers around it” - is correctly applied and correctly used, in terms of its basic principle - context -  to every liturgical Rite which includes not only the actual words of each Prayer, but also to the actual words of each Rubric - which gives the rules and directions to follow when performing a specific function or act, as well within the context of each part of the Liturgical Rite.

Is this term   Significatio ex Adjunctis  - signification from the rest of the Rite and the Prayers around it” - now beginning to make more sense to you when used as an important "tool", so to speak, in the above analytical comparisons of the Pontificale Romanum, 1891 Edition, of The Ancient Roman Rite of The Catholic Church with the Roman Pontifical, NEW 1968 Version, of Novus Ordo Rite of  .Satanic..Synod Vatican 2 pseudo-church?

Do you now better and more clearly understand the great importance of the term  Significatio ex Adjunctis    within a liturgical context?

In other words, part of the issue herein involved in the above two comparisons, concern not only each of the words which compose the exact FORM required for the Sacrament of Episcopal Consecration, as well as for all of the Seven Sacraments, but also the function, the rules to follow. when performing this act, i.e. HOW to speak the exact words of the Form which is to be done in the "secret voice which is clear, distinct, without interruption", etc., but also which issues, insofar as  the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theologian Theologian Heretics  are concerned, is irrelevant because  the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theologian Theologian Heretics use a "dictionary" in which the actual definition of each word is in a state of perpetual change, of perpetual evolution, of constant transformation  which changes these heretics also apply to the unchangeable Dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church.

However, when the RULE of the  Significatio ex Adjunctis  of the Liturgical Rite, taken as a whole - which defines, by the CONTEXT of the Liturgical Rite whole and entire, in and of itself, per se, what is meant by the FORM - plus the FUNCTION as per the rules of the rubrics of exactly how to do it - then the LIES of the LIARS, who are  the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theologian Theologian Heretics, ironically now become irrelevant because their pseudo-dictionary of lies is made invalid and unlawful, being exposed for its Satanic decepetion by the  Significatio ex Adjunctis  of the Liturgical Rite for the Sacrament of the Episcopacy, because taken as a whole, the  Significatio ex Adjunctis  defines the CONTEXT and the FUNCTION of the Liturgical Rite for the Sacrament of the Episcopacy, including, but not limited to, the rules of the rubrics for all of the primary acts required by the Liturgical Rite for the Sacrament of the Episcopacy.

In other words, the  Significatio ex Adjunctis  of the Liturgical Rite for the Sacrament of the Episcopacy, does not rely 100% on ONLY each of the words of the FORM for this Sacrament, but also on ALL of the rules of the acts  of the FUNCTION of which ALL of the words of the ENTIRE Liturgical Rite for the Sacrament of the Episcopacy are in harmony, and with the reverse being equally true.

In so doing, such a process causes the  the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theologian Theologian Heretics  to be made dumb, i.e. speechless, and 100% ineffective in communicating their heretical lies by whatever means and methods.

Therefore, it is by the  Significatio ex Adjunctis  of the ENTIRE CONTEXT of the Liturgical Rite for the Sacrament of the Episcopacy that the Truth prevails and the requirement for the VALIDITY of the FORM for the Sacrament of the Episcopacy is defended and safeguarded from these rogues who are nothing more than LIARS, and notorious clones of anti-Christ!

Or, said another way, this explains why the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics and NEW Theologian Theologian Heretics  really are  -  anathema  in the sight of Almighty God -  for  all of them are possessed by the Spirits of Error and Doctrines of Devils speaking lies in hypocrisy    and having their conscience seared!




Conclusion of Our Commentary

Yet, in the true spirit of Charity. We invite each of you to join Our special Rosary Crusade For the Grace of Conversion For ALL Members of the .Satanic..Synod Vatican 2 pseudo-church.
But, of course, such people are free to accept or to reject the Grace of Conversion.

Nevertheless, one must also be aware of this fact:

Medicinal rebuke must be applied to all who sin, lest they should either themselves perish, or be the ruin of others....”  (Bishop Saint Augustine, a.k.a. Aurelius Augustinus [b. Tagaste, Africa, Saturday, November 13, 354 A.D. - d. Hippo Regia, Africa, Wednesday, August 28, 430 A.D.], Bishop of Hippo Regia, Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, the Doctor of Grace, a protégé of Patriarch Saint Ambrose.  Extract from Bishop Saint Augustine’s “Retractations”, Book II, Chapter 67, On the Following Treatise: “De Correptione et Gratia”, Treatise on Rebuke and Grace, Addressed to Valentine, and with him to the Monks of Adrumetum, 426 A.D., or 427 A.D., Introduction; emphasis added.)
And also:
Let no one therefore say that a man must not be rebuked when he deviates from the right way, but that his return and perseverance must only be asked for from the Lord for him.”  (Bishop Saint Augustine, a.k.a. Aurelius Augustinus [b. Tagaste, Africa.  Extract from Bishop Saint Augustine’s “Retractations”, Book II, Chapter 67, On the Following Treatise: “De Correptione et Gratia”, Treatise on Rebuke and Grace, Addressed to Valentine, and with him to the Monks of Adrumetum, 426 A.D., or 427 A.D., Chapter 25, Therefore Rebuke is to Be Used; emphasis added.)
These very expert Masters of Deceit and professional purveyors  of heretical psychobabble, will try to get as many Catholics as possible to accept and to believe their heresies, the metaphysical essence of which is heretical psychobabble, the cause of which is an ontological essence which consists of a combination of hatred/ignorance of the Truth, or worse, an affected ignorance within the context of gross indifferentism.

Father David Greenstock, writing in The Thomist [1950], warned that the only reason that the leaders of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism overwhelm their readers with some of the Greek Fathers of the Church is in order to circumvent the Angelic Doctor, Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.

Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernist theologians actually disdain Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., no matter how much they may ostentatiously pledge their devotion to the Angelic Doctor, because they know that Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., the Great Scholastic, confutes and exposes their errors which are anti-Scholastic!

On the contrary, both Scholastic Philosophy and Scholastic Theology, a.k.a. Thomistic Theology, are required to be studied and taught, especially in Roman Catholic Seminaries, according to the Decrees of various Roman Catholic Popes as well as Roman Catholic Canon Law:

“31. If one considers all this well, he will easily see why the Church demands that future priests be instructed in philosophy according to the method, doctrine, and principles of the Angelic Doctor, since, as we well know from the experience of centuries, the method of Aquinas is singularly preeminent both for teaching students and for bringing truth to light; his doctrine is in harmony with Divine Revelation, and is most effective both for safeguarding the foundation of the Faith, and for reaping, safely and usefully, the fruits of sound progress.”  (Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Humani Generis, On Human Origin, Concerning Some False Opinions Threatening to Undermine The Foundations of Catholic Doctrine, Wednesday, April 12, 1950, ¶ 31; emphasis added).
This explains why some of the Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, who are, without a doubt, very expert Masters of Deceit and professional purveyors  of heretical psychobabble, will frequently try to get as many naive, ignorant, uninformed, and confused Catholics to accept and to believe their pernicious heresies, the metaphysical essence of which is nothing less than heretical psychobabble, the cause of which is an ontological essence which consists of a combination of hatred/ignorance of the Truth, or worse, an affected ignorance within the context of gross indifferentism.

Some of the tricks these Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, who are expert Masters of Deceit and professional purveyorsof heretical psychobabble, include the following by which they victimize  Catholics who are gullible, either due to their own gross ignorance and/or gross indifferentism, and which said Catholics unjustly and ignorantly too readily impute to these clones of anti-Christ a false credibility and counterfeit authority, suggested by the mesmerizing verbal prestidigitation of these wizards of melodramatic theatrics who easily misdirect the mind from objective truths by quickly presenting their embellished demonic sales pitch which these intellectual quacks have honed to perfection in order to try to cut and slash the Truth to shreds, while hypocritically covering over whatever modicum of truth they pretend to teach with a glaze dripping with the trappings of false dialectics brimming over with the errors of evolution which ostensibly is supposed to eradicate the penumbra of the darkness of mental confusion, thereby intending to sound good to the unwary, but which, in reality, is not good and sound, instead being filled with fallacies, contradictions, generalizations, denials, and brazen lies, signifying nothing except their deliberately obfuscated chicanery as exampled by the following modus operandi of their incredible brash deception.

1. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism quote texts from the Angelic Doctor, Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., including his Summa Theologica and then attempt to spin these texts in order to make these text mean either something different, or even the exact opposite, of what the texts actually says. This process of spinning the texts also tends to confuse some opponents.

2. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism habitually meet well-argued criticisms from their opponents with a mere categorical general denial.

3. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism really believe their own errors.

4. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism regularly claim that what they write and what they say is merely misunderstood.

5. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism try to cover up their heresies with equivocal words or terms which could be interpreted in more than one way.

6. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism routinely try to explain how their rational is really orthodox. This explains why, in the case of some very deceptive Modernist Heretics, disputes arise at to exactly what a certain Modernist Heretic actually said, even after the death of the said Modernist Heretic.

7. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism try to cover themselves with the cloak of Catholicity by pretending that their works simply explain and/or interpret various teachings of the Roman Catholic Church in what they classify as modern terminology.

8. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, using a variety of fallacies, attempt to try to escape ecclesiastical censures by using these (i.e. the said fallacies) and other deceptive practices.

9. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, especially those among them who highly skilled in the art of dialectics, seek out opponents who are unlearned on those subjects with which the Modernist Heretic claims to have thoroughly researched and studied in an attempt to either discredit such opponents, especially in public, or to try to convert such opponents to accept their various heresies of Modernism, thereby taking advantage of the ignorance of such opponents who, armed with only the best of intentions, whether through ignorance and/or pride, make a futile attempt to defend the Truth.

10. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, while trying to hide their True identity as Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, attempt to subtly insinuate their heretical propaganda into what they put on the internet, especially in what are called blogs - which are too frequently, with some exceptions, cesspools, both of ignorance and of learned ignorance, and which, to some observers, have become virtual internet weeds, multiplying exponentially, and thereby de facto choking the Truth in an internet war against the Truth whereby the Truth has become the target to attack.  This is done in part by trying to overwhelm the Truth by trying to outnumber those websites devoted to the Truth. As a result, search engines will, more and more frequently, direct searchers to those websites operated by the thus-far relatively small numbers of Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism.

Observers are sad and very concerned that the heresies of the NEW Theology theologians now appear to be proliferating on an unknown number of Catholic web sites which have, perhaps with the best of intentions of their Lay webmasters, replicated such heretical theological data without a clue as to its real meaning so that, by sheer force of numbers - quantity - search engines will provide more and more links to these kinds of questionable websites which have Traditional Catholic-sounding names.

Those among such intellectual midgets, which is to say, Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, who would reject the Grace of Conversion, and who by pride continue to reject the Truth concerning the many proofs for the invalidity of the NEW liturgical rite of the Synod Vatican 2 church for the ordination of a Bishop, need to remember that they have already been automatically excommunicated by various censures of valid Ecumenical Doctrinal Councils, as well as by the various documents of certain Roman Catholic Popes.

Sad to say, those who reject the said conversion, by the Grace of God, are automatically under the ecclesiastical penalty of anathema!:

Ergo, Anathema Sint!  - Therefore, let them be anathema!
The conclusion then, is ultimately the same conclusion of Pope Leo XIII:

The text of the Encyclical, Apostolicae Curae, of Tuesday, September 15, 1896 of Pope Leo XII declares that Anglican Orders are invalid.  This simply means that all of the Bishops and Priests who were consecrated and ordained with the use of the Anglican Ordinal are not Bishops and not Priests!  Priests ordained by Bishops who themselves were ordained by the NEW rite of ordination of a bishop, are not validly ordained priests because the bishops ordaining them are not valid bishops.

On the contrary, all those ordained priests and bishops with the NEW rite of 1968 of the Synod Vatican 2 church, which is an empty ceremony, like a stage play or a movie, etc., are, just like their Protestant counter-parts, simply members of the Laity dressed up like Bishops and Priests because they have no Sacramental Powers of offer Mass, to administer the Sacraments, to Bless, to perform Exorcisms, etc., because the Bishop(s) who ordained/consecrated the Protestant priests/bishops, used the Anglican [Edwardine] Ordinal which contains invalid liturgical Rites for the Seven Sacraments, including the Sacrament of Holy Orders, and, for the same reasons, the Bishop(s) who ordained/consecrated the Synod Vatican 2 church priests/bishops, who use the 1968 Roman Pontifical, which contains invalid liturgical Rites for the Seven Sacraments, including the Sacrament of Holy Orders, especially the ordination of bishops, are likewise simply members of the Laity dressed up like Bishops and Priests because they have no Sacramental Powers of offer Mass, to administer the Sacraments, to Bless, to perform Exorcisms, etc.



Some Very Important Information Concerning the NEW mass,
Of the  .Satanic..Synod Vatican 2 pseudo-church, Which the
.Satanic..Synod Vatican 2 pseudo-church..Does NOT Want Any Catholics to Know:

WARNING:  ALL of the clergy (popes, cardinals, archbishops, bishops, and priests) who take any kind of an active part in the NEW mass, a.k.a. The Novus Ordo Rite of mass, a.k.a. The Novus Ordo Missae, of the .Satanic..Synod Vatican 2 pseudo-church automatically incur the censure of automatic excommunication from the Roman Catholic Church.

This means that all the bishops and priests who do this are all automatically excommunicated and are therefore no longer members of the Roman Catholic Church.


A Few Sources

“On account of the tacit resignation admitted by the law itself any office [This includes the Office of the Episcopacy] is vacant ipso facto and without any declaration, if a cleric:...  4.  Publicly defects from the Catholic Faith.”  (Codex Iuris Canonici - Code of Canon Law, 188.4; emphasis added.)

Canon #2259 says in part:

No excommunicated person has the right to assist at Divine Services..  (Codex Iuris Canonici - Code of Canon Law, 2259.)

“§ 1.. Omnes a christiana fide apostatae et omnes et singuli haeretici aut schismatici:  All apostates from the Christian faith and all heretics and schismatics:   1o.  Incurrunt ipso facto excommunicationem;  Incur excommunication ipso facto” [automatically, by the fact itself].  (Codex Iuris Canonici - Code of Canon Law, 2314; emphasis added.)



Anyone who spontaneously and with full knowledge helps in any way in the propagation of heresy, or who co-operates in any way with heretics contrary to the provision of Canon #1258 is suspected of heresy.”  (Codex Iuris Canonici - Code of Canon Law, 2316; emphasis added.)

Persons not in Sacerdotal Orders, who pretend to say Mass or to hear Sacramental Confession, ipso facto incur the excommunication reserved in a special manner to the Apostolic See.  A layman performing such acts must, besides, be deprived of any pension and offices he may hold in the church, and be punished with other penalties, according to the gravity of the crime:  a cleric is to be deposed.” (Codex Iuris Canonici - Code of Canon Law, 2322; emphasis added.)



NOTE:  Because the NEW mass, the Novus Ordo Rite of mass, is NOT the VALID Catholic Traditional Ancient Roman Rite of Mass  (it is an anti-Mass), as proven on some of the other web pages on this web site, the above law applies to all who use the anti-Catholic NEW mass.


Father Joseph Gelineau S.J.

To tell the Truth, it [the NEW “mass”] is a different liturgy of the Mass.  This needs to be said without ambiguity:  the Roman Rite as we knew it no longer exists [le rite romain tel que nous l'avons connu n'existe plus]. It has been destroyed [il est detruit]....  We must not weep over the ruins or dream of an historical reconstruction.”  (Father Joseph Gelineau S.J. [b. at Champ-sur-Layon, Maine-et-Loire, West-Central France, on Sunday, October 31, 1920 - d. at Sallanches, a commune in the Haute-Savoie  department in the Rhône-Alps, South-Eastern France, on Friday, August 8, 2008].   He was a Synod Vatican 2 “peritus” - expert - who helped to make up the NOR along with other anti-Catholics and the 6 Protestants. He was proud of what he did, and a professional apologist for the NOR.  This quotation is from his book - “Demain La Liturgk”, Paris, 1976, pp. 9-10; emphasis added.)




Two Modernist Heretics:
Paul 6 and Jean Guitton

The intention of Paul VI with regard to what is commonly called the Mass, was to reform the Catholic liturgy in such a way that it should almost coincide with the Protestant liturgy -- but what is curious is that Paul VI did that to get as close as possible to the Protestant Lord's supper.... ” (Jean Guitton, December 19, Radio Discourse, cited from Anthony Fraser, "Ecumenism - a Disaster for the Church", Apropos, No. 18, 1996 (Scotland), p. 122; emphasis added).

Therefore, the so-called NEW mass is NOT Catholic!  Therefore, those who use the NEW mass automatically incur the automatic excommunications of the Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church quoted above!




Tolle Missam - Tolle Ecclesiam.
(Attributed to heretic Father Martin Luther, O.S.A.)

It means: When the Catholic Mass is taken away,
the Catholic Church is automatically taken away.

This is exactly what the anti-Catholic pope Paul 6 actually did with his NEW mass - the Novus Ordo Rite of mass - Novus Ordo Missae!



Important prophetic warnings of Sacred Scripture and of Jesus Christ:


Daniel the Prophet

“And in the half of the week the Victim and the Sacrifice [of the Catholic Traditional Mass] shall fail:  and there shall be in the Temple the Abomination of Desolation: and the Desolation shall continue even to the consummation, and to the end.” (Daniel  9:27; emphasis added.)

“And they shall defile the Sanctuary of Strength, and shall take away the Continual Sacrifice [the Catholic Traditional Ancient Mass], and they shall place there the Abomination unto desolationn [The NOR - Novus Ordo Rite of mass, a.k.a. the NEW mass, the Novus Ordo Missae].” (Daniel  11:31; emphasis added.)




Jesus Christ Warned All Catholics
About the NEW Mass:

I give you a warning. The disciples who are not of My Gospel are now working hard to remake according to their ideas, and under the influence of the enemy of souls [Satan],a Mass that contains words which are odious in My Sight. When the fatal hour arrives when the faith of My Priests are put to the test, it will be these texts that will be celebrated, in this second period.” (emphasis added).




Our Blessed Mother
Also Warned All Catholics
About the NEW Sacraments


Furthermore, all of the bishops and priests who use the NOR, Novus Ordo Rite of mass, a.k.a., the NEW mass, also incur the following censures of anathema - ipso facto automatic excommunication for their violation of the following.


Pope Eugene IV

1.  Infallible Form for the Double Consecration:

“40.  It uses this Form of words in the Consecration of the Lord’s Body:

‘For this is My Body’.
(LatinHoc est enim Corpus meum.)
“41.  And [It uses this Form of words in the Consecration] of His Blood:
‘For this is the Chalice of My Blood, of the New and Everlasting Covenant, which will be shed for you and for many unto the remission of sins’.
(LatinHic est enim calix Sanguinis mei, novi et aeterni  testamenti;  mysterium fidei, qui pro vobis et pro multis effundetur in remissionem peccatorum.)”

(Cantate Domino, An Infallible Papal Bulla of the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Eugene IV,  Gabriele Condulmer [Thursday, March 3, 1431 - Tuesday, February 23, 1447].  This is the Infallible Papal Bulla of Union with the Copts which Infallibly Decreed, in union with the Infallible Ścumenical and Doctrinal Roman Catholic Council of Florence, in Session 11, Friday, February 4, 1442 A.D., the exact unchangeable Form of words to be used by every Mass Celebrant when Offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Catholic Mass.)




Council Vatican 1

Because the Roman Catholic Council Vatican 1 Infallibly teaches all Roman Catholics that everything every Roman Catholic Pope did, said, and wrote before 1870 was Infallible, this obviously includes the Papal Bulla Cantate Domino which is therefore an Infallible Papal Bulla of the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Eugene IV which Infallibly teaches what the exact unchangeable and Infallible Form is - word-for-word - that must be used in the Double Consecration of the Catholic Mass in order to have a valid Mass.



Therefore, any  change of any kind made to this Infallible FORM means that such a Mass is not really a Catholic Mass!


Illegal and Invalid:
Novus Ordo Missae

Of course, the NEW mass, a.k.a. the Novus Ordo Rite mass, a.k.a. Novus Ordo Missae, of the .Satanic..Synod Vatican 2 pseudo-church, omits mysterium fidei - mystery of faith - which refers directly to the Transubstantiation and also uses pro omnibus - for all - instead of pro multis - for many.




Roman Catholic Council of Trent

This not only makes the NEW mass, a.k.a. the Novus Ordo Rite mass, a.k.a. Novus Ordo Missae, juridically ILLEGAL, but also theologically INVALID.

2.  CANON III.  If any one saith, that the Sacrifice of the Mass is only a sacrifice of praise and of thanksgiving; or, that it is a bare commemoration of the Sacrifice consummated on the Cross, but not a propitiatory sacrifice; or, that it profits him only who receives; and that it ought not to be offered for the living and the dead for sins, pains, satisfactions, and other necessities; let him be anathema.

CANON VI.   If  anyone says that the Canon of the [Ancient Roman Rite of] Mass contains errors and is therefore to be changed; let him be anathema.

(NOTE:  The anti-Catholic Infiltrators, and automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics, 2nd pope John 23rd added the name of Saint Joseph to the Canon of the Mass and pope Paul 6, changed the words of the Double Consecration - THE FORM - which is part of the ontological essence of the Canon of the Catholic Traditional Mass - the Ancient Roman Rite of Mass.)
CANON VIII.   If any one saith, that Masses, wherein the Priest alone communicates Sacramentally, are unlawful, and are, therefore, to be abrogated [abolished]; let him be anathema.   (Infallible Roman Catholic Council of Trent, Session 22, Monday, September 17, 1562, On the Sacrifice of the Mass, Canons 3, 6, and 8; emphasis added.)


Pope Saint Pius V


Quo Primum Tempore

3.  Papal Bulla of Pope Saint Pius V, Quo Primum Tempore, Tuesday, July 14, 1570, for using a different missal for their mass in which, among many other changes, the name of Saint Joseph was inserted into the Canon of the Mass by 2nd John 23rd, and the Form for the Consecration of the Precious Blood was changed in two places by Paul 6:  it omits mysterium fidei - mystery of faith - which refers directly to the Transubstantiation and also uses pro omnibus - for all - instead of pro multis - for many.

The request to have St. Joseph’s name placed in the Canon of the Mass was officially rejected by Pope Pius VII on Saturday, September 16, 1815, and by Pope Leo XIII on Monday, August 15, 1892.

2nd John 23rd, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli [Tuesday, October 28, 1958 - Monday, June 3, 1963], inserted the name of Saint Joseph into the Canon of the Mass on Tuesday, November 13, 1962.  Thus came about the so-called “2nd Missal of 2nd John 23rd”, a.k.a. the “1962 Missal”, a.k.a. the “Missal of Pope John 23”.

Besides incurring the automatic excommunication by anathema  of Canon 6 of the Infallible Roman Catholic Council of Trent, Session 22, Monday, September 17, 1562, A.D., 2nd John 23rd and Paul 6 were also perjured liars who committed the Mortal Sin of Perjury by breaking their first Solemn Oath,  The Profession of Faith, as well as their second Solemn Oath, The Oath Against Modernism, plus their third Solemn Oath, The Coronation Oath of the Pope-Elect which IS Required of Every Pope-Elect.

The request to have Saint Joseph’s name placed in the Canon of the Mass had been officially rejected by Pope Pius VII, Barnaba-Gregorio-Chiaramonti [Friday, March 14, 1800 - Wednesday, August 20, 1823], on Saturday, September 16, 1815, and by Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Vincenzo Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], on Monday, August 15, 1892.

Ironically, in the NEW mass, a.k.a. the Novus Ordo Missae,  a.k.a. the Novus Ordo Rite of mass, of Pope Montini, a.k.a. Paul 6, Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978], the name of Saint Joseph appears in ONLY ONE of the FOUR so-called "anaphora"!

So the Modernist Heretical Innovators and NEW Theology Theologian Heretical Innovators were NOT really serious about including Saint Joseph's name and after they gained total control, and they could change whatever they wanted to change, they virtually IGNORED Saint Joseph's name!



Plus, the Mortal Sin of Perjury, for breaking:


Pope Pius IV

1.  Solemn Oath: Profession of Faith, including:

a) Further, without doubting, I accept and profess all of the Doctrines defined, handed down, and promulgated by the Sacred Canons and General Councils, especially by the most Holy Roman Catholic Council of Trent.

b) I condemn, reject and anathematize everything which is contrary to these propositions and all heresies without exception which have been condemned, rejected and anathematized by the Church(Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Pius IV, Giovanni Angelo De Medici [Friday, December 25, 1559 - Thursday, December 9, 1565], 1565 Profession of Faith, a.k.a. Professio Fidei Tridentina - the “Tridentine Profession of Faith”.)



Pope Saint Pius X

2.  Solemn Oath: Oath Against Modernism, which includes the following.

“...we may never believe nor understand anything other than the absolute and unchangeable Truth preached from the beginning by the Apostles.”

“...Fourthly, I accept sincerely the Doctrine of Faith transmitted from the Apostles through the Orthodox Fathers, always in the same sense and interpretation...”

“...I profess to be utterly free of the error according to which the Modernists hold that there is nothing Divine in the Sacred Tradition...”

“...I retain most firmly the faith of the Fathers, and shall retain it until the final breath of my life... so that the absolute and immutable Truth preached by the Apostles from the beginning may never be believed otherwise, may never be understood otherwise.  All these things I promise that I shall faithfully, completely, and sincerely keep and inviolably watch, never deviating from them in word and writing either while teaching or in any other pursuit.  So I promise, so I swear...”   (Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto [b. at Riese, Lombardy-Venetia, Austrian Empire on Tuesday, June 2, 1835; Pope: Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Papal Motu Proprio [On His Own Initiative], “Sacrorum Antistitum” - “The Oath Against Modernism”, Thursday, September 1, 1910, AAS - “Acta Apostolica Sedis” - Acts of the Apostolic See, 2-655; “Fontes”, n. 689, Volume III, page 774; emphasis added.)



Important Quotes

 
“[Saint Paul commands,] ‘Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold the Traditions which you have been taught, whether by word [oral Tradition] or by Our letter [written Tradition - Scripture]’ [2 Thessalonians 2:15]. From this it is clear that they did not hand down everything by letter [written Tradition - Scripture], but there is much also that was not written [oral Tradition]. Like that which was written [written Tradition - Scripture], the unwritten [oral Tradition] too is worthy of belief. So let us regard the Tradition [oral Tradition] of the Church also as worthy of belief. Is it a Tradition? Seek no further”  (Patriarch Saint John Chrysostom [b. Antioch, c. 347 A.D. - d. at Commana in Pontus on Friday, September 14, 407 A.D.], Patriarch of Constantinople [Thursday, February 26, 398 A.D. - Thursday, June 24, 404 A.D.], exiled from his See the 2nd time on Thursday, June 24, 404 A.D., Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church; Homilies on Second Thessalonians [A.D. 402]).

“These latter days have witnessed a notable increase in the number of the enemies of the Cross of Christ, who, by arts entirely new and full of deceit, are striving to destroy the vital energy of the Church, and, as far as in them lies, utterly to subvert the very Kingdom of Christ. Wherefore, We may no longer keep silence, lest We should seem to fail in Our most Sacred Duty, and lest the kindness that, in the hope of wiser counsels, We have hitherto shown them, should be set down to lack of diligence in the discharge of Our Office” (Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, Sunday, September 8, 1907, ¶ 1; emphasis added.)

“Therefore, heresy is so-called from the Greek word meaning choice, by which each chooses according to his own will what he pleases to teach or believe.  But we are not permitted to believe whatever we choose, nor to choose whatever someone else has believed.  We have the Apostles of God as authorities, who did not themselves of their own will choose what they would believe, but faithfully transmitted to the nations the teaching received from Christ.  So, even if an Angel from Heaven should preach otherwise, he shall be called anathema”  (Saint Isidore of Seville [b. Cartagena, Spain 560 A.D. - d. Seville, Spain, 636 A.D.], Bishop of Seville, Doctor of the Catholic Church, Etymologies, 8, 3; emphasis added).

“And you shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).

“Am I then become your enemy, because I tell you the Truth?” (Galatians 4:16).

“For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the Truth, but will be turned unto fables” (2 Timothy 4:3-4).

“But though We, or an angel from Heaven, preach to you a Gospel besides that which We have preached to you; let him be anathema” (Galatians 1:8).

“Be not led away with various and strange doctrines.  Jesus Christ yesterday, and today, and the same forever” (Hebrews 13:8-9).

“With the Father of light there is no change nor shadow of alteration”  (James 1:17).

“God is Truth”.  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 16, Article 5; Summa Theologica, Part II-II, Question 93, Article 2, Reply to Objection 2. Summa Contra Gentiles, Book I, Chapter 60.)

“Truth knows no distinction of persons.  Therefore, he who speaks the Truth is invincible, dispute with whom he may”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Commentary on Job, Chapter 13, Lesson 2).

“If people are scandalized at the Truth, it is better to allow the birth of scandal, than to abandon the Truth” (Saint Gregory I, the Great, [Friday, September 3, 590 - Monday, March 12, 604], Homily on Ezechiel, 7; cited by Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part II-II, Question 43, Article 7).

“But such as dare either to put together another faith, or to bring forward or to teach or to deliver a different Creed... let them be anathema [i.e. automatically excommunicated]” (Fourth Ścumenical Council, the First Council of Chalcedon, Session 5, Sunday, October 22, 451 A.D.).

“We have only one doctrine; this is the faith of the Doctors of the Church; this is the Faith of the Holy Apostles; this is the Faith which has saved the world.” (Fourth Ścumenical Council, the First Council of Chalcedon [Sunday, October 8, 451 A.D. - Wednesday, November 1, 451 A.D.])

“If anyone rejects all ecclesiastical Tradition, either written or unwritten:  let him be anathema.” (Seventh Ścumenical Council, the Second Council of Nicæa [Thursday, September 24, 787 A.D. - Friday, October 23, 787 A.D.], Anathema 4).



Which One of these Two Different Liturgical Rites
Used for the Administration of The Sacrament of the Episcopacy
Is the One and Only VALID Rite?

Dear Reader,

In the Side-by-Side Comparison of Two Different Liturgical Rites Used for the Administration of The Sacrament of the Episcopacy  you had an opportunity to see and to read for yourself each of the three different texts that are used for the Administration of the Sacrament of the Holy Priesthood in the Roman Catholic Church, in the Church of England, a.k.a. Anglican, and in the Synod Vatican 2 church.  A few relatively brief commentaries were given to help you to better understand the meaning of certain specific sections.

The same is also true regarding the Side-by-Side Comparison in Detail of the Ancient Roman Rite with the Novus Ordo Rite of the Required Essential Form According to the Infallible Apostolic Constitution Sacramentum Ordinis, On the Sacrament of Order, by Pope Pius XII, on the First Sunday of Advent, November 30, 1947 which likewise has a few relatively brief commentaries.

However, the primary purpose and focus of all of this data is to give you an opportunity to make your own comparisons and determinations regarding each of the above data.

But the problem for most of the Laity, and perhaps with even some members of the Clergy?, is that the necessary knowledge of Church History, of certain principles of Thomistic Theology, and of certain Infallible Documents, not only of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent - plus its Canons with their respective Censures of automatic excommunication, but also of certain Roman Catholic Popes, especially regarding the Sacrament of the Holy Priesthood, is something that the average Catholic does not know because the average Catholic has never been required to study any of these subjects in any real depth.

Apparently the required study of Thomistic Theology by Seminarians - future priests - has long ago been abanded in the Synod Vatican 2 church, along with some of the Infallible Documents of certain pre-Synod Vatican 2 Popes, and most especially the Infallible Canons and Decrees of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent, each of which were Infallibly promulgated by the Roman Catholic Popes of that time period?

Therefore, now it is time to provide you with the answer to the question:  Which one of these three different Liturgical Rites used for the Administration of the Sacrament of the Holy Priesthood is the one and only VALID Rite?

Over time, a few studies, more or less scholarly, have been written concerning the validity, as well as the invalidity, of certain Liturgical Rites that are used for the Administration of The Sacrament of the Holy Priesthood.

Some of these studies can be very confusing for the average Catholic to read, and most especially to understand.

Therefore, We have chosen one such study which should be less confusing, but still scholarly, and definitely much easier for the average Catholic to read.

As you might expect. such a study requires more than just a few random paragraphs, because, as you can readily appriciate from the above comparisons, clear explanations are necessary in order to better understand the conclusion.

Because this current web page is already very long, We have decided to provide a separate web page for the answer to the question:   Which one of these three different Liturgical Rites used for the Administration of the Sacrament of the Holy Priesthood is the one and only VALID Rite?

Please click on this link for the answer which is found on this web page:
Which Liturgical Rite used for the Administration of The Sacrament of the Episcopacy is the One and Only VALID Rite?

Thank you for reading all of the data on this web page and for your interest in this subject which is of extreme vital importance for every Catholic to know?

Why?

Because IF a Catholic is going to a valid Rite of Mass being Offered by a LAYMAN who was never validly Ordained to the Roman Catholic Priesthood, the extremely negative consequences for your Immortal Soul should be very obvious, as well as for the fake priest!

This also should make it self-evident that REAL Roman Catholic Priests and Prelates have a duty and a responsibility, not to mention the crucial need, to warn the Roman Catholic Laity of the double-talk, lies, and other tricks of some of the members of the  .Satanic..Synod Vatican 2 pseudo-church!



God Bless You!

Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.


Important Quotes
“[Saint Paul commands,] ‘Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold the Traditions which you have been taught, whether by word [oral Tradition] or by Our letter [written Tradition - Scripture]’ [2 Thessalonians 2:15]. From this it is clear that they did not hand down everything by letter [written Tradition - Scripture], but there is much also that was not written [oral Tradition]. Like that which was written [written Tradition - Scripture], the unwritten [oral Tradition] too is worthy of belief. So let us regard the Tradition [oral Tradition] of the Church also as worthy of belief. Is it a Tradition? Seek no further”  (Patriarch Saint John Chrysostom [b. Antioch, c. 347 A.D. - d. at Commana in Pontus on Friday, September 14, 407 A.D.], Patriarch of Constantinople [Thursday, February 26, 398 A.D. - Thursday, June 24, 404 A.D.], exiled from his See the 2nd time on Thursday, June 24, 404 A.D., Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church; Homilies on Second Thessalonians [A.D. 402]).

“These latter days have witnessed a notable increase in the number of the enemies of the Cross of Christ, who, by arts entirely new and full of deceit, are striving to destroy the vital energy of the Church, and, as far as in them lies, utterly to subvert the very Kingdom of Christ. Wherefore, We may no longer keep silence, lest We should seem to fail in Our most Sacred Duty, and lest the kindness that, in the hope of wiser counsels, We have hitherto shown them, should be set down to lack of diligence in the discharge of Our Office.” (Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, Sunday, September 8, 1907, ¶ 1; emphasis added.)

“Therefore, heresy is so-called from the Greek word meaning choice, by which each chooses according to his own will what he pleases to teach or believe.  But we are not permitted to believe whatever we choose, nor to choose whatever someone else has believed.  We have the Apostles of God as authorities, who did not themselves of their own will choose what they would believe, but faithfully transmitted to the nations the teaching received from Christ.  So, even if an Angel from Heaven should preach otherwise, he shall be called anathema”  (Saint Isidore of Seville [b. Cartagena, Spain 560 A.D. - d. Seville, Spain, 636 A.D.], Bishop of Seville, Doctor of the Catholic Church, Etymologies, 8, 3; emphasis added).

“And you shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).

“Am I then become your enemy, because I tell you the Truth?” (Galatians 4:16).

“For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the Truth, but will be turned unto fables” (2 Timothy 4:3-4).

“But though We, or an angel from Heaven, preach to you a Gospel besides that which We have preached to you; let him be anathema” (Galatians 1:8).

“Be not led away with various and strange doctrines.  Jesus Christ yesterday, and today, and the same forever” (Hebrews 13:8-9).

“With the Father of light there is no change nor shadow of alteration”  (James 1:17).

“God is Truth”.  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 16, Article 5; Summa Theologica, Part II-II, Question 93, Article 2, Reply to Objection 2. Summa Contra Gentiles, Book I, Chapter 60.)

“Truth knows no distinction of persons.  Therefore, he who speaks the Truth is invincible, dispute with whom he may”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Commentary on Job, Chapter 13, Lesson 2).

“If people are scandalized at the Truth, it is better to allow the birth of scandal, than to abandon the Truth” (Saint Gregory I, the Great, [Friday, September 3, 590 - Monday, March 12, 604], Homily on Ezechiel, 7; cited by Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part II-II, Question 43, Article 7).

“But such as dare either to put together another faith, or to bring forward or to teach or to deliver a different Creed... let them be anathema [i.e. automatically excommunicated]” (Fourth Ścumenical Council, the First Council of Chalcedon, Session 5, Sunday, October 22, 451 A.D.).

“We have only one doctrine; this is the faith of the Doctors of the Church; this is the Faith of the Holy Apostles; this is the Faith which has saved the world.” (Fourth Ścumenical Council, the First Council of Chalcedon [Sunday, October 8, 451 A.D. - Wednesday, November 1, 451 A.D.])

“If anyone rejects all ecclesiastical Tradition, either written or unwritten:  let him be anathema.” (Seventh Ścumenical Council, the Second Council of Nicæa [Thursday, September 24, 787 A.D. - Friday, October 23, 787 A.D.], Anathema 4).





The Blessing
V. Sit + Nomen Domini benedictum.
R. Ex hoc nunc, et usque in saeculum.
V. Adjutorium nostrum in
Nomine Domini.
R. Qui fecit cślum et terram.
V. Benedicat vos, Omnipotens Deus:
V. Pa + ter, et Fi + lius, et Spiritus + Sanctus, descendat super vos, et maneat semper.
R. Amen.
V. Blessed + be the Name of the Lord.
R. Now and for ever more.x
V. Our help is in the Name of the Lord.
mm
R. Who made Heaven and earth.
V. May Almighty God Bless thee:x
V. The Fa + ther, the + Son, and the Holy + Ghost, descend upon thee, and always remain with thee.
R. Amen.

Our Blessed Mother asks Catholics to
Pray her Traditional Rosary daily.
The Rosary will really make a
Powerful difference in Your Life!

The Memorare
Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary, that never was it known that anyone who fled to thy protection, implored thy help or sought thy intercession, was left unaided. Inspired by this confidence, I fly unto thee, O Virgin of virgins, my Mother. To thee do I come; before thee I stand, sinful and sorrowful. O Mother of the Word Incarnate despise not my petitions, but in thy mercy hear and answer me. Amen. 
Please click here to go to
The Sermons Homepage
Please click here to go to the
Editorial Contents Homepage.
Please click here to go to the
Contents Homepage.

http://www.traditionalcatholicmass.com/home-m57.html