http://www.traditionalcatholicmass.com/home-m120.html

Hosted and Edited by
Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.
J.M.J.
A.M.D.G.
F.V.T.
An Ecclesiastical, Religious, Spiritual, Devotional, Educational, Informational, News, Data, and E-Journal Web Site, Dedicated to Preserving the Authentic Apostolic Tradition of the Catholic Church on Important Subjects and Issues Concerning the Catholic Church and Her Members.
Did You Know?


The Roman Catholic Church
Was Devastated by Modernist Heretics,
a.k.a. NEW Theology Theologian Heretics,
Back in the 19th and 20th Centuries!




Four Modernist Heretics, a.k.a. NEW Theology Theologians
Top Row, Left to Right

1. Mr. Ernest Renan.  2.  Father Alfred Loisy.
3.  Mr. Maurice Blondel  4.  Father Pierre Teilhard DeChardin


Four Modernist Heretics, a.k.a. NEW Theology Theologians
Bottom Row, Left to Right

5.  Father Marie-Dominique Chenu, O.P.  6.  Father Karl Rahner.
7.  Cardinal Yves Marie Joseph Congar, O.P.  8.  Cardinal Jean-Guenolé-Marie Daniélou

m
The Roman Catholic Church was Devastated
by the Modernist Heretics,
a.k.a. NEW Theology Theologian Heretics, at Synod Vatican 2
Which Now Extends to the Aftermath of Synod Vatican 2!


Six Modernist Heretics, a.k.a.
NEW Theology Theologian Heretics,
Heretical Periti - Heretical Theological Experts
Who Advised the Bishops at Synod Vatican 2:

Top Row, Left to Right
1.  Fr. Hans Küng [b. 1928 - present?]
2.  Fr. Karl Rahner, S.J. [b. 1904 - d. 1984]
3.  Fr. John Courtney Murray, S.J. [b. 1904 - d. 1967]

Bottom Row:
4.  Cardinal Yves Congar, O.P. [b. 1904 - d. 1995]
5.  Fr. Edward Schillebeeckx, O.P. [b. 1914 - d. 2009]
6.  Cardinal Henri-Marie De Lubac, S.J. [b. 1896 - d. 1991]


Contents

General Introduction

Bishop Aloysius Wycislo
Theological Experts
Scholastic Philosophy and Scholastic Theology
Pope Pius XII
Pope Leo XIII
Pope Saint Pius X
The Question
Fr. Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli
Ernesto Buonaiuti
Pope Roncalli, a.k.a. 2nd John 23rd
  Stop the Council! Stop the Council!
Classical Trademarks of Some Modernist Heretics - Purveyors of The NEW Theology

List of Some of the NEW Theology Theologians

1) Mr. Ernest Renan

2) Father Alfred Firmin Loisy

3) Father George Tyrrell, a.k.a. George Tyrell, S.J.

4) Mr. Maurice Blondel

5) Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, S.J.

6) 2nd Pope John 23rd, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli

7) Father Marie-Dominique Chenu, O.P.

8) Cardinal Henri-Marie De Lubac, S.J.

9) Pope Paul 6, Giovanni Battista Enrico Antonio Maria Montini

10) Mr. Jean Mouroux

11) Mr. Jean Guitton

12) Father Karl Rahner, S.J.

13) Cardinal Yves Marie Joseph Congar, O.P.

14) Father John Courtney Murray, S.J.

15) Cardinal Jean-Guenolé-Marie Daniélou

16) Cardinal-Elect, Father Hans Urs von Balthasar, S.J.

17) Mr. Louis Bouyer, Ex-Protestant French Lutheran Minister

18) Father Edward Cornelis Florentius Alfonsus Schillebeeckx, O.P.

19) Pope JP-2, a.k.a. John-Paul 2, Karol Józef Wyotya, a.k.a. Karol Józef Wojtyla

20) Pope B-16, Joseph Alois Ratzinger

21) Bishop Peter Henrici, S.J.

22) Father Hans Küng

Appendices:
Appendix 1:  Monitum (Warning) Regarding the Writings of Father Teilhard De Chardin,
Issued by The Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, Saturday, June 30, 1962.
The Monitum (Admonition)
Appendix 2:  On behalf of Pope JP-2
Agostino Cardinal Casaroli sent a Letter to the then Archbishop (later Cardinal) Paul Poupard, Praising Father Teilhard de Chardin's works, which Letter was Printed on the Front Page of L'Osservatore Romano, on Wednesday, June 10, 1981
Introduction:  List of Facts
Pope JP-2
Agostino Cardinal Casaroli
Teilhard de Chardin
Appendix 3:  Letter of Agostino Cardinal Casarol to Archbishop Paul Poupard

Appendix 4: Communiqué of the Press Office of the Holy See

English edition of L'Osservatore Romano, Monday, July 20, 1981, In Effect Backpedaling the Approval of the Writings of Father Teilhard De Chardin by Pope JP-2.

Suggested Readings Revelant to the NEW Theology Theologians, etc.

Father Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P.:

La nouvelle théologie où va-t-elle?
Where is the New Theology Leading Us?
Encyclical of Pope Pius XII:
Humani Generis:  (On Human Origin), Concerning Some False Opinions Threatening to Undermine The Foundations of Catholic Doctrine, Wednesday, April 12, 1950
The Plot Against the Church

The New Montinian Church


General Introduction



Bishop Aloysius Wycislo

The above collage shows six of the NEW Theology Theologians who were Periti at Synod V-2 according to Bishop Aloysius Wycislo:

Pope Pius XII's encyclical Humani Generis had.... a devastating effect on the work of a number of pre-conciliar theologians.... theologians and biblical scholars, who had been under a cloud for years, surfaced as periti [theological experts who advised the Bishops] at Vatican II.  (Bishop Aloysius Wycislo [b. at Chicago, Illinois in 1908 - d. in 2005] Vatican Two Revisited; Reflections by One who was there, paperback edition published by Alba House on October, 1987.)


Congar and Chenu
Theological Experts

Wycislo specifically mentions Hans Kung, Karl Rahner, John Courtney Murray, Yves Congar, Edward Schillebeeckx, and Henri De Lubac as theologians who had been under a cloud of suspicion of heresy, and yet they were admitted as periti, i.e. theological experts, to Synod Vatican 2!

What kind of a theological expert is someone who has been under a cloud of suspicion of heresy?

How can such a person, who had been under a cloud of suspicion of heresy, have any credibility or be given any credentials?

How can such a person even claim to be a theological expert?

What is it that makes him a theological expert?  How can a person who has been under a cloud of suspicion of heresy be classified as an expert in anything, except for being an expert Heretic?


Scholastic Philosophy and Scholastic Theology

HOW can a theologian - who who had been under a cloud of suspicion of heresy - no less! - be considered a theological expert in Catholic Theology, especially Thomistic Theology, a.k.a. Scholastic Theology, as well as Scholastic Philosophy?


Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.

This is what is called a contradiction of terms in Scholastic Philosophy because:

“Truth cannot be Truth’s contrary”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Contra Gentiles, IV, 8)
since:
“what Truth can come from that which is false?”  (Ecclesiasticus  34:4)
for those who are:
“ever learning, and never attaining to the knowledge of the Truth” (2 Timothy 3:7).


Pope Pius XII

Both Scholastic Philosophy and Scholastic Theology, a.k.a. Thomistic Theology, are required to be studied and taught, especially in Roman Catholic Seminaries, according to the Decrees of various Roman Catholic Popes as well as Roman Catholic Canon Law:

31. If one considers all this well, he will easily see why the Church demands that future priests be instructed in philosophy according to the method, doctrine, and principles of the Angelic Doctor, [8] since, as we well know from the experience of centuries, the method of Aquinas is singularly preeminent both for teaching students and for bringing truth to light; his doctrine is in harmony with Divine Revelation, and is most effective both for safeguarding the foundation of the Faith, and for reaping, safely and usefully, the fruits of sound progress.  [9]”  (Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Humani Generis, On Human Origin, Concerning Some False Opinions Threatening to Undermine The Foundations of Catholic Doctrine, Wednesday, April 12, 1950, ¶ 31; emphasis added).


Pope Leo XIII

His Holiness, Pope Leo XIII “canonized”, so to speak,  the primacy of Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P. and Scholastic Philosophy in Catholicism where he wrote in part:

“While, therefore, We hold that every word of wisdom, every useful thing by whomsoever discovered or planned, ought to be received with a willing and grateful mind, We exhort you, Venerable Brethren, in all earnestness to restore the golden wisdom of Saint Thomas [Aquinas], and to spread it far and wide for the defense and beauty of the Catholic Faith, for the good of society, and for the advantage of all the sciences.

The wisdom of Saint Thomas, We say; for if anything is taken up with too great subtlety by the Scholastic Doctors, or too carelessly stated -- if there be anything that ill agrees with the discoveries of a later age, or, in a word, improbable in whatever way -- it does not enter Our mind to propose that for imitation to Our age.

Let carefully selected teachers endeavor to implant the doctrine of Thomas Aquinas in the minds of students, and set forth clearly his solidity and excellence over others. Let the universities already founded or to be founded by you illustrate and defend this doctrine, and use it for the refutation of prevailing errors.

But, lest the false for the true or the corrupt for the pure be drunk in, be ye watchful that the doctrine of Thomas be drawn from his own fountains, or at least from those rivulets which, derived from the very fount, have thus far flowed, according to the established agreement of learned men, pure and clear; be careful to guard the minds of youth from those which are said to flow thence, but in reality are gathered from strange and unwholesome streams”  (Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], Encyclical, “Æterni Patris”, On the Restoration of Christian Philosophy, Monday, August 4, 1879 A.D., ¶ 31; emphasis added).

Concerning Scholastic Theology, a.k.a. Thomistic Theology, the same Pope wrote:
“21.  Rightly, then, does the same [Pope] Sixtus V call theology (and here he is referring especially to Scholastic Theology) a Gift from Heaven, and ask that it be maintained in the schools and cultivated with great ardor, as being abundant in fruitfulness for the Church. [Footnote # 13.  Pope Sixtus V, Apostolic Constitution, “Triumphantis Ierusalem”].” (Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical, “Depuis Le Jour”, On the Education of the Clergy, September 8, 1899; ¶ 21; emphasis added).

“Is it necessary to add that the book par excellence in which students may with most profit study Scholastic Theology is the Summa Theologica of Saint Thomas Aquinas.  It is our wish, therefore, that professors be sure to explain to all their pupils its method, as well as the principal articles relating to Catholic Faith” (Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical, “Depuis Le Jour”, On the Education of the Clergy, September 8, 1899; ¶ 21-22; emphasis added).

He had also written on the subject of Scholastic Theology in a previous Encyclical:
“14. Later on, the doctors of the middle ages, who are called Scholastics, addressed themselves to a great work -- that of diligently collecting, and sifting, and storing up, as it were, in one place, for the use and convenience of posterity the rich and fertile harvests of Christian learning scattered abroad in the voluminous works of the Holy Fathers [of the Catholic Church]. And with regard, Venerable Brethren, to the origin, drift, and excellence of this Scholastic learning, it may be well here to speak more fully in the words of one of the wisest of Our Predecessors, [Pope] Sixtus V:
‘By the Divine favor of Him who alone gives the spirit of science, and wisdom, and understanding, and who though all ages, as there may be need, enriches His Church with new blessings and strengthens it with new safeguards, there was founded by Our fathers, men of eminent wisdom, the Scholastic Theology, which two glorious Doctors in particular, the Angelic Saint Thomas and the Seraphic Saint Bonaventure, illustrious teachers of this faculty, ....with surpassing genius, by unwearied diligence, and at the cost of long labors and vigils, set in order and beautified, and when skillfully arranged and clearly explained in a variety of ways, handed down to posterity.’
“And, indeed, the knowledge and use of so salutary a science, which flows from the fertilizing founts of the sacred writings, the sovereign Pontiffs, the Holy Fathers [of the Church] and the Councils, must always be of the greatest assistance to the Church, whether with the view of really and soundly understanding and interpreting the Scriptures, or more safely and to better purpose reading and explaining the Fathers [of the Church], or for exposing and refuting the various errors and heresies; and in these late days, when those dangerous times described by the Apostle are already upon us, when the blasphemers, the proud, and the seducers go from bad to worse, erring themselves and causing others to err, there is surely a very great need of confirming the Dogmas of Catholic Faith and confuting heresies”  (Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical, “Æterni Patris”, On the Restoration of Christian Philosophy, Monday, August 4, 1879 A.D.; ¶ 14-15; emphasis added).


Pope Saint Pius X

Concerning the Heresy of Modernism on the subject of Scholastic Theology, one reads:

“38. It remains for Us now to say a few words about the Modernist as reformer. From all that has preceded, it is abundantly clear how great and how eager is the passion of such men for innovation. In all Catholicism there is absolutely nothing on which it does not fasten. They wish Philosophy to be reformed, especially in the Ecclesiastical Seminaries.
[N.B.:  This was back in 1907 A.D.!  And this is what happened before, during, and especially after Synod Vatican 2.]
They wish the Scholastic Philosophy to be relegated to the History of Philosophy and to be classed among absolute systems, and the young men to be taught modern philosophy which alone is true and suited to the times in which we live. They desire the reform of Theology: rational theology is to have modern philosophy for its foundation, and positive theology is to be founded on the history of dogma.

As for history, it must be written and taught only according to their methods and modern principles. Dogmas and their evolution, mthey affirm, are to be harmonized with science and history. In the Catechism no Dogmas are to be inserted except those that have been reformed and are within the capacity of the people. m

[N.B.:  This is what happened after Synod Vatican 2 with the NEW catechism.]
Regarding Worship, they say, the number of external Devotions is to he reduced, and steps must be taken to prevent their further increasem
[N.B.:  This also happened after Synod Vatican 2.],
though, indeed, some of the admirers of symbolism are disposed to be more indulgent on this head. They cry out that ecclesiastical government requires to be reformed in all its branches, but especially in its disciplinary and dogmatic departments They insist that both outwardly and inwardly it must be brought into harmony with the modern conscience which now wholly tends towards Democracy; a share in ecclesiastical government should therefore be given to the lower ranks of the Clergy and even to the Laity and authority which is too much concentrated should be decentralized....

“41. If we pass on from the moral to the intellectual causes of Modernism, the first and the chief which presents itself is ignorance. Yes, these very Modernists who seek to be esteemed as Doctors of the Church, who speak so loftily of modern philosophy and show such contempt for Scholasticism, have embraced the one with all its false glamor, precisely because their ignorance of the other has left them without the means of being able to recognize confusion of thought and to refute sophistry. mTheir whole system, containing as it does errors so many and so great, has been born of the union between faith and false philosophy.

“42....Against Scholastic Philosophy and m[Scholastic] Theology they use the weapons of ridicule and contempt.  Whether it is ignorance or fear, or both, that inspires this conduct in them, certain it is that the passion for novelty is always united in them with hatred of Scholasticism, and there is no surer sign that a man is tending to Modernism than when he begins to show his dislike for the Scholastic Method.

Let the Modernists and their admirers remember the proposition condemned by Pius IX:

‘The method and principles which have served the Ancient Doctors of Scholasticism when treating of theology no longer correspond with the exigencies of our time or the progress of science.’ [Footnote # 22.  Pope Pius IX, “Syllabus of Errors”, Proposition 13.]
They exercise all their ingenuity in an effort to weaken the force and falsify the character of Tradition, so as to rob it of all its weight and authority. But for Catholics nothing will remove the authority of the Second Council of Nicæa, where it condemns those
‘who dare, after the impious fashion of heretics, to deride the Ecclesiastical Traditions, to invent novelties of some kind... or endeavor by malice or craft to overthrow any one of the legitimate Traditions of the Catholic Church’;
nor that of the declaration of the Fourth Council of Constantinople:
‘We therefore profess to preserve and guard the rules bequeathed to the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, by the Holy and most illustrious Apostles, by the Orthodox Councils [i.e. those Catholic Traditional Doctrinal Councils that are 100% faithful to the unchangeable Apostolic Tradition preserved by the Fathers and Doctors of the Catholic Church], both general and local, and by everyone of those Divine interpreters, the Fathers and Doctors of the Church.’
Wherefore the Roman Pontiffs, Pius IV and Pius IX, ordered the insertion in the Profession of Faith of the following declaration:
I most firmly admit and embrace the Apostolic and Ecclesiastical Traditions and other observances and Constitutions of the Church.’......
“45...And let it be clearly understood above all things that when We prescribe Scholastic Philosophy We understand chiefly that which the Angelic Doctor [Saint Thomas Aquinas] has bequeathed to us, and We, therefore, declare that all the ordinances of Our predecessor [Pope Leo XIII] on this subject continue fully in force, and, as far as may be necessary, We do decree anew, and confirm, and order that they shall be strictly observed by all.

In Seminaries where they have been neglected it will be for the Bishops to exact and require their observance in the future; and let this apply also to the Superiors of Religious Orders. Further, We admonish Professors to bear well in mind that they cannot set aside Saint Thomas [Aquinas], especially in Metaphysical questions, without grave disadvantage.....

“49...  For the future the Doctorate of Theology and Canon Law must never be conferred on anyone who has not first of all made the regular course of Scholastic Philosophy; if conferred, it shall be held as null and void” (Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, Sunday, September 8, 1907; emphasis added).


The Question

Because of these teachings by Infallible Roman Catholic Popes and Infallible Roman Catholic Doctrinal Councils, this begs the question:

Why were the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretics, a.k.a. the NEW Theology Theologians, including Fr. Hans Kung, Fr. Karl Rahner, Fr. John Courtney Murray, Cardinal Yves Marie Joseph Congar, Fr. Edward Schillebeeckx, and Fr. Henri De Lubac, even permitted to attend Synod Vatican 2, let alone be accepted as periti - theological experts - who advised the Bishops of Synod Vatican 2?

When one considers the fact that the rules of Synod Vatican 2 forbade every theologian, who had ever been under suspicion of heresy, from being admitted to the Synod as a peritus, a theological expert, who advised the Bishops at Synod Vatican 2, the question becomes more grave.

Here is part of the answer:



Fr. Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli
Seated, 1901

According to several Vatican insiders, back in the days when Fr. Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, the future Pope Roncalli (2nd Pope John 23rd), was a Seminary Professor, the Holy Office had maintained a dossier on him for many, many years.  This file included the statement that Fr. Roncalli was suspected of Modernism.

Modernism, of course, is a heresy, refuted and condemned by Pope Saint Pius X.

So, in other words, the file was really saying that Fr. Roncalli was suspected of being a Modernist Heretic!  Of course, Pope Saint Pius X had issued an automatic excommunication of all heretics, most especially of Modernists Heretics!

The file on Fr. Roncalli dated back to 1925 when Fr. Roncalli, who was known for his unorthodox teachings, was abruptly removed from his Professorship at the Lateran Seminary in mid-semester.   Fr. Roncalli was accused of the Heresy of Modernism. Roncalli was shipped off to Bulgaria. This transfer to Bulgaria began his diplomatic career.



Ernesto Buonaiuti

Of particular concern to Rome (an euphamistic expression used to denote the Vatican) was Fr. Roncalli's continuing close association with the defrocked priest Ernesto Buonaiuti [b. at Rome, Italy on April 24, 1881 - d. at Rome, Italy on April 20, 1946].  (Lawrence Elliott, I Will Be Called John, 1973, pp. 90-92.).

Ernesto Buonaiuti was excommunicated for the Heresy of Modernism on Sunday, January 25, 1925.

This formal Excommunication of Ernesto Buonaiuti for the Heresy of Modernism was repeated several times because in his works he had defended the Heresy of Modernism - in particular his Il programma dei modernisti (The Modernists' Program) of 1908, and his Lettere di un prete modernista (Letters from a Modernist Priest), also of 1908.



Pope Roncalli
a.k.a. 2nd John 23rd
1st President of the NEW One World Order anti-Christ Religion

Upon becoming Pope, 2nd Pope John 23rd was asked if he would continue the policies of his predecessor, Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958].  A Vatican insider claims that Pope Roncalli (2nd Pope John 23rd) answered:

“Think of what Pius XII would do and I will do the opposite”!
A Vatican insider claims that it was Jolly John (this is what the media called him) himself who personally appointed a number of pre-conciliar theologians.... theologians and biblical scholars, who had been under a cloud for years”, as periti [theological experts who advised the Bishops] for Synod Vatican 2, despite the fact that the rules of Synod Vatican 2 forbade every theologian, who had ever been under suspicion, from being admitted to the Synod as a peritus, a theological expert, who advised the Bishops at Synod Vatican 2!  So much for the "rules"!


Pope Pius XII

Obviously, this was most certainly the opposite of what Pope Pius XII would have done!

But then Pope Pius XII was NOT suspected of being an automatically excommunicated Modernists Heretic as was Pope Roncalli!

In addition, Pope Roncalli had obviously self-excommunicated himself because of his violation of the Coronation Oath of the Pope-Elect for permitting those suspected of Heresy to become periti at Vatican 2.

Finally, Pope Roncalli is also strongly suspected of not even being a Pope because of the Infallible Papal Bulla of Pope Paul IV!  This fact might explain why, shortly before he died, apparently no one paid any attention to him when he allegedly screamed:



Stop the Council! Stop the Council!

(Pope Roncalli [2nd Pope John 23rd] on his deathbed.  Quoted in Kevin Haney, “The Stormy History of General Councils,” Latin Mass magazine, Spring 1995, attributed to Jean Guitton [b. at Saint-Étienne, Loire, in East-Central France on Sunday, August 18, 1901 - d. at Paris, France on Sunday, March 21, 1999]. The Council which Pope Roncalli (2nd Pope John 23rd) wanted stopped was Vatican 2.
Therefore, is it any wonder that Synod Vatican 2 is responsible for the epidemic of the heretical NEW Theology Theologians and the Heresy of Modernism which has run rampant in the church since Synod Vatican 2, and because of Modernism's heresy of evolution, has unleashed the never-ending changes of the changes of the changes of the changes of the changes?

So now you know why the Synod Vatican 2 church is the church of the never-ending changes of the changes of the changes of the changes of the changes ad infinitum!




Classical Trademarks of Some Modernist Heretics
Purveyors of Nouvelle Théologie
The NEW Theology a.k.a. neo-Modernism
The Learned Ignorance of Heretical Psychobabble

1. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism quote texts from the Angelic Doctor, Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., including his Summa Theologica and then attempt to spin these texts in order to make these text mean either something different, or even the exact opposite, of what the texts actually says. This process of spinning the texts also tends to confuse some opponents.

2. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism habitually meet well-argued criticisms from their opponents with a mere categorical general denial.

3. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism really believe their own errors.

4. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism regularly claim that what they write and what they say is merely misunderstood.

5. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism try to cover up their heresies with equivocal words or terms which could be interpreted in more than one way.

6. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism routinely try to explain how their rational is really orthodox. This explains why, in the case of some very deceptive Modernist Heretics, disputes arise at to exactly what a certain Modernist Heretic actually said, even after the death of the said Modernist Heretic.

7. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism try to cover themselves with the cloak of Catholicity by pretending that their works simply explain and/or interpret various teachings of the Roman Catholic Church in what they classify as modern terminology.

8. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, using a variety of fallacies, attempt to try to escape ecclesiastical censures by using these (i.e. the said fallacies) and other deceptive practices.

9. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, especially those among them who highly skilled in the art of dialectics, seek out opponents who are unlearned on those subjects with which the Modernist Heretic claims to have thoroughly researched and studied in an attempt to either discredit such opponents, especially in public, or to try to convert such opponents to accept their various heresies of Modernism, thereby taking advantage of the ignorance of such opponents who, armed with only the best of intentions, whether through ignorance and/or pride, make a futile attempt to defend the Truth.

10. Some Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, while trying to hide their True identity as Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, attempt to subtly insinuate their heretical propaganda into what they put on the internet, especially in what are called blogs - which are too frequently, with some exceptions, cesspools, both of ignorance and of learned ignorance, and which, to some observers, have become virtual internet weeds, multiplying exponentially, and thereby de facto choking the Truth in an internet war against the Truth whereby the Truth has become the target to attack.

This is done in part by trying to overwhelm the Truth by trying to outnumber those websites devoted to the Truth. As a result, search engines will, more and more frequently, direct searchers to those websites operated by the thus-far relatively small numbers of Modernist Heretics and Disciples of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism.

Observers are sad and very concerned that the heresies of the NEW Theology theologians now appear to be proliferating on an unknown number of Catholic web sites which have, perhaps with the best of intentions of their Lay webmasters, replicated such heretical theological data without a clue as to its real meaning so that, by sheer force of numbers - quantity - search engines will provide more and more links to these kinds of questionable websites which have Traditional Catholic-sounding names.

The following list of some of the proponents of the Heresy Modernism and/or Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, is not exhaustive because it is limited to only 22 of them. Because this list includes some names which are generally not know to the Laity, with but a few very notable exceptions, some relatively brief data is given about each one of them.

List of Some of the NEW Theology Theologians

A Brief List of Some Proponents of Modernism
and/or Nouvelle Théologie
"the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism"

1) Mr. Ernest Renan

2) Father Alfred Firmin Loisy

3) Father George Tyrrell, a.k.a. George Tyrell, S.J.

4) Mr. Maurice Blondel

5) Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, S.J.

6) 2nd Pope John 23rd, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli

7) Father Marie-Dominique Chenu, O.P.

8) Cardinal Henri-Marie De Lubac, S.J.

9) Pope Paul 6, Giovanni Battista Enrico Antonio Maria Montini

10) Mr. Jean Mouroux

11) Mr. Jean Guitton

12) Father Karl Rahner, S.J.

13) Cardinal Yves Marie Joseph Congar, O.P.

14) Father John Courtney Murray, S.J.

15) Cardinal Jean-Guenolé-Marie Daniélou

16) Cardinal-Elect, Father Hans Urs von Balthasar, S.J.

17) Mr. Louis Bouyer, Ex-Protestant French Lutheran Minister

18) Father Edward Cornelis Florentius Alfonsus Schillebeeckx, O.P.

19) Pope JP-2, a.k.a. John-Paul 2, Karol Józef Wyotya, a.k.a. Karol Józef Wojtyla

20) Pope B-16, Joseph Alois Ratzinger

21) Bishop Peter Henrici, S.J.

22) Father Hans Küng

A virtual "handful" of the "apostles", and/or their "disciples", of Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" greatly influenced the "documents" and other "teachings" of Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965] according to Bishop Aloysius Wycislo.

The following list of some of the proponents of the Heresy of Modernism, a.k.a. "neo-Modernism", which term has been re-packaged, so to speak, under its NEW, UPDATED, name:  Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology", is not exhaustive because it is limited to only 22 of them. Because this list includes some names which are generally not know to most of the Laity, with perhaps only a few very notable exceptions, some relatively brief data is given about each of them in sequence by their date of birth.


1) Mr. Ernest Renan
[b. at Tréguier in Brittany on February 28, 1823 -
d. at Paris, France, on October 12, 1892]

He had been educated in a Roman Catholic Seminary but apparently was never Ordained to the Holy Priesthood. Hugely influential in his lifetime, Renan was eulogized after his death as the embodiment of the progressive spirit in western culture.

François-Anatole Thibault, a.k.a. Anatole France [b. at Paris, France on April 16, 1844 - d. at Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire, Tours, France on October 12, 1924], wrote that Renan was the incarnation of Modernity.

Jose Manuel de los Reyes González de Prada y Ulloa, a.k.a. Manuel González Prada [b. at Lima, Peru on January 6, 1844 - d. at Lima, Peru on July 22,1918] was one of his greatest admirers. Manuel González Prada took the "Life of Jesus", published by Renan in 1863, as a basis for his virulent anti-clericalism. Anarchist Prada's book, "Free Pages", caused a public outcry that brought Prada close to excommunication from the Roman Catholic Church.

The above example of the Anarchist Prada is but one instance of some of the many rotten fruits of the Heresy of Modernism planted by Mr. Ernest Renan.


2) Father Alfred Firmin Loisy
[b. at Ambriéres, France on February 28, 1857 -
d. on June 1, 1940]

He was a French Roman Catholic Priest, a professor and theologian, who became the intellectual standard bearer for the Heresy of Biblical Modernism in the Roman Catholic Church. His Heresy of Modernism brought him into conflict with The Roman Catholic Pope Leo XIII and The Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X.

In 1893, he was dismissed as a professor from the Institut Catholique de Paris. His books were condemned as heretical by the Vatican.  Loisy thought that many of the ideas on consubstantiality came from the Council of Nicæa and would have been unknown to Christ or to His Apostles, who saw Christ primarily in Jewish messianic terms. For this heresy, Father Loisy was excommunicated "Vitandus" on the Feast Day of Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., March 7, 1908.

After his excommunication, he ceased his efforts trying to reconcile with the Roman Church and stopped wearing his Clericals. However, he continued to maintain his loyalty to Catholicism as he understood it. Along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


3) Father George Tyrrell,
a.k.a. George Tyrell, S.J.
[b. at 91 Dorset Street, Dublin, Ireland on February 6, 1861 -
d. on July 15, 1909]

He was a Modernist Heretical theologian and scholar, as well as a Jesuit Priest, until his expulsion from the Jesuit Order. His attempts to evolve and adapt Roman Catholic teaching in the context of Modernism made him a key figure among Modernist Heretics in the Roman Catholic Church in the late 19th Century.

Tyrrell was disciplined under the Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X for claiming:

"the right of each age to adjust the historico-philosophical expression of Christianity to contemporary certainties, and thus to put an end to this utterly needless conflict between faith and science which is a mere theological bogey."
Tyrrell was expelled from the Jesuit Order in 1906 and suspended from the Sacraments the following year. He was given Extreme Unction on his deathbed on July 15, 1909, but he was denied burial in a Roman Catholic cemetery.

Although he was denied a Catholic burial, Tyrrell was, in a real sense, "vindicated" by the Convention of Modernist Heretics, a.k.a. Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965].

His name was indeed mentioned during the Synod, but as an apostate and heretic by Cardinal Ruffini who said that the Church cannot be called a "sacrament" because, for one reason, this is precisely what "the prince of the Modernists", the "apostate priest", George Tyrrell wanted to call it.

It should also be noted that when the Modernist Heretic, 2nd Pope John 23rd called for Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965], this Modernist Heretic used much of the imagery and language that Tyrrell had used in a famous letter of 1908 to Cardinal Mercier.

Therefore, along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2, as verified by David G. Schultenover, on the last page of his critical study of Tyrrell's thought, entitled "George Tyrrell: In Search of Catholicism" (Shepherdstown, West Virginia: Patmos Press, 1981), who writes:

"Anyone who has studied both him [Tyrrell] and the documents of Vatican II will recognize his principles [of the Heresy of Modernism] reborn on nearly every page"!


4) Mr. Maurice Blondel
[b. at Dijon, France on November 2, 1861 -
d. at Aix-en-Provence, France on June 4, 1949]

He was a Layman who was exposed as a Modernist Heretic by 19th and early 20th Century Thomists (theologians who follow the teachings of the Angelic Doctor, Saint Thomas Aquinas) for having rationalized theology. He was also exposed as a Modernist Heretic by the periodical "L'Action Francaise".

His heresies included the error that whatever is Supernatural, e.g. Sanctifying Grace, which is found in a person, ultimately comes from human nature itself - not from God. As a natural consequent, Sanctifying Grace, which is a participation in very Life of God, therefore is not natural to mankind because it is a free gift that is above our nature. This leads him to even more heresies by claiming that not only Faith, but even the Supernatural Life of Sanctifying Grace is already "inside man".

His heresies are but an extension of the Modernist heretical belief in the "Divine Immanence" which was condemned by Pope St. Pius X:

"39. It may, perhaps, seem to some, Venerable Brethren, that We have dealt at too great length on this exposition of the doctrines of the Modernists. But it was necessary that We should do so, both in order to meet their customary charge that We do not understand their ideas, and to show that their system does not consist in scattered and unconnected theories, but, as it were, in a closely connected whole, so that it is not possible to admit one without admitting all."

"For this reason, too, We have had to give to this exposition a somewhat didactic form, and not to shrink from employing certain unwonted terms which the Modernists have brought into use. And now with Our eyes fixed upon the whole system, no one will be surprised that We should define it to be the synthesis of all heresies."

"Undoubtedly, were anyone to attempt the task of collecting together all the errors that have been broached against the faith and to concentrate into one the sap and substance of them all, he could not succeed in doing so better than the Modernists have done. Nay, they have gone farther than this, for, as We have already intimated, their system means the destruction not of the Catholic religion alone, but of all religion. Hence the rationalists are not wanting in their applause, and the most frank and sincere among them congratulate themselves on having found in the Modernists the most valuable of all allies."

"Let us turn for a moment, Venerable Brethren, to that most disastrous doctrine of agnosticism. By it every avenue to God on the side of the intellect is barred to man, while a better way is supposed to be opened from the side of a certain sense of the soul and action. But who does not see how mistaken is such a contention? For the sense of the soul is the response to the action of the thing which the intellect or the outward senses set before it. Take away the intelligence, and man, already inclined to follow the senses, becomes their slave."

"Doubly mistaken, from another point of view, for all these fantasies of the religious sense will never be able to destroy common sense, and common sense tells us that emotion and everything that leads the heart captive proves a hindrance instead of a help to the discovery of truth. We speak of truth in itself -- for that other purely subjective truth, the fruit of the internal sense and action, if it serves its purpose for the play of words, is of no benefit to the man who wants above all things to know whether outside himself there is a God into whose hands he is one day to fall."

"True, the Modernists call in experience to eke out their system, but what does this experience add to that sense of the soul? Absolutely nothing beyond a certain intensity and a proportionate deepening of the conviction of the reality of the object. But these two will never make the sense of the soul into anything but sense, nor will they alter its nature, which is liable to deception when the intelligence is not there to guide it; on the contrary, they but confirm and strengthen this nature, for the more intense the sense is the more it is really sense."

"And as we are here dealing with religious sense and the experience involved in it, it is known to you, Venerable Brethren, how necessary in such a matter is prudence, and the learning by which prudence is guided. You know it from your own dealings with souls, and especially with souls in whom sentiment predominates; you know it also from your reading of works of ascetical theology -- works for which the Modernists have but little esteem, but which testify to a science and a solidity far greater than theirs, and to a refinement and subtlety of observation far beyond any which the Modernists take credit to themselves for possessing."

"It seems to Us nothing short of madness, or at the least consummate temerity to accept for true, and without investigation, these incomplete experiences which are the vaunt of the Modernist. Let Us for a moment put the question: If experiences have so much force and value in their estimation, why do they not attach equal weight to the experience that so many thousands of Catholics have that the Modernists are on the wrong path? Is it that the Catholic experiences are the only ones which are false and deceptive?"

"The vast majority of mankind holds and always will hold firmly that sense and experience alone, when not enlightened and guided by reason, cannot reach to the knowledge of God. What, then, remains but atheism and the absence of all religion? Certainly it is not the doctrine of .symbolism that will save us from this. For if all the intellectual elements, as they call them, of religion are nothing more than mere symbols of God, will not the very name of God or of divine personality be also a symbol, and if this be admitted, the personality of God will become a matter of doubt and the gate will be opened to pantheism? And to pantheism pure and simple that other doctrine of the divine immanence leads directly."

"For this is the question which We ask: Does or does not this immanence leave God distinct from man? If it does, in what does it differ from the Catholic doctrine, and why does it reject the doctrine of external revelation? If it does not, it is pantheism."

"Now the doctrine of immanence in the Modernist acceptation holds and professes that every phenomenon of conscience proceeds from man as man. The rigorous conclusion from this is the identity of man with God, which means pantheism."

"The distinction which Modernists make between science and faith leads to the same conclusion. The object of science, they say, is the reality of the knowable; the object of faith, on the contrary, is the reality of the unknowable. Now, what makes the unknowable - unknowable - is the fact that there is no proportion between its object and the intellect -- a defect of proportion which nothing whatever, even in the doctrine of the Modernist, can suppress."

"Hence the unknowable remains and will eternally remain unknowable to the believer as well as to the philosopher. Therefore if any religion at all is possible, it can only be the religion of an unknowable reality. And why this might not be that soul of the universe, of which certain rationalists speak, is something which certainly does not seem to Us apparent."

"These reasons suffice to show superabundantly by how many roads Modernism leads to atheism and to the annihilation of all religion. The error of Protestantism made the first step on this path; that of Modernism makes the second; atheism makes the next" (Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Encyclical "Pascendi Dominici Gregis", On the Doctrine of the Modernists,Sunday, September 8, 1907, ¶ 39; emphasis added).

Along with other Modernist Heretics, Mr. Maurice Blondel, who is sometimes classified as a "neo-Modernist Heretic", is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


5) Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, S.J.
[b. at Orcines, Central France on May 1, 1881 -
d. at New York, New York, on April 10, 1955]

Father Wlodimir Ledóchowski, S.J., a.k.a. Wlodzimierz Ledóchowski, a.k.a. Vladimir Ledóchowski [b. at the family estate, Sitzenthal, in Loosdorf, near St. Pölten , Lower Austria on October 7, 1866 - d. at Rome, Italy on December 13, 1942] was the 26th Superior-General of the Society of Jesus.

Father General, Wlodimir Ledóchowski, S.J., ordered Father Teilhard de Chardin, S.J. to leave his teaching position in France and to sign a statement withdrawing his controversial statements regarding the Doctrine of Original Sin. This was back in 1925. Father Teilhard de Chardin, S.J., the evolutionist, pantheist, and Modernist Heretic, decided against leaving the Jesuit Order. Therefore, he signed the statement and left for China.

This turned out to be only the first of a number of ecclesiastical condemnations by certain ecclesiastical officials against Teilhard de Chardin.

These ecclesiastical condemnations continued, even after his death which climaxed in 1962 when a reprimand, called a "Monitum", was issued by the Holy Office denouncing his works. Here is an excerpt from this "Monitum":

"Prescinding from a judgement about those points that concern the positive sciences, it is sufficiently clear that the above-mentioned works abound in such ambiguities and indeed even serious errors, as to offend Catholic doctrine."

"For this reason, the most eminent and most revered Fathers of the Holy Office exhort all Ordinaries as well as the superiors of Religious institutes, rectors of seminaries and presidents of universities, effectively to protect the minds, particularly of the youth, against the dangers presented by the works of Fr. Teilhard de Chardin and of his followers."

For the complete text of this Monitum, please click on this link.

Despite all of this, Teilhard's writings continued to circulate privately in mimeographs among various Jesuits and theologians.

As the Modernists Heretic Infiltrators in the Roman Catholic Church gradually rose to positions of power in the Vatican, in seminaries around the world, and in various dioceses, they gradually brought Teilhard de Chardin's works into the public arena.

On example is the following case of the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretic, NEW Theology Theologian, and anti-Catholic Infiltrator, Pope JP-2, a.k.a. John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]:

On behalf of Pope JP-2, Agostino Cardinal Casaroli sent a Letter to the then Archbishop (later Cardinal) Paul Poupard, praising Father Teilhard de Chardin's works, which Letter was printed on the front age of L'Osservatore Romano, on Wednesday, June 10, 1981.

Please click on this link for detailed data.

Please click on this link for the actual text of this letter.

However, it was only a few five weeks and five days after this blatant front page praise (L'Osservatore Romano, Wednesday, June 10, 1981) by the automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretic, NEW Theology Theologian, and anti-Catholic Infiltrator, Pope JP-2, a.k.a. John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005] for Teilhard de Chardin, that a "clarification" was forthcoming by the Vatican.

The Communiqué of the Press Office of the Holy See's English edition of L'Osservatore Romano, dated Monday, July 20, 1981, in effect backpedaled Pope JP-2's front page salubrious and vigorous adulation and approval for Teilhard De Chardin and his writings and, "reinstated" the Saturday, June 30, 1962 Monitum of 1962 against Teilhard de Chardin - which is still the current official Vatican policy.

The teachings and writings of the evolutionist, pantheist, automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretic and NEW Theology Theologian, Teilhard de Chardin, were condemned as a perversion of the Roman Catholic Faith by noted Roman Catholics who included Jacques Maritain and Dietrich von Hildebrand.

But Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965] certainly accepted the heretical teachings and writings, and even the evolutionist, pantheist, and heretical "spirit", of Teilhard de Chardin, who, along with other automatically excommunicated heretical NEW Theology Theologians and automaticall excommunicated Modernist Heretics, is responsible for the Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" which played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.

It was almost as if the periti (theological experts) who advised the Council Fathers (Bishops) of Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965] had placed some of the books of this automatically excommunicated heretic on the Main Altar for constant reference, perhaps including some of these heretical inventions:

1) Le Phénomène Humain (The Phenomenon of Man);

2) La Place de l'Homme dans la Nature (Man's Place in Nature);

3) Le Milieu Divin (The Divine Milieu);

4) L'Avenir de l'Homme (The Future of Man);

5) Hymne de l'Univers (Hymn of the Universe);

6) L'Energie Humaine (The Human Energy);

7) L'Activation de l'Energie (The Activation of Energy);

8) Christianisme et Évolution (Christianity and Evolution).

Yet, even today, over 50 years after Synod Vatican 2 was opened [Thursday, October 11, 1962], there are still millions and millions of grossly ignorant and grossly irresponsible Catholics who see nothing wrong with the heretical and anti-Catholic teachings and documents of Synod Vatican 2 and those automatically excommunicated heretics who have implemented such heretical and anti-Catholic changes, including all of the Popes (each one of which has been automatically excommunicated for their egregious anti-Catholic action and gross dereliction of duty) since Synod Vatican 2!



6) 2nd Pope John 23rd, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli
1st President of the NEW One World Order anti-Christ Religion
[b. at Sotto il Monte, Italy on November 25, 1881 -
d. at the Vatican on Monday, June 3, 1963]
Papacy: [Tuesday, October 28, 1958 - Monday, June 3, 1963]

For years the Holy Office had maintained a dossier on Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, the future 2nd Pope John 23rd, which read "suspected of Modernism." The file dated back to 1925, when Roncalli, who was known for his unorthodox teachings, was abruptly removed from his Professorship at the Lateran Seminary in mid-semester. He was accused of the Heresy of Modernism. Roncalli was shipped off to Bulgaria. This transfer to Bulgaria began his diplomatic career. Of particular concern to Rome was Roncalli's continuing close association with the defrocked priest Ernesto Buonaiuti, who was excommunicated for heresy in 1926. (Lawrence Elliott, "I Will Be Called John" 1973, pp. 90-92.).

Is there any proof that Roncalli was a heretic even before he became pope?

In 1935, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli arrived in Turkey and became friends with the Under Secretary of the Foreign Office, Naman Rifat Menemengioglu (Alden Hatch, "A Man Named John", New York, New York, Hawthorn Books Inc., 1963, p. 93).

Menemengioglu said to Roncalli:

"The secularity of the State is our fundamental principle and the guarantee of our liberty."
Roncalli responded:
"The Church will be careful not to infringe your liberty" (Alden Hatch, "A Man Named John", p. 94).
While in Turkey, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli also stated:
"You Irish are impossible. The moment you come into the world, even before you are baptized, you begin damning everybody who doesn't belong to the Church, especially Protestants!" (Alden Hatch, "A Man Named John", p. 96).
When Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli was later "elevated" to the College of Cardinals, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli insisted upon receiving the red biretta from the atheist and notoriously anti-clerical socialist Vincent Auriol, President of the country of France, whom he had described as "an honest socialist" (Alden Hatch, "A Man Named John", p. 121).


Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli choose to receive his
Cardinal's Biretta from the notorious anti-Catholic Vincent Auriol

Roncalli knelt before Auriol, and Auriol placed the Cardinal's biretta on Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli's head. Auriol then hung a:

"broad red ribbon around the Cardinal's neck embracing him on each cheek with a little bear-hug that imparted personal warmth to formal protocol" (Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, p. 123).

Auriol had to wipe away his tears with a handkerchief when Roncalli left to assume his new dignity as "Cardinal" (Kurt Klinger, "A Pope Laughs", p. 99).



Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli Socializing with
A Communist whose Government killed Catholics

At social functions in Paris, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli was also frequently seen socializing with the Soviet ambassador, M. Bogomolov, even though Bogomolov's government had resumed its pre-war policy of brutal extermination of Catholics in Russia.


Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli
with Ed Herriot and Other Radicals

Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli was also known as a "good friend and confidant" of Edouard Herriot, Secretary of the anti-Catholic Radical Socialists (of France) (Rev. Francis Murphy,"John XXIII Comes To The Vatican", 1959, p. 139).

"Perhaps Roncalli's greatest friend was the grand old socialist and anti-clerical, Edouard Herriot" (Alden Hatch, A Man Named John, p. 114).
Before Roncalli left Paris, he gave a farewell dinner for his friends.
"The guests included politicians on the Right, the Left, and the Center united on this one occasion in their affection for their genial host" (Alden Hatch, "A Man Named John", p. 125).
When Roncalli was "Cardinal" of Venice, he:
"offered the Communists no grounds on which to criticize him. Habitual anti-clerical insults gave way to respectful silence" (Kurt Klinger, "A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII", p. 104).
While in Venice:
"Cardinal" Roncalli "exhorted the faithful to welcome the Socialists of all Italy, who were holding their thirty-second party" in Venice (Mark Fellows, "Fatima in Twilight", Niagra Falls, New York, Marmion Publications, 2003, p. 159).

"The Patriarch (the future 2nd John 23rd, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli) had notices placed on the walls all over Venice for the opening of the thirty-second Congress of the Socialist Party of Italy (PSI) in February, 1957.

They read as follows:

I welcome the exceptional significance of this event, which is so important for the future of our country"(Kurt Klinger, "A Pope Laughs, Stories of John XXIII", p. 105).

Pope Pius XI

On the contrary, the teaching of the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope on the subject of being a Socialist clearly states:

"No one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true Socialist" (Pope Pius XI, Achille Ratti [Monday, February 6, 1922 - Friday, February 10, 1939], Encyclical Quadragesimo Anno May 15, 1931, ¶ 120).

2nd John 23rd
Opening Speech to Satanic Synod Vatican 2

On October 11, 1962, 2nd John 23rd gave his opening speech to Satanic Synod Vatican 2:

"They say that our era, in comparison with past eras, is getting worse, and they behave as though at the time of former councils everything was a full triumph for the Christian idea and life and for proper religious liberty. We feel we must disagree with those prophets of gloom, who are always forecasting disaster, as though the end of the world were at hand. In the present order of things, Divine Providence is leading us to a new order of human relations…"

"…errors vanish as quickly as they arise, like fog before the sun. The Church has always opposed these errors. Frequently she has condemned them with the greatest severity. Nowadays, however, the Spouse of Christ prefers to make use of the medicine of mercy rather than that of severity. She (the Church) considers that she meets the needs of the present day by demonstrating the validity of her teaching rather than by condemnations. …Unfortunately, the entire Christian family has not yet fully attained this visible unity in Truth" (Op. Cit.).

As you will note in his opening speech at Synod Vatican 2, 2nd John 23rd stated that the Church had historically opposed and condemned errors, but today it wasn't going to issue any condemnations.

He also uttered the heresy that the

"entire Christian family has not yet fully attained this visible unity in Truth."
The entire Christian family, by definition, is composed ONLY of Catholics. To say that the entire Christian family includes non-Catholics, as 2nd John 23rd did, is heresy. This is a denial of the unity of the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church which is ONE in faith. Historically, the Catholic Church has already attained a "visible unity in Truth."

On the contrary:


Pope Leo XIII

1. "The Church in respect of its unity belongs to the category of things indivisible by nature, though heretics try to divide it into many parts" (Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical Satis Cognitum, June 29, 1896, ¶ 4).

2. "There is one God, and one Christ; and His Church is one and the faith is one; and one people, joined together in the solid unity of the body in the bond of concord. This unity cannot be broken, nor the one body divided by the separation of its constituent parts" (Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical Satis Cognitum, June 29, 1896, ¶ 5).


2nd John 23rd
1st President of the NEW One World Order anti-Christ Religion
Novum Rubricarum Brevarii et Missalis Romani

On July 25, 1960 2nd John 23rd issued his infamous Litteræ Apostolicæ (Apostolic Letter), the Motu Proprio (On his own initiative), Novum Rubricarum Brevarii et Missalis Romani, (The NEW Rubrics for the Breviary and Roman Missal)".

With it came the "General Rubrics of the Roman Missal".

In 1962 another major change in the Roman Missal came about, despite the erroneous belief among many Catholics faithful to Tradition that 2nd John 23rd had made no real changes in the 1962 version of his defective, invalid, and unlawful "missal".

Those who accept the adulterated 1962 changed missal are logically forced to accept the reason for which they were promulgated, i.e. the 1962 missal was only an interim liturgical reform dependent upon the changes that would be wrought by Synod Vatican 2.

Those who accept the 1962 changes, e.g. the "Indultarians", are also forced to accept the other evils that came with such changes.

Why should anyone want to accept a "missal" which "killed", by replacing it - the Missale Romanum - with the notorious 1960 and 1962 missals of 2nd John 23rd?!

How many Catholics realize the reality that the infamous 1960 and 1962 missals of 2nd John 23rd are missals, not of the Roman Catholic Church, but of the NEW religion of the anti-Christ Satanic Synod Vatican 2 church????!!!

Did you know that the "2nd Missal of 2nd John 23rd", a.k.a. the "1962 Missal", a.k.a. the "Missal of 2nd Pope John 23rd", upon which the now infamous "Indult mass" is based, was birthed by a document of the Congregation for Divine Worship entitled Quattuor Abhinc Annos, dated Wednesday, October 3, 1984 A.D.?

You will find it in:  AAS 76, 1984 edition, pp. 1088-1089.

It is sometimes called "On the Use of the Tridentine Liturgy."

This document states in part the "Tridentine Mass" (a deliberate misnomer - there is no such thing as the Tridentine Mass) could still be celebrated just so long as the Synod Vatican 2 changes were accepted and that such adulterated, invalidated, illegal and unlawful "masses" were not done inside parish churches.

What are some of the changes found in the anti-Catholic "missals" of 2nd Pope John 23rd issued in 1960 and in 1962, neither anti-Catholic "missal" of which is worth the paper upon which it is printed?

2nd Pope John 23rd had "ordered" (for which "order" he automatically self-excommunicated himself!), among other things, the following.

He ordered the suppression of the Leonine Prayers, the prayers prescribed by Pope Leo XIII to be recited after every Low Mass. These prayers had been ordered by Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], and by Pope Pius XI, Achille Ratti [Monday, February 6, 1922 - Friday, February 10, 1939].

This included the Prayer to Saint Michael the Archangel, a prayer that specifically makes mention of the battle that the Church wages against the Devil.

2nd John 23rd removed the Psalm Judica me from the Mass during the prayers at the foot of the Altar.

2nd John 23rd suppressed the Last Gospel, the Gospel of Saint John.

In doing this, 2nd John 23rd, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, proved beyond any shadow of any doubt that he was in fact a "born-again" Albigensian Heretic!

It should be noted that any mass celebrant who does NOT use the required Last Gospel, the Gospel of Saint John, is also automatically a born-again Albigensian Heretic!

In plain Anglo-Saxon English this simply means that any Prelate (Pope, Cardinal, Bishop, etc.) and Priest who does NOT use the required Last Gospel, the Gospel of Saint John, is also automatically a de facto "born-again" Albigensian Heretic!

Why?

Because, beginning in about the 13th Century, all Mass Celebrants (i.e. all Prelates - Popes, Cardinals, Bishops, etc., as well as Priests) were required to recite the Last Gospel, which is the beginning of the Gospel of Saint John (1:1-14), on the way back to the Sacristy. But since it was easier to recite it at the Holy Altar before returning to the Sacristy, the Liturgical Custom began of completely reciting all 14 verses of it at the Gospel Side of the Holy Altar.

Pope Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572], gave it the force of law in his "Missale Romanum" of Tuesday, July 14, 1570 A.D. with his Papal Bulla "Quo Primum Tempore" (Tuesday, July 14, 1570 A.D.), and forbade that this Missal be changed in the future under the penalty of automatic excommunication with the exception of the addition of new feast days and minor rubrical clarifications!

The reason for reciting the Last Gospel of the Mass, which is the beginning of the Gospel of Saint John (1:1-14), was due to the infection of the Clergy with the Heresy of Catharism which had its roots in older heresies such as Manichæanism and Docetism and which spawned the Heresy of Albigensian. But it was difficult to determine if the Mass Celebrant, whether a Bishop or a Priest, was a Cathar or an Albigensian Heretic.

Therefore, the requirement of the recitation of the first fourteen verses of the first chapter of the Gospel of Saint John as the Last Gospel, certifies that the Mass Celebrant, whether a Prelate - Pope, a Cardinal, Archbishop, Bishop, etc., or whether a Priest, in a very public and very clear way, does in fact believe in the Divinity of Jesus Christ.

In other words, when the Mass Celebrant recites the Last Gospel (John 1:1-14), that Prelate or Priest who Offers that Holy Sacrifice of the Mass thereby publicly ratifies all that he did during that Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, especially that he has in fact really and truly effected Transubstantiation!

But it also means that this particular Mass Celebrant publicly attests to the fact that he is not a Cathar, Manichæan, Docetist, and/or an Albigensian Heretic. Why? Because all such heretics deny the Divinity of Jesus Christ claiming that Jesus Christ is not God the Son but only a finite man, something which is contrary to the express Divinely Revealed Teachings of Saint John the Apostle in his Epistles and especially in the beginning of his Gospel, of which chapter one, verses one to fourteen, compose the Last Gospel of the Mass.

For example, Saint John uses the words et Verbum caro factum est (and the Word was made flesh) (John 1:14).

Based upon the principle of lex orandi, lex credendi ( the law of praying is the law of believing, or you believe what you pray and you pray what you believe), anyone who recites this Last Gospel gives public testimony to the fact that he, the Mass Celebrant, does in fact believe that Jesus Christ is God the Son, the Eternal Logos or Divine Word of God, as Saint John so clearly teaches in the very first verse of his Gospel saying: In the beginning was the Word (i.e. God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal Logos), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God (John 1:1).

But Cathar, Manichæan, Docetist, and/or Albigensian Heretics can not truly say the words: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God (John 1:1).

Neither can such Heretics say: And the Word was made flesh (John 1:14). Nor, can they genuflect as they say these words. Therefore, their inability, or today - their refusal, to do these things publicly proves to everyone who is present that they are one and/or all of the following: Cathar, Manichæan, Docetist, and/or Albigensian Heretics and there is also a grave doubt that they ever effected Transubstantiation during their "mass"!

Therefore, Dear Reader, IF you are going to a mass which does NOT have the Last Gospel of Saint John the Apostle and Evangelist - chapter one, verses one to fourteen - then this automatically means that most probably there was no Transubstantiation during that mass because of the fact that the said mass celebrant, whether formally or only materially, is any one and/or all of the following:

a born-again Cathar, and/or Manichæan, and/or Docetist, and/or Albigensian Heretic.
It also means that such a mass is not really a mass at all - it is only a theatrical performance where the actor, a.k.a. the mass celebrant, PRETENDS to Transubstantiate!

2nd John 23rd eliminated the second Confiteor just before the Laity receive Holy Communion.

2nd John 23rd violated the Canon of the Mass by inserting the name of Saint Joseph.

It should be noted that the request to have the name of Saint Joseph inserted into the Canon of the Mass was officially rejected by Pope Pius VII on September 16, 1815, and by Pope Leo XIII on August 15, 1892.


7) Father Marie-Dominique Chenu, O.P.
[b. 1895 - d. 1990]

In 1942, the Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII condemned the heresies of Chenu and the Holy Office put his book Le Saulchoir: Une école de la théologie on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum - Index of Forbidden Books - because of its heresy concerning the role of historical studies in theology.

But no one should be surprised to discover that Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965], the Synod of the Heresy of Modernism and Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism", not only invited Chenu to be a peritus, a theological "expert" who advised the Bishops at Synod Vatican 2, but also that Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965], despite the fact that Chenu's heretical theology had been condemned in 1942 by the Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII and that the Holy Office had put his heretical book Le Saulchoir: Une école de la théologie on the "Index Librorum Prohibitorum" - Index of Forbidden Books, embraced Chenu and his Heresy of Modernism and his heretical Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism".

This helps to explain why, while he was at Synod Vatican 2, Chenu imbued the "Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World" (Gaudium et Spes) with his Heresies of Modernism and Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" (Walter Principe, "Chenu, M.D.", in Harper Collins' "Encyclopedia of Catholicism", Edited by Richard McBrien, 1995).

Along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


8) Cardinal Henri-Marie De Lubac, S.J.
[b. at Cambrai, Northern France, on February 20, 1896 -
d. on September 4, 1991]

Like most, perhaps all?, of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism theologians, who had some, or all, of their teachings and/or writings condemned as heresy, whether in the 1920's, and/or 1930's, and/or 1940's, and/or 1950's, De Lubac was no exception because in 1950, he was forbidden by his Jesuit Superiors to teach or to publish after doctrinal objections were raised against his book Surnaturel.

After the Modernist Heretics and Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism theologians took over the Vatican, as well as various Religious Orders, e.g. the Dominicans, Jesuits, etc., as was to be expected, this ban was lifted in 1959.

So it was no surprise that De Lubac played a major role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.

His involvement with Synod Vatican 2 began in August, 1960, when Pope Roncalli appointed De Lubac as a consultant to the Preparatory Theological Commission for the upcoming Synod.

Likewise, it was no surprise when he was also made a peritus, a theological expert who advised the Bishops at Synod Vatican 2.

After the death of Pope Roncalli, Pope Montini (Paul 6), made De Lubac not only a member of Synod Vatican 2's Theological Commission, but also of two Synod Vatican 2 secretariats.

Because of his behind-the-scenes involvement and influence, De Lubac left no precise audit trail, so to speak, of exactly some of what he did at Synod Vatican 2.  Nevertheless, in the public arena, what is clear is that his heretical writings were certainly an influence during and after Synod Vatican 2.

For example, this is found in his Ecclesiology in which he considered the Church to be the community of the whole people of God and which said Ecclesiology also contains a concomitant antithesis regarding the Clergy (D. Grumett, De Lubac: A Guide for the Perplexed, London, T & T Clark, 2007, pp. 51-52).

De Lubac reminds one of what happens when the blind lead the blind!!!

It should be noted that community of the whole people of God is a Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism term, which not only ignores the Church as being the Mystical Body of Christ, but, also, again according to Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, in effect it makes the Laity members of the Clergy!

Ironically, despite his active role, especially in private, at Synod Vatican 2, it was after Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965] that De Lubac became disappointed by what he perceived as the ensuing ambiguity.

WHY was he surprised?

De Lubac helped to firmly establish this confusion, this chaos, this disorder during Synod Vatican 2! Does one not reap what they sow???

De Lubac wrote various works attempting to explain the true teachings of Synod Vatican 2. He also condemned the confusion, chaos, and disorder that now pervades the theological minds of the Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism theologians.

De Lubac failed to recognize the logical cause and effect relationship of the wholesale, continual, and deliberate use of vague, equivocal, ambiguous, confused, psycho-babble terminology, which is one of the primary tools used extensively by the Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism theologians, which had led to this cacophony of ignorance, error, heresy, and wholesale apostasy due to the absence of the clear, precise, exact, definite, certain, accurate terminology which is found in what De Lubac, and all of the other Nouvelle Théologie -the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism theologians hate, despise, and eschew - namely Scholastic Philosophy and Thomistic Theology - which possess nothing less than laser-sharp definitions and terminology - the antithiesis of, and an anti-dote against, the blatant heresies of the NEW Theology Theologians.

In other words, De Lubac saw the effects of, but either did not recognize, or was in denial concerning, the cause of, the rampant Heresy of Modernism which found expression in its repackaged Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism at Synod Vatican 2 and its infamous aftermath!

De Lubac stubbornly preferred the heresies of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism to the Truth.


Father Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P.

For example, when Father Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P. exposed De Lubac's errors in Where is the New Theology Leading Us? in 1946 in which this great Thomist of the 20th Century pointed out that the NEW Theology is just a re-hash of the Heresy of Modernism, De Lubac's insidious response consisted of insults and mockery, accusing Father Garrigou-Lagrange of having simplistic views on the absoluteness of truth.


Pope Pius XII

Another example is found in 1950 when the Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII condemned De Lubac's theology in his Encyclical Humani Generis, On Human Origin, Concerning Some False Opinions Threatening to Undermine The Foundations of Catholic Doctrine, on Wednesday, April 12, 1950, especially in paragraphs 29, 30, 32, and 34 of the Encyclical.

De Lubac's rejoinder was that this was highly one-sided ... it doesn't concern me - talk about an acute case of being in denial and also of affected ignorance!

For the record:

"Affected ignorance does not excuse from guilt, but rather aggravates it since it shows that a man is so strongly attached to sin that he wishes to incur ignorance lest he avoid sinning. The Jews therefore sinned, as crucifiers not only of the Man-Christ, but also as of God" (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part III, Question 47, Article 5, Reply to Objection 3).
Some Readers may object by pointing out that De Lubac was a great expert on the Fathers of the Catholic Church.

On the contrary, Father David Greenstock, writing in The Thomist [1950], warned that the only reason that the leaders of Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism overwhelm their readers with some of the Greek Fathers of the Church is in order to circumvent the Angelic Doctor, Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.

Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism theologians actually disdain Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., no matter how much they may ostentatiously pledge their devotion to the Angelic Doctor, because they know that Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., the Great Scholastic, confutes and exposes their errors which are anti-Scholastic!

If De Lubac's Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism is taken to its logical conclusion, such Modernism would mean that either Jesus Christ is not God, or that man is Divine (Cardinal Siri, Gethsemane, 1981).

This is simply another way of saying Nouvelle Théologie -the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism ultimately leads to pantheism (the heresy that God can be identified with the universe, or that the universe is a manifestation of God)!

Both Modernist Heretic and Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism Popes, Pope Montini (Paul 6, a.k.a. P-6, a.k.a. Paul VI, Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978]), and Pope Wyotya (John-Paul 2, a.k.a. JP-2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]), admired De Lubac's heresies so much that Pope Montini wanted to make De Lubac a Cardinal in 1969, but De Lubac refused because he did not want to be made a Bishop - something Pope Roncalli required of all Cardinals in 1962.

De Lubac told P-6 that to make him a Cardinal would be an abuse of an apostolic office. Instead, P-6 made De Lubac's younger colleague, Jean Daniélou, a Cardinal in that consistory insofar as P-6 had pledged to grant the Cardinalate to a Jesuit theologian.

In 1983 JP-2 also offered De Lubac the Cardinalate, but with it came a dispensation from Episcopal Consecration. Thus De Lubac accepted and became the first Cardinal after 1962 who was not also a Bishop, in the Consistory of February 2, 1983, being created Cardinal Deacon of Santa Maria in Domnica.

At the end of his life, De Lubac began to wonder about the fact that just maybe mhe had strayed into error!

For example, he wrote in part:

"This period is as full of error as any.... maybe I should have concentrated more on essentials [like the essentials of real, Infallible Roman Catholic Dogma?] ... for the last seven or eight years I have been paralyzed by the fear of confronting head on, in concrete fashion, the essential problems in their scolding reality. Out of wisdom or weakness? Was I right or wrong?"
Of course by that time the seeds of his heresies in Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism, the neo-Modernist heresies, had already over-run the fields of the Roman Catholic Faith, Mass, and Sacraments, choking them with his weeds of the heresies of Modernism and Nouvelle Théologie - the NEW Theology - a.k.a. neo-Modernism.

In addition, if, as De Lubac claims, he was paralyzed by the fear of confronting head on, in concrete fashion, the essential problems in their scolding reality, one can only imagine how, when De Lubac died, he was REALLY paralyzed by the fear of giving an account of his stewardship to the Just Judge, Jesus Christ, Who sits upon His great white throne (Apocalypse 20:11) of blinding white lightthe white light of which is brighter than a million suns combined!!!  Since this is only His Throne, you can only imagine how much brighter than this Christ is by comparison!  We speak of this from personal experience!

Today, his nefarious cult lives on.


9) Pope Paul 6, Giovanni Battista
Enrico Antonio Maria Montini
2nd President of the NEW One World Order anti-Christ Religion
[b. at Concesio, Italy on September 26, 1897 -
d. at Castel Gandolfo, Italy on Sunday, August 6, 1978]
Papacy: [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978]

Part One


Father Rama Coomaraswamy
Priestly Ordination
Note Cardinal Malachi Martin, D.D. in Background

"The policies initiated by John XXIII were followed by the even more pro-Communist actions of Paul VI. Avro Manhattan calls him a Marxist Pope and calls his Populo progresso the most radical Encyclical ever promulgated. It was Paul's conviction that the world was going to be Communist and that the Church had better join the 'forces of history'. Throughout the Communist world, whenever Paul VI nominated bishops or cardinals, he first made sure they had the approval of the various native Communist dictators. In addition, he himself made sure that those he chose for the South American countries had leftist orientation. So much was this the case that Cuba's Communist Premier, Fidel Castro observed 'The U.S. shouldn't worry about the Soviets in Latin America, because they are no longer revolutionaries. They should worry about the Catholic revolutionaries who are.' (Footnote # 21: Talk to the Congregation for the Evangelization of the Peoples, 1976. One must remember that at the time such a statement was shocking. Today post-Conciliar Catholics brought up to accept Socialism and Communism as compatible with the teachings of the Church, the statement looses all its force.)"

"The words and actions of Paul VI can only be described as incredible. Consider the following conversation between him and Archbishop Helder Camara of Olinda-Recife, Brazil, as reported in Le Monde (Sept. 26, 1974):


Archbishop Helder Camara

'Opening his arms to Mgr. Helder Camara who approached him, Paul VI exclaimed:

"Good Morning, my Communist Bishop, How are you?"
The Archbishop retorted:
"And Good Morning to you, Our Communist Pope!"'
"The same reportage continued, Archbishop Camara noting that 'it is as if one played the piano with four hands, I start the theme and the Pope finishes it'."

"'How come one of your predecessors considered himself to be a King?' asked Mgr. Camara. Pope Paul VI took up the refrain: 'And that he was head of the Pontifical States.' Helder Camara: 'Why is it that Pius IX believed that it was the devil who relieved him of these states and why did he not see that Garibaldi had been sent by God?' Pope Paul VI answered: 'If one were to go through the archives of the Vatican one would see that Pius IX asked the Bishops to deliver him of all that, but that it was the French Bishops that forced it on him.'"

"Apart from the fact that this is a re-writing of history, and apart from the fact that Garibaldi was a Freemason who spent his entire life in fighting the Church, this remains a must unusual statement. Either Paul VI is serious in greeting Archbishop Camara as 'his Communist Bishop' (and the Archbishop is well known to be such), or he is acting like a buffoon in public. One may be permitted to wonder which alternative puts him in a better light. But if we have any doubts about his actual thoughts, let us again quote in him in a discussion of Communist China during the times of Mao Tse Tung:"

"'The Church recognizes and favors the just expression of the present historical phase of China and the transformation of ancient forms of aesthetic culture into inevitable new forms that rise out of the social and industrial structure of the modern world... We would like to enter into contact once again with China in order to show with how much interest and sympathy we look on their present and enthusiastic efforts for the ideals for a diligent, full and peaceful life.' (Footnote # 22: For a bishop to give his oath of loyalty to an atheistic government is excommunicate himself. During the French Revolution the priests who gave their oath of fidelity to the new government were not persecuted. The Church however responded by excommunicating them.)" (Father Rama Coomaraswamy, Catholic Writings, Chapter XIII, part 2, Communism, Ostpolitik and Liberation Theology.  Rama Coomaraswamy, M.D., The Destruction of the Christian Tradition, pp. 364-365).

Part Two


P-6
2nd President of the NEW One World Order anti-Christ Religion
With Self-Admitted Modernist Heretic Jean Guitton

"The intention of Pope Paul VI with regard to what is commonly called the Mass, was to reform the Catholic Liturgy in such a way that it should almost coincide with the Protestant liturgy [which is only a memorial supper meal, not a sacrifice]. There was with Pope Paul VI an ecumenical intention to remove, or, at least to correct, or, at least to relax, what was too Catholic in the traditional sense in the Mass and, I repeat, to get the Catholic Mass closer to the Calvinist mass" (Jean Guitton [b. at Saint-Étienne, Loire, in East-Central France on Sunday, August 18, 1901 - d. at Paris, France on Sunday, March 21, 1999], Apropos, Number 17, December 19, 1993, (17), p. 8ff. Also, Christian Order, October,1994.   N.B.: Jean Guitton was a confidant and an intimate friend of Pope Paul 6 who had 116 of his books and had made marginal study notes in 17 of these books. Quotation and citations are in Christopher A. Ferrara and Thomas E. Woods, Jr., "The Great Facade", The Remnant Publishing Company, 2002, p. 317).
Jean Guitton, a close friend of Paul 6, repeated the same thing in a mid-1990 radio interview:
"The intention of Paul VI with regard to what is commonly called the Mass, was to reform the Catholic liturgy in such a way that it should almost coincide with the Protestant liturgy -- but what is curious is that Paul VI did that to get as close as possible to the Protestant Lord's supper.... there was with Paul VI an ecumenical intention to remove, or at least to correct, or at least to relax, what was too Catholic, in the traditional sense, in the Mass - and, I repeat, to get the Catholic Mass closer to the Calvinist Mass" (Jean Guitton, December 19, Radio Discourse, cited from Anthony Fraser, "Ecumenism - a Disaster for the Church", Apropos, No. 18, 1996 (Scotland), p. 122).
Part Three

Father Joaquin Sáenz y Arriaga, S.J., PhD. (Philosophiæ Doctor - Doctor of Philosophy), Th. D. (Doctor Theologiæ - Doctor of Theology), J.C.D. (Juris Canonici Doctor - Doctor of Canon Law) [b. on Thursday, October 12, 1899 A.D. - d. Wednesday, April 28, 1976 A.D.], who was Ordained a Jesuit Priest of the Roman Catholic Church, on Wednesday, April 30, 1930 and Celebrated his First Mass in the city of Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico on Friday, May 2, 1930, wrote The Plot Against the Church under the pen name of Maurice Pinay - English Translation by Saint Anthony Press, Los Angeles, California, 1978; originally published in 1962.

Father Sáenz personally told Us, many years ago, that he held a public press conference in Rome in 1962 in order to introduce the general public, through this international media press conference, to his book The Plot Against the Church.

Also, during this international press conference in Rome, Father Sáenz also told Us that he told the international press corps that he had given one copy of this book, which he had written, to each of the several thousand Prelates (Bishops, Archbishops, and Cardinals) attending Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965].

Among other things, this book recounts some of the history of the infiltration of the Roman Catholic Church by non-Catholics. Among other things, one purpose was to warn those Prelates, who were still Roman Catholics faithful to Apostolic Tradition, about the infiltration of the Roman Catholic Church by her enemies, and how these enemies were trying to destroy the Roman Catholic Church from within, in order to alert the Traditional Prelates to expect that the infiltrators would try to get their agenda shoved through Synod Vatican 2.

After Pope Paul 6 closed Synod Vatican 2 on Wednesday, December 8, 1965, Father Joaquin Sáenz y Arriaga, S.J., PhD., Th. D., J.C.D. issued a press release signed by 28 Roman Catholic leaders, who were faithful to the authentic Apostolic Tradition, which press release attacked Synod Vatican 2 for having yielded to the pressures or to the money of Judaism, not to mention the alleged blackmail of certain Prelates, and Priest-experts, under the alleged guidance of the Jewish Cardinal Bea.

When the heresies of Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965] began to be implemented in Mexico, as well as in other parts of North America, the courageous Father Joaquin Sáenz y Arriaga, S.J., PhD., Th. D., J.C.D. led the fight against Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism".

Father Joaquin Sáenz y Arriaga, S.J., PhD., Th. D., J.C.D. also wrote La nueva iglesia montinian - "The New Montinian Church". This book was published on Sunday, August 15, 1971 in Mexico. It was eventually fully published in Spanish and in Italian ... but not in English until 1985. Please click on this link to read four chapters of this book which have been translated into English.

Among his many other books, Father Joaquin Sáenz y Arriaga, S.J., PhD., Th. D., J.C.D. also wrote Sede Vacante: Paulo VI no es Papa legítimo - "Sede Vacante: Paul VI is no longer a legitimate Pope" which was published in 1973.

Please click on this link to read three chapters of "The Plot Against the Church" which have been translated into English.


10)  Mr. Jean Mouroux
[b. at Dijon, France in 1901 - d. in 1973]

He was briefly a peritus, a theological "expert" who advised the Bishops at Synod Vatican 2.

Along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


11) Mr. Jean Guitton
Self-Admitted Modernist Heretic
[b. at Saint-Étienne, Loire, in East-Central France on Sunday, August 18, 1901 -
d. at Paris, France on Sunday, March 21, 1999]

"When I read the documents relative to the Modernism, as it was defined by Saint Pius X, and when I compare them to the documents of the Second Vatican Council, I cannot help being bewildered.  For what was condemned as heresy in 1906 was proclaimed as what is and should be from now on the doctrine and method of the ChurchIn other words, the modernists of 1906 were, somewhat, precursors to me. My masters were part of them. My parents taught me Modernism. How could Saint Pius X reject those that now seem to be my precursors?" (Jean Guitton, Portrait du Père Lagrange, Paris: Éditions Robert Laffont, 1992, pp. 55-56).
Along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


12) Father Karl Rahner, S.J.
[b. at Freiburg, Germany on March 5, 1904 -
d. at Innsbruck, Austria on March 30, 1984]

Before Synod Vatican 2, Rahner had worked alongside Yves Congar, Henri De Lubac, Joseph Alois Ratzinger - the future Pope B-16, and Marie-Dominique Chenu, all of whom are Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians which heresy had been disapproved and very weakly judged to be unfit by the Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII in his Encyclical Humani Generis, On Human Origin, Concerning Some False Opinions Threatening to Undermine The Foundations of Catholic Doctrine, Wednesday, April 12, 1950.

There is a photo that way taken at Synod Vatican 2 which shows both Rahner (left) and Ratzinger (right) each wearing a white shirt, suit, and tie with no indication they were Roman Catholic Priests.

Along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


13) Cardinal Yves Marie Joseph Congar, O.P.
[b. at Sedan, Ardennes, North East France, on April 8, 1904 -
d. on June 22, 1995].

As was the case with a number of Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians, a.k.a. neo-Modernists, Congar was forbidden by the Holy Office, during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII, to teach and to have his works published.

As was also the case with this same group of Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians, Congar, who works had been condemned by the Roman Catholic Church, was readily accepted by Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians at Synod Vatican 2.

Regarding some of the heresies of Congar, here is one example.

Please remember how the Roman Catholic Council Vatican 1, along with Pope Pius IX, infallibly defined:

"Peter alone, before the other apostles, whether individually or all together, was confided the true and proper primacy of jurisdiction by Christ" (Father Heinrich Joseph Dominicus Denzinger [b. at Liège, Belgium on Sunday, October 10, 1819 A.D. - d. at Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany on Tuesday, June 19, 1883 A.D.], Enchiridion Symbolorum et Definitionum, Council Vatican 1, Session IV, July 18, 1870, Dogmatic Constitution I, De Ecclesia Christi - On the Church of Christ, Chapter 1. The Institution of Apostolic Primacy in Blessed Peter, # 1822).
Many of Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians oppose the Council Vatican 1 Doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church and instead teach the heresy that the very essence of the Papacy is collegial.

In other words, Papal Primacy does not come only from the successor of Saint Peter, but rather from the Communio, a.k.a. Communion or College of Bishops which Communio is the successor of the College of the Apostles. Congar is the most conspicuous of all Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians who teach this heresy which is contrary to the above doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church from Council Vatican 1, as proven from this following quotation by him:

"Some say that only the Pope has universal jurisdiction in the Church, and that the jurisdiction of the Bishops proceeds from him. In my opinion, this thesis is absolutely unacceptable. It has the advantage of being simple and coherent, but it turns its back on many texts and facts of early Christianity."

"In the opposite sense, there is the thesis that affirms the power in the Church, even the power of the Pope, would always be collegial. The Pope would always act as 'head of the College'. He could not act by his own power as 'Vicar of Christ' (I place the last words between quotation marks because I am not comfortable with this expression, which I personally avoid using)...."

"I am strongly favorable to a collegial power that can be exercised by the College of Bishops as well as by the Pope himself as its head, representing the whole body" (Yves Congar, Jean Puyo Interroge le Pere Congar, Paris: Centurion, 1975, pp. 209-210).

It was Heretic Congar who was one of the primary Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians who was responsible for introducing this heresy into the documents of Synod Vatican 2.

“It cannot be denied that the Declaration on Religious Liberty does say materially something else than the Syllabus of 1864; it even says just about the opposite of Propositions 15 and 77 to 79 of this document.....  I collaborated on the final paragraphs - which left me less satisfied.  It involved demonstrating that the theme of religious liberty was already contained in Scripture.  Now, it isn't there.”  (Cardinal Yves Marie Joseph Congar, O.P. [b. at Sedan, Ardennes, North East France, on April 8, 1904 - d. on June 22, 1995], “Challenge to the Church”, London, 1977, p. 44).

Synod Vatican 2, “Dignitatis Humanæ” [On the Dignity of the Human Person], “Declaration on Religious Liberty”, Tuesday, December 7, 1965.

Despite the fact that Congar never repudiated his heresy, Pope JP-2, THE Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" THEOLOGIAN and HERETIC, made Heretic Congar a Cardinal in 1994, most probably because it was from Congar, beginning in about 1946, that the future JP-2 learned about the heresies Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" which, based upon his actions as Pope, JP-2 had learned very well from his "MASTER" Congar!


14) Father John Courtney Murray, S.J.
[b. at New York City on September 12, 1904 -
d. at Queens, New York of a heart attack on August 16, 1967]

He was infamous for his heresy to reconcile Catholicism and religious pluralism, particularly focusing on the relationship between religious freedom and the institutions of a democratically structured modern state.

Murray's claim that a new moral truth had emerged outside the church led to conflict with Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani [b. at Rome, Italy on Wednesday, October 29, 1890 - d. at Rome, Italy on Friday, August 3, 1979], Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation of the Holy Office, and the eventual Vatican demand, in 1954, that Murray cease writing on religious freedom and stop publication of his two latest articles on the issue.

In spite of his silencing, Murray continued to write privately on religious liberties and submitted his works to the Vatican, all of which were rejected.

He was finally invited to the second session of Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965] in 1963. Modernist Heretic Murray drafted both the third and fourth versions of what eventually became the Synod's heretical teachings on religious freedom, Dignitatis Humanæ Personæ, in 1965.

Along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


15) Cardinal Jean-Guenolé-Marie Daniélou
[b. at Neuilly-sur-Seine, Paris, France on May 14, 1905 -
d. unexpectedly in the home of a prostitute on Wednesday, May 29, 1974]

At the request of 2nd Pope John 23rd, Father Daniélou served as a peritus, a theological expert who advised the Bishops at Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965].

In 1969, he was consecrated a Bishop by Paul 6 and also made a Cardinal by the same P-6.

Along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


16) Cardinal-Elect, Father Hans Urs von Balthasar, S.J.
[b. at Lucerne, Switzerland on Saturday, August 12, 1905 -
d. at Basel, Switzerland on Sunday, June 26, 1988]

In 1950 he left the Society of Jesus because he felt that God had called him to found a Secular Institute, a Lay form of consecrated life which desired to work for the sanctification of the world especially from within the world itself.

But in leaving the Jesuit Order, Balthasar was without a position, a pastorate, a place to live, or an income. Because he had left the Jesuit order, the Society of Jesus, the Congregation for Seminaries and Universities had banned him from teaching. Eventually he found an ecclesiastical home with a sympathetic Bishop and was able to live by a grueling schedule of lecture tours. ("Hans Urs von Balthasar [1905-1988]", Radical Faith, The Society of the Sacred Mission).

As time passed, his reputation eventually brought him to the attention of JP-2 who asked him to be a cardinal in 1988. However he died in his home at Basel, Switzerland on Sunday, June 26, 1988, two days before the ceremony to make him a cardinal.

Balthasar co-founded the Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" Journal "Communio", along with his fellow Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians Henri De Lubac, Walter Kasper, and Joseph Ratzinger - the future B-16. In delivering his eulogy, Ratzinger, quoted De Lubac, saying that Balthasar was "perhaps the most cultured man of our time"

(http://www.crossroadsinitiative.com/library_article/757), a tribute to Balthasar's immense erudition (Volumes 4 and 5 of "The Glory of the Lord" span all of Western philosophy, literature, and theology). Balthasar translated many authors, from Peguy to Saint Ignatius De Loyola, Saint Augustine, Calderon de la Barca, and Claudel's "Satin Slipper".

It was claimed that he was an incredible musician, with a particular affinity for Mozart. Unfortunately, Balthasar had no affinity for the Authentic Apostolic Tradition.

Along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


17) Mr. Louis Bouyer
Ex-Protestant French Lutheran Minister
[b. at Paris, France in 1913 - d. in 2004]

Bouyer was a scholar who apparently was a peritus, a theological expert who advised the Bishops at Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965].

Bouyer also co-founded Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" Journal Communio, along with his fellow Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theologians, a.k.a. neo-Modernists, Henri De Lubac, Walter Kasper, Balthasar, and Joseph Ratzinger - the future B-16.

He was chosen by P-6 to be part of a team to initiate the International Theological Commission in 1969.

Along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


18) Father Edward Cornelis
Florentius Alfonsus Schillebeeckx, O.P.
[b. at Antwerp, Belgian on November 12, 1914 -
d. at Nijmegen, Netherlands on December 23, 2009]

From 1945 to July, 1946, he studied at the Dominican study center Le Saulchoir at Étiolles, near Paris, France where representatives of heresy of Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism", including Chenu and Congar, introduced him to this heresy of Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism", and also the heresies of various Calvinist theologians like Karl Barth.

In 1958 the Catholic University of Nijmegen in the Netherlands made him a professor of dogmatic theology and history of theology. His inaugural lecture Op zoek naar de levende God, "In Searching of the Living God", introduced Dutch theologians to Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism", which had been founded by such heretics as Chenu, Congar, Ratzinger (B-16), Hans Urs von Balthasar, etc., etc.

At Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965], Schillebeeckx was one of the most active Nouvelle Théologie - "NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist", theologians.

It was Schillebeeckx who drafted various council interventions for Dutch bishops such as Cardinal Bernard Jan Alfrink, and gave conferences on theological ressourcement for many episcopal conferences present in Rome.

Because Schillebeeckx has ghost written the Dutch bishops' Pastoral Letter in 1961 on the upcoming Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965], Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani [b. at Rome, Italy on Wednesday, October 29, 1890 - d. at Rome, Italy on Friday, August 3, 1979], Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation of the Holy Office, and the Dutchman Sebastiaan Tromp, the Secretary of the Congregation of the Holy Office, both considered Schillebeeckx suspect of heresy.

This became the first of three instances in which Schillebeeckx had to defend his heretical theological positions. As a result, Schillebeeckx, obviously out for revenge, anonymously drafted mostly negative comments on the schemata prepared by the Preparatory Theological Commission which was headed by Cardinal Ottaviani.

These anonymous negative comments on the theological schemata debated at Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965], and the articles he published, resulted in the growth of several Synodal Constitutions such as Dei Verbum and Lumen Gentium.

Regarding Lumen Gentium, the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Schillebeeckx was mainly involved in the debate on episcopal collegiality, attempting to shift Roman Catholic ecclesiology away from an hierarchical structure of the church, which according to Schillebeeckx focused too much on Papal authority as the result of the Roman Catholic Dogma of Papal infallibility in the Roman Catholic Council Vatican 1's Infallible Constitution Pastor Æternus.

What Schillebeeckx and his comrades wanted was to neuter the Papacy and thus neuter the Pope by shifting to stressing the role of the Communio, the Communion of Bishops, the Episcopal College.

It was in this way that heretic Schillebeeckx's influence emerged far greater than that of a formal peritus, which ironically was a status the Dutch bishops had not granted to him!

As early as 1963, Schillebeeckx, along with heretics Chenu, Congar, Karl Rahner, and Hans Küng, was involved in preparing the rise of the heretical Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist" theological journal Concilium, officially founded in 1965, with the support of Paul Brand and Antoine Van den Boogaard, and which promoted reformist thought which was just a fancy name for heretical thought!


"We have used ambiguous terms during the Council and we know how we shall interpret them afterwards."

Along with other Modernist Heretics, Father Edward Cornelis Florentius Alfonsus Schillebeeckx, O.P. played a major role at Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965] and was definitely greatly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.


Pretend Pope JP-2 Relaxing with his Daughter by his Wife Edwige?

19) Pope JP-2, a.k.a. John-Paul 2,
Karol Józef Wyotya,
a.k.a. Karol Józef Wojtyla
4th President of the NEW One World Order anti-Christ Religion
[b. at Wadowice, Poland on Tuesday, May 18, 1920 -
d. at the Apostolic Palace, Vatican City on Friday, April 1, 2005]
Papacy: [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]

For starters, the anti-Catholic Infiltrator, and automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretic, automatically excommunicated heretical NEW Theology Theologian, and an egregious Apostate, Pope JP-2 never restored the Ancient Roman Rite for Offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Catholic Mass and for Administering the Seven Sacraments.

JP-2 never restored the Catholic Faith or the Roman Catechism of the Infallible Roman Catholic Council of Trent - instead he issued his own catechism which contains heresies!

He continued the heretical policies of the anti-Catholic Infiltrator, the anti-Catholic Infiltrator and Modernist Heretic, Pope Paul 6.

He made up his own anti-Catholic, heretical, invalid, and totally illegal masses.

For example:

1. The PAGAN Hindu Tilak mass on Saturday, February 1, 1986 at a stadium in New Delhi, India. (L'Osservatore Romano, Sunday, February 2, 1986).

2. The PAGAN Voodoo "mass" in July of 1980. Earlier, JP-2 said instead of condemning such popular beliefs:

"it is necessary to cultivate and use popular religiosity for the better evangelization of people. It is important not to look down upon it nor to laugh at it" (Rockford Register Star, Rockford, Illinois, Saturday, July 12, 1980).
3. The NUDE NOR (Novus Ordo Rite) "mass", - the God-Prophecized Abomination of Desolation, at Papua, New Guinea, on Tuesday, May 8, 1984. at which JP-2 became the first PORNO POPE of the  Satanic Synod Vatican 2 church.


Pagan Aztec Priestess
Does Exorcism on Pretend Pope JP-2
During Pagan Aztec mass

4. The PAGAN Aztec mass in the Satanic Synod Vatican 2 church monstrosity called the basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City on Wednesday, July 31, 2002.

He permitted sermons which contain the heresy of Secular Humanism such as God is NOT in the punishment business!

He did nothing to prevent the wholesale abuse of Children by Pedophile Prelates and Priests around the world.

Has was very actively involved in all kinds of PAGAN religious ceremonies, as proven from the many photos which have been posted on the internet and elsewhere.

For example, the above disgusting photo of THE GREAT PAGAN HERETIC, APOSTATE, and anti-Catholic Infiltrator, JP-2 kissing a PAGAN Mohammadan book called the KORAN.

DID YOU KNOW:

This pagan "holy book" - the Koran:

1)  Refers to the Most Holy Trinity as an abomination!
2)  Christians are called impure!
3)  Christians are call infidels!

During the Conclave of Cardinals which selected Pope John-Paul 1, Albano Luciani [Saturday, August 26, 1978 - Thursday, September 28, 1978], according to one source, the future Pope JP-2 - Cardinal "Wojtyla always takes along some reading matter wherever he goes, and during those long periods of voting in the conclave he was calmly perusing a [philosophy] book of political theory by Karl Marx. When a fellow cardinal asked if he didn't feel it sacrilegious to read such an author in that sacred place, he answered with a good natured smile, My conscience is clear" (Wilton Wynn, KEEPERS OF THE KEYS, p. 39)!

One must not forget his heretical teachings on Heaven and Hell.

"In the context of Revelation, we know that the 'heaven' or 'happiness' in which we will find ourselves is neither an abstraction nor a physical place in the clouds, but a living, personal relationship with the Holy Trinity. It is our meeting with the Father which takes place in the risen Christ through the communion of the Holy Spirit" (JP-2, General Audience of Wednesday, 21 July, 1999; published in L'Osservatore Romano - 28 July 1999).
JP-2's "heaven" is NOT "a physical place"; rather, it is a state -
"a...relationship". In reality, it is the Teilhardian black hole of the omega point! Shades of the pantheism of Spinoza and a sentimentalized atheism, ala Cartesian Teilhardism! Thus, a state of "nowhere"!
"Hell is not a punishment imposed externally by God, but the condition resulting from attitudes and actions which people adopt in this life. It is the ultimate consequence of sin itself. Sacred Scripture uses many images to describe the pain, frustration and emptiness of life without God. More than a physical place, hell is the state of those who freely and definitively separate themselves from God, the source of all life and joy" (JP-2, General Audience of Wednesday, 28 July, 1999; Taken from Vatican, the Holy See Web Site on the Internet at: http://www.vatican.va/; emphasis added).
This time, using a more deliberate ambiguity, while actually calling Hell "more than a physical place", he unequivocally, for a change, stated that "hell is the state of..." Thus, in reality, another "state" of "nowhere"!

For JP-2, Heaven and Hell are "states", like "Never-Never Land", not really "places", because "a...relationship" and a "condition" are so far superior to being mere anachronistic "places" in the mind of this automatically excommunicated heretic!

Here is an example of Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism" run rampant in this "nothingness of nowhere" in his will-o'-the-wisp elitist eclecticism which subrogates the Laws of Almighty God with the wormwood of spiritually invalid and illegal substitutions, including the updated 16th Century Protestant supper memorial meal, a.k.a. the "new mass", plus the proliferation of doctrinal, theological, philosophical and liturgical error, heresy, destruction, and decay which lead to Spiritual death in a REAL PLACE the Catholic Church calls "Hell"!

It is an ironic contradiction for JP-2 to first say that Heaven in NOT a "physical place" but that Hell IS "a physical place"!

This is all nonsense! Heretical blabbering! Of such Modernist Heretics, like Pope JP-2, who automatically self-excommunicated himself, Pope Saint Pius X wrote in part:

"13. Dogma is not only able, but ought to evolve and to be changed.... 'Blind'- they are, and 'leaders of the blind' puffed up with the proud name of science, they have reached that pitch of folly at which they pervert the eternal concept of truth and the true meaning of religion; in introducing a new system in which 'they are seen to be under the sway of a blind and unchecked passion for novelty, thinking not at all of finding some solid foundation of truth, but despising the Holy and Apostolic Traditions, they embrace other and vain, futile, uncertain doctrines, unapproved by the Church, on which, in the height of their vanity, they think they can base and maintain truth itself'" (Footnote # 8: Gregory XVI, Encyclical of June 25, 1834, Singulari Nos)".  (Pope Saint Pius X, Encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, Sunday, September 8, 1907, ¶ 13; emphasis added).
Here is part of the infamous quote from JP-2 about Heaven:
"...heaven 'is neither an abstraction nor a PHYSICAL PLACE in the clouds, but a living, personal relationship with the Holy Trinity'."
One author has attempted to defend this heretical statement by JP-2 by quoting the Angelic Doctor in this wise:
"In this statement, as (almost) always, the great Holy Father [JP-2] was in perfect accord with St. Thomas Aquinas
'Incorporeal things are not in place after a manner known and familiar to us, in which way we say that bodies are properly in place; but they are in place after a manner befitting spiritual substances, a manner that cannot be fully manifest to us' (ST Supplement, q.69, a.1, ad 1)."
O Really?

First of all, in the second part of his same sentence, Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P. goes on to say that "Incorporeal things", i.e. in this case "Souls", "ARE IN PLACE after a manner befitting spiritual substances", thus contradicting:

1) JP-2's heretical teaching that Heaven "is" not "a PHYSICAL PLACE... but a living, personal relationship with the Holy Trinity'."!

2) The author, who tried to defend this heretical statement of JP-2, apparently only read the first part of the sentence and not the last part of the same sentence, which is found in the Summa Theologica as correctly quoted and cited above:

Souls ARE IN PLACE after a manner befitting spiritual substances.
Still more, O Really?!!!

Second of all, the following quotations should prove, once and for all, that JP-2 was in error in teaching that Heaven "is" not "a PHYSICAL PLACE because Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P. had already taught:

"PLACE is implied as existing in the Empyrean Heaven, this being the boundary of the universe. And since PLACE has reference to things permanent, it was created at once in its totality. But time, as not being permanent, was created in its beginning: even as actually we cannot lay hold of any part of time save the now." (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 66, Article 4, Reply to Objection 5).

"What is the locality where the Angels were created called? We call it Heaven simply, and sometimes the Empyrean Heaven (LXI. 4)."

"What does the Empyrean Heaven mean? It means a place full of glory and splendour which is the most beautiful part of the corporal world (ibid.)."

"Is the Empyrean Heaven the same as the Heaven of the Blessed? Yes (ibid. Obj. 3)" (P. Thomas Pegues, O.P., "Catechism of the Summa Theologica of Saint Thomas Aquinas For the Use of the Faithful," IX. Of the Creation of the Angels, p. 19, Benziger Brothers, New York, Cincinnati, Chicago, 1922).

Yet still more, O Really?!!!

Thirdly, the following quotations prove, beyond a shadow of any doubt, that the author who tried to defend JP-2 was either ignorant of these following quotations and/or deliberately lying in his misleading statement, where he writes in part:

"In this statement, as (almost) always, the great Holy Father [JP-2] was in perfect accord with St. Thomas Aquinas..."
JP-2, the GREAT HERETIC, is NOT in any way "in perfect accord with St. Thomas Aquinas...", because IF JP-2 HAD BEEN in the said falsely alleged "perfect accord", this means that JP-2 would have said that "Heaven IS a PLACE" because this is the teaching of Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P. in his Summa Theologica where the Angelic Doctor writes in part:
"PLACE is implied as existing in the Empyrean Heaven, this being the boundary of the universe. And since PLACE has reference to things PERMANENT, it was created at once in its totality. But time, as not being permanent [i.e. finite], was created in its beginning: even as actually we cannot lay hold of any part of time save the 'now'." (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, "Summa Theologica," Part I, Question 66, Article 4, Reply to Objection 5; emphasis added).
Therefore, the "Empyrean Heaven," which is "the same as the Heaven of the Blessed", i.e. of the SOULS of the Saint in Heaven, is a PERMANENT PLACE according to Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.!
"What is the locality where the Angels were created called? We call it Heaven simply, and sometimes the Empyrean Heaven (LXI. 4)."

"What does the Empyrean Heaven mean? It means a place full of glory and splendour which is the most beautiful part of the corporal world (ibid.)."

"Is the Empyrean Heaven the same as the Heaven of the Blessed? Yes (ibid. Obj. 3)".  (P. Thomas Pegues, O.P., "Catechism of the Summa Theologica of Saint Thomas Aquinas For the Use of the Faithful," IX. Of the Creation of the Angels, p. 19, Benziger Brothers, New York, Cincinnati, Chicago, 1922).

Finally, WHERE do you find Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P. explicitly teaching that Heaven "is.... a living, personal relationship with the Holy Trinity"???!!! NOWHERE!!!!

So much for the GREAT LIE of the author who vainly tried to defend the heresy of JP-2 by saying that:

"the great Holy Father [JP-2] was in perfect accord with St. Thomas Aquinas..."!!!
What happens to those who CHANGE what is
of Liturgical DIVINE Institution as the Scripture testifies?
"And Nadab and Abiu, the Sons of Aaron, taking their censers, put fire therein, and incense on it, offering before the Lord strange fire: which was not commanded them.   And fire coming out from the Lord destroyed them:  and they died before the Lord."  (Leviticus 10:1-2)
"Nadab and Abiu died before their father."  (1 Paralipomenon 24:2)


Nadab and Abiu
CHANGED the Old Testament Sacrifice
DIVINELY  Instituted by God

What happened to Pretend Pope JP-2 the GREAT Modernist Heretic
4th President of the NEW One World Order anti-Christ Religion
Who CHANGED the New & Eternal Sacrifice
Which is of DIVINE Institution?


The  Eternal  PUNISHMENT  for
THE   GREAT   "PATRON  SAINT"
of the Satanic  Synod Vatican 2 church!!!!

Because it is necessary to repeat certain Truths, due to the fact that there will always be some people who will be in stubborn denial of self-evident Truths, here, once again, are a few examples of WHY the GREAT anti-Catholic INFILTRATOR into the Roman Catholic Church, Pope JP-2, the GREAT Automatically Excommunicated MODERNIST HERETIC and NEW Theology Heretic, and Apostate, ended up in Hell because he dared to CHANGE and DESTROY THE HOLY SACRIFICE OF THE MASS WHICH WAS DIVINELY INSTITUTED BY INFINITE GOD THE SON, JESUS CHRIST, and which this finite GREAT anti-Catholic Infiltrator into the Roman Catholic Church, and GREAT Modernist and NEW Theology Heretic, replaced with His own NOR's, most especially the God-Condemned "Abomination of Desolation".


“And in the half of the week
the Victim and the Sacrifice shall fail:

[The UNCHANGEABLE Ontological Essence and the UNCHANGEABLE Metaphysical Essence of the Unchangeable Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass Perfectly and Divinely Instituted by Jesus Christ which are found in The Valid and Lawful Catholic Traditional Approved Ancient Mass Rites.]


and
there shall be in the Temple the Abomination of Desolation:

[The NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae]
and the Desolation shall continue even to the consummation, and to the end” (Daniel  9:27; emphasis added).


“And they shall defile the Sanctuary of Strength,
and shall take away the Continual Sacrifice

[The UNCHANGEABLE Ontological Essence and the UNCHANGEABLE Metaphysical Essence of the Unchangeable Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass Perfectly and Divinely Instituted by Jesus Christ which are found in The Valid and Lawful Catholic Traditional Approved Ancient Mass Rites.],


and they shall place there the Abomination unto desolation

[The NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae]

(Daniel  11:31; emphasis added).

“But there were also
false prophets among the people,


even as there shall be among you
lying teachers,

who shall bring in sects of perdition,
and deny the Lord who bought them:


bringing upon themselves swift destruction.


And many shall follow their riotousnesses,
through whom the way of Truth
shall be evil spoken of.

And through covetousness shall they
with feigned words make merchandise of you.


Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not,
and their perdition slumbereth not.

For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower Hell, unto torments,

to be reserved unto judgment...   The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly from temptation,


but to reserve the unjust unto
the day of judgment to be tormented.


And especially them who walk
after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness
(2 Peter 2:1-4; 2:9-10).


Salome Dancing

Did Jesus Christ Hire Salome
To Perform NUDE at HIS Mass??!!

NO  WAY!!!

Is it any wonder that the "reward" of  the GREAT anti-Catholic INFILTRATOR, the GREAT automatically excommunicated Modernist and New Theology Heretic, the GREAT Apostate, in the Roman Catholic Church, Pope JP-2 ended up in the eternal fires of Hell, there to BURN for all eternity, as:

1.  Evidenced by the above photo taken in Poland during a celebration in honor of this GREAT ANTI-CATHOLIC who did everything in his power to DESTROY the Roman Catholic Church!

2.  Proven by the testimony of the Bible as to what happens to those who CHANGE what is of LITURGICAL DIVINE INSTITUTION:

"And Nadab and Abiu, the Sons of Aaron, taking their censers, put fire therein, and incense on it, offering before the Lord strange fire: which was not commanded them.   And fire coming out from the Lord destroyed them:  and they died before the Lord." (Leviticus 10:1-2)

Truly, the Wages of SIN are DEATH!
The Eternal PUNISHMENT for these SATANIC Acts by
The GREAT anti-Catholic Infiltrator,
automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretic -
New Theology Heretic, and the GREAT Apostate:   POPE JP-2


 The GREAT anti-Catholic Infiltrator,
automatically excommunicated Modernist Heretic -
New Theology Heretic, and the GREAT Apostate,
POPE JP-2 BURNS in the Fires of Hell for all Eternity!!!


This SAME Eternal PUNISHMENT of Hell-Fire
Awaits ALL Pretend: Popes, Prelates, & Priests
Who Continue to Use Any Version of the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite
Even the 1960, and also the 1962, missals of 2nd Pope John 23rd!



20)  Pope B-16, Joseph Alois Ratzinger
[b. at Marktl am Inn, Bavaria, Germany on April 16, 1927 - present]
Papacy: [Tuesday, April 19, 2005 - Thursday, February 28, 2013]]

2nd John 23rd made Father Ratzinger a peritus, a theological expert, who advised the Bishops at Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965].

In 1981 Ratzinger was appointed as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

As Pope B-16, he never restored the Ancient Roman Rite for Offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Catholic Mass and for Administering the Seven Sacraments.

B-16 never restored the Catholic Faith or the Roman Catechism of the Infallible Roman Catholic Council of Trent - instead he continued the heretical "catechism" of JP-2.

He continued the heretical policies of the Modernist Heretic Popes Paul 6 and JP-2.

Some apologists for Pope B-16 claim that he is "a no-holds-barred traditionalist"!

On the contrary, this Pope reminded one of how Pope Paul 6, Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978] confused the people in his days with his official writings which overflowed with the vagueness of his aggressive amphibology.

For the record, amphibology is the 2nd of Aristotle's Six Fallacies of Diction. It means an ambiguity of structure in which the misunderstanding arises, not from any one word, but from the structure of the sentence. A well-known example is Shakespeare's sentence:

"The Duke yet lives that Henry shall depose" which could mean either that the Duke shall depose Henry or that Henry shall depose the Duke!
The difference is that while Pope Benedict 16 cleverly imitated the vagueness of Pope Paul 6's aggressive amphibology, Pope Benedict 16 wraped up all of this with the benign sweater of "conservatism" which he then attempted to cover with the coat of tradition.

Therefore, is it any wonder that Pope Benedict XVI became the proverbial "mystery inside an enigma" to many people?

This reminds one of yet another "mystery inside an enigma", or to be more precise:
"I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma." (Sir Winston Spencer Churchill [b. on Saturday, November 28, 1874 at Blenheim Palace, Woodstock, Oxfordshire, England - d. on Sunday, January 24, 1965 (age 90) at Hyde Park Gate, London, England], Radio Broadcast, Sunday, October 1, 1939.)

Perhaps it was this and other Anglo-Saxonisms which won for Churchill the following accolade:

"He mobilized the English language and sent it into battle." (John Fitzgerald Kennedy [b. on Tuesday, May 29, 1917 at Brookline, Massachusetts - d. assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963 (age 46) at Dallas, Texas], on conferring honorary citizenship on Churchill on Tuesday, April 9, 1963.)
Heretic JP-2 had the temerity to "change" the Most Holy Rosary so that it no longer makes sense as a reflection of the 150 Psalms.

B-16 had the temerity to change the Stations of the Cross at the Colosseum on Good Friday, 2007. He had new Stations written by some Vatican bureaucrat, who removed Saint Veronica and the three falls of Christ because they are not "biblical," but come only from "popular imagination."

This was another Modernist attack against established Tradition.

Ancient Traditions do not proceed from the "imagination," but from the strong oral culture that accompanied the transmission of the written Scriptures. Obviously, not everything that happened in the Holy Land 2000 years ago was recorded in the Bible. Other events were transmitted orally and those that were true were allowed to flourish by the devout ecclesiastical authorities, i.e. the Bishops, of earlier times.

On November 30, 2006 B-16 uttered the following heresy in the Mohammadan country of Turkey, at the Blue Mosque, facing towards Mecca, live, on television:

"I addressed the one Lord of Heaven and earth, the Merciful Father of all humanity. May all believers recognize that they are His creatures and witness to true brotherhood".
Do you understand what this means?

It means that God the Son, the Incarnate Word of God, Jesus Christ, and the Catholic Church are eliminated - they are irrelevant!

So there was no surprise when observers saw that B-16 adhered to Gaudium et Spes' unanimism. This meant no more condemnations of false religions, but instead a general invitation to "dialogue", to the "quest for truth", in the brotherhood of others - ignoring the past almost 2,000 years of the consistent teachings of the Catholic Church contrary to this heresy which further explained B-16's talk on December 22, 2006 for his Christmas wishes to the Roman Curia.

Pope Flip-Flop the previous year in his talk to the Roman Curia condemned all rupture with the Church's Tradition and claimed that this rupture did not exist in the texts of Synod Vatican 2.

But only a year later, after his depiction of the state of the world, Pope Flip-Flop then appealed

"to the true conquests of the philosophy of the Enlightenment, the rights of man" - blatant pagan secular humanism!
How many different Popes B-16 have there been?!

B-16 then went to Latin America during the summer of 2007 where he repeated all the heresies of Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism", on the subject of "social doctrine" as blabbered by P-6 and Populorum Progressio in the blatant support of the Zionist NEW World Order globalization.

To say such heresy is contrary to the Magisterial Teachings of the Infallible Popes of the Roman Catholic Church for the previous two hundred years up to Saint Pius X is an understatement!

How do Nouvelle Théologie - "NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist", theologians justify such nonsense?

In order to justify this heresy, they must rely upon other heresies which would make this heresy more understandable, to wit, there is no Hell or, at least, Hell is empty, at least according to B-16's second Encyclical dedicated to Hope since B-16 was inarticulate when it cames to any mention of eternal happiness in Heaven because such a thing, such a thought, is far beyond our intelligence and, according to B-16, there is no one in Hell - Hell is EMPTY!!!

For example, in October 2006, during a Wednesday General Audience, B-16 said that it can not be affirmed that Judas is in Hell.

When B-16 returned from his visit to the U.S., he said:

"I give thanks to God for having generously blessed this unique missionary experience and for having allowed me to become an instrument of the hope of Christ for this Church and this country. I give thanks to Him at the same time, for I myself was confirmed in hope by the American Catholics."
So it is no longer Peter who confirms his brethren in the Faith. It is the brethren who confirm Peter in the cult of man - the heresy of pagan secular humanism!


Pope B-16

Pope B-16 rejoiced for having the opportunity to help to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the "Universal Declaration of the Rights of Man" at the UN headquarters:

"My visit to the Headquarters of the United Nations gave me the opportunity to confirm the value of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to refer to its universal foundation, that is, the dignity of the human person, created by God in His image and likeness so that he might cooperate in the world with God's great plan of life and peace."
This time it is Peter who "confirms his brethren", but it is done in "the value of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights" and not in the Catholic Faith which is not even an afterthought for B-16, a diminutive, pathetic person, whose Spiritual and moral equilibrium was destroyed by his adherence to the acute degenerative disease known as the Heresy of Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism", and who became lost in the twin midnight shadows of the anti-Catholic Infiltrators and automatically excommunicated Modernist and NEW Theology Heretics and Apostates, Popes P-6 and JP-2.

Perhaps in the future, an "amateur" Church Historian, perhaps in around the year 3080 A.D.?, will attaint, i.e. condemn, B-16 for his heretical Modernism in but one tiny footnote, and who otherwise remains unnoticed in the dustbin of pathetic characters whose identity languishes as part of their well-deserved denunciation, but even then only as an afterthought, since all of the "professional" Church Historians will have bypassed Pope Flip-Flop and his contradictory pontificate as an irrelevant maze of confusion, contradiction, and contempt for not only the Truth, but also for the Authentic Apostolic Tradition and the consistent Teachings of the Papal Magisterium up to the days of Pope Saint Pius X!!!


21) Bishop Peter Henrici, S.J.
[b. at Zürich, Switzerland on March 28, 1928 - present?]
Auxiliary Bishop of Chur, Switzerland

He was an advocate of Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism".

Henrici reportedly said that De Lubac's theology

"which insists on the non-opposition between nature and supernature ... became the official theology at Vatican II."


"De Lubac's theology" which "became the official theology at Vatican II", was Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism"!


Giuseppe Cardinal Siri

No wonder Synod Vatican 2 was:

"the greatest disaster in recent ecclesiastical history" (Giuseppe Cardinal Siri [b. Sunday, May 20, 1906 in Genoa, Italy - d. Tuesday, May 2, 1989], Archbishop of Genoa, Italy, from "Pontiff", p. 369 - Gordon Thomas/Max Morgan Witts).
No wonder Synod Vatican 2 was:
"a sinister farce acted out by three thousand good-for-nothings, some of whom, despite the gold [pectoral] crosses on their chests, don't even believe in the Trinity or the Virgin" (Bishop Antonio Romeo of the Sacred Congregation of Rites in Bob Considine's column "On the Line" in the NEW YORK JOURNAL AMERICAN of Friday, November 27, 1964).

Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani

No wonder another Cardinal said:

"I pray to God that I may die before the end of the council -- in that way I can die a Catholic" (Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani [b. at Rome, Italy on Wednesday, October 29, 1890 - d. at Rome, Italy on Friday, August 3, 1979], June, 1962, Cardinal Prefect of the Supreme Holy Office, following a speech by Cardinal Montini - the future Paul 6 - on the need for changes in the Church).
Since Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965], Henrici wrote an article for the Fall, 2001 issue of Communion entitled: "Is There Such a Thing as Catholic Fundamentalism?".

In the Text He Writes in Part

1. "The Catechism of the Catholic Church and the most recent proclamations from Rome represent life rafts [for Catholic fundamentalists]."

2. Just as Protestant fundamentalists "cling" to the Bible, so "Catholic fundamentalists" "cling" to "texts from the Church's magisterium."

3. The first fundamental of Protestant fundamentalism is

"the literal inerrancy of Holy Scriptures".
4. Henrici claimed that this first fundamental of Protestant fundamentalism is crucial because of "the need people experience over the course of their lives to find certainty on the basis of infallible propositions…."

5. Henrici wrote that

"faith cannot be reduced to individual propositions, even if these are affirmed as essential; it [faith] represents an organic whole, formed from many truths (not propositions), which together make up a single truth. It is possible to test the validity of a proposition…. But truth is something one can only enter into…."
On the Contrary

a) Henrici denies that the proper object of the intellect is Truth and totally ignores the proper role of the Act of Understanding. As a matter of fact, Henrici does not even reference the understanding.

b) Regarding this "single truth" of Henrici - what is the basis or justification to identify this thing as "truth" and how is the intellect supposed to understand it?

c) Upon what foundation is the "thing" - which Henrici claims to be "truth" - which "one can only "enter into" really Truth?

d) How does one "ENTER into" Truth? By taking some kind of an hallucinogenic drug? Or, does one merely designate one room in their place of residence "truth" and "enter into" the room of truth whenever one needs to the know the Truth? But this "single" room must be:

da) totally empty;

db) only "a single" room.

dc) Why? Because there is only "a single truth" according to Henrici.

e) Henrici does not even attempt to prove why "faith cannot be reduced to individual propositions, even if these are affirmed as essential"!

f) Henrici, as do most - if not all - Modernist Heretics, seems to hate the word "traditional". He certainly does his best to ignore the word.

g) Henrici wrote in part about "Catholic fundamentalists" who "cling" to "texts from the Church's magisterium."

ga) To attempt to identify Catholics who are faithful to the authentic Apostolic Tradition of the Catholic Church as Catholic fundamentalists is an absurd example of the utter desperation and frustration which Modernist Heretics and Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist", theologians have regarding the words "Tradition" and "Traditional".

gb) To desperately try to label them as Catholic fundamentalists within the same equation as Protestant fundamentalists is but the false comparison of apples to oranges - the two are not similar but different.

gc) In addition, the comparison also fails because there really is no such thing as Catholic fundamentalists, only Catholic Traditionalists.

gd) On the contrary, it is obvious that Henrici deliberately uses the term Catholic fundamentalists as a misleading and totally false substitute for the term Catholic Traditionalists, because, to some observers, it is self-evident that Henrici hates the terms Tradition, Traditional, and Traditionalist because these terms expose his heresy of evolution which, along with continual change, are the bases of the Heresy of Modernism and Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism".

ge) To claim that Catholic fundamentalists "cling" to "texts from the Church's magisterium" is in error. The proper role of the Magisterium is often misunderstood by non-Catholics as well as by an alleged "Bishop" who seems to be totally bankrupt of any real knowledge of the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church?

gf) In passing, We will cite two quotations on the subject of the Magisterium:

gf1) "The teaching [Magisterium] of the Apostles [Apostolic Tradition] is the true gnosis [knowledge]. We have the Ancient Constitution (systema) of the Church throughout the world, and the character of the [Mystical] Body of Christ in the successions of Bishops to whom they [the Apostles] entrusted the Church in each place, which has come down to us with its safeguard of the Scriptures in the fulness and soundness of their interpretation, without addition or subtraction" (Bishop Saint Irenæus, "Against the Heresies", {written 180 A.D. - 199 A.D.}, Book 4, chapter 33, ¶ 8).

gf2) "Let them innovate in nothing, but keep the [Apostolic] Traditions [Magisterium]" (Nihil innovetur nisi quod traditum est.)" (Pope Saint Stephen I [Friday, May 12, 254 - Sunday, August 2, 257], "Letter to Saint Cyprian", 74).

gf3) N.B. In reading this last quotation, it should be very, very obvious why Henrici does not have any use for the fact that "The teaching [Magisterium] of the Apostles [Apostolic Tradition] is the true gnosis [knowledge]" because all Catholics - is Henrici really a Catholic? - are required by Pope Saint Stephen I, who in the proper exercise of his Ordinary Magisterium - which is "Infallible" according to the decree of Council Vatican I - to OBEY this PAPAL INFALLIBLE DECREE:

"Let them innovate in nothing, but keep the [Apostolic] Traditions [Magisterium]" (Nihil innovetur nisi quod traditum est.)".
Of course it goes without saying that Heretic Henrici has innovated in everything because this is what Modernist Heretics and Nouvelle Théologie - "NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist", theologians always do - they innovate in everything, they change everything!

Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965] is the example, par excellence, of how the Modernist Heretics and Nouvelle Théologie - "NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernist", theologians have innovated - changed - EVERYTHING that is CATHOLIC and have DISOBEYED the PAPAL INFALLIBLE DECREE:

"Let them innovate in nothing, but keep the [Apostolic] Traditions [Magisterium]" (Nihil innovetur nisi quod traditum est.)" of Pope Saint Stephen I.
h) This hocus-pocus is the vain attempt of a confused, deluded, darkened mind to make the God of Truth irrelevant and, instead, with the mind "blindfolded", to try to discover "single truth" in the ante-room of heresy which contains the proverbial black hole of Apostasy.

ha) On the contrary, the object of the intellect is Truth, something totally ignored by Henrici:

ha1) The object of the intellect is something universal, namely, [an objective, universal quiddity] "being" and [an objective, universal Truth called] "the true," in which the act also of understanding is comprised. Wherefore the intellect can understand its own act. But not primarily, since the first object of our intellect, in this state of life, is not every being and everything true, but [an objective, universal quiddity] "being" and [an objective, universal Truth] "true," as considered in material things, as we have said above (Q[84], A[7]), from which it acquires knowledge of all other things. (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 87, Article 3, Reply to Objection 1).


22) Father Hans Küng
[b. at Sursee, Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland on March 19, 1928 - present]

The Vatican has rescinded his faculties to teach Catholic theology.

In 1960, he was appointed professor of theology at Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.

Along with his colleague, Father Joseph Ratzinger, the future Pope B-16, in 1962 he was appointed a peritus by 2nd Pope John 23rd and served in that capacity until the close of Synod Vatican 2 on Wednesday, December 8, 1965.

At Küng's instigation, the Catholic Faculty at Tübingen appointed Father Ratzinger as professor of dogmatics. However, due to the 1968 students revolt, Ratzinger moved to the university of Regensburg, ending cooperation between the two.

In a 1963 tour of the United States, Küng gave the lecture "The Church and Freedom", for which he received an Interdict from the Catholic University of America but an honorary doctorate from St. Louis University.

He accepted an invitation to visit President John F. Kennedy at the White House (John J. Kiwiet, "Hans Küng", Makers of the Modern Theological Mind Series, 1985).

Along with other Modernist Heretics, he is also partly responsible for Nouvelle Théologie - "the NEW Theology" - a.k.a. "neo-Modernism", that played a monumental role in the arguments, deliberations, and documents of Synod Vatican 2.

Appendices


Appendix 1

Monitum (Warning)
Regarding the Writings of
Father Teilhard De Chardin
Issued by
The Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office
Saturday, June 30, 1962

On Saturday, June 30, 1962, the Holy Office issued a Monitum (warning) regarding the writings of Father Teilhard de Chardin.   In 1981 the Holy See reiterated this warning against rumors that it no longer applied.


The Monitum (Admonition)

Several works of Fr. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, some of which were posthumously published, are being edited and are gaining a good deal of success.

Prescinding from a judgement about those points that concern the positive sciences, it is sufficiently clear that the above-mentioned works abound in such ambiguities and indeed even serious errors, as to offend Catholic doctrine.

For this reason, the most eminent and most revered Fathers of the Holy Office exhort all Ordinaries as well as the superiors of Religious institutes, rectors of seminaries and presidents of universities, effectively to protect the minds, particularly of the youth, against the dangers presented by the works of Fr. Teilhard de Chardin and of his followers.

Given at Rome, from the palace of the Holy Office, on the thirtieth day of June, 1962.

Sebastianus Masala, Notarius

Appendix 2

On behalf of Pope JP-2, Agostino Cardinal Casaroli sent a Letter to the then Archbishop (later Cardinal) Paul Poupard, Praising Father Teilhard de Chardin's works, which Letter was Printed on the Front Page of L'Osservatore Romano, Wednesday, June 10, 1981


Introduction - List of Facts

Here is a list of facts, which investigative research has discovered, concerning the people involved in one way or another with this letter dated Tuesday, May 12, 1981.


Pope JP-2

1. Pope JP-2, a.k.a. John-Paul 2, Karol Józef Wyotya, a.k.a. Karol Józef Wojtyla [b. at Wadowice, Poland on Tuesday, May 18, 1920 - d. at the Apostolic Palace, Vatican City on Friday, April 1, 2005]; Papacy: [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005] communicated a specific "message" in this specific letter to Archbishop (later Cardinal) Paul Poupard, who was the Rector of the Institut Catholique de Paris.

2. What was the specific "message"? It's primary thrust stated:

"There can be no doubt that the celebrations of his [Teilhard de Chardin's] 100th birthday - at the Catholic Institute of Paris [Institut Catholique de Paris], the Museum of Natural History, UNESCO, and Notre Dame of Paris - are an occasion for an encouraging evaluation [of his work] using a just methodological distinction of procedures in order to achieve a rigorous epistemological study."
3. This letter, part, or all, of which might have been written by JP-2?, asserted that Teilhard de Chardin had anticipated JP-2's appeal:
"Be not afraid, open, open wide to Christ the doors of the immense domains of culture, civilization, and progress."


Agostino Cardinal Casaroli

4. Agostino Cardinal Casaroli [b. at Castel San Giovanni, in the Province of Piacenza, Italy on November 24, 1914 - d. of cardiorespiratory disease at Rome, Italy on June 9, 1998], who held the second most powerful position in the Vatican, after the Pope himself, as the Vatican Secretary of State, is the person under whose name this letter, dated Tuesday, May 12, 1981, was sent to Archbishop (later Cardinal) Paul Poupard, who was the Rector of the Institut Catholique de Paris.

5. Is it only a mere coincidencethat this letter is dated May 12, just 6 days before the 61st birthday of Pope JP-2 on May 18?

6. This letter was printed on the front page of the Wednesday, June 10, 1981 edition of L'Osservatore Romano.

7. Who was Agostino Cardinal Casaroli?

8. In addition to being the most powerful person in the Vatican, after the Pope, as Secretary of State, at the time this letter was sent to Archbishop (later Cardinal) Paul Poupard, who was the Rector of the Institut Catholique de Paris, it has been claimed that earlier in the career of Casaroli that he was the infamous inventor of the NEW Vatican foreign policy towards the Communists called Ostpolitik (German for "Eastern Politics").

9. This was the Change Through Rapprochement principle which Communist Russian leader Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev [b. in Kalinovka, Russian Empire, on Tuesday, April 17, 1894 - d. in Moscow, Russia, Soviet Union on Saturday, September 11, 1971] offered the Vatican on the occasion of the 80th birthday of 2nd Pope John 23rd, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli [b. at Sotto il Monte, Italy on November 25, 1881 - d. at the Vatican on Monday, June 3, 1963]; Papacy: [Tuesday, October 28, 1958 - Monday, June 3, 1963], on Saturday, November 25, 1961, which resulted in the Vatican ignoring the persecution of millions of Catholics by the Communists, especially in the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and primarily in the Ukraine where over 8 million Catholics had died thanks to Stalin's demonic policies of death).

10. This letter, which carried the name of Agostino Cardinal Casaroli as its author, became infamous as the rehabilitation of Teilhard de Chardin, the evolutionist, pantheist, and Modernist Heretic.


Teilhard de Chardin

11. Teilhard de Chardin [b. at Orcines, Central France on May 1, 1881 - d. at New York, New York, on April 10, 1955], the evolutionist, pantheist, and Modernist Heretic, had been forbidden to continue teaching in 1925 and had also been indirectly condemned by the Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII:

"35. It remains for Us now to speak about those questions which, although they pertain to the positive sciences, are nevertheless more or less connected with the truths of the Christian faith. In fact, not a few insistently demand that the Catholic religion takes these sciences into account as much as possible. This certainly would be praiseworthy in the case of clearly proved facts; but caution must be used when there is rather question of hypotheses, having some sort of scientific foundation, in which the doctrine contained in Sacred Scripture or in Tradition is involved. If such conjectural opinions are directly or indirectly opposed to the doctrine revealed by God, then the demand that they be recognized can in no way be admitted" (Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Humani Generis (On Human Origin), Concerning Some False Opinions Threatening to Undermine The Foundations of Catholic Doctrine, Wednesday, April 12, 1950, ¶ 35; emphasis added).


Appendix 3

Letter of Agostino Cardinal Casaroli
To Archbishop Paul Poupard
Rector of the Institut Catholique de Paris
Tuesday, May 12, 1981

Monsignor,

The international scientific community and, more generally, the entire intellectual world is preparing to celebrate the centennial of Fr. Teilhard de Chardin's birth. The astonishing resonance of his research, as well as the brilliance of his personality and richness of his thinking, have profoundly marked our epoch.

In him, a powerful poetic intuition of nature's profound value, a sharp perception of creation's dynamism, and a broad vision of the world's future join together with an incontestable religious fervor.

Similarly, his unremitting desire to dialogue with the science of his time and his bold optimism about the evolution of the world have given his intuitions - through the rich variety of his words and the magic of his images - considerable influence.

Completely turned to the future, this synthesis, often lyrical and animated with passion for the universal, will help to restore hope to those assailed by doubts. At the same time, the complexity of the problems he analyzed and the variety of approaches he adopted raised difficulties that understandably called for a calm, critical study - in the scientific, philosophical and theological realms - of his extraordinary work.

There can be no doubt that the celebrations of his 100th birthday - at the Catholic Institute of Paris, the Museum of Natural History, UNESCO, and Notre Dame of Paris - are an occasion for an encouraging evaluation [of his work] using a just methodological distinction of procedures in order to achieve a rigorous epistemological study.

What our contemporaries will undoubtedly remember, beyond the difficulties of conception and deficiencies of expression in this audacious attempt to reach a synthesis, is the testimony of the coherent life of a man possessed by Christ in the depths of his soul. He was concerned with honoring both faith and reason, and anticipated the response to John Paul II's appeal: 'Be not afraid, open, open wide to Christ the doors of the immense domains of culture, civilization, and progress.'

I am pleased, Monsignor, to communicate this message on behalf of the Holy Father to you and all the participants of the conference over which you are presiding at the Catholic Institute of Paris in homage to Fr. Teilhard de Chardin, and to assure you of my faithful allegiance.

Agostino Cardinal Casaroli

L'Osservatore Romano, June 10, 1981



Appendix 4

Communiqué of the Press Office of the Holy See
English edition of L'Osservatore Romano
Monday, July 20, 1981

In Effect Backpedaling the Approval of
The Writings of Father Teilhard De Chardin by Pope JP-2

"The letter sent by the Cardinal Secretary of State to His Excellency Mons. Poupard on the occasion of the centenary of the birth of Fr. Teilhard de Chardin has been interpreted in a certain section of the press as a revision of previous stands taken by the Holy See in regard to this author, and in particular of the Monitum of the Holy Office of 30 June 1962, which pointed out that the work of the author contained ambiguities and grave doctrinal errors.

"The question has been asked whether such an interpretation is well founded.

"After having consulted the Cardinal Secretary of State and the Cardinal Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which, by order of the Holy Father, had been duly consulted beforehand, about the letter in question, we are in a position to reply in the negative. Far from being a revision of the previous stands of the Holy See, Cardinal Casaroli's letter expresses reservation in various passages (and these reservations have been passed over in silence by certain newspapers) reservations which refer precisely to the judgement given in the Monitum of June 1962, even though this document is not explicitly mentioned."






Catholics who love the Truth, are able to see:
Valid, Lawful Catholic Mass, Valid, Lawful Catholic Sacrament and also Invalid, Unlawful anti-Catholic mass, Invalid, Unlawful anti-Catholic sacrament

Catholics who DO NOT love the Truth, are UNABLE to see:
Valid, Lawful Catholic Mass, Valid, Lawful Catholic Sacrament and also Invalid, Unlawful anti-Catholic mass, Invalid, Unlawful anti-Catholic sacrament

“Because they receive not the love of the Truth, that they might be saved. Therefore, God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying:  That all may be judged who have not believed the Truth” (2 Thessalonians 2:10-11).

http://www.traditionalcatholicmass.com/home-m120.html

 
The Blessing
V. Sit + Nomen Domini benedictum.
R. Ex hoc nunc, et usque in saeculum.
V. Adjutorium nostrum in
Nomine Domini.
R. Qui fecit cœlum et terram.
V. Benedicat vos, Omnipotens Deus:
V. Pa + ter, et Fi + lius, et Spiritus + Sanctus, descendat super vos, et maneat semper.
R. Amen.
V. Blessed + be the Name of the Lord.
R. Now and for ever more.x
V. Our help is in the Name of the Lord.
mm
R. Who made Heaven and earth.
V. May Almighty God Bless thee:x
V. The Fa + ther, the + Son, and the Holy + Ghost, descend upon thee, and always remain with thee.
R. Amen.

Dear Visitors:

Please help Us to continue to provide the Truth,  which   all Catholics need to know,   in these days of deliberate confusion,   lies, brainwashing,  and   propaganda!

Some of Our web pages are the only places on the Internet where you will find some very important facts,  because some of these facts are from Our own many personal experiences,     as well as the result of Our meetings with many Catholic Traditional Clergy including various Patriarchs, Cardinals, Primates, Metropolitans, Archbishops, Bishops, and Religious and Secular Priests, over many, many, many decades,    plus    Our own eye-witness testimony,   concerning   some of the many, many, many changes, which began many, many, many decades,   before the many, many, many younger generations of Catholics were even born,   and    of which changes all of these so many, many younger generations of Catholics,   have no personal knowledge and/or personal experiences.

Most of these many changes    are not only   illegal,  but they are also   invalid,  and   most of them include the censure of  automatic excommunication of the perpetrators,  because, in reality, such changes by the cabal of   automatically excommunicated Innovators,   as well as   the secret gangs   of anti-Catholic Infiltrators,    are changes which are  anti-Catholic!

Discover what the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH teaches    about the UNCHANGEABLERoman Catholic Faith,   Mass, Sacraments,  etc., etc.

We have recently added what has quickly become Our very popular Editorial Pages on various subjects.

Please Donate to Our Patriarchal Website at:
http://www.traditionalcatholicmass.com/home-m08.html
Thank You!  God Bless You!
Patriarch Jacobus Maria DeJesus, D.D.


Knowledge
 
It is of the greatest importance that in order to gain assured knowledge of things, to rely on exact acquaintance with facts, rather than on the uncertain testimony of public rumor; and then what we have proved for certain we may proclaim without hesitation. (Saint Bernard of Clairvaux  [b. Castle Fontaines, near Dijon, France in 1090 A.D. - d. at Clairvaux, France on Friday, August 21, 1153 A.D.], Abbot of Clairvaux, Doctor of the Church, Letters).
All Catholics Need Purgatory Fire Insurance NOW!
IF You are Wise by helping a Soul with Catholic Traditional
Requiem Masses to get out of Purgatory much faster NOW,
Another Wise and Charitable Person will help YOU,
when YOUR time comes, to get out of Purgatory much faster!
God Rewards Charity for the Suffering Souls in Purgatory!

Please Help a Suffering Soul in Purgatory NOW!
Our Blessed Mother asks Catholics to Pray her Traditional Rosary daily.
The Rosary will really make a Powerful difference in Your Life!
Please click here to go to the Editorial Contents Homepage.
Please click here to go to the Contents Homepage.
2